Personally I identify as bipolitical as libertarian with rightist preference being the primary ideology and objectivism being the secondary. Sometimes I feel ancapfluid.
PS. We need to end the left-right ideology primary, it's fucking 2017.
>>130076171
iam a mix between ancap and transhumanism
i'm a fascist but i do like a few ascpects of ancap
Totalitarian autocratic anarchism.
I believe in establishment American politics as we pursue our goal of global domination.
I'm always labeled by these tests as either a Libertarian Socialist or a Social Libertarian. Either way, I'm in the green quadrant.
>>130076364
Are you me?
>>130076743
>Either way, I'm in the most retarded quadrant
>Demflag
Are you Obamaleaf?
I am a Anarcho-fascist
I'm an ethno-anarchist. I believe anarchy can only work with white people
>>130076171
Meritocratic Socialism
>>130076739
I'm a libertarian but we should totally just take over the world when we get warbots and then enforce freedom on everybody.
>>130076171
"Which one of these cute symbols do you like best?!"
>>130076171
Ethno-Socialist.
>>130077023
I think you meant the *best quadrant, anon.
>Explain in one/ a few short sentences what Anarco-Capitalism is.
Is it the privatization of many business sectors "normally" controlled by the state?
Is it an economic environment where the state has no influence what so ever, like trade regulations for example?
is there a place to get a quick rundown on all of these ideologies besides anarcho balls
I'm whatever identity hates communists at that time. Monarchist, fascist, libertarian, doesn't matter. Whoever is fighting Bolshevism is who I am
>>130076171
Anarcho-nihilism is the only way to go. Everything else is absolute faggotry.
>>130076364
transhumanism is a meme, the Jews own all the relevant tech
transhumanism will turn out your worst nightmare
Is there an ideology for "unless it is proven I'm doing harm, leave me the hell alone to do what i want"?
>>130076171
how the fuck would you enforce Anarcho Pacifism?
>>130076171
I identify as Christian.
>>130078468
Libertarianism?
>>130076364
Very good opinion
>>130076743
Pretty cool
>>130076739
That's good
>>130077280
You're right
>>130077468
I hope you achieve your goals
>>130078048
Interesting
>>130078101
Wow
>>130078168
You're a cool guy
>>130078305
That's cool
>>130078468
Hmm, what could that be? Interesting thought.
>>130078048
>what Anarco-Capitalism is
No Discordians in here? A principled and consistent political ideology is nice and all, but if your primary interest is the maximization of liberty the correct answer is to use and subvert, not support.
These days I look like a Democrat. Increase taxes on those with power, increase social programs to create a greater range of engaged voters, reduce corporate power. The very instant a Sanders type makes it into the White House, though, I'll swing right.
What we need is crippling bureaucracy, we need gridlock, we need more parties to create more conflict, we need endless committees. We need chaos with a gavel.
And probably a good assassination.
>>130076743
>Libertarian Socialist
Those ideas are mutually exclusive.
>>130076171
I'm of the political opinion that what I say goes. Fuck anyone else.
>>130079132
Not necessarily. You can simultaneously support state assistance (which is inherently Socialist in nature) and personal freedoms.
>>130079344
>you are free to do what you want with what you have so long as it doesn't directly hurt anybody else
That is what Libertarianism is. I don't know how on Earth you can end up with libertarian socialism.
>>130078468
>>130079344
>that's some nice wealth you've earned, would be a same if I gave it to someone else
Yes, necessarily.
>>130078168
>>130079344
You fail to understand the driving force behind libertarianism.
>>130079551
It generally means civilly libertarian and fiscally democratic socialist. One can have a highly restricted, focused state which has amongst it's limited powers the ability to maintain a robust social safety net funded by a tax system. Most modern western states don't need to use much violence to maintain tax compliance, anyway. You could add guns to the Netherlands and be pretty close to this concept if the EU wasn't a thing.
>>130079904
>A fucking commie calling someone else edgy
>>130079993
>massive governments that steal a large part of your income are totally libertarian guys
Fuck off commie.
>>130079904
>communist unironically finds morals edgy
you don't say
>>130079086
So Discordians are literally anyone who think to fix the system, you have to make it so unbearable the people have to reform it?
Personally, I don't like handing my executioner a SUPER TORTURE 3000 in the hopes everyone else in line decide to try and bum rush the armed guards.
I'm basically undecided except for one thing; more government is garbage. Government in general is garbage, and should be kept at a minimum. While I agree nothing short of a massive overhaul will change our governments, it's not guaranteed to work, so I'll pass the buck to next generation if it doesn't become unbearable.
And simply put, I doubt Discordians will accomplish anything other than making things mildly more shit.
>>130076364
you have to be retarded to think transhumanism is possible within our lifetime. AI as well. I'm personal friends with people working in that field and it's far less feasible than people think b/c lack of understanding of the relationship between brain activity and consciousness. There are at least 10 schools of thought right now on the interpretation of FMRI brain imaging.
>>130076171
National socialism mate
>>130079551
>you are free to do what you want with what you have so long as it doesn't directly hurt anybody else
So libertarianism is essentially the destruction of the social contract then? What would a country be exactly in an ancap government? Would culture even exist?
>>130080293
Commie? Please, I haven't supported the idea at any point. You've got your black and yellow, but how much skin do you have in the game? How much income have you successfully hidden? Whens the last time you committed a felony because you don't recognize the power of the state?
I carried in Chicago when pistols were still banned and having a loaded one on your person was still a felony if you weren't a cop or an elected official. I've organized my life around a business with just enough cash and just enough opportunity for expenses and losses that I can make shit up and pay an accountant a couple grand a year so that an audit wouldn't show anything untoward.
What have you done to fight the state?
>>130081000
How does that lead to the destruction of the social contract?
And do you honestly believe that culture comes from the government?
>>130076171
EEEEHRM.
THIS VIOLATES THE NAP.
WHERE IS ANCAP`!q!!?`!
>>130081041
Not today FBI.
I prefer conservatarian
>>130076171
Capitalist Fascist
>>130076171
Profoundly black-pilled.
>>130081106
>you are free to do what you want with what you have so long as it doesn't directly hurt anybody else
Read the quote that guy posted. In a culture there are social rules of association and behaviour that don't come from government, but nonetheless are firm rules. Libertarianism states that they do not exist. If you could truly "do whatever you want" with your money you wouldn't be living in a society.
>>130081000
>he thinks libertarian = ancap
>>130076171
I don't care, I just don't like seeing the world controlled by a group of corporate oligopolies.
>>130076171
I don't.
Putting yourself in a box is rather limiting.
>>130081316
wait that was you nvm
>>130081353
libertarianism is just ancap light. The political values are the same, just less intense.
>>130081041
>fighting the state means breaking laws that in no way harm the state
I can understand hiding assets being a harmful action, but carrying a gun in a no-gun zone isn't harming the government at all; it's just opening you up to unneeded risk.
>>130081000
>So libertarianism is essentially the destruction of the social contract then?
No.
>What would a country be exactly in an ancap government?
Countries would be at most a loose collection of people on cultural and ethnic lines.
>Would culture even exist?
Yes. Don't know why you think it wouldn't.
>>130076364
>transhumanism
*hisssss*
National Syndicalist with NatSoc elements.
>>130076171
I am a moderate centerist
>>130081468
As far as the market is concerned sure, but libertarians believe a government is necessary.
>>130076171
I'm sort of an environmentalist conservative (in the Hoppean meaning of the word) anarchist
>>130076171
Anarchists need to be fucking exterminated
Green anarchism
We need to end scarcity and suffering via BCI tech, 3D printing and renewable energy.
Everyone should be free to themselves and there should be no ruling class.
>>130081316
>In a culture there are social rules of association and behaviour that don't come from government, but nonetheless are firm rules.
And the most a community could do to enforce those social rules is ostracization (using freedom of association). Social rules still exist, it's just that in a Libertarian state, they couldn't be backed up by violence or seizure of property or movement.
>>130081851
Naive, but noble.
>>130081526
>would culture even exist
Culture contains a collection of unwritten societal rules of behaviour. These need to be policed on some level above the family unit or you have degeneration. Ancap is infeasible in this regard unless you have at the very least, a meaningful local government.
>>130076171
Libertarian Transhumanist
>>130081205
I laughed. Well played, sir, well played.
>>130081526
Its not about harming the state, its about living one's life as one sees fit. I have a right to defend myself. Carrying didn't open me up to unneeded risk, it shifted the risk. Its not like I don't have reason to suspect I might have successfully resisted arrest.
>>130081893
>ostracization only
So then other cultures that enforce their rules with violence would take over, since they would be more cohesive.
>>130082016
Aka underage dumbfuck roleplayer
>>130081783
I believe in strong community/family bonds, and I'm against big businesses, bankers and all government agents.
I think local authorities are extremely important. But a government ruling more than a neighborhood is simply absurd.
The environmentalist part is just more personal. I believe that if power is descentralized in a large scale there is no fear of big farmers chopping down huge forests to do monoculture. And also, the communities should be as autonomous as possible in relation to food, money, etc.
>>130082261
t.commie
>>130076171
>B-b-but it's the current year
>>130082261
The fuck you talking about? I'm more or less in the same boat.
>>130079904
>Commie calling others edgy
Wew
>>130076171
what the hell is that logo for anarcho syndicalism
what the fuck is anarcho feminism/lgbt
>anti-populist, fundamentally anti-democratic but not politically
>meritocracy
>free speech
>environmentalist
>anti-war extremist
>traditional family
>transhumanist
>good people have a moral duty to own firearms, not a right
>anti-racist, demolish racial identity to kill racism, criminalize racism in public institutions and begin enforcing the civil rights act of 1964 (killing blow to SJWs)
>dismantle and rebuild university to be a place of education and discourse, certain colleges like Evergreen should just be shut down as criminal organizations
>ban usury and tax inheritance 90%
>brand and regulate businesses which are at their core exploitative or deceptive, including those which rely on making people into addicts (cigarettes, soda, porn, etc)
>expand food stamps but make them designed for healthy ascetic lifestyles, cannot purchase junk or luxury
>universal healthcare for healthy people
>publicly fund elections, ban lobbying and donation
classical liberal? fascist? not sure
>>130083037
>free speech
>criminalize racism
Fucking kill yourself faggot.
>>130083325
>context
I said criminalize racism in public institutions. A government or government-funded organization should not be allowed to discriminate on the basis of race. Segregationists should not hold positions in public education or law enforcement.
>>130076171
Individualism FTW
>>130083786
My bad. Yes completely destroy bullshit like affirmative action, but also allow private companies to not hire anyone they want for whatever reason they want.
>>130076364
Egoism but since there is no fucking egoist flag I use Ancap flag
>anarcha
>>130076171
I don't know, classify me. I want the key infrastructure, healthcare, police, and military to be in the hands of a strong government while everything else is fair game for private business. What comes to moral values, degeneracy should neither be promoted nor forbidden.
>>130086354
Centrist I guess...
>>130076171
>>Anarc
>>Anarc
>>Anarc
Wtf is this hippy jew shit?
Anarchist is the nihilist of politics. Just an idealistic retard belief
Go to a niggers hood. That is anarchy
>>130076171
>Sometimes I feel ancapfluid.
>ancapfluid.
>>130076171
This guy
>>130076171
This thread is Gay, your worse than all the other letters
>>130081990
>These need to be policed on some level above the family unit or you have degeneration. Ancap is infeasible in this regard unless you have at the very least, a meaningful local government.
There are societal structures between government and family in terms of granularity and use of force.
>>130082229
Except a libertarian society would have more unity.
A more authoritarian society might have more compliance, but there will also be more resentment and stagnation due to overhead reducing efficiency.
A bit fashy innit.
>>130081000
Wasted trips
>>130092570
Beautiful
>>130082229
Or the people would defect en masse when they view a place more free. Why do North Koreans defect to the South? Why did East Germans defect to the West? Why did PRC citizens defect to the ROC?
>>130092390
>calls himself a fascist
>voted for may
>>130093151
Actually ended up voting DUP in the end because pic related.