What do you guys think?

> referencing lone wolf mass shootings as terrorist attacks

>>129652844
Need more bumps. Keep the thread alive!

>>129652844
>reading reason
>linking reason

http://archive.is/LOk4P

>>129652844
Archived.

https://web.archive.org/web/20170613013706/http://reason.com/archives/2017/03/24/do-muslims-commit-most-us-terrorist-atta

>>129653262
>praising Breveik on an anime image board

>>129652844
Nick took Trump too seriously, Reason is going downhill.

>>129652844
Of course they fucking don't because they're less than 1% of the population. However, the fact that less than 1% of the population commits so many terrorist attacks should definitely be a cause for alarm.

>>129652844
Even going by their shit numbers, .008% of the American population committed 17% of terrorist acts.

>>129653697
>had to do with religion

>>129652844
Nope, only the most deaths
http://thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/loonwatch-94-percent.aspx

>>129652844
Do libertarians even exist anymore?
Thought they all went fascist, when they began to see nonwhite people being treated fairly

>>129652844

well for starters they have a very broad definition for terror attacks, so much so that they include a string of arsons on townhomes as terrorism, even though it's a huge stretch that it meets their own basic criteria.

>For example, a cursory Nexis search failed to turn up any news stories about a 2011 arson attack on townhouses under construction in Grand Rapids, Michigan. An internet search by me did find several local news reports that cited a threatening letter warning residents to leave the neighborhood: "This attack was not isolated, nor will it be the last. We are not peaceful. We are not willing to negotiate." The GTD reports so far that no one has been apprehended for the attack.

definitely not a clear act of terrorism though it could be. My guess is, since they are trying to make the strongest case possible, of the 77 'attacks' not committed by muslims this is probably in the top 10.

>For those five years, the researchers found, Muslims carried out only 11 out of the 89 attacks, yet those attacks received 44 percent of the media coverage.

Sounds bad right?

Well for non muslim attacks it's just as bad. They listed 3 note-able terrorist attacks (probably the only ones of the 89 that were actually acts of terrorism by non muslims).

> 3.8 percent, 7.4 percent, 8.5 percent

Three attacks, by whites accounting for almost 20% (19.7 to be exact) of the news articles for all the attacks. If three more attacks like this happen you would have basically parity to within the accuracy of this garbage study, despite having almost 1/2 as few the number of total attacks.

If you stop and think about this it becomes clear the amount of news coverage an attack gets is not even remotely related to race, but rather more likely number of people killed, injured, and directly effected.

File: IMG_9530.jpg (172KB, 1024x1207px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1024x1207px

>>129653342
The only bumps you get are your genital warts.

File: 1497305833827.jpg (513KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

513KB, 2048x1536px

>>129652844
Haven't you all realized /pol/ is satire. The majority of the beta males on /pol/ look like pic related

why can't these fucking assholes ever figure out what proportions are or why they are important

>>129654650
post was too long, part 2...

The reason arson in annarbor michigan is largely unreported is because it affects only people who's town homes were targeted. Meanwhile the boston marathon massacre killed 3, injured dozens, and was targeted at thousands there that day.

>"By covering terrorist attacks by Muslims dramatically more than other incidents, media frame this type of event as more prevalent. Based on these findings, it is no wonder that Americans are so fearful of radical Islamic terrorism. Reality shows, however, that these fears are misplaced."

If all 81 terrorist attacks are truly terrorist attacks this still isn't true. The media reports tragedy because they know people will watch it.

>Such fears are indeed misplaced. Your risk of being killed in a jihadist terror attack in the last 15 years amounted to roughly 1 in 2,640,000. Even if you stretch the period back to include 9/11, the risk would still just have been 1 in 110,000. Your lifetime risk of dying in a lightning strike is 1 in 161,000, and your chance of being killed in a motor vehicle crash is 1 in 114. Given that our government has already squandered more than $500 billion on homeland security, while encroaching on our liberties, it is vital that Americans keep the threat of terrorism in perspective. This new study is one small step in that direction.

what are my odds of being killed by a non muslim in a terror attack? probably way worse than anything mentioned here and that makes this entire paragraph misleading.

I'll be honest I expect crap reporting these days, even from reason who are hit or miss but if you're coming on /pol/ put some fucken effort into your god damn jewposting. You seriously didn't even bother or attempt to provide a summary or archive this thing. You are the cancer, kill yourself faggot.

>>129654650
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.


According to FBI statistics, and even global statistics. Muslim terrorism only makes up 6% of total terrorism. Most terrorism is wh*te, and most police are worried about some autist getting some autistic fantasies and shooting up the local welfare office.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opinion/the-other-terror-threat.html

File: terror_killings.png (40KB, 660x357px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 660x357px

>>129652844
>counting number of attacks and not kill count

>>129654988
Checked. Let's archive that.
https://archive.is/eaUpq

>>129652844
>ignore 9/11 to make the result look less terrible

They can fuck off. Besides jihad is a global problem

>>129652844
Nazis commit even less terrorist attacks than Muslims, yet somehow everyone hates Nazis.

File: islam-poster.png (200KB, 1634x1698px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1634x1698px

>>129652844

~30,000 terrorist attacks since 9/11 and those people must be making up a fake definition of terrorism if they are saying muslims dont commit the majority, because they are almost exclusively the only people who commit political violence to intimidate people with the goal of being ceded political demands. Thats terrorism.

You make political demands, and plan to gain them by terrorizing people with violence.

>>129655010
This US only?
I dont see NICE frances or paris wild west rock n roll shootout

File: 1496008828818.jpg (146KB, 1026x749px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1026x749px

>>129655010
If we're gonna do that, we can compare it to all the people right-wingers kill when they bomb the Middle East, for example when drumpf launched 100 missles into Syria.

>muh mooslems
>muh shawreuh
Tbh the only people even complaining about these non-existent things are the retards in pic related

>>129655357
>retards actually make up false statistics without any sources
According to the START database on terrorism, out of the 150,000 terrorist attacks since 1970, less than 9000 of them are Muslim related. Out of 1.7 billion Muslims, less than 100,000 are actually terrorists.

https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/Results.aspx?search=islam&sa.x=0&sa.y=0&sa=Search

File: rashid.jpg (84KB, 477x388px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 477x388px

>>129652844
Muslims perpetrated all but 2 of around 500 recorded terrorist attacks in 2016. They're a shit people, liberals are literally insane for elevating them as their new pet minority.

>>129655010
muslims are right wing extremists though....

>>129655444
Full house. I don't fucking understand why they had matches against Sharia. It's not like it's even being proposed anywhere in the country. Fucking idiots.

>>129655305
Yea but they did start World War Two and heaps us and our allies got killed by them. So that is probably why.

>>129655010
link me to the far right wing attacks.

muslim males are .0003% of the population. but we've had several muslim males, and eve females, commit terror attacks.

That is not a coincidence.

>>129655630
Do 1.7 billion Muslims live in America?

>>129652844
>ignoring 9/11
>ignoring the recent strings of attacks in late 2015 and 2016
>failing to take into account proportionality, and that whites are 63% of the population and muslims are only 2%

>>129655708
The rally was organized by a Mossad Jewish shill, and they even kicked out anyone who had "neo-nazi" ideas.

>>129655851
According to FBI statistics on terrorism in America since 1970, less than 10% is Muslim. Globally it's 6%

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_battles_and_other_violent_events_by_death_toll#Terrorist_attacks


I suppose all of those under the Islamic extremism category are pure coincidence

>>129655401
These studies are always bullshit because the definition of terrorism is always twisted so things like Nice, France and the nightclub shooting don't count as terrorism, but every threat made against a mosque is.

I doubt it, that's why Trump needs to be able to take his preventitive measures, before you end up like Europe.

What's the alternative, do nothing until people start dying by the thousands each year and then act like Trump was an idiot because it wasn't a real problem back then?

>>129656061
>wikipedia lists vs actual FBI statistics and databases and terrorism analysis

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/homeland-security/278664-three-things-terrorism-experts-want-you-to-know-about

>>129656061
>Communism
ahhhhh hahaha

>>129653904
That number accounts for Muslims already living here. They can come fr foreign countries and commit terror attacks

>>129653697
>Breveik was American

>>129654082
I think they're 0.8 of the total population, but it hardly matters. Why is this so hard for the average normie to comprehend? No, they do no commit the greatest amount of terrorist attacks (using their bullshit definition of terrorism), but they are statistically overrepresented by a wide margin. It's the same deal with blacks: small pop, disproportionate crime rate, caution/suspicion is justified.
Just because they are not responsible for every attack, even most attacks, doesn't mean they don't commit attacks at a far higher rate and thus present a greater danger.

>>129656317
I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm pointing out that this statistic is utter shit and only people who don't understand how statistics work fall for garbage like this.

File: 1483823892397.png (34KB, 972x1108px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 972x1108px

>>129654988

New York Times isn't a reputable news source.

File: images.jpg (3KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 225x225px

>>129652844
>of we stretch out the definition of terrorism really far, we can excuse Islam and pretend they're not the WWE champion of terrorism

>>129655010
>all right wing terrorism is any white male with a gun

File: 1480004046693.jpg (221KB, 852x805px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 852x805px

Really fires up my neurons.

>>129652844
yes and no.
The fact that they only counted CNN as a new outlet is deeply concerning. Their criteria is also vague. Terror attacks are generally for political reasons.
Also, by their own standards, Black Americans are the largest group of terrorist in the world

File: OCDE_Terror_Attacks_fatalities.png (71KB, 894x413px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 894x413px

in OCDE countries

Is this the article that counts animal rights activists, environmental activists, and anti-abortionists as "right wing" wing terrorists?

no doubt they are politically motivated but it isn't exactly what you think of when it comes to right wing terorrism.

Historically, niggers and leftists commit the most terror attacks.

File: piechart2.jpg (48KB, 491x491px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 491x491px

>>129656643
>literally making up statistics
t. Donal Drumpf

Jews would be the most overrepresented.
https://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005#terror_05sum

>>129656643
Also rather than Arab, I think you mean Muslims. Because Pakis, Afghans, Black Muslims are not Arabs. Not to mention most of the Muslim related terrorism isn't by arabs. This is why you shouldn't make up your own graphs

>>129658730
>2002-2005
CAIRN is working in double time now.

>>129652844
>what is per capita