Help me out...

No. Why would it be?

>>130016843

>Noah's Ark story is a fairy tale
>this country is going to be underwater in 50 years

Really makes you think.

>>130016843
It's not an offense. Speech is protected unless it's specifically used to motivate harm. And even then it needs to be extremely substantial. "lol jk" is damn near an affirmative defense in even the most aggrieves hate speech.

Just wanted to make sure. Would have been damn satisfying to sue one of those trolls. Thanks anyway.

>>130016843
PING PONG CHING CHONG ! YOU NO INSULT CHINA!

a leftist said it so no

>>130016843
Just in very poor taste.

>>130016843
I doubt Wong would get in trouble with saying that.

Cunt either way.

My thoughts exactly

Asians are usually the less problematic people, in all countries. Guess there are rotten fruits in every basket

>>130016843
No in most instances for speech to be unprotected you need to have the ways and means to carry out a threat, which usually means the threat has to be made in person.

Please note I'm not a lawyer I've only taken a couple business law classes so I may not know wtf I'm talking about.

I'll keep an eye on her. She is most likely mentally unstable, just like most of those trolls

>>130016843
>Fox news citing Fake News
You can't have it both ways you little fuck. Either That infographic is fake, or the Fake News is real.