What does /pol/ consider the worst or most overused ad hominems in political discussions ?
For me it'd have to be racist/sexist etc from leftists or paid russian troll/ 50 Cent.
>>130004274
>Strawmen
They're fucking everywhere.
>>130004274
>racist/sexist
kek
they're all equally tiresome and ineffective
>>130004368
>>130004274
Besides racist, the line: You're on the wrong side of history!
As if history is a static thing that freezes itself when it reaches a moral climate that confirms a liberals bias.
Something like you can't tell me what to do you don't speak for everyone.
Emotional Leftists love that one
>>130004274
Appeals to hypocrisy are a form of the ad hominem fallacy, but most people don't seem to realize it.
>You say that X is good! But you did Y! Therefore, X is bad!
Actually, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. X might be great, Y might suck, and people have their own motivations for doing things. An abstract argument does not rest on personal behavior.
>>130004368
>thinking strawman fallacy is an ad hominem
faggot
>>130005187
I think he misread it as fallacies not ad hominem
>>130004893
I hate this shit so much. What can you even do in this situation, really? They're acting like goddamn children and there isn't a thing you can do about it.
>>130005530
I get the impression its actual femanons. I just make my point and stop replying to them.
>>130004274
"cuck"