Was 9/11 completely Staged? Fake Towers?

>>130155645
It's called perspective you retard, that's why they look different.

>>130155645
>that pic
Someone can't be this dumb.

File: 1411063448278.gif (498KB, 300x222px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 300x222px

>>130155645

>>130155645
windows size is also different

The proportions and details are all wrong. The window size, the scale compared to the people, and the "tulip" design" at the top.

The Building corner sections are the wrong dimension and construction, and the uprights are not correct in comparison to the actual WTC. and that is not the antenna. It is a crude mockup modeled to look gee-whiz-high-tech on a scaffold. No one realizes the "LIVE FEED" was composed of many hundreds of edits and interspersed clips shown at a dizzying machine-gun speed. Live feeds are constant--not edits from NUMEROUS pre-arranged camera vantage points. This complete "video movie" already composed of these numerous clips was fed to all networks as the official story. It was never meant to be analyzed and scrutinized. This FAKE SET is UNDISPUTIBLE, given the trap doors, no windows, and the wrong overall proportions and details.

>>130155645
you are right those are two different structures.

>>130155862
>>130156017
He's right, you dumb fucks.

>>130155645
>someone made this image
>you spent actual time on this thread

Kill yourself

>>130161068
/thread

There's so many more sketchy things about it. This is a distraction

>>130155645
They had 5 million eye witnesses. Yes. Totally fake.

>>130155645
>Being too stupid to identify the same object from different cameras.

there's something called perspective. If you zoom the camera on an object (in this case, window) and if you place the camera close to an object, it won't look the same
the "fake tower" pic is taken from below, zoomed upwards
the "real wtc" pic seems to be taken from a helicopter or high place, physically wayyy closer to the windows.
Perspective's different between the 2 pictures, it creates an illusion of different window shapes.

>>130164362
imo the roof's lower border is clearly different, not a matter of "perspective".

>>130155645
so you be saying they moved the towers one night right

>>130161068
I wouldn't throw it out the window that all the footage was fake. but this is a pretty retarded thread.

>>130162033
>can't read.
he's not saying that 9/11 didn't happen, he's saying all the footage that was used was fake.

File: flatearth.jpg (10KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 225x225px

>>130155645
> I got this topic
I can trump that one OP

File: moon cock.png (527KB, 960x864px) Image search: [Google]

527KB, 960x864px

>>130165419
OH YOUR RIGHT WE JUST NEED ONE SPECTATR AND THIS GODAMN COUNTRY CAN GO TOHELL
>16 YEARS LATER
FUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKCKKKKKKK

>>130155645
You know WHO started this and is currently pushing it
as part of (((his))) agenda
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KrAfMHF9Qw

>>130155645
I lived in NYC for 30 years. Never saw these so called twin towers. Probably some jew fake videos from hollywood.

>>130165419
IF IT was PRE_PLANNED ALSO which IS STUPID
any 3rd party footage would show the news as being fake that day as you could confirm and
THEY CANT PREDICT THE FUTURE SO FUCK OFF
AND HTEY NEVER WOULD OF MATCHED WHAT WOULD OF HAPPENED WITH ACTUALLY DEMOLISHING A BUILDING WITH< A PREVIOUSLY FILMED BUNCH OF SHIT
YOUR SO FUCKING STUPID

>>130165393
lmfao are you retarded? can't you read the thread description? he's saying the footages of the people jumping from the top were faked, the tower's top used was a clone probably cgi or else, and you can clearly see the tower's mask is totally different from the actual WTC, you people are so stupid

>>130155645
>>130168320
HEY GUYS THIS IS SOOO REAL (OP)
HURHRHRURHUHRUHRUHRUHRUHURHURHRUHRUHURHURRHUH
16 years in the making
doesnt do ANY fact checking or providing any evidence to make their CLAIM just spews some shit and HOPES IT STICKS GODAN THIS SITE IS LIKE THIS ALL DAY>>130167359

>>130155645
Holy fucking shit you conspiracy wackos are off the fucking rails now

>>130165419
THIS
OP is confirming everything we already know, controlled dem etc, adding the jumpers footages shown by cnn were fake. fake as the "semptember clues" planes. it's pretty simple.

>>130168572
I'd say it's>>130167634
>embed related
hes got so much shit he's tried to pulul off over the years
fake being hacked on limewire news
nanny site
fbi honeypot on p2p
pushing this internet bullshit not the actual hey wtf lets talk about 9/11 no he's a fuckign communist faggot cocksucker >embed related
and this whole topic
many other shit-related..... fuck him and any shit he says its real but you know
they gottta stick some truth in their shit to sell their SHIT
and
If called out he will go on the attack ive seen it
ive got lots of pictures provign all this shit but uhh yea ill show htem if need ed

>>130168320
don't you know "jammers" were used in manhattan on 9/11? there are no "3rd party footages", you people are really retarded.

File: HANGINGoutofwindowsF.jpg (198KB, 657x442px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 657x442px

>>130167359

>>130162033
>>130155645
Name one (1) eye witness that isn't a paid shill. I have family living in Jew York and none of them noticed anything on 9/11. In the 16 years since the event not a single reliable witness has described the event. That in combination with the CGI plane and (((silverstein))) should open your eyes.

>>130168945
jammers 3rd party footage. no witnesses NY haha
16 years
what go fuck yourself your sick with your dumbshit we made our conclusion go suck each other off

File: KingKongMan12ftTALL.jpg (463KB, 1143x794px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 1143x794px

>>130170884

>>130170884
any fucking witnesses in new york since september 11th so your just telling me the WHOLE INTGERNET is SCRUBBED LIVE and NOONE KNOWS THIS

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAWHAHAWHAHAWHAWHAHAWHAWDHAB HAHAHAHA

>>130171094
Well, you know, I tried to do better, >>130167209
here,
but it looked like it didnt work

File: c7c.png (98KB, 612x491px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 612x491px

>>130155645
learn about; lens focal length.... You are a massive faggot, op. Don't ever post here ever again, you are too dumb to output anything, take more input. dumb niggerish faggot.

>>130155645
No.

I was in New York the week it happened. Tons of smoke, rubble, fire. The only survivor I could talk to was a hot dog salesman. His only words were 'who order those two jumbos?'.

>>130171412
lens focal length probably on the large zoom in which they where doing closeups with their circa 2001 footage they bitch about so much anyway

File: 1489763942053.jpg (19KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 251x242px

>>130155645
So where did the real towers go?
Also who was phone?