Monarchy/Fascism is NOT the Solution

>>129500972
>Monarchy would lead to corruption and the globalists controlling the monarch in exactly the same way they control the presidents today
Why is this specific to monarchy? No system would function as intended if it being controlled by elites.

Democracy as you propose would still have all the same problems as democracy today, except you personally would enjoy it since everyone would vote in your interests.

>>129502318
> Why is this specific to monarchy? No system would function as intended if it being controlled by elites.

Because in a Democratic Republic, like the one I outlined, the representatives would be voted in by an elite sample of people who are less likely to be corrupt since they are land owning, high IQ, educated, ages white males. In a Monarchy this is not the case.

> Democracy as you propose would still have all the same problems as democracy today

How? The main problems in the current system are that people who are not loyal to the country are given political power via the vote.

> except you personally would enjoy it since everyone would vote in your interests.

It's not about me personally. It's about only granting voting power to people who are A) Invested in the country and B) Able to make smart decisions for the country.

>>129504649
Stop being retarded

>>129505018
If I post a joke thread or some brap pic I'm "creating a slide thread" to you faggots, if I post a serious thread I get no responses or gay responses like this.

File: 1497128021982.jpg (309KB, 768x897px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 768x897px

>>129500972
It really doesn't matter what form of government comes next, any revolution is going to involve the mass extermination and deportation of Jews.

>>129504649
There is no objective "smart decision" for each political problem. Whatever you consider to be the smart decision comes from your own opinion. If you seem to know all the smart decisions then why don't you just lead the country? what the point of voting at all?

There are many significant problems with democracy but I won't bother outlining them since you won't even understand them if you struggle to see why your system is flawed.

MINIARCHY
ANARCOFASCISM

>>129500972
Wow great arguments all around

>>129505888
> It really doesn't matter what form of government comes next, any revolution is going to involve the mass extermination and deportation of Jews.

Whites are nearly a minority in the USA at the moment. The most likely situation of a future revolution would be a socialist one imo. We are currently riding a small and miraculous wind towards the right within a hurricane that has been sucking us to the left. The left has a plan on all fronts => Social Media, Universities, The MSM, Hollywood, Politics, Demographics. The right has absolutely nothing and is going nowhere and identitarian movements and the alt right are like microscopic problems for the globalists. Yeah, this day you guys keep talking about is never happening. There will definitely be a day when whites "wake up" but it will be waaaaaay too late to do anything about it, probably because they were sitting around larping about monarchy and fascism and debating Christians vs Pagans vs Atheists.

>>129506379
> There is no objective "smart decision" for each political problem.

That's a straw man. I never said it was objective. Intersubjective values can be generalized and decisions towards changes that are more positive for society can be achieved in this regard.

> Whatever you consider to be the smart decision comes from your own opinion.

The decisions being made in the system I am proposing would be made by representatives selected by a democracy of an elite sampling of the country, so it would be their opinion technically, not mine. I think it's smarter to have the cream of the crop with political power and everyone else to have no political power.

> If you seem to know all the smart decisions then why don't you just lead the country? what the point of voting at all?

I didn't say I knew all the decisions about everything. I am not educated in the issues of each and every single district, city and state.

> There are many significant problems with democracy but I won't bother outlining them since you won't even understand them if you struggle to see why your system is flawed.

I don't believe that you have countered my argument in any way whatsoever leaf. If you want to try again I'm willing to hear you out once more.

File: bilderberg.jpg (2MB, 3434x2959px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3434x2959px

>>129500972
We need the same system we have, we just need less oligopolies.

>Being this bluepilled
Take the anarcho-monarchist pill goy

>>129507833
Your proposition was to "only grant voting power to people who are ... able to make smart decisions for the country". I countered by stating that there is no objective way to decide what a smart decision for a country is and thus the direction of the country will be subjective to the interests of whomever decides what this voting group is. This is shittier than what we have now.

Also, IQ has long ago been proven useless for measuring intelligence of individuals and only partially useless for correlating the intelligence for large groups.
Likewise home ownership doesn't really mean anything either, as many successful people living in huge cities rent while any retard can buy a piece of shit farmhouse in the middle of nowhere.
If someone wasn't white but was high IQ, educated, aged and land owning why shouldn't he be allowed to vote?