Liberals will defend this.

>>130042878

You know, even without the shop, it looks exactly the same.

>>130043137
A "shut the fuck up" donny may be in order to create.

>>130042878
Liberals are violent butchers.

File: guide_to_firearms_tfbtfb5.jpg (40KB, 400x738px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 400x738px

>>130044118
And then they call for gun control. The (((Media)) and the (((Left))) have gone too far.

File: LiberalsDefendViolence.jpg (211KB, 1067x1000px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1067x1000px

>>130042878

to be fair conservatives would defend the opposite like usual so it's a 2 way street it happens either way

>>130042878
/pol/ also supports political violence

>>130046605
Palin personally took a lot of flak for Giffords shooting bc of "crosshairs" used on her website. The MSM went after the right for language, and that wasn't even a political attack, No one on the right praised the event either.
Of course, that might be why one party rules the majority of the nation and the other cannot win no matter how much money they throw in the fire.

>>130046605
You think conservatives would defend a person who went onto that field "to kill as many democrats as possible"? The "progressive" left is who hates freedom of speech at the moment not conservatives. While some on the right obviously have their flaws, they don't have the whole media, politicians, and celebrities advocating violence of democrats.

File: IMG_1431.jpg (54KB, 200x300px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 200x300px

You did a great job following the intel I provided.

>>130046739
>/pol/ is one person
Go fuck yourself.

>>130047993
Is this the person who wrote the NYT article on Monday talking about the congressmen and the security detail's locations?

File: guilty horns.jpg (332KB, 830x547px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 830x547px

>>130042878

>>130047550
I think the crosshairs on the map were a poor choice, but is nothing to the degree of Kathy Griffin's decapitated head stunt or the video by Loretta Lynch advocating for blood in the streets. And yes, no one on either praised the attack on Gifford.

>>130050126

this.

if you think the MSM is not advocating for violence you are a nimnull.

a. nimnull.

>>130042878
It's just pure 2nd amendment right.
Cucks will deny this.

>>130049905
>>130049938
>>130049977
What are you even implying? Your pictures seem contradictory.

>>130044118
Be careful who you claim race war against. Conservatives have always been all bark no bite. This mother fucker got a head shit off the bat and had a gun fihht with government trained cops still svirinh hits. Liberals are just better with guns than conservatives.

File: walter-and-smokey.jpg (233KB, 849x592px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 849x592px

>>130042878
Was he over the line /pol/?

>>130046109
The government needs further motivation to take guns away from stupid americans.

>>130047701
Conservatives are constantly trying to suppress the MSM and their right to free speech.

>>130042878
Except for some nobodies, the left has condemned this right away. Plus the more attention this gets the more it shines a light on gun control.

File: df3612486fb50970411774f991b6baec9fb7cca2e144180b885f03fba7b07217.jpg (44KB, 448x299px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 448x299px

>>130050624

>>130049905
He fucking shot Rand Paul, he is a hero.

>>130050941
What law would have stopped this from happening without breaching the 2nd Ammendment?

>>130042878
Name a single time bernie has advocated violence. I can confirm several for Trump.