>The hemline index is a theory presented by economist George Taylor in 1926.[1][2]
>The theory suggests that hemlines on women's dresses rise along with stock prices. In good economies, we get such results as miniskirts (as seen in the 1920s and the 1960s),[3] or in poor economic times, as shown by the 1929 Wall Street Crash, hems can drop almost overnight. Non-peer-reviewed research in 2010 supported the correlation, suggesting that "the economic cycle leads the hemline with about three years".[4]
>Non-peer-reviewed research in 2010 supported the correlation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemline_index
---
>Stocks close at all-time highs as Street shrugs off jobs report
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/02/us-stocks-jobs-report-disappoints.html
---
Well, now you know why women show off so much skin these days.
>>128919031
correlation =/= causation
>>128919031
>Higher stock
>More lavish spending from rich people
>Pop culture and fashion culture changes
>???
Profit!
>>128919341
The causation is that men have more money in stock markets and are richer, thus women feel the need to compete over the resources that these men have acquired.
When the market contracts they don't feel the need to slut it up as much.
It's pretty simple.
>>128919653
>if they're poor, they won't be sluts
>>128919031
There is no ass there. Where is the ass. I NEED ass!!!
>>128919653
Well, the poor man can't bank on high or low stock market prices. Chad always wins
>>128919983
>>if they're poor, they won't masquerade as sluts
women lock down one man in times of economic hardship and don't try to "upgrade" as much
thus they dress more conservatively
I don't see why this is so difficult for you to grasp
>>128919031
>>128919983
>>128920501
>mfw women are informed about the economy
>>128922060
not informed, its instinct like the jew to not work.
>>128919031
shit's retarded
in africa they are naked