One of the favorite insults of the communists is to call all those on the right-wing or left-of-centre who advocate for capitalism "reactionaries," as if the ideology that they are espousing is merely a reaction to the criticisms lobbied at them and a desire to "return" to the "good ol' days."
...but explain to me how gommunists and anarchists aren't the ultimate reactionaries themselves, if the society that they desire is essentially what humanity was like in its hunter-gatherer phase before wypipo started agriculture? How is it not hypocritical for a communist to unironically call their opponents "reactionaries"? Are they not also "reacting" to capitalism?
This be mummy thread nao !
>>129785181
mummy is wholesome
>>129785181
delet
>>129784793
Reactionary never really came across as an insult to me
>>129784793
>>129785053
>>129785181
mummy a qt
>>129785181
Why is mummy so nice ?
i wanna fuck natalia
>How is it not hypocritical for a communist to unironically call their opponents "reactionaries"? Are they not also "reacting" to capitalism?
Read some actual theory, retard.
>>129785451
she a prosecutie
>>129785451
All political ideology, term and ideas are reactions.
>>129785304
>>129785354
No xD
>>129784793
I need to know what she tastes like.
>>129785755
You will pay dearly for insulting mummy anon.
>>129785687
>prosecutie
>>129786034
Now this is leafposting
>>129785640
Your ideology is a series of moral arguments based on empirical falsehoods. Marx was a moralist, pure and simple.
>>129785640
Well then explain it to me instead of being condescending, or come up with another word for what you're trying to say instead of "reactionary."
>>129786034
CANADA YES
>>129786107
>>129786545
She is fucking perfect man... wow..
>>129786545
here, have a rare
Post more, I lost my folder
MUMMIE
>>129784793
In truth, traditionalists were evolutionaries. They were building on the blocks of tradition, until revolutionaries tore it down. Revolutionaries got lucky because the industrial revolution cemented their power base.
But there was no permanent revolution, so the old revolutionaries became flaccid conservatives.
The new revolutionaries/"progressives" make no other distinctions other than themselves and those enemies they call reactionaries. It's useful for them because they can just keep lampooning their enemies as never being original, only reacting to their advances.
>>129786961
so nice of you
anti communists "react" to the revolution of communists, and that term stuck.
>>129784793
What is the root word? Reaction. To react is to move without thinking, reflexively. How can one react without thinking? FEELING, is the only answer. So, to be a reactionary has nothing inherently to do with politics. However, because liberals, lefties, and all SJWs, do not think to arrive at their conclusions and instead use their feelings to guide them, they are in fact, reactionaries.
It's the same old thing they have always done. Here is the word. Oh, that word means this? Well, we'll just flip it around and shout the lie loud enough so that it eventually becomes the "truth" perspectively to the masses.
These Saul Alinsky followers never really change their playbook if you look hard enough.
>>129787614
Natalia is top mom :)
>>129787680
...and yet communists "react" to capitalism.
It's a meaningless term, everything is a reaction to everything.
>>129787787
>A reactionary is a person who holds political views that favor a return to the status quo ante, the previous political state of society, which they believe possessed characteristics (discipline, respect for authority, etc.) that are negatively absent from the contemporary status quo of a society. As an adjective, the word reactionary describes points of view and policies meant to restore the status quo ante.[1]
Political reactionaries are at the right-wing of a political spectrum; yet, reactionary ideologies can be radical, in the sense of political extremism, in service to re-establishing the status quo ante. In political discourse, being a reactionary is generally regarded as negative; yet the descriptor "political reactionary" has been adopted by the likes of the Austrian monarchist Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn,[2] the Scottish journalist Gerald Warner of Craigenmaddie,[3] the Colombian political theologist Nicolás Gómez Dávila, and the American historian John Lukacs.
>>129786143
>Marx was a moralist
Even worst desu. He reduced history to economics and "muh oppression". And the funny part is that his "solution" to capitalism was a economic disaster since the his theory. Anybody with a minimal understanding of economics can say marxism will not work without looking it on practice.
>>129788174
We're aware of what they mean when they say "reactionary," it's just that the word itself isn't a good descriptor for the intended meaning, because it just be turned around right back at whoever is lobbying it as an accusation in the first place.
>>129788786
It works for communists until they start trying to argue that primitive civilization was communist. Then it falls apart.
>>129788174
You swallowed the kool-aid, friend. Tell me, how can a word that is as innocuous and pure as reactionary, automatically have a definition ascribed to it that makes it right-wing? It can't.
This is why it's so important for people to expand their vocabulary. The root meaning of the words and the suffixes or prefixes attached to them, define the word. Without knowing this, anyone will become like a bundle of sticks floating along a river without any control whatsoever in the direction that they go.
>>129788786
This.
>>129784793
>>129785451
she belongs to bbc
>>129789665
DELET
>>129789665
Yes!
>>129789665
DELET THIS
>>129789665
why are you doing this?
>>129789775
>>129789982
>>129790268
>>129790719
Russian women need black dick otherwise they are racist. they need to breed and create biracial children
>>129791123
kys nigger
>>129791123
smells like something... smells like... THE LEAF
>>129784793
God, you're dumb.