The way things are going, we can either achieve greatness and prosperity, or we can degenerate into slaves of the machine, allow me to compound.
The forecast for the future (all jew tricks aside) is that we will all become mixed race mongrels who are a slave to the corporate entity, the sole purpose of which is to drive consumerism and increase profits.
If you have read any number of books then you may see why this is fucked. The reason being that we will live our lives out, from cradle to grave, as little incoherent nobodies with a handful of dollars and a heart full of despair.
NatSoc, on the other hand isn't like that. NatSoc wont try to turn you into a robot with no sense of belonging or people. NatSoc wont try to do everything imaginable to increase profits, everything up to and including destroying the environment.
Everyone shills for AnCap and similar ideologies, blissfully unaware that it will lead to eventual degeneracy and destruction.
Not thinking twice about the benefits of NatSoc.
They will say "But Muh Capitalism"
They will claim that it will get rid of all property and freedom, that you will be nothing more than a slave.
They couldn't be more wrong.
NatSoc does many things, but degeneracy is not one of them.
You will still have freedom
You will still have property
And you will still be able to have capitalistic ventures
NatSoc is so much more than just a political ideology, its a way of life.
To truly be apart of something bigger than yourself, to be in and amongst those most similar to you, people who think, act, and even look like you
If you don't want to invest yourself into that kind of society and ideology, then I don't know what to tell you friendo.
>>130226999
Those trips!
>>130226999
DAMN RIGHT
this will hopefully give some insight into exactly what I mean
Heil Hitler
>>130226999
All of that will be negated by genetic engineering. You'll either fight each other over differences while a small group of elite begin to turn you in to a slave class with no free will
Or come together in unity for a better world for everyone
for nu/pol/ either be NatSoc or leave
>>130229346
Oh yes, the typical Hitler plowing in the fields with the peasants, aye? :^)
>>130229388
>>130229503
I hate summerfags.
>>130229810
there is also this one which seems just as reasonable
>>130229503
Yes.
>>130229388
>how do into space empire
>how do tribalism
also
>what is animal farm
>what is any dystopian novel
I wish, OP, but I cannot help but think that we have come to far down this god-awful path that we are on now. That from here on in, things are just going to get worse.
>>130229948
>>130229948
>>130230248
Why couldn't he have won
>>130230436
We'd be flying to Jupiter now, just like in Gattaca
>>130230436
fret not comrade, for the battle is eternal.
There will always be enemies pounding down the door of goodness.
Nay, we may not have one, but we have not lost either, the battle is not yet over
>>130230248
>Literally hitler
>>130230112
things are going to remain the same way they have for millennia, the only difference will be compounding numbers, the main difference between now and the time of the romans is the mass amount of humans in existence.
life has become cheap, so they will cut down the currency until it is valuable again, and when its value starts to go up, then, and only then can we reclaim our birthright.
remember the saying friend, things have to get worse before they can get better
I'm half Irish (1st generation) and half Bolivian (2nd generation). How will I fair in a National Socialist society?
>>130231837
probably not too bad.
the key to NatSoc is "birds of a feather flock together" so if you have predominant European features you shouldn't have much trouble fitting into a group of NatSoc's
so long as you make the well being of the state and your family before yourself you shouldn't have any problems
were going for tribalism esentially
National Socialism is just an Aryan version of Islam, except with Hitler as the prophet.
>>130232900
not quite, in fact its very different in many ways.
The main separating factor is tolerance of degenerate things
sure islam is against some degenerate things, but the ideology itself is degenerate, such as having sex with things that shouldn't be had sex with for a long time if at all.
The thing about NatSoc that makes it inherently good is that it wants everyone to be their very best, to be ubermencsh.
islam, however, is inherently degenerate in that its oppressive as fuck. between that and the fact that a majority of their believers are pedophile goat fucking stone throwing betas
>>130233456
Your definition of degenerate is arbitrary. There is no established science designation X behavior as degenerate beyond
>Hitler was against it
>I don't like it
>>130234184
degeneracy is simple, destroying order.
it doesn't matter if hitler liked it or not, if its something that leads to a break down of order, traditions, and the like, then its degenerate
>>130233456
For National Socialism to actually be realistically viable you need to first.
1. Define degeneracy
2. Prove stopping a degenerate behavior will result in better outcomes for societies than allowing it
2. Establish methodology that proves X behavior is degenerate scientifically. That is everyone following this scientific methodology will come to the same conclusion.
Until you can make identifying degeneracy an objective measurement and not a subjective one, there is no difference between National Socialism and Islam beyond subjective perceptions of what degeneracy actually is. This is not to say what you think is degenerate may not be degenerate, but until you can establish a methodology that can objectively judge every single human social behavior it's subjective and arbitrary.
>>130234344
>degeneracy is simple, destroying order.
That's not simple at all
>leads to a break down of order, traditions, and the like
Is Technological innovation degenerate then?
>>130235067
the goal of NatSoc is really, really simple.
sure degeneracy can be subjective, but that's not the point, what we want to attain is a higher standard in all things
for example
we may consider a lardass feminist degenerate because her habits of eating mass amounts of unhealthy food and actively trying to destroy healthy families.
But on the other hand we have a healthy tradionalist woman who eats healthy food, tries to be in peak physical condition, and hold deep religious and political convictions that lead to prosperity and health, she would not be considered a degenerate.
like I said, its subjective, but it can be summed up if it promotes unhealthy behaviors and decreases the efficiency of the group
>>130229503
We all lost in 1945
https://youtu.be/epw-rISDJSE
>>130236483
the final battle has not been fought yet.
There will likely be a war in our time, the actual great war, the war to end all wars.
that, is where the last stand will be.
so long as there is breath in white men, the fight will not be over.
until either us or them are extinguished from the earth, the war will not end.
this isn't the end, its the beginning of the end.
>>130236989
HEIL VICTORY
NatSoc AI technocracy when?
>>130231127
>>130240556
generosity is easier when you know who your helping