Post your state, /pol/ http://filteries.com/politics

State of constant sadness.

File: курчина.png (168KB, 1152x625px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1152x625px

>>129383691
these are the best threads. also, your state is a orwellian shithole
>>129384569
>export tariff
starvation within 2 months

>>129384989
i think you are confusing imports with exports

>>129385139
dude, your country has a export tariff of 100%. that means, when someone exports something, they have no economical gain. this leads to a collapsing economy and starvation.

>>129385318
it also lets kikes rape your country of resources and then in the end you have nothing.

File: MILITARY KING.png (532KB, 2680x1419px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 2680x1419px

Did I do good /pol/? Can I be part of your club now?

>>129384989
>constitutional monarchy
>orwellian

>>129385555
but when people stop exporting, you lose the money from those taxes cause noone exports anymore. this means you no more have money for the welfare state and you go bankrupt. nice quads, tho
>>129385700
>basically no free speech
>no democracy
>the state only finances paranoid defence spending while taxing the living shit out of people that actually keep the economy running
what are you doing?
these threads always make me realize noone on /pol/ actually has an idea how they would run things and their county would collapse faster than venezuela?

>>129383691

It always surprises me that so few anons choose technocracy.

File: screen.png (208KB, 1914x786px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1914x786px

>>129386037
>basically no free speech
>no democracy
You can have free spech without democracy, unless you want to say something degenerate.
>>129386262
Technocracy means a bunch of university autists are in charge of the country. No thanks, there's a place for those within the government, but not at the very top.

>>129386037
>free speach
>obscenity, defamation, blasphemy
Kek
>democracy
Quit falling for the meme. It works for small, local communities only. There is no place for democracy on national level.
>paranoid defence spending
>5%
Kek

>>129386843

But most choises are done based on science anyways, so a technocracy would just remove the middle man from the decision making process.

File: ucjQThn.png (207KB, 2560x696px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 2560x696px

enjoy not being able to pay for your military

>>129387520
>>129385671

>>129333333

>>129387455
>But most choises are done based on science anyways
Sure buddy. Maybe that's true on a lower level, but when it comes to large issues like economy and even social issues there is no science. Not to mention deciding the national objectives and the direction a country should take, what degree do you need for that?

File: Untitled.png (149KB, 1344x732px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1344x732px

>>129383691

>>129388159
ignore the direct, i actually wanted a multi-party democracy and am too lazy to redo

>>129386843
but his state literally bans government criticism. also good luck drawing the line.
>>129387019
no, no, leaving it to people to rule by heridatory lines will certainly work better.
my state is simply superior to all of yours.
>>129388159
sadly this is better than all the other ones i've seen

>>129388241
>but his state literally bans government criticism
Yah, I haven't noticed that.

>>129388041

The direction of the country is somewhat arbitary anyways, so it does not hurt to have scientists influence it. Degrees in philosophy and economics can help with the other issues.

File: Screenshot 2017-06-10 23.26.25.png (353KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 1920x1080px

>>129383691
Imperial Absolute Monarchy ftw

>>129388919
>ancap
>country

>>129388974
so jesus wants to kill people based on their race? wtf i love christkikes now

>>129388974
>13% of deficit despite all the taxation
why is noone here even trying?

>>129389083
>so jesus wants to kill people based on their race?

Yes. No ethnic minorities allowed.

>>129389342
according to what bible verse?

File: rename.png (350KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 1920x1080px

>>129389248
Fine, updated

File: most recent.jpg (192KB, 1920x826px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1920x826px

FUCK OFF COMMIE SCUM WITH YOUR INCOME TAX

>>129389580
still a shithole tbqh

>>129388404
>criticising government
You can discuss with government and suggest ideas. You cannot say 'fuck you, prime minister'. That's basically how I understand it, maybe because this kind of critique is so common in Bolan.
>>129388241
Heridatory line provides stability and continuity of countries policies. Also, the heir is taught to rule from the very beginning. Seems better than millions of random people, not necessarily well educated people who change the whole government every few years.

File: charles-ii-of-spain_imagelarge.jpg (14KB, 448x312px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 448x312px

>>129389769
>Heridatory line provides stability

>>129389666
>still a shithole tbqh

Off to the camps with you

>>129388159
Isn't this what you have right now in Germany, except for LGBT rights?
>>129388943
>The direction of the country is somewhat arbitary anyways
It is in a democracy, and wil allways be to some degree but can still be signifficantly influenced.
>Degrees in philosophy and economics can help with the other issues.
Yah right, I'd rather have some random guy on the street make those decissions that someone with a philosophy degree. And economics is not a science, since you have economists recomending opposite policies.
A leader should make himself remarked by his character rather than a diploma. And trying to make everything rational always fails, it's what the communists tries to do.

>>129389927
Incest =/= monarchy
Burgers will never understand this for some reason, this was a result of a lack of feudalism.

>>129389927
>heridatory line = incest
American educayshion

File: filteries.png (205KB, 1920x696px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 1920x696px

Anyone know if the genetics section is coming back or not?

>>129390055
>>129390175
Monarchy is a meme regardless. There are unstable monarchies, there are stable republics.

>>129389769
>You cannot say 'fuck you, prime minister
y tho
>Heridatory line provides stability and continuity of countries policies. Also, the heir is taught to rule from the very beginning. Seems better than millions of random people, not necessarily well educated people who change the whole government every few years.
get a idiot to inherit the throne and your country is fucked. also, today people are ruled by abusive elites even when they have some kind of democracy. good luck with preventing that with that being the law. furhter on, what guarantee do i have the monarch wont sperg out and cause shit?
>>129389972
>implying you'll be able to afford them with such economy and that i won't be able to get 90% of your citizens to rise against you due to starvation and cutting of all liberties
>>129390240
>genetics section
what did that consist of?

>>129389991
not quite, my system is technocratic, has a state-owned central bank, gun ownership only requires a background check, not a license, and i have outlawed street prostitution and brothels, both of which are present and legal in germany

File: I1.png (384KB, 1043x3848px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 1043x3848px

>>129390362
>what did that consist of?
like this
wanted to save everything but they took it down for some reason

File: 2017-06-10 19.44.24.png (220KB, 1067x1741px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 1067x1741px

>>129383691

>>129389769
It's an interesting issue. I think people should be allowed to criticize speciffic government policies or members of the goverment, but not the founding principles.
>Heridatory line provides stability and continuity of countries policies.
I'm not a communist, but the Soviet Union seemed to be able to achieve that too, as well as the Chinese. Having the ruler just appoint a successor based on merit and experience seems much better. This is what some roman emperors did, wich led to the period of the four good emperors, wich ended when Marcus Aurelius appointed his incompetent son as heir.

>>129389991

I don't understand how the point about direction is against technocracy. I am quite sure that the economic opinion of an economist is better than that of a random person from the street, and the national policy can be guided by several economists and mathematicians in order to reach a conceus. Also tests and competitions can be used to asses the character of a person.

>>129390827
interesting tbqh
>>129391027
this actually seems ok, tho i'd fund healthcare too.

>>129390362
>y tho
Because it is retarded
>idiot
Monarchs live long enough to see if the heir is an idiot. If so, he can pass a crown to another son. Also, implying idiots will not elect idiot.

File: Sand Incoming.png (234KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 1366x768px

>>129383691

truly, there is no superior state other than mine.

>>129391266
>Monarchs live long enough to see if the heir is an idiot.
that sounds like a great secuirty meassure. their father's common sence.
>Also, implying idiots will not elect idiot.
maybe, but at least the idiot won't have the power to do all of the stupid shit he wants to
>>129391433
>lib left
>20% deficit despite taxing the living shit out of people that actually help the economy
well, imagine my shauk

>>129384311
fpbp

File: Screenshot (120).png (270KB, 1918x696px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 1918x696px

>>129388919
Is that a country?

File: Untitled.png (306KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1920x1080px

>>129383691
Authority belongs at the border, so that the inside of the country can remain a safe liberal democracy. I'm undecided on gun laws.

File: absolutely decadent.jpg (98KB, 1197x1241px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1197x1241px

>>129391433
>Atheistic Ultraprogressive Cosmopolitanism

>>129391096
>am quite sure that the economic opinion of an economist is better than that of a random person from the street
I'm pretty sure the opposite is true. First of all, like I said economists don't have a common view, so you'l probably find some economist to agree with whatever you say. Same thing goes for philosophy. Aside for that, most modern economists will probably tell you to sell the country to international jews, while common people have more common sense. The dictator of South Korea, Park Chung He (a military man) got his country out of africa level poverty by ignoring mainstream economic taught, being future oriented, investing in research and protecting infant industry.
>the national policy can be guided by several economists and mathematicians in order to reach a conceus
National policy doesn't have to do just with economics, but also social issues and geopolitics. Economists and mathematicians have no authority here. Also, consensus doesn't mean an optimal choice, I would much rather have a single person make the final decission on an issue and actually take responsability for it.
>Also tests and competitions can be used to asses the character of a person.
Yah, if they'r good at it then they shouldn't be in charge of the government. The people who are the best at such test tend to be suboptimal at real life tasks.

>>129391085
>Soviet Union and China
I don't fancy a totalitarian state.
>founding principles
I guess I could remove the restriction then.

>>129392993
>I don't fancy a totalitarian state.
Neither do I. But i guess if you just want the monarch to be a figurehead hereditary can work. If the monarch actually makes decissions in the course the country takes, I don't see why he couldn't appoint someone instead of just leaving the possition to a relative.

>>129393000
>28% surplus
wew

File: no weed allowed.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>129383691
edgy enough?

>>129392957

Other areas of policy are obviously influenced mostly by other professionals, and groups can also be held accountable. I don't know enough about the case for south korea in order to debate it, but a single example doesn't prove a trend. Also, do you have evidence for that last statement?

>>129392560

everything is possible in the perfect future anon

>>129394431
did you just take a photo of your screen?

>>129395130
no, I just put a brown filter over the screenshot

>>129394558
>and groups can also be held accountable
Certainly not in the same way an individual can. And they will also feel less personal responsability since the weigth ofthe consequences wil bedistributed betwen them.
> Also, do you have evidence for that last statement?
No, but I think it's common sense that a test is not the best way to measure competence, specially for a task of this scale. Experience and character are obviouslly more important, and tests can be gamed or cheated (if the agency making them is corrupt for example, and someone leaks them). The contents of the tests are also debatable, as well as the answers to them. If there's a test for who decides economic policy, then the guys making the test are the ones who really decide the pollicy no? Since they decide the right answers.
I'm not actually saying that technocrats shouldn't have a place in government, but it's a secondary role.

File: spengler.jpg (172KB, 583x792px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 583x792px

>>129394814
>believing in progress
There is no perfect future anon. Enjoy the present.

File: Warshington.jpg (188KB, 1919x797px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1919x797px

Washington State, USA
>blue, liberally dominate
>51% welfare

File: State.png (205KB, 1349x662px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 1349x662px

>>129383691

File: no roads.jpg (332KB, 1913x875px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 1913x875px

>>129383691
What state ?

>>129394431
That fucking budget

File: pol.png (231KB, 1898x871px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 1898x871px

>>129383691
Pls rate.

File: filteries.compoltics.png (230KB, 1913x699px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1913x699px

You retards on here need to start reading some political theory books, your fantasy governments would collapse in a day.

File: Euroserf.png (51KB, 500x400px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 500x400px

>>129383691
>No Free speech

I thought poles were based? You want to be a medieval serf.

>>129397990
why online casinos are illegal and local aren't?

>>129399055
To keep kids away maybe, or to encourage people to socialize.

>>129399237
>>129399055
Seriously, who the fuck gambles online?

File: 0497333.png (218KB, 2559x799px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 2559x799px

>>129383691
best state incoming

>>129399323
i do, ama

>>129399055
>>129399237
Because the chances of winning on online casinos can be changed anytime, so they are easy to rig and scam people with. It's all code, say the majority of people on a gambling website have a 50% chance of winning a gamble, but the admins and moderators of the website have a 70% chance. (Not 50% of course but just an example.) And yes, this encourages people to socialize and keep kids away. Online gambling websites, especially based in other countries, can avoid paying the country taxes as well.

>>129400349
thats why you only gamble online with casino who are also rooted in real life so you wont be scammed

File: realistic state.jpg (352KB, 1919x913px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 1919x913px

Moral, realistic, and functional. Best state ITT incoming.

Also, it's pretty funny seeing states here who imprison people for criticizing the government or give the death penalty based on race have little to no military funding. How will you suppress the dissidents and revolutionaries ?

>>129401656
The game is flawed in the sense that there should ve a separate slider for "Law and Order" as opposed to military though.

>>129402682
*should be