Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5
Anonymous
wtf I love Breitbart now 2017-06-13 12:04:19 Post No. 129644954
[Report] Image search: [Google]
wtf I love Breitbart now 2017-06-13 12:04:19 Post No. 129644954
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Captura de pantalla 2017-06-12 a la(s) 19.01.39.png (86KB, 589x260px) Image search:
[Google]
86KB, 589x260px
>>
>greentexting
>not green
???
>>
>>129645034
yeah, like Twitter, get on the program
>>
>>129644954
>greentexting outside of 4chan
The instant sign of redditors
>>
lumpf btfo again by based millenial
>>
>>129645197
Silly burger, those are le memearrows
>>
File: le sir.jpg (60KB, 620x811px) Image search:
[Google]
60KB, 620x811px
>>129645327
le funny my fellow pede
>>
File: Capture.png (181KB, 926x605px) Image search:
[Google]
181KB, 926x605px
>>129645528
>>
>>129645197
>look guise we're one of you
pathetic
>>
>>129645712
One of us, one of us. Gooble gobble gooble gobble!
>>
File: IMG_2168.jpg (46KB, 345x309px) Image search:
[Google]
46KB, 345x309px
>>129645034
>>129645176
'>' was an inception from old email chains. '>' soon became a quote symbol and was adopted in chans. Using '>' outside chans serves the same purpose as it does on /pol/ and people originally didn't put '>' because it was "greentext" but because it meant quoting something that someone said. Turning the quote green was just for distinction purposes and a secondary thing.
Also, nu-fags get outtttttt.
>>
File: 1470177852399.png (51KB, 657x527px) Image search:
[Google]
51KB, 657x527px
>>129645197
what about greentexting on /pol/ news forever on twitter
>>
>>129645034
>>129645197
>>129645712
Who are you quoting?
Thread posts: 13
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5