nationalism, questions

>>129271777
All ideologies based on continental philosophy are fundamentally incompatible with the precepts of liberty.

>>129271777
NSM was just a name the NSDAP party used to garner support from the uneducated and financially struggling population. National "Socialism" wasn't Socialism or Communism. It was a name used to attract the populace. The NSDAP permitted private property and a capitalistic system when they took power, something actual Socialists and Communists wouldn't do.

>>129271777
Trips of truth>>129271777

(((national socialism))) is jewish invention
/thread

It's basically 'America 1st' and instead of spending trillions on foreign aid you spend it on yourselves in socialist health, education, transport programs.

>>129273136
A lot of the foreign aid money is to make sure certain countries behave themselves. We're better served bribing Pakistan to shut the fuck up than having them nuke India or someshit.

The vast majority of us are not national socialists. Deliberately targeting innocent civilians is degeneracy worthy of Islamism. A fair number are White Nationalists, but, even then, most are aiming for a more pragmatic 85% white state. All are redpilled on IQ and behavorial genetics, however.

National Socialism, like all forms of socialism, is anti the individual, so, joking aside, it's not actually a popular ideology on /pol/ contrary to what the MSM claim. Most of /pol/ is pro free speech, anti collectivism and pro individualism. Think about it, we don't even have a leader!

>>129271777
>what is national socialism? how is it different (if at all) from regular socialism? how is capitalism compared to it? why should i hate (or not hate) it? how is capitalism better (or not better)? is there any common ground or inbetween areas with this and capitalism?

This should answer all of that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1tUFx_StSo

>>129274679
>muh individualism
>muh anti-collectivism

Yes good goy, remain a detached hedonistic individual while everyone forms massive coalitions against a shared enemy: YOU.

Nationalism Socialism is highly militaristic in nature. /pol/ stands against the 'Invade the World, Invite the World' globalist policy.

>>129273416

>Pakistan nuke India

Why should this bother Americans? The fact that western people have become invested in the affairs of others is the reason sand niggers rampage unchecked over Europe and America is being cucked by nigs, latinos and your sjws

>>129271777
NS means permanent warfare , a totally different SS world .

real "life" : supermarkets , a nigger world , religious madness , a meaningless life full of kikeplastic products you do not need . make a choice

>>129275098
>Nationalism Socialism is highly militaristic in nature. /pol/ stands against the 'Invade the World, Invite the World' globalist policy.

That's leftist (((Neoconservative))) foreign policy, literally nothing to do with Nazism.

File: a-society-that-robs-an-individual-of-the-product-of-2499945.png (98KB, 500x349px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 500x349px

>>129274679
Hello, RockingMre.

File: Gregor strasser.png (273KB, 478x499px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 478x499px

>>129271777
National Socialism is just national social democracy with a strong military. Strasserism is far superior due to it getting at the root of the problem which is capitalism in itself.

File: Me leninin.png (91KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 800x600px

>>129271777
Btw, Leninism is the final redpill. Once you stop believing that liberals and leftists are the same, you'll see how right Marxist Leninists are.