He's right you know...

>>129319246
Both are, my Russian friend

>>129319246
Why is he so antisemitic?

>it's wrong to pay the person who creats jobs lots of money

>>129319355
They're not really doing great at the creating jobs part anymore though, theres less jobs and more people every day

>>129319246
>waa waa why doesn't mr. goldstein give me free money
I fucking hate poorfags.

stop being so antisemitic dude. 7 out of the top 8 are jewish.

>>129319246
There has been a wealthy upper class in every human society in recorded history, without exception. This includes communist societies. Focus on the achievable.

>>129319420
whatever
if their company crashes and burns while they take out giant salaries, that's on them

File: 1496094383944.jpg (220KB, 600x403px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 600x403px

>>129319246

File: bce.jpg (46KB, 608x402px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 608x402px

>>129319355
>creates jobs
Oh boy here we go again

File: 0d7ca5dd63c1f27ea6e8713edc2ca4983a5e30f460c8ea44b64828c7be9d4a82.png (337KB, 657x780px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 657x780px

Actually, it's both the ultra wealthy kikes & shabbos goyim as well as the parasitic dregs on food stamps that are the problem. The dregs on foodstamps are the footsoldiers of the wealthy elite, elites only have to promise them some meager token welfare statism, ie gibs, and the dregs gladly fight for the causes of the elite.
It's a case of the parasitic elites and the parasitic underclass putting the squeeze on the productive middle.

>>129319246
but I dont see someone having more money than me as a problem....

someone being rich doesnt mean someone else is poor because of it

>>129319420
>theres less jobs and more people every day

There's more people every day because we let welfare leeches fuck a hundred kids into existence, and give them the privilege of draining the public coffers more for each one.

>>129319246
You don't understand. Their grandfathers' grandfathers did something very useful once so now they all deserve to live like kangs until the end of time.

File: tmp_29849-1496261247475822965050.png (500KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

500KB, 800x533px

>>129319246
he should probably complain some more on (((Twitter))) I'm sure it will resolve it

>>129319355
Jobs are created by aggregate demand, not by rich people.

>>129319553
Put your leaf back on

if we take all the "money" from "rich" people we lose all our fucking infrastructure but hey, bunch of niggermonkeys will be able to eat for a month like kangz

File: tmp_29849-c151228611541.jpg (19KB, 300x295px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 300x295px

>>129319740
remember,no leafs

>have something people want and are willing to pay you for
>make a lot of money

Versus:
>be a retard with no skills
>have to live off of food stamps

Really makes you think.

>>129319489
A wealthy elite is fine and dandy, when they're a national aristocratic elite who have vested interests in properly ruling over the Realm and seeing to it the subjects are properly cared for as their well-being directly contributes to the well-being of the realm.
The problem these days is the wealthy elites are rootless cosmopolitans whose interest it is to deconstruct and pillage the Realm and enslave the common people.

File: 2016.11.23 - SNAP 2_1.jpg (121KB, 1200x828px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1200x828px

>>129319246
Make SNAP (food stamps) change from EBT debit card to direct food vouchers to solve the problem of pic related.

>>129319798
Yes, goy. If that guy doesn't get his daily caviar on his private yacht filled with child slaves society will LITERALLY collapse.

>>129319853
Now there's a discussion worth having. Can't say I have any answers, though.

>>129319740
He was ranked last night

File: WICCheck.png (85KB, 515x201px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 515x201px

>>129319880
Direct food vouchers like pic related, like the WIC program, are needed to reform SNAPs failures.

>>129319489
>>129319687
The U.S. is supposed to have an estate tax to prevent royalty from developing yet we somehow still have fuckers like the Rockafellers and Kennedys. Either our laws are selectively inforced or they're easy as fuck to get around, but the rich still want to get rid of that tax for some reason.

yeah, he is right
unironically
faggot

>>129319853
> rootless cosmopolitans
aka Jews

File: 1494253865256.jpg (19KB, 272x276px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 272x276px

What do they want? A society where it's _impossible_ to succeed? Sure, most of the money on these megabillionaires is inherited old money, but there are countless of rags-to-riches examples that prove that with extra wit, smarts, and hard work it's possible to achieve anything. Imagine a world where you can never ever get rich and successful even if you come up with the best invention ever.
Imagine working your entire life and knowing there is never going to be that big chance. Even today people work every day of their lives and never get it big, but at least there is that minor chance of success that keeps everyone going on and dreaming about better tomorrow.

File: Jack-in-the-Box-EBT.jpg (82KB, 620x330px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 620x330px

>>129319950
Without direct food vouchers for healthy items .. and allowing EBT cards to purchase any food item they want you end up with pic from >>129319880 and also pic attached here

>>129319246
4 billion x 0 = 0
much math, such wow

>>129319246
woah...thats so fucking true dude

>>129319246

Is he saying rich jews are the problem?

File: food_stamps_2000-2013.jpg (25KB, 508x399px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 508x399px

>>129320060
By implementing direct vouchers and getting rid of EBT for SNAP you can reduce the food stamp budget by at least $750million or more annually, simply from cutting out junk food/soda purchases

>>129319980
Get taxed your whole life, government takes half of what is left when you die.

>>129319853
I've read libertarian economists who say the problem is democracy and the lack of anyone who feels they "own" the government. Democracy is like a public beach used by people without concern for its long term upkeep, only in modern times its only the ultra rich get to party on the sand in this analogy.

>>129319670
this

File: cat_computer.jpg (38KB, 450x311px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 450x311px

>spread wealth equally
>can't buy anything because that would disbalance the wealth distribution

>>129319687
None of the top 8 wealths are inherited afaik

>>129319907
short of going back to monarchies when the royals used their people and country's well-being for bragging rights and improving their own status, we're pretty much boned

>>129320198
But like I said, we still have ultra rich fucks generations later. Like Warren Buffet say, what's hard about loving off "only" millions? Who needs billions?

>>129319648
So if I stole all your money and became rich while you become poor that's not my fault?

>>129319355
>Yes goyiimmm I create lots of jobs how dare you to critise me now give me tax cuts I need them hehehe

File: 1497055679489.jpg (61KB, 640x543px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 640x543px

>>129319246
>Appealing to emotions lol

There's no logical connection whatsoever with people having money and others being on welfare. And no one ever said all people on welfare are a problem - it's those that decided not to pursue a job and permanently live off other people's money.

Redistribution is a myth. Stop being a covetous faggot and earn your way to the top.

>>129320265
>"""""libertarian"""""

>>129319246
Pretty antisemitic desu baka senpai

Everyone of these 8 guys except Carlos Slim deserve their wealth.

>>129319246
Slick Nick sounds like an anti-Semite.

>>129319246
Rich people are rich because they are creative and they work hard.
Can't say the same about who live in the richest nations in the world and somehow can't get a job and make a living.

>>129320359
It might be a matter of the right carrots and sticks.

The general goal would be to incentivise competitive enterprise and wealth creation, but disincentivise exportation of wealth and enterprise.

Modern thinking is the two aren't really compatible, as the latter actively works against the former. Untying that knot would be a lovely thing.

>>129320050
Why leave out 'luck' from your list of what it takes to get ultra rich? You really think the Uber guy wasn't lucky that millenials just happened to download his app more than other ride share apps floating around the same time? Not to mention all the fucks who made it big in finance, aka legalized gambling with no benefit to society at all.

>>129320468
>Stop being a covetous faggot and earn your way to the top.
That won't work for the majority of society because it takes a certain kind of skill-set and a great deal of luck.

A sheep won't ever become butcher, no matter how well-behaved it waits in the line at the slaughterhouse.

File: 300x300.jpg (15KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x300px

>>129320555
but... whitey has dats... if whitey habs dats, then why whitey not gibs me dats?

(La'queensha looked confused and agitated. Maybe you should give her what she wants?)

>>129319980
Money makes money. That's the problem except you can hardly call it a problem. A rich kid will have a better education, better healthcare, better connections, etc. so his odds of becoming rich are a lot higher than some dumpster nigger.

File: 1488213851544.png (127KB, 601x508px)

127KB, 601x508px

>>129320765
Luck, chance, same thing. There really are billion different ways to get rich. Some people even get rich from doing stupid mobile app versions of things that already exist ie. flappy bird, which is a rip off of those age old helicopter games.

>tfw to lazy to get rich

>>129319489

>there has been leftist in Every society
>there gas never been full isolationism and full homogenety
>there has always been sub-cultures within big cultures
>there are always disagreements in politics even if everyone is white

Plenty of uachivable goal for the nationalists

>>129319497
>too big to fail
>american "free market"

>>129321057

>there has been leftist in Every society
Reduction in numbers and influence =/= eradication
>there gas never been full isolationism and full homogenety
Wrong, and who wants that anyway
>there has always been sub-cultures within big cultures
Your point being?
>there are always disagreements in politics even if everyone is white
Your point being?

>>129320725
most wealth is in property , without shelter people can't really live so they have no choice but to spend 30 years paying half their income in loan payments or rent. All we seem to be doing is forcing people to work nowadays, food energy and building materials are so cheap the government and law make it expensive

File: trumpjew4.png (173KB, 568x595px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 568x595px

>>129319355
>you're a good goy

>>129319246
>There can only be one problem that needs dealing with
Hitler would have removed both types of parasite.

>>129321057
Japan was doing well until they were bullied into opening their ports to the world. Theyre still doing better than most

>Bill Gates
>Warren Buffett
>Jeff Bezos
>Amancio Ortega
>(((Zucc)))
>Larry Ellison
>Carlos Slim
>Michael (((Bloomberg)))

>>129319246
the real problem is the group of anonymous millionaires that hold most of the 1%'s wealth

but we won't hear anything about them, because they're the demographic that generates antifa and brianna wu

>>129321268
Trading with the main land, then with the dutch

>>129319246
>wealth tied down in investments vs wealth squandered on lotto tickets, junk food and autism spinners

hmmm wonder what's best for society

>>129320430
my point is that i think that rich people arent rich because they stole the poor peoples money.
thats communism

>be billionaire
>provide millions of people with a product or service that's high in demand
>get rich, deservedly
>be welfarewhore
>steal other people's money legally because I didn't feel like paying attention in Algebra and contribution nothing to society except fatherless children who will grow up to become criminals and probably kill a few of the very people who fund my food stamp adventures

>>129319980
No the US has an estate tax to pay for widows and pensions of the civil war. Since their all dead we don't need it anymore.

only one or two of these people reside in the us. None of them fire taxes in the us.

>>129321143
There is No such thing as a nationalist utopia, just as there is No communist utopia

>>129321405
and that is without the mention of (((bankers))) like the rothschilds who owned half of the worlds wealth by the 1900s and currently own the federal reserve in America.

the jews control the money
the whites control the power
its time to take our money and do an actual holocaust

>>129321794
Agreed.

So we both agree that 'muh 1%' whinging like in OP pic is essentially pointless, yes?

>>129319912
so.. what's his ranking now? top 10?

File: Screen-Shot-2016-07-25-at-1.35.25-PM-590x330.png (320KB, 590x330px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 590x330px

>>129319246
Keep fighting while they build walls so you have nothing else but to fight each other.
That show is pretty red pilled it also mentions Mexico wall before Trump got elected.

File: no.jpg (69KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 960x960px

>>129319246
>8 people is richer than 4 billion
>libertarians unironically defend this while calling everyone else commies
really activated my almonds

>>129319246
Who are these 8 trillionaires ?
Queen of England
Rothschild
Rockefeller
Saudi king
and?

>>129322462
>>129321405

>>129322462
nah, it's actually "little" people like bill gates, mark zuckerberg, warren buffet, etc.
>https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/list/

rotschilds, rockefellers and saudi rolay family have their wealth equally redistributed among family members so they don't attract too much attention, but combined they are far richer that top 8 "richest" people according to forbes

>>129322689
Archive
https://archive.is/ZqPnS

>>129322331
4 billions of slavs, niggers and people with student debt for transfat otter fishing studies.

>>129319246

I agree, a people should aim to help the needing

And if those 8 old dudes are not aligned with national interest they better get REKTED by the nationalists

>>129322711
>he has been summonded

>>129319246
There's literally nothing wrong with people who are successful.
There is a lot wrong with life failures who depend on government handouts.
Commies get out.

>>129322488
Those are bilionaire!
Billionaires can't have what 4 billion people have, only trillionaires can, again with a T.
>>129322689
>muh jew mag will expose the biggest jew
sure

>>129322926
eh this is what this "study" says

>>129319880
every single food item is trash

no wonder niggers are so fucking stupid

Yeah we should redistribute the wea-
Oh wait the rich people just left the country along with their money.

>>129319246
He is 100% correct. Money hoarding Jews are the problem not the welfare slaves the Jews created.

>>129320852
If a sheep graduated high school with a 3.5 GPA and has been a hard worker with some nice references I might be willing to hear him out though.

>>129319880
That's because pieces of shit who shouldn't even be eligible use it to buy 3 cases of Monster instead of food because they have thousands in drug money to buy actual food with.

>>129319246
See
>>129322819

>>129322965
Billionaires CAN'T have what 4 billion people have.
Are you stupid or something?!

File: 1479108035755.png (424KB, 500x536px) Image search: [Google]

424KB, 500x536px

>>129320294
kek it's hard for gommunists to logic

>>129321187
/pol/ wouldn't.
>>129322819
>sociopathy as a dispositor to success is literally nothing wrong
>>129323054
>muh they took all the monopoly money and the sovereign issuer of wealth can't print more so we have to sit and starve ;_;
And this is why you neoliberals need to kill yourselves. Your money's no good here.

>>129321405

>Bill Gates
>Warren Buffett
>Jeff Bezos
>(((Zucc)))
>(((Larry Ellison)))
>(((Michael Bloomberg)))
>Koch Bros.
>(((Larry Page)))
>(((Sergey Brin)))

Hmm...

>>129322331
Wealth is only useful as a medium of exchange for goods and services.

Redistributing that wealth would not increase the number or quantity of goods and services available to the general population, it would just tank the economy in the name of feels.

they must have worked really hard

on the other hand, THE STATE would totally use that money wisely

>>129323255
I've actually read this """"""""""study"""""""""". They only count net wealth a person has, not his income or standarts of living. For example a nigger earning .5$ a day that owns his mudhut in Africa and has no debt is richer than a MIT graduate who earns 80k a year, but has 200k student debt and no property.

Since most people nowadays live in constant debt and don't invest it is not surprising that Zucc and few others have more money then half of the world.

>>129319553
Isn't that a character from the show 'Vikings'?

>>129322689
these lists make no sense, it's a guessing game and they purposefully "forget" to mention the dictators, warlords, criminals, hidden assets etc.
Most dictators are much richer than any of these. Even Kim Jung, with his starving population and completely cut off from the rest of the world, is richer.
These articles serve one purpose only, and it's to make sure you don't know about the really rich and powerful.
The same thing goes for this ridiculous "8 people as rich as 50% of the world" claims. It's ridiculous because they always "forget" to mention that, because of the way they determine how rich you are (which do not count your iphone and the likes, only your house, stocks, bank accounts,...), among these 50%, most have a net worth of 0 (or less if they're in debt).
Give a newborn a $100 worth of stocks and he too will be as rich as roughly 20% of the world.

It's just another scam to guilt you into helping other people.
>if we take into account everything you own, and "forget" to take into account this poor migrant's brand new iphone, $300 shoes, $100 shirt etc, you're 1000 times richer than he is! GIVE HIM MONEY GOY!

>>129323506
Wouldn't it reduce the amount of time and resources wasted on luxury goods and increase the demand (and therefore, in theory, the supply) of other goods which are not being produced because of a lack of demand?

I like how faggots here defend it
thinking that somehow oneday they themselves will be one of those top people
that it's actually possible for them to do so
so having such a complete and total imbalance is ok
everyone here is a retard
but you would think this wouldn't be difficult to figure out

nys fags

>>129319670
Plus add to this the fact that what started these businesses and jobs was people trying to move forward in life and become successful, but now we give everyone welfare and they have no reason to go out, start a business, and hire people, when they can stay in their section 8 house with 8 kids eating microwavable chicken nuggets.

>>129323504
>>129319246
>>129321405
>>129322689
>>129322926
>>129323745

TOP RICHEST:

>(((((THE ROTHSCHILDS))))))
>Bill Gates
>Warren Buffett
>Jeff Bezos
>(((Zucc)))
>(((Larry Ellison)))
>(((Michael Bloomberg)))
>2 Koch Bros.
>(((Larry Page)))
>(((Sergey Brin)))
>3 Walton Bros
>(((Sheldon Adelson)))
>(((Steve Ballmer)))
>2 Mars
>Phil Knight
>((((George Soros)))))
>(((Michael Dell))))

Hitler was right.

>>129323606
>half of the world
>world has 7 billion
>doesn't understand basic division
Stop drinking vodka, it fucks up your small brain with poor genetics.

>>129323914
t. цыгaн.

>>129323504
>implying the queen of England has less money.
You poltards sure are silly.

>>129323504

Buffett, Bezos, and Koch are kikes too.

Of course I'm still

>>129323987
>he defends rich kikes
>for free

Top bootlicking cuck.

>>129323727
Interesting, but that would only really apply I think in a conflict-free redistribution, which is so unrealistic as to be impossible.

You're more likely to have an enormous amount of time and resources spent on a meaningless class war, followed by the rise of a brand new upper class branding themselves as representatives of the workers. It's been done.

>>129324010
>are kikes too
They are greedy kikes that don't like to donate to the community of kikes.
>>129324079
>implying the royal blood is not jew tainted

>>129319355
>who creats jobs lots of money
this person would replace these "jobs" with machines anytime he can. dont twist reality

File: 1494583865711.jpg (82KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 850x400px

>>129320265
>Democracy is like a public beach used by people without concern for its long term upkeep
That's a really great analogy for it. Democratic government always seems to unroot the people and turn the polity and society into a mere pirated coffer to be pillaged instead of a repository of heritage and a birthright to the future that must be safeguarded.

I agree. We need to do something about Jewish wealth and how to destroy it.

>>129319246

the 8 dudes have a positive tax contribution. The food stamps users have a negative tax contribution. Why can't libtards understand this?

>muh bailouts

Yeah wall street got bailed out after '08, what they didn't tell you is that they paid the money back plus inflation plus tax within like 2 years.

>>129319851

When the fuck did the Europeans start shit talking leafs?

Butt out bucko the leafs are America's to pound

>>129323892

(((2 koch bros)))

ftfy

>>129324094
For basic needs, I don't believe you are correct. Plenty of food goes off before it can be sold, anecdotally as I see in my produce sections.
>enormous amount of time and resources spent on a meaningless class war
>rise of a brand new upper class branding themselves as representatives of the workers
>GOTO 10
Eventually all the niggers that have a will to power will get chucked into the meat grinder, including most of the old money and blood-of-Christ wannabes.
>>129324250
Except that's what happened with the US republic, which is not a democracy no matter how much liberals think hanging the word liberal on it makes things better.
In democracies, governments don't waste money on etiquette lessons and (selective) vice enforcement, as the success of several social-libertarian plebiscites has shown.

>>129324372
>8 dudes have a positive tax contribution
Proofs? Are you also counting their suckling on the public teat as "earned" income, such as Bezos' CIA and other federal cloud services contracts?

File: holy mountain.jpg (440KB, 1517x1000px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 1517x1000px

this is why communism will win in the end

hasta la victoria

>>129319420
Not their problem imbecile. Those 8 people at the top, the world only manages to function this efficiently because of them.

File: world according to pol.jpg (1MB, 3173x1988px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3173x1988px

>>129319355
>job creators

ahahhaHAHAHAHAHAH

>>129324250
But almost 90% of the times THEY DON'T KEEP SUCH PROMISES you Moronosaurus.
That's how democracy works, with the help of STUPID people just like you.
Democracy=the art of lulling morons= the manufacture of consent

>>129319312
A leaf

>>129319246
Do these people think they have all that money just laying around on a pile?

>a handful of people have 99.999999% of all the worlds wealth
>billions of people on the planet

BUT BUT BUT MUH MUH CAPTLISMSMS AN AND AND AND JOBSW!!!!!

clearly somethings wrong

>>129319553
It's the opposite you idiot

>>129324372
That's a good point.

>>129324701
they kept these promises here and we all know how that turned out.

File: 1nfrux.jpg (9KB, 400x217px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 400x217px

>>129324586
>chinese
>communist

File: sh.png (532KB, 405x682px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 405x682px

we just have to give what little we have left to the top kike, you know for more jobs and better capitalism

>>129324500
We're well beyond basic needs right now, meeting those is a step backwards not forwards.

True believers trying to carry the torch of ideals forward through the revolution and failing is also a tried and true historical pattern. Successful revolutionaries are a canny lot, and the inevitable power hungry ones know how to nip counter-revolutions in the bud because they did it themselves.

>>129319355
Anyone holding that much wealth is not creating anything anon. They are hording.

When you are at the point that you have more money than you can spend in 1000 lifetimes it's not about interest in job creation anymore. It's just trying to get a high score.

>>129324642
>efficiently
For whom, them? Fuck them.

>>129324982
interesting point.But would you say that for example,bill gates is trying to get a high score and doesnt deserve his billions?

>>129319246
>You already suffer from pneumonia but yes the nail in your foot is the problem *sips aftican semen* *drops mic* *smirks*

This is how dumb leftcucks are

>>129319246
Both are the problem.

Both are bad. Food stamps are deplorable, and a smack in the face to the working poor who have to earn their cash to buy food while other lazy assholes get it for free and feel entitled to it, getting cartloads of soda and candy and shit every month

Just because you're getting fucked by the wealthy elite doesn't mean these leeches aren't fucking you over too

>>129319420
There are more jobs every day. That's why people have jobs despite an increasing population. Retard.

>>129319246
> the person that takes money isn't the problem you idiots
> it's the wealthiest 50% that pay 98% of all income taxes that are the problem

File: SJC & Barack Obama_May 2008_3.jpg (571KB, 2994x2402px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 2994x2402px

>>129319246

The people who he is talking about are on the bottom of the wealth distribution pyramid which is made up of those earning <10,000 USD. Since Americans make up 6 of those 8 he was talking about lets do some math. American minimum wage is 7.25/hr, which means that if you work fulltime in america (40 hours a week) you would gross $15,080. This means in a year of working in america you surpass 68.7% of the wealth that people worked their entire life for. He is really just a piece of shit who uses the least fortunate in the world to push his agenda of getting free gibs for himself. But hey, if you want to cuck yourself economically by subjecting your country to another 50 years of communism and falling even further behind in economic development because some American Starbucks barista says its a good idea be my guest.

>>129324971
I can't speak for Australia, but in the States a great portion of "we" are struggling mightily for mere basics and not always managing to get them.
>true believers
>as you sit here and try to sell neoliberal capitalism to me
Not a true believer. I merely believe that the ruling class needs to be purged much more often. Sometimes things do run away from them.
>>129325335
We never see that money, moron. At least you're correctly decoupling taxation from spending.

>>129325402
Stop gargling oligarch cum and go back to /r/neoliberal

File: 958b3503ecaa751d8871a179e623dc7da9432c1b94fa83c4ea9937e490725d5a.png (430KB, 480x516px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 480x516px

>>129324865
those are koreans you fucking retard

>>129319246
Gas both, take their money and invest in Bitcoin.

/thread

>>129325402
>basic empathy is communism
>sanders is a commie!
>Corbyn is a pinko bastard!

were you cradled next to a wall as a child, by any chance?

File: 1474215933018.jpg (341KB, 1174x771px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 1174x771px

>>129325444

For some reason I have a feeling that you have a degree that only taught you how to gargle cum.

Why is this board full of unironic communists

Wahhhhh there's a few billion niggers and shitskins who are poor wahhhhh we need to take rich people's money away from them

>>129319246
He is right the person in front of me using food stamps is the problem

File: billgates.jpg (15KB, 489x178px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 489x178px

>>129325162
I am not saying they don't deserve it. Just because it is a game to them, doesn't mean they aren't winning.

I am saying I wish the rules allowed for more upward mobilty.

I would say Bill gates was interested in only winning until his marriage, then he set up his foundation and started to actually spend it on things he thought would improve the world.

His wealth took a huge dip but he is effecting more change and will leave more of a legacy as a result, which I think is important to him.
Pic related is his net worth over time.

>>129325586

No I live in the part of america where you could actually live off minimum wage if you aren't a retard.

>>129325586
Go guzzle Muzzie Cock you faggot Marxist

File: millennials are just fucking lazy.png (174KB, 4672x1800px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 4672x1800px

>>129319246
KEYNESIANISM DINDU NUFFIN

I TRUSS MUH GUBMENT 2 PRINT MONEE

>one generated his wealth
>one is stealing from people through the government due to inability to offer value to society
Really stimulates my spaghetti

>theft is okay if its to fund tyrone

>>129325950
Really makes you think

It's almost as if the welfare rat would be dead of starvation or crawling in a ditch without rich tax payers

>>129319246
He literally is because he wouldn't be here if those 8 dudes didn't reshape government, culture and consciousness to enable this situation

>>129320765
Dem' rich white should give mo' money fo' dem programs !

>>129325412
I'm speaking hypothetically about what happens after a revolution, that wasn't even directed at you, please don't take it personally you mong.

Your idea of purges might seem fine on paper, but when has that sort of thing ever made a populace better off in practice? Our modern society does a better job caring for its lower classes than any other concrete examples you could point to throughout history I think. Not saying there isn't room for improvement because there sure as shit is, but until there enough real world examples sitting in the 'for' column to match the overfull 'against' column I'll continue to treat Marxist redistribution as a fairy tale.

File: imrs.php_.jpg (217KB, 1484x1122px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1484x1122px

>>129319246
the person in front of me is a nigger claiming the employee is racist while chimping out over some mcnuggets

>>129326009
>theft is okay if its done by white businessmen

>>129319322
Underrated

>>129326044
>Your idea of purges might seem fine on paper, but when has that sort of thing ever made a populace better off in practice?
In the short term ? Every revolution ever.
In the long term ? The revolutions that lead to sustainable governments.

>>129325586
>forcing other people, who worked their ass their entire life, to pay for your shit, because you were too dumb and lazy, is basic empathy
I earn more than 90% of Polish people before even having finished my MSc, despite coming from a poor family (not poor anymore, but they used to be when I was growing up). All it took was a lot of work and not being a retard. There was little to no luck involved, and anyone with my education can earn about as much as I do if they're not retarded, so the conclusion is that 90% of the population is either retarded or lazy. Why should I care about them?

>>129319246
WRONG
what's our problem is wealth expropriation through oppressive taxes and mandatory central banking kikery
as soon as those get fucked, so shall the subhumans either by not being fit enough to survive or by supersonic lead cast their way in defense by those who will

>>129319246

Those eight people didn't get their money money from out of my pocket. Unless they happen to be in an industry that receives subsidies, but in that case I at least get something for my money. I get nothing from the welfare queen, so yeah, I'm gonna get pissed if they're using money that was taken from me for luxury instead of subsistence.

>>129326283
>In the short term ? Every revolution ever.
Laughable.
>In the long term ? The revolutions that lead to sustainable governments.
Like what? The French one, that put their nation in a horrible bloody war and starved thousands before the government eventually failed? The Russian one, that put their nation in a horrible bloody war and starved thousands before the government eventually failed?

Or perhaps you mean something like the American 'revolution' that kept the local elite in power (and gave them more).

>>129319246
And odds are those 4 billion people live in poor as fuck countries. As in so poor that the clown with the food stamps look rich by comparison.

When ya take that into account 8 assholes with more money than 4 billion people that live in poor as fuck countries doesn't sound that hard to believe.

I think most would agree that ther is nothing fair about the state of the world. Being born is like joining a game of monopoly that has already be going on for 3000 years. Most of the good shit is already taken. Now you are pretty lucky if you can work 80 years to save enough for baltic with one house and hope you dont land on park place with 28 hotels.

>>129325448
Cubans lives in a Communist Paradise, yet flee in droves to live in the American capitalist hell.

Not unlike East-Germans, in fact...

>>129326614
So your augments are, the French would be better under a monarchy, the Russians would be better under the czar and the Ameicans under the British ?

C'mon that's all bullshit and you know it.

>>129326770
fairness is a concept not found in nature
it is used as a go-to goyspeak for further wealth expropriation
everyone's destiny lies in their own hands

>>129326680
Also they're both problems to society.

Rich fucks who only get richer

Poor fucks who don't contribute shit and take out of the system

>>129319246
this man doesn't understand pareto distribution.

Or perhaps he does. Because by those numbers he is right in a sense. But high wealth disparities are completely normal.

the top 10 workers in a company of 100 produce 50% of the profits. that's just reality, so they should earn 50% of the money because they literally earnt it.

SHILL>>129319246
>The economy is zero sum. If somebody has something it means you do not.

>>129327041
this anon knows
be the 10% or at least mingle with their kind

> try to talk about the economic, social and political ramifications of such wealth being hoarded by so few
> shouted down as a commie straight away

We're headed for feudalism you dumb fucks, and people still use the "muh job creators" line

>>129319322
OY VEY! His post was another shoah!

>>129319355
>the wealthy elite are wealthy through hard, honest work that benefits society
You are so naive.

>tfw you're only a failure because other people were too successful and hoarded all the success for themselves :/

>>129319246
I think the difference is that one earned it, the other got a hand out from the people complaining.

Bill gates or JK Rowling being billionaires has no impact on most people, millions on food stamps however means less money for infrastructure or the defence of the world.

Sweden for instance has almost no army at all, they rely on the US military machine.

>>129319246
Damn right. Scummy working class cunts should pay for themselves instead of taking other people's money. It's not just that though, it's the standard they set for society

>>129326912
Unironically yes for the Americans and Russians, and I'm only hesitating for the French one because despite its failure it spread democratic ideals, which could have been done without a revolution.

Both of our countries are extremely successful under a constitutional monarchy. We transitioned into our relatively egalitarian modern states without needing violent overthrows and bloody purges.

Why don't people deserve to keep the money they earned? Middle class people are rich to me and you don't see me mugging every soccer mom I see cuz I somehow deserve it more for being lower class

>>129319246
And liberals suck at least the cock of three of them.


Really makes me think...

File: main-qimg-da37007cf4b7af6b973656ad91851aa2.png (30KB, 550x450px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 550x450px

>>129319355
>"job creators"
>they literally destroy jobs
Funny.

>>129327423
The US is the most successful nation in the world and it had everything to do with the revolution. Taking the power from the British and giving it to "the people" is directly responsible for that success.

How can you argue that the American revolution was a failure? They were giving their wealth to an entity who wasn't representing their personal interests.

On it's face this is just moronic.

>>129327874
I put 'revolution' in quotes in my earlier post for a reason. It's more a rebellion of an occupied nation than a revolution in the classic sense. The wealthy and influential American landowners pre-'revolution' continued to be so post-'revolution'. American society didn't really go through a class upheaval comparable to Russia or France's.

>>129319355
uh akutually its the workers who create jobs

>>129327235

I guess I shouldn't have said communism, but I was mostly doing that in reference to OP's flag. My point is that as an American I can't complain because I know a literal retard who makes 20k a year which is more than the wealth those 4 billion will ever accumulate. Most of the people who complain here are either in debt because they got a meme degree(I would be fine with universal education if it was based around gathering real world skills instead of a place for people to play pretend adults for 4 years) or people who live in overcrowded cities when they could move to places that may not be as fun but you can live comfortably.

>>129328215
Furthermore, even though the American situation was not a "purge the wealthy" situation that is specifically being discussed and so is a sideshow to the point at hand, what specifically would prevent the economic conditions that led to America's world dominance if they remained under British rule?

The food belt would remain, the industrial heartland would almost certainly still have grown, they'd still have their population.

>>129319246
>mfw people unironically think Bill Gates, Carlos Dlim and Warren Buffet are the wealthiest people in the world

>>129319246
>I want free stuff gimme gimme

so this is the power of socialism....impressive....

>>129319246

I have no issue with the executive, the hedge fund manager, the celebrity, the tech wizard, or the athlete making more in a week than I do in a year and more in a year than I will in my life. People can and should be able to use their talents, ingenuity, or perspicacity to get ahead and be rewarded.

Simultaneously, I have no problem with the cripple, the mentally disabled, the laid-off, or the genuinely unfortunate utilizing government programs to make ends meet or feed themselves. A prosperous society can and should have safety nets for the truly disadvantaged.

My problem is with the ultra-rich, the .0001%, the Bildeberg member, the career politician, the globalist banker, the pharmaceutical giant. The true elite who use their ridiculous affluence to game the system, who set domestic and international policy in ways that syphon capital into their limitless coffers at the expense of the middle class; the doctor, the engineer, the regional distributor who have to charge more and make less due to restrictive regulations that make them less competitive or who have had their industries co-opted and monopolized.

My problem is with the single mother raising six children by five men, the urban thug collecting welfare while he gets rich dealing heroine or crack, the coddled illegal immigrant or pseudo-refugee who comes for benefits and refuses to assimilate. All generational welfare broods that hamstring the working class; the family farmer, the tradesman, the miner, the clerk, the local mom-and-pop distributor, and all those who have to sacrifice their time, happiness, and health to barely squeak by on their own honest work ethic, while watching entitled, self-righteous scum destroy their communities and erode the cohesion of their nation.

We have parasites in this world. Some are at the top and some are at the bottom. Both need to be dealt with. Anyone who claims it is otherwise, that it's one or the other, is either blind or controlled opposition.

>>129327874
Well your original question was "
>Your idea of purges might seem fine on paper, but when has that sort of thing ever made a populace better off in practice?
And you concede, it happened during the American revolution with the loyalists and made the populace better off.
I can accept that.

>>129319246
DUDE

SUBSIDISE MY EXISTENCE

LMAO

>>129324982
So when Warren Buffet buys thousands of newspapers, injecting massive amounts of investment into an industry considered dead, he wasn't creating anything? I've met people in real life who got jobs because of that.
It is impossible for a person to get that rich without understanding they need to invest money. And if Warren Buffet wants to stay rich, he has to invest his money as well as he can. That means putting it into the industries with the most potential for growth. The more he's right, the more growth there is. The more growth there is, the more people are needed, and get hired.
Even if a rich person was as exactly as you described, a cartoon villain, he would still invest his money as best he could, shooting billions of dollars into the American economy whenever it took a dip. This is a very good thing.

>>129329015
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalist_(American_Revolution)

Don't see any purges here, and the American one is a softball, because it's not really a revolution despite the name. War of independence is more accurate.

>>129319246 (OP)
you do realize the welfare system is bankrupting you...

File: 1491373459496.jpg (38KB, 460x637px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 460x637px

>>129328630
/thread.

>>129328630
well said

>>129329437
That's true I can't argue with that, even indirectly investment creates jobs. You used a specific example, and of course you cant even spend money without creating jobs.

However, if you look at the waltons, as another example, they are indeed investing, in chinese products, and creating many jobs in china, but also have achieved a level which is impossible to compete with as a small business owner, and so every new job in china, for factory workers, in turn means less business opportunities for north Americans who would like to open a shop, for example, so investment on it's own, is not wholly beneficial, and is also a larger distributor of wealth, from rich to poor than welfare is.

>>129328630
BUT THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!!

File: think.png (698KB, 594x612px) Image search: [Google]

698KB, 594x612px

>>129319246
It's shit but it's still better than the alternative.

>>129319632
This guy is completley right. Its not a matter of rich vs poor, its a matter of good vs evil. Stop leeching and lead by example.

>>129321555
Rich people and the large corporations they own could make their profit margins smaller thus freeing up more money for the poor.

>>129319246
>>129319687
>>129319901
>>129321405
>>129322331
>>129324586
>>129325586
>>129327356


YES LET'S STEAL FROM THE RICH.
It's a reason why the rich people are rich, they are good at what they do, and sell lots of services/products to other people who want to buy them. Forced redistribution (SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM) from competent to incompetent is moronic, bad for the economy as well as very immoral. Plus it's been tried several times through history and tends to lead to mass death in camps and a massive totalitarian government with a few very rich oligarchs and a powerful political elite at the top.

Plus central planning is very inefficient as it does not have any feedback from a market to adjust the response and accurately predict/ascertain what resources/products are needed where.

PROTIP: If you don't know anything about economy, don't preach socialism.

>>129319322

Jews are very disproportionate gibs-me dats at both ends of the spectrum..

>>129319246
Oh God, why did it have to end this way. Why are there so many tin roof zombies!!!

File: Screenshot from 2017-06-10 08-32-46.png (173KB, 541x402px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 541x402px

>>129329516
It's just week. If you are going to try to redifine purge you are getting pathetic. Fine here is a historian's view (pic related)
From The American Revolution: Understanding the Limiting Factors of Washington's Strategy
By Maj Douglas d Jones.

>inb4, what does he know ? pfft a Major, ((((historian)))

https://books.google.ca/books?id=9xRvCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT93&lpg=PT93&dq=loyalists+purged+during+american+revolution&source=bl&ots=xWgY9pdFFL&sig=eg42q6i5EcTCEnpvdtFtiAfNvVU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjgkYCopLPUAhXKyoMKHVCXCGAQ6AEISzAF#v=onepage&q=loyalists%20purged%20during%20american%20revolution&f=false

File: b044111d8e7c727922fd9c9a94b3ebd5da0b1ee89a05aaab2b7593acaaab275b.jpg (172KB, 484x1524px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 484x1524px

>>129330572
>muh job creators
>muh free market that totally doesn't legally let jobs be exported to be done for penny a day rent slave labor so entire american towns are out of work leading to the situation we have today
>jews are the richest people on the planet because they are "job creators"

fucking kill yourself retard. go get blown out by american fire bombs you vietnamese gook shit

>>129319246

Why oh why whenever we see parables like this is the onus always put on the rest of us/middle class?

"BIG MEAN SUPER RICH PEOPLE and SHIT POOR LEACHING PEOPLE means it's MIDDLE CLASS'S duty to shut up, pay more taxes, accept less freedom!"

>>129319246
There should be a separate checkout at grocery stores for EBT folks who need to pay for their groceries and smokes with two different transactions.

>>129330784
You consider some military officers being fired from their positions but keeping their property and personal wealth comparable to the kinds of class-wide purges that the French and Russian revolutions saw?

My original statement was in response to;
>I merely believe that the ruling class needs to be purged much more often. Sometimes things do run away from them.

We can play with semantics as much as you like, but the goalposts don't look much like where they started to me.

>>129320765
The reason Uber won the ride-sharing-app skirmish wasn't "luck", it was "marketing"

File: 1479885990618.jpg (20KB, 225x222px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 225x222px

>>129319246
how do we use people like this to turn them against soros?

Just be thankful somebody cares enough to keep some semblance of order in this shitshow world

>>129319246
>He's right you know...

He is an anti-Semite for calling out (((the banker family)))!

>>129319246
HOLY SHIT THERE ARE EIGHT PEOPLE WHO ARE DOING EVEN BETTER THAN YOU ARE?!?!?!?!? THAT'S SO FUCKIGN UNFAIR

>>129330572
this

>>129319553
you mixed these up moron

>>129319246
These selfish assholes need to give me free stuff!

>>129319729
Why is /pol/ so fucking keynesian these days? This is the reason the right is falling, is because right wingers have no agreements or principles.

Oh wait. I forgot. /pol/ isn't right wing anymore.

File: regret.jpg (257KB, 836x726px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 836x726px

>>129331092
soros funded the anti-communist movements that destroyed the USSR by supporting perastroika and banking there

>>129319246
Not anywhere close. There are a lot of red devils browsing /pol/ today.

>>129330784
Also don't call me pathetic you bay frog maple swilling north mexican snowbacked seal fucking leaf-flag-having mountie fellating hockey watching poutine fiend.

>>129331254
Because a lot of them are basically SJWs who just want whites to rule.

Moronic people who don't understand that the people with all this wealth don't have it in liquid assets. For some reason they seem to think all their money is in a giant pool a-la Scrooge McDuck.

The reality is they own businesses, or major parts of businesses. Stealing from them and having the government run shit has proven time and time again to result in millions of people dying. If only they ran the system, nothing bad would happen and the world would be perfect and fair. These people have a child's understanding of fairness, where equal outcomes mean it was a fair system.

>>129331044
Ok now its a"class wide purge ? Hmm you never said that, who's moving goal posts now ?

Expelling unwanted people from your country is also a purge which totalled over 100,000, on top of the executions and deaths by battle, but since the only argument you have left is semantic, but the examples that YOU provided of France are also sufficient to prove my point.

Moving from the regime of Louis XVI to a system that helped establish the very fundamentals of democarcy in Europe under the cry of liberte, egalite, fraternite has helped to shape the freedoms we enjoy to this day, but let me guess, not a purge ?

>>129331254
Why is /pol/ one person nowadays? Oh wait, it's because you plebbitors have infested every nook and cranny of it. If you want strict consensus about everything, maybe you should return there.

>>129331110
Clearly don't get his point do you?

Go back to sucking Ahmed's dick.

>>129332083
I get his point perfectly. He's a retard, as are you. He is resentful towards those doing better than him. He couldn't give a shit about the homeless. They are just a means to an end. They are his way of rationalizing his hatred.

>>129323097
Half of the population has an IQ below average. A modern society does not need them, and a future society needs them even less.
The political left as well as the political right denies biological determinism. Hard work gets you nowhere if you lack intelligence and the people who do believe they got where they are through hard work rather than innate talent are in most cases mediocre and will be replaced by machines in the future.

if only it was 50% women, then it would be fine
>t. neo-liberal mouth-breather

>>129332283
Half of the people are always going to be below average. By your logic we should kill everyone but the smartest person, and then he should cut off the inferior side of his brains. Machines might very well replace all of us in the future, but that's no reason to base our policies on it. We might just as well go on the assumption that we will always need people to do menial jobs, since to do otherwise would be to willingly give away our humanity. If machines are going to replace us, then it will forcefully rid us of our humanity, so there's no need to do it ourselves.

>>129319246
No he's not.

>>129332055
Now we're retreading old ground.

>Ok now its a"class wide purge ? Hmm you never said that, who's moving goal posts now ?
I didn't say that, I responded to someone who said that, and even quoted it for you in my post. How did you miss it? Here it is again:
"I merely believe that the ruling class needs to be purged much more often. Sometimes things do run away from them." Again, not my words, but what I was responding to.

>Expelling unwanted people from your country is also a purge which totalled over 100,000
Loyalists who fought for Britain were permitted to retain their property and wealth if they remained, which is a very far cry from forced expulsion.

>Moving from the regime of Louis XVI to a system that helped establish the very fundamentals of democarcy in Europe under the cry of liberte, egalite, fraternite has helped to shape the freedoms we enjoy to this day, but let me guess, not a purge ?
This was absolutely a purge, and the fact that this is even in debate has me very upset over how wildly you've missed my point, and how pointless this whole bloody internet fight is if you can't keep what's already been covered in your head.

As stated here >>129326614 that purge put their nation in a horrible bloody war and starved thousands before the government eventually failed. So no short term benefit.
The spreading of democratic ideals was accelerated by the Revolution for sure, but not contingent upon it. For an example, see the Protestant Reformation. That's a similar spreading of ideas across Europe. The French overthrew their monarchy, but monarchies can transition towards those ideals without purges and revolution, as evidenced by the English, which has again already been said.

>>129319246
>flag
>1 post by this ID

>>129332658
>By your logic we should kill everyone but the smartest person
No, not at all.

>We might just as well go on the assumption that we will always need people to do menial jobs, since to do otherwise would be to willingly give away our humanity.
In the Greek republics most of the work was done by slaves, foreigners and women. The free Greek man did not work and he took pride in it since he had more time to cultivate his virtues.
If machines do all the work, why would we try to be luddites and try to prevent it to cling to our current societal model?

>>129333546
>If machines do all the work, why would we try to be luddites and try to prevent it to cling to our current societal model?
If we managed to do that with smart people, we'd manage to do it with stupid people too, I'm sure. There's no need to genocide anyone.

>>129319246

You know what doesn't happen?
I don't run in to those 8 dudes in front of me in line every day.
Those 8 dudes aren't the reason all the housing is taken up.
Those 8 dudes aren't the reason the schools are over crowded and the teachers are stressed.
Those 8 dudes aren't the reason my insurance rates go up.
Those 8 dudes aren't the reason for about 40% of criminals.
This list goes on forever.
Those 8 dudes don't feel the effect of higher local taxes because of those reasons.

>>129319246
>the person in front of my in line with food stamps took money out of the pockets of other citizens and myself
>the rich guys didn't

was the twatter being sarcastic? because his statement was fairly accurate.

File: 1488638486448.jpg (98KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1024x683px

>>129319246
>To complain about a problem is to suggest there is only one problem.
This guy is a fucking idiot.

>>129330817
>>129320147
>>129322125
>>129323063


Free market is no longer free when it is possible to be given political benefits from contributions.
I'm arguing for a free market, not a regulated market/corrupt market.
Only reason to export jobs is tax benefits /political benefits in other countries.
Thus not a free market.


>jews
Jews/central bankers are as far as I know the ones creating the money, which they lend to governments. Therefore they are not really part of the market by creating jobs/services/products as you say, and I would agree, they should not be able to do what they are doing.
They're essentially getting filthy rich from the stupidity and compliance of the host nations.

>>129324670
Christ-Almighty I think I have autism now.

File: ancap-meme-generator.png (200KB, 547x402px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 547x402px

>>129319246
The wealthy using their wealth to either directly or indirectly affect my life is a violation of the NAP

File: image.jpg (70KB, 793x794px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 793x794px

>No no you see, MY brand of wealth redistribution is totally different to the type those commies like!
>I-I'm not a socialist like those leftists!

File: iwontpay.jpg (35KB, 400x323px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 400x323px

>>129319246
Keep going down the rabbit hole, newfriend.

>8 dudes have as much wealth as ...
Where did they get that wealth from?
-Actual work
Where does that wealth go?
-Into higher taxes
-Into job creation
-Reinvested into economy, keeping it strong

>The person in front of you in line at the store with food stamps is the problem.
If the person is/was hard working and is TRULY in need, give them assistance.
If the person is a lazy-ass mooching muthafugga looking for free handouts, then they are exactly the problem.

>>129336253
Yes goy, keep slurping that oligarch cum

Rich people pay the majority of taxes and give the most money away, which makes sense, as you can't give what you don't have.

Of course a lot of them are probably morally bankrupt and have done horrible things to keep their wealth, but it's a problem of the system, not the individuals. No accountability, concentration of power into the hands of a few. Poor people aren't strictly victims, they are just pawns. Income mobility was very fluid in America's past, but these hypocrites will vilify the ones who've benefited from the system in the very same breath that they pray for success themselves. If they buy cheap clothes, buy music from mainstream artists propped up by corporations, they're just hypocrites.

Hypocrisy and foolishness, that's all I see nowadays.

>>129319246
The real problem is that Ukraine isn't a real country

>winning... is w-wrong!

>>129336468
>Implying oligarch cum is any saltier than the cum of a glum bum.

tl;dr: at least the wealthy will pay for cumming in your face

File: 1420653015331.jpg (15KB, 441x411px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 441x411px

>>129319246
>8 dudes have as much wealth as 4 billion people
Source on this? Who are these "8 dudes"?

File: 1489795121045.gif (2MB, 400x250px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x250px

>>129319355
>conservatives

Their money is probably tied up in an Irish, Switzerland or some other tax haven, so it's not like we can just take it anyways.

If we could take it, we probably would just go the way of the Soviet Union and be miserable evenhttp://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/129319246#p129336253tually.

>>129337327
oops

File: 1488325523714.png (33KB, 1002x732px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 1002x732px

Most of /pol/ is full of fucking dumb dumbs who literally just eat up propaganda.

In reality, the wealthy create jobs and reinvest their money into the economy. That is something the poor don't fucking do.

>muh muh rich people don't make jobs

>>129337497
Oh, and most of the population is poor Africans and rural Chinese farmers.

No shit they don't have a lot of money.

>>129327797
>start a business
>need to hire people
>I've actually destroyed jobs by doing this

I just can't do anything right

>>129336468
Dude, nice argument.

Oh wait...

>>129337497
they also wield disproportionate power and are moving the world towards a globalised multicultural hellhole to give them more workers for all the jobs they """"create"""" but you know, who cares about that :^)

File: 29857.jpg (143KB, 1589x285px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1589x285px

>>129328630
nice.

File: 1416604096991.jpg (38KB, 500x581px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 500x581px

>>129337769
>muh common man
>dey hold 2 much power

yeah, you can thank yourselves for getting rid of monarchy and creating a power vacuum for wealthy aristocratic families to compete for.

>>129337861
Who is the "yourselves" you're referring to? I'm a bit confused, because my country is one of the few in the world that still has a (vestigial) monarchy. Yours on the other hand, does not.

>>129331254
>muh principles
lol

>>129319853

So the only people allowed to have nice things are government bureaucrats? Fuck that.

>>129319980

Estate tax is literally getting cucked on your deathbed. Love me some more govt

>>129337970
You reduced your monarchy to being just for show.

Same with other European countries who still have their monarchs. They literally exist only as mascots.

Monarchs not only secure your national identity among competing monarchs, but create both the game and the rules for aristocratic families to play coupled with providing immediate recognition when something gets fucked up instead of a faceless bureaucratic machine.

>>129338096
>Love me some more govt

And the government loves them some $$$.

Worse than the estate tax is what they can do to you while you're still alive. If you end up in a nursing home on Medicare, the government can legally take nearly every dollar you have.

>>129338130
Right, this criticism coming from a country who rebelled because they hated monarchy that much.

>>129319980
It's funny how /pol/ can literally be unable to see the forest for the trees


>House of Rockefeller
>House of Clinton
>House of Bush
>House of Kennedy
>House of Trump

These are aristocratic families no different than ancient times.

The royal family held the hereditary monopoly of power to never be given to aristocrats. Now that we give the vote to every retard anywhere and overthrew the monarchs, there is a free market among these houses to see how can lie and cheat the best to now become the new monarch.

Take the Dark Enlightenment Pill.

If the top 8 would not create money out of literally NOTHING FUCK! I would literally not care.

Our money isn't worth anything, that is why we have debt, so we pay back real worth to THEM who created money out of thin air, it's retarded it's utterly retarded.

>>129319246
Food stamps are gay, so are money hoarders. I propose a day without white men, where we walk off the job and show all where the power lies.

File: 2B99181F-EBB5-4645-BE10-54E2EA609E1C-2427-0000029BC8610484_tmp.jpg (18KB, 583x328px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 583x328px

>>129325586
(((basic empathy)))

>>129319246
Bill Gates created an operating system used by most of the world. In exchange for that people gave him money. Part of that money is given back to to the American people via taxation.

Dudes in the warfare line don't do shit. You involuntarily have to give them money via taxes you pay and there's a reasonable fear that most of them will never stop leeching.

>>129324670
what does the U mean?

>>129336909

read this post again faggot
>>129325689

>>129319355
You mean, aristocratically own the jobs.

Modern corporation ownership is equivalent to hereditary aristocracy.

The problem with the fools in the food stamp queue is that they aspire to nothing, create nothing and leach from everybody.

>>129319246
>8 dudes have as much wealth as 4 billion people
Source?

>>129319420
Oh they're creating jobs alright, just not in America. Thankfully we just Trumped the globalists.

>>129319596
>rich people don't create jobs
Who do you think creates jobs? Obama?

>>129319355
wealth isn't income

>>129324982
>muh hording
Well then, why don't you just go take it from them, Mr. Proletariat.

>>129322331
It's because they don't give a shit about the idea of people being richer than them. It's almost like they aren't driven by jealousy, but are more concerned about the well being of themselves, their families and properties, and will take action when someone threatens it. Have you ever thought about that?

>>129319246
The guy with food stamps isn't the problem. The food stamps themselves are the problem. They create a crutch of dependency on the government and will vote for whoever will maintain that crutch, regardless of whether or not that candidate is good for the country.

>>129319246
But why cant the cunt with the food stamps get a job.

File: 1495862963806.gif (2MB, 320x193px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x193px

>>129320197
it ticks up right at late 2007.

What big event happened then?

>>129319246
He is right. The person on food stamps IS the problem.

>>129342269
The guy on food stamps is still a problem because he's a leech that is sucking tax payer money without doing anything for them.

>>129319246
>implying I cant hate both

>>129319246
antisemitic

>>129320303
They are mostly the children of wealthy people. Bill Gates didn't inherit his fortune, but his dad was and is pretty rich too.

>>129337567
>start a business
>need things done
>hire people
>want to increase profits for my pocket
>replace people with machines
>destroy jobs
Ftfy

Do these people think billionaires keep all their money in an Olympic swimming pool to bathe in?
That wealth doesn't create jobs because it already exists as jobs.

>>129319355
>jobland

>>129319246
So without these "8 dudes" what are you going to do? Rely on the guy with the food stamps?

>>129319950
Grains, eggs, and milk won't work since I'm vegan keto. I need gibs for kale, hemp hearts, and mushrooms.

>>129327423
>Canada and Australia not purging natives

>>129319246
Yes, the person in front with the food stamps is indeed the problem.