It won't be between nations or between religions or even terrorism, here's how modern wars will trully start:
> In a failing underfounded and underfounded financial section of the judiciairy system
> A young overzealous prosecutor comes up a big corporate fraud and decide to go arrest a VIP shareholder, part of the inner circles of NWO, the type of man usually way above the law, rotschild-tier.
> The prosecutor acts too fast and because of an efforts, his corrupted superiors fail to stop him.
> During the arrest, the nervous bodyguards, unused to answer to anyone but their master, refuse the police and get their weapons out. Several policemen dies during the fight.
> Now the affair become public but the shareholder is "too big to fail" and refuse to surrender to the police. Medias are on a loop trying to defend the shareholder, dismiss the event as a mistake and smear the prosecutor, all charges are soon dropped but the public and alternate medias soon realise some people are too important to get arrested, even for murders.
> Quickly things escalate, the people rally the few uncorrupted people on the government and tries to prosecute the ones sold to the corporation, the army is torn between alliegences. In panic, corporations hire paramilitaries to protect themselves and take over the real army assets.
> Fights start all over the countries between those who follow money and contracts and those who want justice and freedom. Part of the army finally rebel and joins the protestors to stage a coup and remove the corrupted politicians and lobbyists.
> Losing the battle, corporations flee to various other countries to mobilize against the "illegal anarchist coup" and retake the country
> WW3
>>129320272
Nah
There will be no WW3. There will be no DOTR. There will be no 4th Reich. The South will never rise again. Jews will never be exterminated. America will never be made great again. Whites will never be on top again.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is a delusional shabbos goy.
>>129320611
>those who want justice and freedom
kek. People fight for their interest. Nothing else.
WW3 will be over south china sea.
>>129320272
nah, it'll be more like how ww1 started
>a sandnigger will blow up someone a little too important
>investigation points to finances coming from a country
>unilateral sanctions and expulsion of migrants
>diplomatic relations fail (over a month or so)
>armed invasion
>international backers join each camp
>ww3
>>129320804
>WW3 will be over south china sea
>not even on the news lately
>>129321012
China is not ready yet. Its against their interest to make too much noise about south china sea. Once they are confident they can take on couple of carriers, you will start hearing about.
>>129321178
china will need to annex someone then, cause there ain't no oil within the 9-dash line
>also, this is a sandnigger country; if there's oil, we will be there fighting it out
>>129320272
>few uncorrupted people on the government
I laughed, to be honest.
>>129321347
If there is a conflict and if china comes out as winner, there will naturally annexation of the parts china "won". or at least annexation of areas they are interested in. That area is also important for trade and military use. And potential future resources. They are obviously not building islands for pleasure.
> this is a sandnigger country
do u even qualify as sandnigger? how many suicide attackers do u even have? you are like muslim cucks
>>129320272
Your scenario is too positive because it distinguishes between a good and bad side. In reality, there will be a factional schism somewhere in the hierarchy where the stakes are high enough to warrant breaking cover and to use Mafia terminology "going to the mattresses". At that point, every serious player's doomsday contingency planning will trigger, and a thousand knives will plunge into a thousand backs (many double kills, many tripped deadman's switch, insurance policies and posthumous bounty placements dropping).
The final outcome will be anarchy/ proliferation of tiny bandit states, increasingly constrained by economic and cultural disintegration.
>>129320611
>There will be no WW3
That's just a statistical improbability.