In anarcho-capitalism really that different from fascism?

>>130215646
>if a town or city is privately owned
Then everyone that lives there would be doing so voluntarily. You can either bar "undesirables" from entering in the first place.

File: 1494323704924.png (9KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 420x420px

Ancap is individualist, fascism is another collectivist ideology for bootlickers who can't fend for themselves.

>>130215973

So you're not allowed to buy a city that already has residents living in it? Sounds like a law.

File: ancap 10.jpg (174KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 640x640px

>>130216229
'Buying' implies a willing seller.
If you try to just take the land, you will break the NAP and get a grenade full of McAnthrax™ delivered by express courier for the low price of 3 BitCoins to your front door
>>130215986
Also this

>>130216229
>buy a city
What does that mean? The situation that would allow this to happen in the first place would be mind-bogglingly complicated (i.e. sectarian strife in the US combined with changing climate or w/e depopulates an entire region, leaving infrastructure largely intact), so your objection is pretty much meaningless.

>>130215646
Fascism is socialist. They are leftist commies

>>130216229
You can buy it if its residents are willing to sell it.

File: Anarcho_Fascism.png (270KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 1920x1080px

OP is a bad fucking goy.

>>130215646
>In anarcho-capitalism really that different from fascism
No. Not at all.

Fascism is big government, anti ideology.
Wont work with any type of anarchy, fascism is againt capitalism.

File: ian smith listen here.jpg (57KB, 760x918px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 760x918px

>>130218873
>The guy with the hammer-and-sickle flag is telling me my ideology isn't really that different from fascism
Really stimulates the ol' synapses

>>130215646
how is no-state similar to lots-of-state?

>>130215646
You say it like its a bad thing.
Its the exact opposite of social engineering.

couldn't you also create your own little commie commune as well? The great thing about ancapism is that you can follow whatever ideology you want in your own private property, as long as all those in it voluntarily consent.

>>130219522
Yeah, great for everyone except commies, socialists, left-anarchists and anyone else whose ideology is literally 'it's okay to steal from people, as long as you have a big enough gang'.
This is why I love AnCap. You can have /comfy/ ethnic abodes, wild-west regions, super high tech cities, corporate empires (think Dutch VOC), anything under the sun. People will freely migrate to wherever they can get the best, most suitable to their tastes, most fulfilling life.

>>130219854
right, but like I was saying, say a bunch of lefty commies decided to own their own commune and be "away from the system, man" and live their own commie fantasies. I assume this would be allowed as well, right? Granted, we all know communism never sustains itself and such a commune would be doomed to fail, but they would still be able to do so?

File: German Guinness.jpg (101KB, 549x960px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 549x960px

>>130215646
>anarcho-capitalism really that different from fascism
Yes, because Fascism actually exists whereas anarcho-capitalism is just a forced meme on an anime image board.

>That is all

>>130220411
Of course, it doesn't hurt anyone else.
I've put this argument to leftists before. 'If your system is so good, then why can't it exist WITHIN a free system? If everyone under your system actually wants to participate in it, then why impose it over others, who don't?' It really annoys them because they can't disagree without revealing that their motive was never to create an actually beneficial system - it was to parasitize those better than them.