Why is Stirner never taught?
Because it spooks the children
Stirner is a spook. His ideas are external to me and therefore may (and should) be ignored.
>>130101956
Spooks won't let it happen.
>>130102828
Just look at his life.
How did he die?
Did he really live as he believed?
>>130101956
Maybe it's because children already have him down with the "nuh uh-uh huh" thing.
>>130101956
He isn't a real philosopher. It is an excellent thing that he is not taught. In fact, I would simply dismiss anyone who attempted to make an argument from egoism from my group.
>>130101956
>>130102828
>>130103035
Stirner is the ultimate spook, he didn't even existed. He was Engel's Tyler Durden.
>>130101956
It's because he and his thoughts are considered dangerous to civilization.
>>130101956
I've been here since '09 and I still don't understand this fucking meme
Too big of a red pill for even the most redpilled of individuals.
>>130103551
>been here since 09>>130103551
2spooky
>>130103551
its a spook
hes a retard
>>130101956
Marx was spooked by him so naturally liberals think he is 2spooky4them.
>>130101956
Because spooks are spooks. "Spooks are spooks" is a spook. "Spooks are spooks is a spook" is a spook.
See? If everything can be a spook, then nothing is. He's ultimately just a sophist.
>>130106156
But what if being a spook is a spook?
Stirner helped me realize how poisonous ideology is, his version of egoism is basically anti-ideology, it is very underrated and even leftists have trouble approaching his work because he shits on their ideas too. I will say for surer I wouldn't be as reactionary as I am today without reading his work and undoing years of baked in ideologies.
>>130101956
Because nietchmeister blows away his stupid two dimensional ideology