Reality: Genetic cluster analysis of DNA supports the idea of DNA clusters — and that’s all. Relating these clusters to so-called races is problematic. For example, DNA analysis reports a non-black Hispanic-American cluster different from a “white” cluster, but Hispanic-Americans are not commonly viewed as a “race” by most Americans. In addition, there is no evidence from any cluster analysis that the DNA components related to clustering are involved with intelligence or behavior. It’s possible the DNA components that produce clustering are all related to superficial phenotype traits such as skin color, eye color, and so on.
>>130190467
>Relating these clusters to so-called races is problematic.
For a faggot like you.
To deny that your DNA "Cluster" in some way affects your intelligence is to deny the genetic component inherited intelligence
you can't separate the two, your genome doesn't have a separate heritable pattern for "superficial" genes and for ones affecting behavior and intelligence
Saged.
>>130191025
>you can't separate the two, your genome doesn't have a separate heritable pattern for "superficial" genes and for ones affecting behavior and intelligence
The question is whether our concept of "race" which is determined by external phenotype traits means that people with those phenotype traits have higher or lower IQs etc. as a group.
>>130190467
White is a race
Black is a race
Asian is either two races, mongoloid or east indian
Arab is a race
However
Hispanic is not a race
Any race could be hispanic