>>129269281
No. Long live eugenic ethnocraty
yee
>>129269407
a system like that could work well with a monarch at its head.
>>129270022
Funny how the British one is not even fully European and others were and are easy on non-whites today
Constitutional monarchist, yes.
>>129270207
what constraint to ruling would you have put on the monarch?
>>129269281
MABA
>>129269281
VIVA ESPAÑA
VIVA EL REY
VIVA LA ORDEN Y LA LEY
>>129269281
Yes. Humans are naturally an animal that relies a top down social order. Democracy is cancer and we should go back to a white, non jewish, aristocrat republic. Also blacks are usually useless.
>>129269281
Yes. We need a king more than ever. Someone pull a sword from a stone damnit
>>129270725
Nigger we are a republic. Pure democracy doesn't exist.
Yes, literally the only good political system.
Today is a good evidence monarchy is shit
If your leader is retarded youre fucked
>the queen personally appointed May of all people
>May wrote literally the worst manifesto since communist one
>Muh ivory, muh hunt, and cuts on breakfasts yeah
>Cons imoplode spectacularly in no time
This was fucking isane,
Who were she thinking would vote for such a monifesto
>>129270902
We got rid of monarchy for a reason. Aristocratic systems stopped functioning properly hundreds of years ago, and even when they functioned properly, the only reason we used them is because at the time there was no other way to have a functioning military.
>>129271096
It doesn't change the fact it's still better than d*mocracy. And yea, they stopped functioning thanks to jews brainwashing people.
>DUDE, EQUALITY, LMAO
Fuck d*mocracy, it's a joke that 2 hobos votes are more valuable than 1 vote of proffesor of university.
>>129269281
only if im the monarch
>>129269281
I am descended from kings, so yes.
>>129269281
>>129270373
Right to own and operate weapons
Right to private and personal property
Right to meme
Can't think of anything else atm
>>129271627
>And yea, they stopped functioning thanks to jews brainwashing people.
They stopped functioning because the aristocrats stopped doing their actual jobs, which was being the trained military class. Them running things was a means to an end.
>>DUDE, EQUALITY, LMAO
Equality is good only insofar as it serves liberty, you stupid faggot. I'm not a Marxist. Monarchies and aristocracies aren't about getting the best people in power. Aristocracies being meritocratic in terms of rulership is monarchist propaganda. It has always been about the aristocrats being the military class, same as any similar society outside of Europe.
>>129271674
Not if i send an anonymous letter to the Cardinal or if a conspiracy about your cousin the Duchess Von Fuck appears to the populace.
Now Count; shall we renegociate the terms about The Duchy?
100%
>>129269407
So, what the feudal nobility was supposed to be?
>>129269281
God save the Queen, Long may she reign over us!
Monarchy or Fascism
I just want to live in a society that celebrates a national identity and personifies that in a leader who loves his people and nation.
That's all I want...
Not to have to be expected to hate my own volk.
>>129270373
no capes
>>129269281
As long as I'm the monarch
>>129278888
Th-thanks Kek
FUCK YOUR QUEEN
UP THE RA
>>129269281
yup unironically
Monarchy >>>>>>>> Republic
>>129269281
>1789
>not being a Federalist
Neck yourself
>>129271096
>Aristocratic systems stopped functioning properly hundreds of years ago,
3 out of the top 5 HDI countries on earth are monarchies. you are the exception not the rule
>>129269281
No, I'm not retarded. How fucking brain damaged do you have to be to support monarchy? Man, there's some threads that show there's some straight dumbasses use this board.
>>129277658
>celebrates a national identity and personifies that in a leader who loves his people and nation.
You've got a weird twisted view of what monarchy is.
Feudalism is the true redpill
>>129279348
>being this cucked
the house of orange was the only reason the NERDlands was important at all
>>129279348
Damn they're fucking hot.
Monarchies only work when you have a King/Queen that isnt shit.
>>129269281
Were only we had a legitimate monarch
Wouldn't suffer bending my knee to some German filth.
>>129281952
They really are. But they're getting old. Is so sad.
>>129279169
These are not monarchies.
They are democracies first and foremost, with a figurehead monarch that holds no real power.
Monarch babbies literally stuck in the dark ages.
>>129269281
>Are you a monarchist?
Of course not.
Nah monarchy is pleb tier. Two tier citizenship like that of Rome with a consul elected for life from the pool of patricians. Also the cit tiers would be malleable. For example if a guy discovered a mathematical proof he could earn his way into patrician status with his family. This system ensures the best of the best get vote rights and such but also because their privelege is not entirely based off wealth, they have an incentive to maintain the state as is and not sell it out for every shekel like the bourgeoisie are doing right now by flooding countries with shitskin wage slave debt slaves.
>>129283437
>that of Rome
Literally civic shit
>>129269281
>are you a monarchist?
Yeah, why do you ask OP?
>>129269281
Yes, but I don't support a monarchy here.
It's weird, I know.
yes
yes i am
>>129269281
Yes, but only on the grounds it depoliticises the role of Head of State
why not ?
muh royles
waiting for our synthetic overlords
I am. In fact, I'm about to watch a documentary via stream shitting all over democracy.
Starts soon. For anyone interested:
https://www.rabb.it/r/uoagzg
>>129279008
rude
yep
>>129284276
>>129284372
>>129284444
>>129284562
>Tabloid trash
>>129284399
Who would be King of Ireland, somebody from the O'Neill clan?
>>129284768
your trash
Yes, I like the system that Mosley laid out
Anyone in this read who hasnt read Moldbug, shut up, you dont have an opinion on monarchies yet
the british state is trash
>>129269281
Yes, All hail the King of Kings!
>>129284980
What is he at nowadays anyway?
>>129270864
This. US system as laid out by the constitution is ingenious.
No better system has been implemented
>>129284807
No, It would most likely be the current Prince of Hanover, assuming an agnatic preference for heirs of the house of Stewart-through marriage to House of Hanover.
>>129269281
The aritocracy of it is pretty good. I like the idea of having someone who maintains the rights of the people and keeps them safe. As long as they don''t go full commie long live the monarch!