CNN backtracking now!!!! Hahahahahahahahahaahhahahahhahzhahahh

>>130021753
Bump for liberals blown the fuck out again

>>130021753
HAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHHA

>>130021753
How are they backtracking?

>>130023107
A day ago it he WAS being investigated today is MAY*

look at all mislead shills btfo that have threads up now claiming he currently is

>>130023107
They are throwing fake news that make Trump look bad only "correct" them an hour later.
This way all the libtard snowflakes can shill the fake news and make sure their little bubble doesn't burst.

>>130021753
How do you investigate someone for obstructing a crime that didn't take place?

>>130021753
this is what happens when fake news tries to use FOX as the tip of the sword to convince us their bullshit story is not fake news

I don't know what the rest of the faggot internet thinks, but no one here trusts any media of any knid

>>130022268
>Bump for liberals blown the fuck out again
We all called it, didn't we. I knew it was more leftist bullshit the second they announced it yesterday. Checked an article: "anonymous sources say." Yup, it's bullshit!

>>130023107
A day ago they were saying he WAS getting investigated. Someone must have reminded them how badly it went the last time they made an absolute statement based on an (((anonymous source))), so now there MAY be an investigation

>>130023383
(((They))) will always find evidence :^)

>>130023383
>firing comey over Russia
>pressuring him to drop Flynn investigation
>pressuring coats and rogers to help him end the investigation
>not obstruction
Sure kid

>>130023628
they failed to for their russian job lol this why its moved to this and its failing already

They just keep digging themselves deeper. The same thing happened with the Mueller firing story.

>>130023383

Mueller and his team of high powered lawyers know what obstruction is and they know its a phony charge. There are 5 specific things that are outlined in an obstruction of justice charge, none of which Trump even got close to doing. Furthermore, it plays on the ignorance of the common libtard that Trump can obstruct justice in the case of his subordinate, implying that the FBI is somehow not apart of the Executive Branch. Which is extremely interesting considering how involved the Obama admin was in directing the FBI's investigations.

Mueller must be fired immediately for leaking.

>>130023683
The worst part is people actually belive this.

>>130021753
you guys are idiots, russia never meddled with the election, our own country bought this president so they could fund more black ops.

>>130023683
none of those things hinders the investigation
>pressuring coats and rogers to help him end the investigation
no evidence of pressure m8

he could of literally told comey to stop and it wouldn't of been.

all you have is" I hope" and as was testified is not obstruction

>>130021753

>source

who else thinks this should be the word of 2017?

File: moscow-attractions-red-square2-xlarge.jpg (142KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1280x800px

>>130021753
Russian Clouds...... Mosclouds

>>130023683
>firing comey over Russia
Try proving that. Comey is an incompetent twat.
>pressuring him to drop Flynn investigation
And yet the incompetent twat said this wasnt the case, and trump was referring to allegations that had been disproven anyway.
>pressuring coats and rogers to help him end the investigation
See my first reply
>not obstruction
Yes. Firing Comey was within his power, and a favor to the American people.

>>130023787
Why is it wrong?

>>130023787
no they don't man

Trump literally could of pardoned Flynn and anyone involved and it not be obstruction

>>130024055
Pardon him for what, he didn't even commit any crime. Is Flynn in jail? No. How the fuck do you obstruct justice by "blocking" investigation of a crime that didn't occur?

>>130024266
Thats my point but you dont have to be found guilty to be pardoned before hand.

SOURCES INSIDE THE WH HEARD AN ANONYMOUS SOURCE WAS SPEAKING WITH INTELLIGENCE SOURCES ABOUT HOW ONE OF TRUMPS CABINET MEMBERS HAS AN AID WHO MAY HAVE VISITED MOSCOW IN 1995!!

>>130024030
>And yet the incompetent twat said this wasnt the case
Wrong

>>130023868

THANK YOU

Trump Rages: 'You Are Witnessing the Single Greatest Witch Hunt in American Political History'

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-15/trump-rages-you-are-witnessing-single-greatest-witch-hunt-american-political-history
he's right, you know.

>>130023896
>could of
Opinion discarded

>>130023383
>Obstructing a crime
You mean an investigation. I'm not saying Trump obstructed it, just saying what you said is wrong.

>>130021753
>Mueller """"may"""" investigate [...]

So in short - it's fucking nothing once again.

CANT STUMP THE TRUMP!

>>130024578
not a argument m8

>>130024472
He relayed their conversation and said outright that he didnt feel that trump was pressuring him. The investigation into Flynn was shown to have produced no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at that point anyway.

Had Obama and his cronies not stripped anonymity of US citizens, and signed an EO that allowed all of the "intelligence agencies" to share these documents with each other and leak them profusely, you wouldnt have even heard about this shit.

The only crime here is Obama's weaponization of the intel communities against US citizens.

>>130023683
Trump can fire the FBI Director on a whim. That's privilege of being President.

He asked & Comey was too Autistic to clarify what he really meant. He kept saying he doesn't know Trump's character. He was too afraid of being left alone with him. Unlike Obama which Comey sucked his dick everyday, Trump wasn't a faggot like that.

Comey said no one talked to him about dropping the investigation other than the President that one time.

President could've fired Comey immediately, he didn't. He could've ordered him to stop the investigation, he didn't. He could've gotten his folks to run interference, he didn't. Trump even said Comey should investigate everyone.

It's probaby 100% fake news just like they said comey was going to deny he told trump he wasn't under investigation 3 times.

ONLY reason that story came out yesterday was as a smokescreen for the leftwing democrat terrorist attack.

Look at all the blown out shills on the catalog who took the WP seriously lol

>>130024796
I don't argue with people who say shit like "could of" and "would of", you must be this smart to ride.

>>130025026
>ONLY reason that story came out yesterday was as a smokescreen for the leftwing democrat terrorist attack.

THIS hence they are backtracking it so fast

>>130025074
so if you were investigating me for trespassing and I rightfully could of set up a fucking camp site and slept there you would ignore what that means to what your accusing me of lol

your done cuck

>>130023986
nice mosque

>>130025074
>I was going to provide a counter-argument, but I see you've made a grammatical error, so I win.

>>130023683
you are making many assumptions

>>130024821
>The investigation into Flynn was shown to have produced no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at that point anyway.
How is hat relevant to obstruction of the investigation?

Anyway, comey, like any sensible person, knew what trump was saying
>“I took it as a direction,” he said. “This is the president and me alone, and he says, this is what I want you to do.”

Otherwise we clear the room of everyone, including the AG he reports to?

>>130024629
yeah your right, that's what i meant

>>130025024
>He could've ordered him to stop the investigation
Not how the FBI works

>>130025622
>How is hat relevant to obstruction of the investigation?
The investigation came up empty, what's to obstruct?

How does what Trump said equate obstruction anyway? You never proved it does, and guess what? You cannot. You have to add context and words that simply were not stated.

>>130025491
What argument? Elucidate it.

>>130025622
he also said nothing in his words was a order and i hope is not grounds for obstruction of justice.

not to mention he testified in front of congress he never felt pressure in any investigation.

>>130025872
Doesn't matter the outcome, obstructing an ongoing investigation is obstruction. You don't have to prove collusion to prove obstruction.

>>130021753
>Trump definitely colluded with Russia
>Trump maybe colluded with Russia, but we don't know
>Trump's possible collusion will be investigated
>Trump's possible collusion may be investigated some time in the future
Increasingly cucked liberals shit themselves for Nth time this month.

>>130025926
That trump could of done more explicit things to out right end the investigation and it still would not be considers obstruction and you are failing to see how this would bold to proving it under lesser extents

>>130025926
Refer to the post you pathetically replied to by calling out a grammatical error.

>>130026011
yet you wont be able to prove obstruction either and muller meeting with IC leaders is literally because he currently does not even have grounds to investigate it hence MAY*

>>130025781
What branch if the FBI a member of?

>>130025955
>trump didn't say the magic word! If he asks him to end the shminvestigation into Shmichael Shmynn then he didden do nuffin!

>>130026011
Do you know what you do have to prove? That there was obstruction of any kind.

You cannot take Trump's words, and use the to prove obstruction. It is literally impossible to do without adding your own context. Or framing it with "like a mob boss!" nonsense that colors the plain facts.

>>130026098
I did, there wasn't an argument in it

>>130025872
The investigation hasn't ended yet.

>>130026168
Does it operate with a large degree of independence y/n? Did it investigate Nixon y/n?

>>130026183
Did he ask him to end it?

No.

Why are you so fucking desperate? 2024 will come soon enough

>>130026221
>Do you know what you do have to prove? That there was obstruction of any kind.

That's Mueller's job actually

>>130026183
when did he ASK anyone to end any investigation.

>>130025026
This

Disgusting!!

>>130026236
see>>130026084


sorry m8 you just dont have a answer

>>130026248
You think Mueller is going to testify just for the fuck of it? They either have something or nothing at this point and I'd bet my left nut Mueller goes up there and BTFOs the lefts entire narrative for the past year live on cspan. The salt is going to be unreal, probably get flashbacks to election night.

>>130026248
Regarding the original allegations against Flynn that have been disproven? As if one could prove a logan act violation with such scant evidence?

>>130026311
If it wasnt an implicit request why did he clear the room?

>>130026371
And he ((MAY*)) investigate
HAHAHAAHHHA

>>130021753
WAT THEF UCK THEY MEAN BY (((MAY)))??????
SHRIMPBLFPT NEEDS TO BE IMPICHED NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!
IMPICH/IMPRISON/KILL FOR TREASON!!!!!

>>130021753
They realized that if Mueller is leaking then it's grounds for his termination.

>>130023683
>>firing comey over Russia
>>pressuring him to drop Flynn investigation
>>pressuring coats and rogers to help him end the investigation
>>not obstruction

A little truth, if you please.

>Firing Comey over delaying the Russian investigation instead of completing it in an expedient manner.
>Is it really a surprise that Trump would HOPE for Flynn's exoneration? Obstruction implies actually getting in someone's way, preventing them from acting. "Pressure" is a fuzzy word, not necessarily implying anything illegal. Obstruction is illegal. Period.
>Not for nothing, I think these people need to finish their investigations so we can all learn the truth. Pressure them until they do their actual jobs.
>You tell me: does this amount to obstruction?

This is what happens when people parrot talking points without understanding the facts.

>>130021753
Oh look, yet another investigation on trump....

when is this gonna end?

>>130026506
Your eternal hope. It's beautiful, but tragic.

>>130026371
So you're saying you cannot prove it? And you're referring to the guy, who at this point, will likely not be investigating it due to a complete lack of evidence?

Why exactly are you speaking as if you're privvy to the facts, when you obviously are not?

Never mind, I forgot you think pointing out grammatical errors is an argument. you're just pathetic.

>>130026296
I don't recall our founding fathers mentioning anything about an FBI. It exists at the mercy of the federal government. Trump really needs to neutralize the deep state. It isn't serving its intended purpose.

>>130026503
Hi shareblue.
kys.

>>130026503
So Comey would understand how serious trump takes the issue and hopes he will eventually clear flynn.

>>130026503
do you know the definition of implicit.

File: jews fake news.jpg (95KB, 471x650px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 471x650px

>>130021753

Let me guess, no named sources either.

Mueller WiLL (IF HE DARES NOT WE'LL FUCKING GUT HIM ALIVE AT THE OWL'S ALTAR PRAISE SATAN FUCK DRUMPFIE) investigate Trump for obstruction

>>130023683
>Trump told by Comey three times he's not under investigation for muh Russia
>Trump then fires Comey for muh Russia for some reason
Sure (((kid)))

>>130023683
He fired Comey because Comey wouldn't tell the public that he was not being investigated and instead just let all the Media rumors continue.

All Comey had to do was say just what he said in his testimony to congress. That trump wasn't being investigated.

He ended up doing what Trump asked him to do anyways.

>>130026645
But I am a trump voter not a liberal m8....

kek

>>130021753
How bad is this obstruction thing? Enough for impeach as the democrats on twitter seem to think it is?

Also what did I miss, came back after a few weeks and there is this flag selector thing?

>>130026460
I think Mueller will first investigate and then testify. There will be probably nothing, but the dirt will still stick on Trump.

>>130026474
As far as I know nothing has been proven or disproven yet. What we know is that Flynn lied to Pence about his meetings with Kisljak.
The FBI will wait as long as possible to publish the final report to harm Trump.

>>130026296
Yes but every officer of the federal government is answerable to The President. Full stop.

>>130023683
I opened this thread to find you and personally call you a faggot.
Faggot.


There are 2 Americans, those that stand with the sitting president, and traitors.

>>130024266
Ask niggers that catch obstruction charges and resisting arrest, even without any other crime. Happens all the time.

>>130026854
not even a issue and not even being investigated according to CNN

>>130026854
All you missed was 24 hrs of flag shitposting before things got back to normal (or whatever that means around these parts).

File: IMG_4713.jpg (41KB, 605x328px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 605x328px

>>130024035

>>130026460
If Mueller did this we would know he's in our side. I haven't seen him on TV enough to know who he is and if he's as sniveling a coward as Comey

>>130026934
he is already scheduled to testify next week.

>>130026503
Is he not allowed privacy? When will you alert the POTUS as to what he can do without your approval?

>>130026460
is mueller supposed to testify?

File: 1496945559260s.jpg (3KB, 125x125px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 125x125px

>>130026997

Look ... two scoops ...

>>130026934
He is set to testify next week hans

>>130021753

Mueller probably called them and told them to shut the fuck up.

Bwahaha.

>>130023683
Flynn investigation was already over by the time Trump said anything to Comey

>>130023570
>"anonymous sources say

it's like they are quoting 4chan users now.

>>130027185
Actually I'm wrong could have swore I read that yesterday

>>130027236
I'd like to believe you, but Trump certainly does seem to have discussed Flynn with Comey.

>That doesn't mean there was obstruction, or any other criminal activity.

Being from NY, Trumps comment is fairly typical. "For what it's worth, he's a good guy." It doesn't really mean anything and there's no force behind it, but you put in your two cents in the HOPE that it may help.

>>130023572
This.

>It's not backtracking but more being aware of how butt hurt people get over technicalities

>>130021753
wwwwwwwwwwwwwooooooooooooooppppppppssss

>>130027571
technicality there is no current investigation into trump based on that headline..

>>130027935
technically*

File: 1497505618817.jpg (32KB, 505x490px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 505x490px

>>130027148

>>130023683
It's not obstruction for the President (who IS the executive branch) to direct his subordinates what action to take or not to take or fire subordinates for any reason whatsoever including subverting his administration which is what Comey was doing. That is his constitutional prerogative as the elected leader.

File: cnnPresZucker.png (986KB, 710x473px) Image search: [Google]

986KB, 710x473px

>>130026934
>but the dirt will still stick on Trump.

File: 1494595945177.png (277KB, 809x590px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 809x590px

>>130028085

>>130027935
Yes, exactly. CNN is literally just propaganda. They want you to hate Trump so they're talking about hypothetical situations where he's evilor twisting his words around and taking them out of context, and then they present that to you in a form that looks all official so you will think it's real news and not just propaganda.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_executive_departments

>The United States federal executive departments are the primary units of the executive branch of the federal government of the United States, and are analogous to ministries common in parliamentary or semi-presidential systems but, with the United States being a presidential system, led by a head of government separate from the head of state. The executive departments are the administrative arms of the President of the United States. There are currently 15 executive departments.

>The heads of the executive departments receive the title of Secretary of their respective department, except for the Attorney-General who is head of the Justice Department (and the Postmaster General who until 1971 was head of the Post Office Department). The heads of the executive departments are appointed by the President and take office after confirmation by the United States Senate, and serve at the pleasure of the President.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Justice

>The United States Department of Justice (DOJ), also known as the Justice Department, is a federal executive department of the U.S. government, responsible for the enforcement of the law and administration of justice in the United States, equivalent to the justice or interior ministries of other countries. The department was formed in 1870 during the Ulysses S. Grant administration.

The Justice Department is under the jurisdiction of the Executive Branch and serves at the President's pleasure.

>>130023107

The news about Mueller investigating Trump came out the day that Bernfag shot a U.S. Senator. There was, for the first time in a long time, a sense of unity in the Senate. This was a big boon to Trump. Conveniently the (((MSM))) comes out with this (((anonymous))) story about Mueller placing Trump under investigation for obstruction of justice. If this actually happened and it were leaked it. Mueller would be at risk of resigning from the investigation because of this leak. This is the same pattern the left has been using for nearly a decade. Whenever the conservatives seem to have a good day some bullshit story comes out to distract the public.

TL;DR The MSM wanted to remind the public that DRUMPFY *may* still be impeached for his two scoops.

They changed it because they could be sued big time if they didn't.

Muller can investigate Trump for anything, that is part of his job in the Special Counsel, it doesn't mean he will. He could literally say "TWO SCOOPS SEAM SUSPICIOUS" and investigate Trump on that too, but he won't because it is useless. Their is no obstruction of justice unless both Coney and Sessions lied openly, which would mean that investigation would have to include the entire intelligence community in their inquiry

>>130028123
Only in the executive branch. Any investigation is in the judicative branch in which he isn't allowed to interfere.

i really fucking hate the jews, /pol/

>>130029784
judicative branch?

>Russia meddled in the US election
>forgets that AIPAC is the biggest political action comitee in the US

>>130030127
Fuck, I translated the German word "Judikativer Bereich" wrong. I meant the judicial system. As far as I know it is independed from the executive branch. The "leader" of this branch would be the Supreme Court and not the president.

>>130021753
Bumping this shitshow

>>130026084
holy shit stop saying "could of" or "would of"

it's COULD'VE

File: IMG_8667.jpg (2MB, 1880x2880px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1880x2880px

>>130028749

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-15/ken-starr-bursts-cnns-bubble-no-obstruction-case-against-trump-what-ive-seen

Wow very fake news

>>130031080
its actually could have could've is a slang contraction.

>>130031425
no shit. but you're saying "could of", which stupid people always say when they're trying to say "could've"

>>130031824
I would rather correct someone with the correct equivalent and it would be could have not a contraction smart guy.

>>130031138
At least Anderson Cooper isn't a kike.

>>130025026
>>130025181
>>130026405
Its not a terrorist attack, its a mass shooting / assassination attempt.

The fact that the shooter is incompetent is irrelevant.

Get your terminology in order

>>130032440
wtf

File: DADp1sIXUAIh5kl.jpg large.jpg (158KB, 1024x1010px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1024x1010px

>>130027516

>>130032004
no, because people mistake "could've" for "could of". nobody mistakes could have for "could of".

>>130033194
Because he is fucking stupid.

>>130033619
Except I was not using a contraction and you tried to correct me with one....

It's as if I spelled you all wrong and you told me to use yall...

>>130033619
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/usage/could-of-or-could-have

Just stop m8 ur a cuck failure of a Grammer nazi

Can someone post a before and after pic of this? June 14th; will. June 15th; may.

>>130033772
>Let Ignore that you can't obstruct a investigation that no longer is happening

>>130034499
The investigation just didn't end on that day.

>>130034644
Yea it was 21 days before....

>>130034499
>>130034644
Never mind that, they're ignoring that what Trump said doesnt equate obstruction of justice, under and light, by any means.

You absolutely cannot prove OoJ based on Trump's change with Comey, unless you yourself add verbiage and context that simply was no expressed by either party.

>>130035004
True

>>130035004
That is definitely right. Nevertheless the general Russia investigation is still ongoing and Trump confirmed that at least his satellites did something wrong.

>>130026011
Are you a paid shill?
Or just that brainwashed.


Cognitive dissonance

>>130035320
Yea he said it be great to find our if they did.... Sure sounds like a guilty guy to me rite....rite...

>>130026067
Yep. And they are currently going for,

>Trump may be investigated for possibly obstructing investigation that found zilch

Of course they leave the last bit out.

>>130023295
Just like on Twitter. Corporate media figures will Tweet out something fake about Trump, it'll get 30k likes and then an hour later retract their statement which gets like 200 at most likes. That faggot Jim Acosta did it yesterday with Trump's visit to Scalise.

>>130035748
>The President went on to say that if there were some “satellite” associates
of his who did something wrong, it would be good to find that out, but that he hadn’t done anything wrong and hoped I would find a way to get it out that we
weren’t investigating him.
Why would you say something like this if you don't have at least some suspicions about your satellites?

File: t3_6hej5t.png (322KB, 521x629px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 521x629px

>>130036175
pic related

Do you dumb fucks not see it? I mean, sometimes I look at this board and not thing everyone is being a faggot for (Yous) and I worry about the collective IQ on both sides.

Here's what this is:

Democrats were taking a goddamn beating in the press yesterday, so they bring this out. Doesn't matter if it never happens it changes the tune.

This story was supposed to come out right before GA6 voted, but i was fast tracked due to the Bernie Bro going nuts.

Guys open your goddamn eyes and think about this shit for a minute. It's very clear if you look with a clear mind.

>>130021753
Kek'd.
I don't personally care if he does investigate Trump, he won't find shit about Trump-Russia.

>>130021753
>Mueller in high publicized investigation
>May Investigate Trump for Obstruction
>Comey said in open hearing that he told Trump he wasn't investigating Trump
>Said he wasn't investigating Trump Satellites either
>Gets Fired
>People think this qualifies as Obstruction
>Trump could legally fire Mueller for not recusing himself after evidence comes out that he has loaded staff with Clinton donators and is too close to Comey
>Liberals don't understand the MASSIVE trap they're heading into
>Liberals talk about civil war as if the right wing hasn't been ready for this since the fucking 1950's red scare.
I see no possible redemption for liberals.

>>130036554
These media personalities need to be held accountable. How long before someone starts taking potshots at the media for their lies and deception?

>>130036258
Because you don't know for sure and don't vouch for them.

I wouldn't vouch for all my coworkers not being pedophiles but don't have evidence to suspect them.

>>130026460
Mueller is going to go up and lie through his teeth about everything.

>>130034052
NOBODY CONFUSES "COULD HAVE" WITH "COULD OF"

HOW FUCKING DENSE ARE YOU.

idiots like you confuse "could've" with "could of". say it out loud, dipshit. "could've" sound phonetically similar to "could of".

>>130037438
It's a common confusion according to Oxford dictionary m8...

>>130037560
Cont. I dident confuse anything with could've as I used two separate words like "could have" is..... And Oxford again as I showed says the two are commonly confused.
Your reaching and squirming.

>>130036893
They should, be they probably won't.

>>130021753
THE ENTIRE NEWS IS THE FUCKING NATIONAL ENQUIRER AND WE ARE POSSIBLY MAKING POLICY BASED ON IT

I WANT MY POLICY TO PROTECT THE BAT BOY AND GIVE HIM A CAVE TO SLEEP IN AND MICE TO EAT BECAUSE OF HIS EXTREME DEFORMITY OR ELSE I AM RIOTING

>>130021753

What a coincidence that they immediately find a incriminating glormpf piece right after a liberal tries to kill a bunch of people during baseball practice

>130023683
>vTmca7DT
awwww widdle baby screams so loud when he picks up the shiny new narrative only to have it snatched from his manlet hands

>"GARUNMPF COLLUDED WITH MUH RUSHA"
>"NO NO WAIT, ZARLOOPMF ACTUALLY OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE"
>"NO NO NO WAIT, EVEN IF ITS NOT TRUE OR CONFIRMED HE'S GOING TO JAIL!!"
>"REEEEEEEE YOU NAZI STUMPFISSSS!"

neck yourself, culling of leftists soon

>>130021753
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAH

File: IMG_4157.jpg (54KB, 460x360px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 460x360px

>>130029585
>two scoops seam suspicious
>seam suspicious
I knew we couldn't trust that short ass French faggot, Neopolitan.

>>130032440
Terror Attack
the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

I think a Bernout attacking a specific demographic of politicians over political differences constitutes terrorism, you fucking reject.

>>130035320
How was that confirmed at all? Did you actually listen to the testimony or is there a language barrier preventing you from comprehending English?

>>130036616
We've been talking about this all being a distraction because of democrat terrorism yesterday, read the thread.

File: 1494849580377.png (342KB, 700x595px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 700x595px

TTTTWWWWWWOOOOOO SSSSSCCCCCCCCOOOOOOOOOOOPPPPPPPPPPSSSSSSSSSSSSS DDDDDDDDDRRRRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUNNNNNNNNNNNAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLDDDDDDDDDDD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDRRRRRRRRRRRRRRUUUUUUUUUUMMNNNNNNNNPPPPPPFFFFFFFEEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNNNN

CNN just changed their reporting to "may... possibly.... be under investigation.... allegedly....according to unnamed sources at the Washington Post". HA HA HA.

>>130023683
>pressuring coats and rogers to help him end the investigation

LOL they said the contrary when they testified. Go home Shareblue

>>130023683
>>130023787
>exact post from another thread yesterday
>exact response
Why do they always hire such low level shills?Doesn't /pol/ deserve more?

The CNN Method:
1. Fabricate a story that fits their narrative.
2. Speculate
3. Bring on guests who speculate
4. Bring on guests who agree with the speculations.
5. The story is now fact.
6. If all else fails... unnamed sources confirm the story is true.

>>130021753

speaking of Mueller:

Book: Special Counsel Mueller Did Exactly What Comey Accused Trump Of Doing

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/10/book-special-counsel-mueller-guilty-of-exactly-what-comey-accused-trump-of-doing/

>But that special counsel, former FBI Director Robert Mueller, was accused of doing exactly the same thing in a 2011 book in regards to the deaths of the Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas.

Byron York: Is Robert Mueller conflicted in Trump probe?

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-is-robert-mueller-conflicted-in-trump-probe/article/2625638

>Comey is a good friend of special counsel Robert Mueller — such a good friend, for about 15 years now, that the two men have been described as "brothers in arms."

James Comey Has A Long History Of Questionable Obstruction Cases

http://thefederalist.com/2017/06/12/james-comey-long-history-questionable-obstruction-cases/

When Comey and Mueller Bungled the Anthrax Case

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2017/05/21/when_comey_and_mueller_bungled_the_anthrax_case_133953.html

>>130021753
IF mueller or his team leak anything about the investigation, or anyone with special access leaks any info about the investigation, It can be disbanded, and a new investigator chosen.

>>130032187
Being a blue blood CIA stoog is almost as bad