What actual evidence is there?

Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 15

Anonymous
What actual evidence is there? 2017-06-14 08:27:17 Post No.
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 1367981212077.png (947KB, 673x513px) Image search: [Google]

What actual evidence is there? Anonymous 2017-06-14 08:27:17 Post No. [Report]

Can someone please explain to me what evidence there is that suggests any connection between Trump and Russia, or Russian involvement in the 2016 election.

There seems to be a legitimate witch hunt going on right now trying to find something, anything, proving the above. But the only two things I can find are

>Podesta fell for a phising attack, that the US intelligence community claims was carried out by Russia. However they have provided no hard evidence that it actually was Russia that did this, and as far as I can tell, have none.
>GCHQ, British Intelligence community, claims that it had "CONCRETE EVIDENCE" of Trump having connections with Russia and supposedly they passed this on to the US intelligence community. Again, this evidence has not been revealed to the public.

So we have at least 2 intelligence communities claiming they have hard evidence but providing none.

So where is the evidence eggman? If they have all this concrete evidence why haven't they revealed it or moved on it??

What we do know, is that Comey lost his job because he went outside of the scope of his job and made a political statement on a case he was not allowed to make public calls on. That to me seems like legitimate, open interference. And we do know that the US and British intelligence communities are claiming loudly to the media that they have HARD EVIDENCE of Russian involvement, or ties between Trump and Russia. However they are providing none!

To me, it seems more like it is these intelligence communities that tried to interfere with the elections!

Anonymous 2017-06-14 08:29:33 Post No.129847431
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-06-14 08:29:33 Post No.129847431 [Report]

File: 1301197783666.jpg (18KB, 346x262px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 346x262px

Furthermore, the current proceedings seem to be being carried out on the claim that the podesta email leak was carried out by the Russians. The US intelligence community said that was the case (under Obama), but have provided no evidence and appear to now be scrambling to prove it.

This article discusses it in more detail:
https://theintercept.com/2016/12/14/heres-the-public-evidence-russia-hacked-the-dnc-its-not-enough/

And this is also based on the assumption that Clinton lost the election on this leak alone, which is obviously not the case.

Anonymous 2017-06-14 08:32:01 Post No.129847604
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-06-14 08:32:01 Post No.129847604 [Report]

File: 1285935273802.jpg (49KB, 473x323px)

49KB, 473x323px

So now we're in this "He said, she said" type argument, with the media supporting the idea collusion occurred, but at the end of the day, there appears to be

ZERO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER.

Saying you have some isn't enough. If it's not enough to start making arrests, then they obviously don't have shit.

Are we witnessing something fucked up here? Is this the biggest witchhunt in America since the McCarthy era?

Is this investigation the establishment trying to destroy Trump, and nothing more?

Someone shed some light on it for me because it really does seem that way.