US appeals court blocks 'travel ban'

Remove the judiciary

It's nothing, shits already at the SCOTUS, so the 9th circuit can cry all they want, it's out of their jurisdiction as of 3:00 PM

>>129604279
Same thing Obama did. Radicalize his voter base til they start forcing shit through.

File: 1497202726405.jpg (104KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 768x1024px

>>129604279
nothing

File: 353453463463.png (303KB, 436x456px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 436x456px

>be president
>have no actual power

>>129604279
Going to be hilarious when the 9th circuit gets broken up. This doesn't even matter anymore since the Supreme Court already is working on the case.

>>129604279
Keep doing this until it goes to the supreme court.

The first travel moritorium would've been done with months ago if they just let it happen.

Also the only feasible constitutional argument against the moritorium is that it is beyond the scope of authority that Congress has delegated to the president.

That it is discriminatory not under 14th Amendment reasons (noncitizen nonresident aliens who are neither on US soil nor detained by US personelle have absolutely no vested US Constitutional Rights) but because of a subsequent law effecting the scope of executive orders that unilaterally alter or ban emmigration on the basis of national origin.

We have two conflicting laws honestly, one that says the president can ban immigration from certain countries at whim (unless they already have a visa or something) and another that sets a vague burden of sufficient cause to allow.

Problem is people have been inferring discriminatory intent based on popular politics, but no credible constitutional scholar would argue that such subjective intent is what should decise these cases.

Subjective intent evidence is a factor but ultimately the only appropriate burden as a decisive element is the objective test.

This is the TL;DR of litterally all 4th and 14th Amendment jurisprudence regarding security and law enforcement acts pre-Trump Administration.

Meaning Trump could outright anounce "glass the sandniggers, remove kebab" but if his ban on Syrian immigration can be justified on reasonable grounds, such as the one under the Obama administration, courts are supposed to uphold it.

>>129604391
4th and 9th agree no fucking wway that supreme cort takes it

File: 1481665984623.jpg (5KB, 191x197px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 191x197px

>>129605960

File: 1478895382273.png (359KB, 788x812px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 788x812px

>9th Circuit in San Francisco

Communist kangaroo court. Did anyone expect anything else?

>>129604279
>preventing terrorists from entering the country is breaking the constitutional rights of terrorists not who dont have any constitutional rights
>meanwhile in Guantanamo
>meanwhile in Iraq
>meanwhile in Iran
>meanwhile in Afghanistan
>meanwhile in Syria
>meanwhile in Syria