Even if your area ends up losing to Labour because too many potential Tory voters went with UKIP instead, it'll just make Tories say 'shit we should have pandered to UKIP voters more' which is exactly what the country needs.
Can we all agree that what the UK needs is for the Conservative party to be actually fucking conservative? By voting for UKIP that's what you're forcing them to become. A party that doesn't pander, dies. It's not like the Tories have a backbone anyway, if they went left to pander to votes and they'll come back to the right to pander to votes too.
Can we all agree?
>>128937735
Yes and no. If you want a UKIP style Brexit then the Conservatives have to win the election. By voting ukip you are splitting the hard Eurosceptic vote. I'm usually a ukip voter but voting Tory this time; this is the Brexit election and Tories have adopted somewhat ukips Brexit stance. Labour will fucking ruin Brexit, don't take the chance
>>128937735
Lads I've had a thing rattling round my head for a bit.
>politicians are notoriously bad for ignoring difficult problems
>demographics are a long term issue
>Labour imports a pile of new tolerant friends 20 years ago
>every politician since whether aware of this or not has been stamping out secondary symptoms of Islamic migration. Cracking down on hate speech, the right, freedom, all while the real problem grows larger and larger.
>this is why they're so desperate to preach solidarity and love, in the hope that they can get through another election cycle without this mess that's too politically awkward to fix blowing up in their faces.
>this is why tolerance is the state religion?
Reposting as I want to discuss this.
Who else here /defaced/ and /spoiled/ their ballot?
>>128937735
CAN'T BARRAGE THE FARAGE
UKIP have said they want to search young girls who come back from holiday to see if they've gone through FGM and they want to ban the burqa and niqab which will be seen as insensitive to people of other religions.
An absolute nonce party.
average mummy poster
>>128937735
No Farage
No vote.
Nuttall is an idiot.
wow wtf i love conservatism so much but i want the communists to win instead now??? also wtf im totally not a shill now??
UKIP not running in my constituency to secure Tory win.
Not sure how to feel about this.
>tfw UKIP aren't standing in my seat
It's either vote Tory to keep the commies at bay or just stay at home lads.
I fucking hate the Irish
>>128938353
Your democratic right to do so. If you happen to be a passionate Brexiteer however, then spoiling your ballot is the dumbest thing ever
>>128938388
Yeah, how dare we try to stop muslims chopping girls clits off. We should be more tolerant.
Tories have pandered to UKIP voters as much as they possibly could. I don't consider myself one of them but they've definitely earned my vote.
I kind of wish Farage would join the conservatives just so I had something to hope for, because UKIP are dying a slow death and there's no stopping it now
>>128938482
Why not cast your ballot and spoil it?
>>128938482
if you spoil your vote they'll read it out, write ukip in massive letters or something to show support for /ourguys/
>>128938353
Why? All you're doing is wasting a volunteer's time. A spoiled ballot means nothing to either the winner or losers of a seat.
>>128938482
Tories are pretty malleable lad, we'll make them a worthwhile party yet.
>>128938560
You can't force-search young girls. That's the problem. It's an ill thought out policy.
>>128938426
People really do look like their pets.
>I have a Siamese fighting fish and a hedgehog that visits the garden every couple nights.
Shit. I am fabulous?
>>128937735
Who here /tweed boys/?
>>128937735
/pol/ always has and always will be a Sir Nige board
>>128938353
I will be spoiling my ballot.
I refuse to support the government regulating and censoring the internet any more than it already does.
I refuse to support the further weakening of our people with more handouts.
>>128938589
spoiling your ballot is a waste of time imho. i would rather just not turn out if i intended not to vote.
>>128938560
I'm fully against female genital mutilation but I don't think we should give customs folk the authority to get a look at any female vulva that is entering the country. Imagine if it was your sister, or daughter or mother.
but shes pepe or so the 4chan cucks say ?
>>128938659
since when do they read out spoilt ballots? you guys are off your rockers
>tfw you step over Labour without apology
>>128938541
Not at all. I do not believe in any party's ability to effectively take us out of the EU, so I will NOT give my positive assent to do a hack job. Nor do I believe in anything really that any party does, or for the reason that they do it.
>>128938690
Precisely.
>you have to vote for one or the other
I am displaying my dissent. If more people did so they the parties would HAVE to look at what they are doing wrong, instead of dismissing people offhand as 'lazy'.
>>128938696
>you can't tax businesses and rich people more and expect them to keep capital in the country
this election has been text-book ill-thought out policies
god lefty pol are going to get absolutely crucified tomorrow and I totally can not wait
CAN'T BARRAGE THE FARAGE
>>128938784
That's fine. As long as you know that you're risking Brexit
I'm a UKIP voter but this election I'll be going tory for sure, i spoke to my local UKIP candidate the other weekend he mentioned that because they won't stand a chance they're all telling other UKIP voters to go tory for the greater good.
I mean we already won with brexit and Farage is happy with that, if Farage is happy I'm happy.
real new Brit/pol/ thread
>>128938668
>>128938668
>>128938668
incase you retards didn't notice, this isn't a Brit/pol/ thread
How are you supposed to vote for it if it's not in the constituency of my area? Also why would I want to lose my vote in the most important binary election ..
Voting for the Communist Removal Party.
Fucking leftists try to ruin everything.
she said it ..not me
>>128938888
checked
>>128937735
What's with the mental acrobatics? Just vote the one party that isn't try to ethnic cleanse native Brits.
>>128938888
So you didn't vote to Leave the EU then. You're a remainer?
>>128938700
>People really do look like their pets.
Here's me.
>>128937735
CAN'T BARRAGE THE FARAGE
>>128939010
which constinuency doesn't have either a labour or conservative rep?
>>128938696
You can easily search young girls just as you would search adults. I don't see the problem. People are paid to look after children and see them naked all the time including medical professionals. Nothing wrong with it. Nonce hysteria is stupid.
Maybe we should ban doctors from operating on children under 16 in case they rape them
My area is a labour seat already so who should I vote for lads?
>>128938896
just make the penalty for trafficking a minor for the purposes of FGM life in prison. that would sort it out fairly quickly, and don't give me the
>that will only make them more devious and difficult to detect
bullshit. there's still only one way any of them are getting back to their shithole countries and that's the airport.
90% of the stupid shit we argue about here is basically a police matter. politics used to have a much broader scope, at least in the 80s and 90s.
>>128938784
>mfw somebody screencapped my own post
>>128938182
>Labour because too many potential Tory voters went with UKIP instead, it'll just make Tories say 'shit we should have pandered to UKIP voters more' which is exactly what the country needs.
This
>>128939103
Brighton Pavilion, Norfolk North, all of Northern Ireland, most of Scotland, some of Wales. I could go on.
>>128939121
take a look at the results of the last two or three elections. If Conservatives came second vote for them, if Lib Dems came second then vote for them instead.
>>128938930
>As long as you know that you're risking Brexit
Do you seriously think a Britain outside of the EU, where the last shreds of your privacy are taken from you, will be better than a botched Brexit?
Once you lose your rights, you won't get them back.
>>128939242
That's honestly surprising to me. If you can't vote tactically to remove whoever you want then just vote with your heart.
>>128939244
>if Lib Dems came second then vote for them instead.
no, my moderate left wing friends are voting labour thinking it is more likely as lib dems could collapse (it's a leave area)
>>128939408
>actually having a eu referendum argument on a vote ukip thread
the state, lad
>>128939409
Are you an American using a proxy?
>>128939259
Are we hiring medical professionals for this position though? Or are we hiring no-skill morons who want to look at some underage cunny? Because examining bodies at customs isn't exactly a high skill career.
>>128939074
Of course I did, but the Article has been triggered. Do not paint false dichotomies; that I MUST vote for a 'Conservative' party and give them a mandate for a government that I do not agree with is false. Should I allow them to continue to masquerade as conservatives? Aid in that? Why? Because I might get a good EU 'deal'? Give them a victory so they can import so many more migrants, continue on their way to globalism, and crush liberties for cynical reasons in their pursuit to avoid the truth? No. I don't have to participate.
In fact, I want no deal. In fact, I HOPE that Labour gets in. That is the true tactical position--if you like that sort of thing. Not only does the Conservative party fail, but Labour, in all likelihood, utterly fails to secure a 'good deal' for those who voted for Leave. Then Labour loses legitimacy as well.
>>128938353
I'm contemplating either voting for the independent in my constituency this year instead of Tory or just spoiling my ballot even though it's a swing one and this election I predict Labour will unseat the convservatives here (Ipswich).
>>128938690
>>128938784
>>128938541
The problem is I don't particularly trust May with Brexit but I do believe she'll further strip away freedoms in the name of "Safety". I cannot consent to what May wishes to do even if she is basically bending me over a barrel with the threat of Labour.
vote may you cuck goy
>>128939408
>rights
There's a sale on tinfoil at Aldi mate. Plenty of hats in that for you.
The most important thing is Brexit, it will affect the us for the next 50 years and the Tories are the only ones saying the right things regarding that
Whether May wants to ban baboon porn or not, I couldn't fucking give a shit about that
unmummy no maternal instinct May only has her preserved power as head of a corrupt pedophilic unaccountable scumbag state. thats all shes got in this world thats all she cares about. she dosnt give a fuck about you or your kids
a vile ugly creature that oozes insecurity and contempt.
>>128939758
Spoiling it shows dissent towards all parties.
>>128937735
Can't barrage the Farage!
>>128939705
>>128939635
post more I'm edging
>>128939758
The thing is that May's desires for removing freedoms are untenable at best and completely impossible at worst. This is the kind of thing that will quietly blow over
>>128939588
Well obviously they'd need a bit of extra training to know what they're looking for. I mean they train border people to look for bombs. There's a chance they could take advantage of the bomb and blow up an airport but these hypothetical crimes are just stupid. I'm sure monitoring could be put in place to avoid abuse. Don't all teachers and other people who will work with children have to go through lots of checks to make sure they're not doing shit
>>128938763
Go tell Brit/pol/ that because they don't seem to think so. Tory voting scum.
>>128937735
Where j live, in Wales, ukip are second to labour in blind poll and I don't think labour turnout will be that high
>>128939797
>tinfoil
are the english kids going to have to put that tinfoil around their ass ???
>>128940039
Teachers don't have to do checks that involve exposing child genitalia to them.
>>128940048
Nigel is gone
>>128939951
kek
>>128939729
None of that makes any logical sense. You're a complete lunatic. So I will say good night to you
>>128937735
I agree with you bro, this is what you guys need to do. You lose with everyone this election, you might as well just send a message instead.
>>128940111
HNNNG more like this please
>>128940153
No I mean checks on the teachers. Like background checks. And asking children about their experiences
>>128940231
Sorry you're an idiot.
>>128940092
Guys what do I do here? If ukip are second to labour do I vote labour or conservative?
>>128937735
CAN'T BARRAGE THE FARAGE
>>128940200
>he thinks Nige wouldn't want us to vote for the party he spent his life building
Zero loyalty, you lads.
>>128940398
Shit I meant ukip not labour, or conservative
>>128940282
you would need a 4tb harddrive to get them all
>>128940463
Nige would want us to /spoil/ our ballots with a pint of bitter.
torys init
>>128940153
Should we ban pediatricians?
>>128940470
I believe that Labour will have the best long-term affect when it comes to rage of people.
>>128940231
UKIP is CIVIC and long-term our enemy.
>>128940532
>he isn't going to stub his cigar out on the ballot paper
silly boy
torys init ..
>>128940532
>>128940709
What's the point even going if you're going to spoil the ballet?
the yanks would know this guy
torys init
just like pepe the frog
>>128940013
I agree it'll mostly be a waste of money and hit only people that cannot simply bypass it all with current proposals however that being said, with people being arrested and sent to court for innocuous shit I cannot feel I can any longer consent to any of this from whichever party promotes it. The line in the sand was crossed long ago and I wish something was done about it then but I like many others just blew it off and continued the support for the current decay in our politics and as such society. I have an independent actually promoting what I agree with so justifying not voting him makes it harder. The only reason I may spoil my ballot is because with a lot of hope just perhaps enough people will spoil their ballot to make an impact. 200 spoiled ballots per constituency can be blown off as 200 idiots but 1000+ makes some form of voice even if meager.
Does sentiment and will still matter even if it goes unnoticed?
>>128940787
I agree. I'm just Nigeposting.
>>128940500
That one is without a shadow of a doubt 100% true.
But wierdo inbreds who have gone mad being in powerful noble families for too long aren't going away if Corbyn get's elected and we'll have the added bonus of a complete twat who is going to permanently spiral fracture the economy.
>>128940709
>he isn't going to cigar-out the Tory name, piss on the Labour name, cum on the Lib Dem name, and shit on the Green name
>>128940787
Because you participate in the process and reject all the parties? It counts towards the spoiled number and not the 'didn't vote therefore lazy' number.
>>128937735
The definition of "Conservative" is to conserve. They are nothing but a corporate enabling husk of a party now.
If you wish to "conserve", vote for the parties that will end the stripping of assets to foreign countries, end polluting our rivers and soil, end fracking and end the restriction on the renewable sector.
If you say "what about the immigrants" neither the Conservatives or Ukip every intended to do anything about them. Do you really trust the once so called Libertarian party to handle integration when their only policy is checking the vaginas of little girls?
Do you really think the spivs at Ukip have dedicated more than 5 minutes of their thoughts to actually solving the countries long rooted problems?
>>128939244
Just checked mate, been labour since 1929.. think i'll just move before the next elections
>>128939758
Ordinary I would say spoiling a ballot is a good way of indicating your grievance as it gets acknowledged in the count. However, you know two things for pretty much certain - One. May is saying all the correct things on Brexit (no customs union membership, no ECJ, no Single Market membership), she also said she'll reduce immigration once out and deport suspected terrorists (even if that means changing human rights laws to do so). Two. Labour have been all over the place with Brexit, have had absolutely no idea what they want for months. They diffintely will keep immigration high, and they will sell out freedom of movement for Single Market access or membership. They're also likely to keep us in the customs union, which means we won't be able to seek our own trade deals. Labour will essentially keep us in the EU in all but name
I understand what you're saying about freedoms, but it literally is between the Tories and May. Corbyn is a Marxist, the country as a whole will be worse off under him. I'm usually ukip but I am holding my nose and voting Tory, for that reason (and Brexit)
>>128938182
I live in Paki central so Labour will win no matter who I vote for. May as well vote for UKIP.
>>128937735
normally i would agree. but brexit depends on us getting the tories in this election.
so no
>>128941426
Yeah I guess
>>128937735
Problem with voting UKIP is that's ones less vote for labour.
>>128941276
That should read *between Tories and Labour
>>128941639
Fuck Labour you leaf commie prick
>>128941426
Yeah this is smart. Anyone that can vote UKIP should.
>>128941489
What do you hope for the Tories to achieve in the negotiations? If you want a deal and the economy not to crash then that ship has already sailed with the Tories. The biggest tragedy is that they probably don't even care as they've demonstrated they put power before the interests of the country every time.
>>128941276
>she also said she'll reduce immigration once out and deport suspected terrorists
And you believe her? Why are you falling for catharsis? They are both traitors, and they both represent viewpoints which cannot stand. You had the chance to vote for a non-partisan issue in the referendum. All other issues can be negotiated at a later stage, if necessary.
>it wouldn't be good if the EU collapses and we still felt some serious brunt which leads to hatred of Labour any anyone who allowed us to stay partially in it
>>128941276
May will then have to wait 20 years to make a trade deal with the EU. If you think necessity trumps all then why has it taken Canada so long and the US likely will never have one?
With current growth our economy will go back into recession again. You don't seriously believe a new trade deal can be negotiated do you?
It's the final day today, and I'm going to sound like a reet cuck for saying this, but make sure you do get out and vote. Whether it's Tory or UKIP boosting the right wing share of the vote can only help us. If you're voting Labour just stay at home.
>>128938351
Yes, I think they're a bit scared that we'll turn on the wogs, kick them off the pier and make them swim back.
They hope that if they can keep a lid on it, give us enough beer and football to distract us for another 20 years, we'll be so fucked that we won't have anything left to fight for.
I'm not worried about Brexit. Immigration is the bigger problem. Brexit can be put right, whether it takes 10 years of 50 years.
Immigration will fuck us up for 500 years. That's why I don't give a fuck about the tories, they're like fucking blairites, with no convictions about anything other than staying in power.
We'll end up like India, if we're lucky, with different ethnic castes and religions voting for their candidates and squabbling like, well, Indians.
>>128941839
>why did she call the election
To remove Remoaner mp's from Labour, snp, Lib Dems that will hinder the great repeal bill passing through parliament and the final vote on the Brexit deal. If the Tories don't win the election, of course, it'll ironically be a coalition of all the most Remain parties and that will destroy Brexit.
Also the election will give her a personal mandate for credibitly with her direction
A Labour led coalition pulled by the SNP, Lib Dems and Greens will be far worse for our Brexit than the Tories doing it the UKIP way
The conservatives winning the election is essential
Labour for dem free tuition fees.
yes do that please so we can have a corbyn victory
>>128938351
>>128942303
Why are you concerned about what Muslims do with the country if year on year YOUR only contribution to our countries direction is banging the same old drum.
To be a truly modern country we need to be zero-carbon, high skills, healthy and have resilient communities. What have you done in the entirety of your life to move the country in this direction? The "Muslim problem" will never go away and you're letting this country rot by concentrating on it year on year.
>>128942108
>and you believe her?
That's a ludicrous position to take. She is saying the correct things, so it's either that or go with the guy that's pretty much saying exactly the opposite. I do believe her, as it happens, not least because her legacy depends on its success. That's not the point though. The mere fact is you have to believe her because the alternative is worse, and so you're suggesting cutting off your nose to spite your face. Bizarre. Your position doesn't make any logical sense
>>128941276
She's was home secretary for 8 years and immigration is higher than it was under labour.
It was May who started all the faggotry about the tories being 'the nasty party'. She's a useless barren hag.
>>128942696
The UKIP way is officially to pay nothing to the EU and settle on WTO terms. Do you think that is wise for the majority of ours businesses? Don't give me this macho bollocks of how the EU will give into our demands because we're holding a gun to our head either.
How are we supposed to strike up worthwhile trade deals with other countries when we don't have the investment for a skilled economy?
>>128942130
>>128942130
>20 years for trade deal
Oh do fuck off
You're either 12 or an actual retard
>>128943292
Saying the right things? She is not the fucking Queen, she works for us and should have to set out her actual goals.
>Her legacy
Do you think Cameron and Osbourne cared about their legacy after raking in millions from making speeches for investment banks? Do you think they would have torn the country in half using any dirty method to get elected if they did? Why do you think Thatcher dismantled the countries industry if she knew it would harm her legacy?
Wake up and smell the coffee with Conservatives. There is a reason why at no point in history so far they have ever supported the working class and for the longest periods were against them.
>>128943305
Regardless of her record (yes it's bad I admit). She is still saying the right things regarding Brexit. When the other option is to let in a coalition of cucked leftists with open mass immigration at the top of their agenda, there really isn't any contest. It's trust the Tories or bust
>>128942130
>Implying the EU will be around in 20 years.
>>128943548
Have you ever worked in Brussels? Do you have any comprehension of their inability to quickly react to processes?
>>128943878
The sentiment of every Kipper pissing their pants over the possibility of the EU surviving. What's the matter? We've voted out now. Why do you care about the EU now we're about to embark on Empire 2.0? You should be happy for them.
>>128943320
May said she'll walk away if the EU isn't giving us a good deal and fall back on WTO (the ukip position), yes. Corbyn has said he won't walk away, which means they now know if he wins the election that they can get away with giving us a really shite deal and he'll still take it. May is the only choice when it comes to Brexit
As for whether WTO is better than a shite deal, well yes, WTO is the default position and when that results in German car manufactures losing their jobs in their thousands then they'll come to us with a sensible deal. That scenario has got to be better than Corbyns shit deal is better than WTO stance
>>128937735
can't barrage the farage. listening to his show right now, never miss one.
>>128943830
You're just a fucking Momentum shill. Fuck off will you, commie bastard. Talking out of your arse
>>128944336
>issing their pants over the possibility of the EU surviving
You really think the EU is going to survive 20 more years of Greek defaults and 100,000,000 illiterate 3rd world savages?
Dream on.
>>128944336
You're a fucking moron, you really are. You're also 12
>>128942990
I'm educated and qualified and at the cutting edge of technology mate. And it's not to help my fellow man. Once I have amassed sufficient wealth, I shall try and find a relatively uninhabited spot and live like a hermit, composing fugues with novel answer intervals, breeding peas with interesting traits, and other poncey shit that I've haven't had time for.
>>128944501
>when that results in German car manufactures losing their jobs in their thousands
You would admit that our economy is going to crash before Germany and probably more severe? My question then is then why would Germany come to us for a sensible deal and not the UK to them?
This has been the flawed thinking from Brexiters all the way through. It only make sense if you're convinced we care less about our citizens jobs and savings than other countries. Maybe you do have a point there!
>>128944915
Anglos are too selfish desu.
>>128944658
>restore the empire
Why exactly would we want to bother running indian and african countries?
>>128944904
>>128944711
Great replies. Really intelligent.
>>128944833
Yes of course the EU will survive. You need to come out of your fantasy world.
>>128941276
I do have a huge part in my head giving your argument as there is merit to its purpose but I feel I've come to the conclusion
>Under the Tories we're fucked
>Under Labour we're fucked sooner
I suppose when it comes down to it I would rather say I opposed both rather than nodded along and with one and ultimately consented to what they'll bring. Neither one really knows how to solve our problems and I cannot say anyone really does. Change is coming sooner or later for that I am sure. How it comes and in what form I do not know but if people aren't willing to change their current sentiment and people won't make any change in voting habits themselves you can never expect anyone else to and if the the status quo doesn't differ I don't think the change we'll see when it truly comes will be for the better.
>>128944658
link m8?
>>128938784
>>128939194
You know that quote is wrong on it's target? Rome's public grain dispensaries were limited to 150,000 - 200,000 ticket-recipients throughout it's usage for the city itself, which they were probably only allowed for free-born Italian males but not women or children, and the rations were barely enough for them to sustain themselves, let alone any families they might have. Most of the efforts to Rome's 'grain supply' were regulations to prevent grain hoarding and over-charging to prevent famines, the rations primary intent was to reduce the market demand and vulnerability by distributing it to the main backbone of the city (free-male laborers). The results of it allowed the city of Rome to have a massive population in antiquity that Europe it-self never saw again until the 1800's. Without it, cost of living and convenience of living in the city wouldn't allow it to be of that size--people would've moved to other cities and settlements that were cheaper, and cause decentralization. But in Rome's circumstance, it allowed for a massive population of free-born males and citizens living in the city itself, that gave them a large pool of both artisans for complex building projects and general laborers, who weren't prone to mass-revolts and constant surveillance like slaves or serfs. The massive economy it supported in the city allowed for all the sorts of artists, engineers, writers, poets, historians, and doctors that we've come to know and love about Rome, due to the fact that the cosmopolitan environment allowed for such niche roles in the economy to exists and thrive. It was a successful policy, and it DID NOT cause the Romans to be more decadent. It was implemented from the first century BC to the 4th century AD--during the first half Rome grew far more powerful than before and left the legacy that we've come to know about it.
>>128945533
>Yes of course the EU will survive. You need to come out of your fantasy world.
Sure it will.
Greeks will pay debnts
The med will get it's shit together.
The EU will flourish thanks to the influx of 100,000,000 doctors and engineers.
I'm going to be so salty when my passport won't get me access to the EU moon base.
>>128945068
>admit Our will economy will crash
No I don't, it was a hypothetical. My underlying point is May is SAYING she'll walk away. Doesn't mean she will. Corbyn is saying he won't, meaning they'll give us a bad deal under him. You don't seem to have much of a point here. We voted to leave the EU, for that to be realised, as it must be, we will need to leave the customs union and membership of the Single Market. We will need to negotiate access providing it doesn't involve freedom of movement. Corbyn has already sold his hand (and the country) down the river by showing his. Whether the economy crashes or not is neither here nor there, the fact is we have to properly extract ourselves from the EU. They sell more to us than we do to them so they'll be the ones coming to us. Even if our econmony takes a hit, it doesn't detract away from the fact that the Conservatives are best placed to steer us through.
You sound like an awful Remoaner. Get over it will you! Or piss off to the EU
>>128945533
I can only work with what I'm given and your replies have been utter dog shit. Plucked "20 years" out of your arse.
>>128947656
>My underlying point is May is SAYING she'll walk away. Doesn't mean she will. Corbyn is saying he won't, meaning they'll give us a bad deal under him.
this
you dont tell the people youre about to do a deal with that youre willing to let them fuck you in the arse. its like negotiating a price and starting off at the amount you want to buy or sell something for. youre supposed to start at the extremes and work towards a middle ground.
same goes with nuclear weapons. you supposed to say youre willing to use them even if deep down you know you never really will. jeremy doesnt understand how you need to behave in these situations.
>>128937735
truth
>>128937735
Agreed. Cuckservatives will continue mass immigration as wage undercutting serves big buisiness and multiculturalism as they are too scared to push the overton window even an inch.
>>128937735
Usually I'm pretty realistic about voting, I always vote for the lesser evil. However, there's a minimum standard that I could in good conscience vote for someone. If I were British I would vote UKIP, even though it's throwing my vote away. Your two realistic choices are the left and the far left and I sure as shit am not voting for lefties
>>128944915
What's your job? I wish to hire you.
>>128937735
Giving Labour a seat is too risky with brexit and terrorism on the horizon
Sorry Nige.
>>128937735
good luck bongs! take back your country
>>128942990
>zero carbon high skills blah blah blah
Humans are not machines you fucking idiot
>>128937735