IMPEACH TRUMP!!!!! http://archive.is/CVwqp

Frumpf is fucking done

i hope this goes to trial so bad. what a joke.

Onigger blocked people also

>>128851793
80 yo Lawyers who dont understand or simply dont know the difference that he didnt block people form accessing Twitter as a service but specifically his privately owned account

Take it to court to watch lawyers get rekt

Your country is a fucking embarrassment

I just want to see all the asshurt that would happen should Trump block every liberal account that latches on him

>muh bullying
>muh freedom of speech

File: jeb surge.jpg (47KB, 680x515px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 680x515px

>>128851992
INCOMING JEB SURGE

>>128851793
>(((lawyers)))
>a (((legal group)))
>designated public forum
I want them to take it up to twitter just so twitter can laugh at their claims

File: Capture.png (219KB, 909x332px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 909x332px

>>128851793
Does this mean I can sue Cherri Jacobus?

File: shareblue-pol-raid-resource-052.png (345KB, 607x504px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 607x504px

DRUMPFLESTILTSKIN NEEDS TO BE EXECUTED FOR THIS!!

>>128851793
Freedom of speech isn't obligation to listen.

>>128851793
Bullshit. @RealDonaldTrump is a personal account. @POTUS is the "official" channel.

File: tmp_8079-1496260811553m186496332.jpg (170KB, 1024x615px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1024x615px

>>128851793

>>128851793
at what point that the west media become so ridiculously ridiculous?

>>128852204
>Your country is a fucking embarrassment

You'd best pipe down, leafer.

Blumpf is FINISHED

>>128852204

> Sent while fucking my dog.

>>128851793
>Your honor, let me present to you evidence of severe misconduct on Trump's part
>Evidence A: Two scoops

> block spam accounts on twitter
> you're violating their rights now

>>128851793
I look forward to my Twitter IP ban being struck down as a violation of my 1st Amendment rights as well, tx.

Lawyers will say anything.

>>128852123
Even if he did (and I highly doubt that Obama wrote "his" tweets) he never claimed tweets were Official statements from the white house.

Trump and Spicer on the other hand, have.

Since I'm fucking bored, let's see who are these retards
https://twitter.com/RT_com/status/872310697815937025
http://archive.is/Ednzg

>On Tuesday, lawyers from the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University sent a letter to Trump, asking him to unblock the Twitter accounts of two individuals who they say were blocked because “they disagreed with, criticized, or mocked” his actions as president.
>They argue that Trump’s Twitter account @realDonaldTrump is a “designated public forum” and blocking any users from the account based on their viewpoints would be considered a violation of their First Amendment rights.
>ACLU’S Jameel Jaffer to Direct Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University
Well, let's see his tweets from november 9
https://twitter.com/JameelJaffer/status/796299098408316928

I could go deeper, but it's not even worth it in my opinion, it's the same fucking drivel every fucking time, it's not even funny

>>128853479
And give you huge fees, theyre just gonna bait some faggot into paying them and then get shutdown

>>128852204
Whoa leafy, you're in no position to criticize any other nation at this point.

>>128853487
Obama signed tweets with an -O that he specifically wrote.

>>128852172
>80 yo Lawyers who dont understand or simply dont know the difference that he didnt block people form accessing Twitter as a service but specifically his privately owned account

No, fuck nuts, this is the problem:
http://www.newsweek.com/trump-tweets-spicer-official-statements-621919

If Trump claims his tweets are official US policy he's obstructing citizen access to that policy by blocking their twitter accounts.

>>128853790

>http://newsweek com/trump-tweets-spicer-official-statements-621919
https://archive.is/uuVVz

>>128853778
Right on, but did the white house ever treat tweets as official statements?

>>128853895
you need an account to view them
shut the fuck up you leftist cocksucker

>>128853895
>>128853943
don't***

LOL These people so butthurt they got blocked on Twitter. First amendment only applies to government, not a private business. Fucking retards.

>>128853790
The tweets are publicly available to everyone, restrictions only apply to signed in users tweeting at him, they can easily read those official statements by not being logged in. If they are, they are obstructing their own ability, or at most, Twitter is

>>128853790
That's a very weak argument seeing as they can still see it logged out, besides it's already questionable conclusion

Here's the thing. I can see every one of Trump's tweets and I don't have a faggy twitter account. So these people who are claiming he is blocking them from seeing information can simply sign out of their accounts to view the tweets. This is pure idiocy.

>>128853943
>>128853965
>>128854130
Let me rephrase what I meant by access:

His tweets are now public domain. Meaning people have a first ammendment right to express themselves in that domain.

why dont they just, i dont know, LOG OUT AND VIEW THEM??????????????

File: 1496075458308.jpg (42KB, 540x547px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 540x547px

>it's illegal to block anyone who have a blue check and is confirmed from the US
>blue checks always get priority at the top

If it's a "public forum", then they does Twitter get to dictate who gets a blue check which allows them to sit atop of said "forum"?

>>128854385
>Meaning people have a first ammendment right to express themselves in that domain.

So how can Twitter kick people off its platform and suspend their accounts without penalty?

File: 1477320455301.png (836KB, 837x835px) Image search: [Google]

836KB, 837x835px

>>128852204
>Your country is a fucking embarrassment

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp_O3liJpu8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5p4NUJMPAjQ

>>128854385
What a stupid argument. By that logic, nobody can ever block anyone.

>>128854539
It can't, that's why there is a class action in the works.

>>128854539
The situation is very bizarre and hairy.

I have no fucking clue what Spicer and Trump were trying to accomplish by claiming his tweets as official statements.

>>128854674
>private company can't do as it damn well pleases

That's the exact opposite of what leftists were saying when gamergate and anyone else conservative were being fucked with. Hmm. I wonder.

>>128852326
Are you cooperating with /leftypol/ when you raid /pol/ , Shareblue?

>>128854587
Not everyone is the leader of the country with a constitution that protects free speech and claim their twitter account as a public platform.

>>128854735
>claiming his tweets as official statements.

They're already seen as such - Hillary took at least SEVEN fucking staffers to compose and/or sign off on one fucking tweet, for instance. People know this. Every fucking company has a twitter account now, it's the new PR.

But given that Democrats are ripping their hair out and screeching as if every 140 word tweet has the same gravitas and import as an address delivered from the fucking Rose Garden, saying "these r official tweetz" is just a good way to get the media wound up even more. The more they screech, the less credibility they have.

>>128852510
Always has been, it's just you noticing it now.

>>128854385
You are free to express yourself in any such manner, but if you're blocked you can't include @realdonaldtrump in your 140 character messages
Unless you want to take it up to twitter, that knowing who's working on the tech side, would just remove anyone's ability to tweet @realdonaldtrump, doing the exact opposite of what you want, and without repercussions

Somebody sue Steve Shives.

>>128853790
>log out
>can read the tweets

>>128854783
this is why we need first amendment and free speech provisions for public spaces on the internet

blocking people is still fine, but barring people from using the service for saying things you dont like is unconstitutional, though not currently against the law

>>128855094
The cunts who are pushing this aren't upset they can't read it they want their snarky reply chains on every tweet he makes.

>>128853615
>Trump’s Twitter account @realDonaldTrump is a “designated public forum”

No it isn't, these lawyers are retards

>>128855187
I literally can't wait for twitter to push themselves as "Voice of the POTUS" by making Trump's tweet unable to be replied to and always stickied on the front page

This is retardation. Obviously it's not unconstitutional to block someone on your twitter account. Maybe if he blocked them with the POTUS account but I doubt that he did since he mostly uses his personal account.

>>128853790
or maybe trump is counting on people to not be such utter sewer faggots and take twitter so seriously

If twitter is a public forum then it should be illegal to censor and ban people.

Also can you imagine being so butthurt over getting blocked on Twitter that you file a lawsuit? LOL

Fuck me, the west has become addicted to a website chat room, known as twitter. Its a website FFS. A chat room. Even Trump is addicted to it.

Bloddy hell, its a chat room. Text on a computer screen. Never understood why people take it so seriously.

It's a chat room FFS.

File: 1482608810620.gif (2MB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x180px

lmao bullshit

File: twoscoops2.jpg (50KB, 750x563px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 750x563px

>>128851793
IMPEACH FLUMPF!!!!
NOW!!

File: 1442960162337.jpg (7KB, 150x146px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 150x146px

What kind of precedent do they intend to set here? Half these people use block lists and block people that they disagree with, yet they are trying to claim being blocked themselves has violated their rights. What about the rights of the people that have blocked? This wont even get to trial, but I'd love to see the pandoras box it would have opened if they were to win.

HAHAHA yes, once this becomes precedent law I Pajeet can harass all the white women's online without being blocked,

File: 1489334353231.jpg (118KB, 540x494px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 540x494px

>>128854385

Can't wait to give my opinion on eugenics and Jewish plots in the Rose garden.

Thanks for this useful and totally not retarded information.

>>128854385
It's not like whitehouse.gov has a comment section you fucking monkey

>>128856535
Obama blocked me. do I get gibme's?

>>128856535
Wouldn't the most logical conclusion from this illogical case of Trump blocking randos from viewing his tweets be to force twitter to get rid of the block feature?

Actually, that would be a great Idea

>>128854385
>a first ammendment right

Have you even read the constitution?

>>128851876

It's over for him.

File: leaf.jpg (17KB, 600x357px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 600x357px

>>128852204

Maybe but you would know what an embarrassing country is.

>>128852204
Youre at the bottom of the totem pole you fucking maple bacon fuck tard. Go practice your pronouns in front of the bathroom mirror.

This is like the woman who claimed he raped her as a teenager. The whole point is to make a big initial stink to try to influence minds but the result never gets published. She never appeared in court and the case was dropped that was quietly reported. This if it goes to court will amount to nothing and that won't be reported but everyone will remember TRUMP WAS ANTI 1ST AMENDMENT.

I am honestly surprised a Dylan Roof type guy hasn't shot up CNN HQ or anything equivalent yet not that I am endorsing that.

>>128856841
Well yeah, they could just remove the block feature, but so would every other social media site if blocking someone is determined to be violating their rights.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

>>128854385
except thats wrong

>>128854385
>when /leftpol/ ventures out of their hugbox

>>128851793
so basically they crave the attention or refuse to make a new account? wtf is this crap man.
are they so desperate for a twitter version of a (you) they are taking this seriously? because this is fucking baffling to me.
I do miss sweetieposting tho,wonder what she is doing now

>>128853790
1. The public has no inherent right in this country to the details of all policy matters.
2. In the case of unclassified information, you can go through official channels by submitting a FOIA request.
3. Or stop being a nignog and log out of twitter to read the tweets.

I think this is some kind of Jew move to get this in court and then assert that whilst the case is ongoing, Trump is not allowed to tweet

File: 1466694807243.jpg (2MB, 3000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3000x3000px

>>128851793
>Assblasted libs
>sips tea

>>128852204
Livestream your suicide leaf.

File: 1457717606879.gif (2MB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 250x250px

>>128858359
he could start up a new rival for twitter and how many would follow him just to shitpost and bot? they have proved how insane they are for his daily words they are seriously trying to take him to court so senpai notices them...this fucking timeline never fails to amaze me.

>>128858501
that better be a dude bro,tell me it's a dude bro?

File: schvswhm.gif (2MB, 320x200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x200px

>>128851793
There's grasping at straws, there's scraping the bottom of the barrel, and then there's this.

>1st amendment

Twitter is fucked if they do anything about this.

Every person ever banned will have to be unlocked.

>>128851793
No safe space if you want to be president!

File: 1496345459277.jpg (109KB, 358x477px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 358x477px

>>128851793

>>128856183
worst thing about it is their stock is in the shitter

Most popular social media platform and they can't figure out a way to make money with it.

>>128858596
I'd pay a lot of money for this to happen and to get rid of the fucking verified nobodies replying 10 times in a row to his tweets. The level of cognitive dissonance these people show is astounding and I would not bet against them trying to get him impeached for blocking them on twitter. Social media won Trump the presidency and you can be sure as hell it could cost him the presidency if these mental cases have their way

He blocked them on his PERSONAL Twitter not the @POTUS only one of those has legal implications.

File: 1489601601057.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>128852204

>>128851793
>these fucking retards actually called a lawyer over a Twitter block

>>128852510
they've been pants on head retarded, they just recently also realized that they can spout nothing but bullshit and flat out lie without any consequences

>>128852204
takes one to know one

>>128852510
>RT
>Western

Klumpf btfo!

>>128851793
Finally they're springing their master plan. Eat shit Grumph! Haha, you losers are fucked, Blomph is going to prison.
Try not to cry too much Vloumph voters, the drains don't work that greats in your mom's basement, you may flood the place.

>>128852254

Pretty much, care to share your exact method so we can open a class action?

>>128852510
it was never good, but in 2013 the law against domestic use of propaganda was repealed and the MSM became the mouthpiece of the deep state

>>128856183
>tfw despite being an abysmal business that just burns money they'll never let it die because they are all mentally enslaved by it

If Twitter said they'd have to shut down due to missing funds they'd probably get millions in an hour. They should just open a Patreon and finally make black numbers.

>>128859998
Crynald Chirrisumph btfo

>>128858300
these people try to build a career around farming twitter followers by being in the top comments below Trump's tweets.

there's one guy who keeps shilling his shitty blog every fucking time he tweets at Trump

File: 1492057032038.jpg (78KB, 517x650px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 517x650px

>>128852204

File: 1496481849528.jpg (130KB, 796x796px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 796x796px

>>128859068
The president is never not the president.

>>128860335
I still don't understand how twitter followers earns them money,then again like another anon pointed out above twitter is just a really shitty chatroom with character limits and it is world wide famous for reasons that elude me.

They would have a legitimate argument if he was blocking people from the official government account. From a personal account not acting in a governmental role you can tell people to fuck off left right and center for any reason you want.

>>128860544
Exactly because of the character limit.
Half of these people probably ran abysmal blogs that no one ever read because who the fuck would waste 10 minutes to read through their daily drivel?

But a 140 characters tweet can be consumed in a second or two, so finally they actually get people to listen to them. With the added bonus that they don't need to put any effort into it.

I am so fucking glad it never got that big in Germany. The media is shilling it hard as fuck 24/7 but the adoption rate among Germans is really poor.

>>128860488
The difference here being that Kathy Griffin is a well-known celebrity whereas the bottom pics were literally red-neck retards in the middle of bumfuck no where.

>>128854385
they can still do that, just not is his account.

White house Youtube Chat is also disabled.

>>128851793

DRUMPF IS DONE IMPEACHMENT IMMINENT

HE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH BLOCKING TWITTER USERS EVEN REPUBLICANS ARE TURNING ON HIM NOW

File: 1495837951151.jpg (99KB, 592x758px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 592x758px

>>128861220
>well known celebrity
The TV has an off button, senpai.

>>128860488
wrong

File: 1490028265647.jpg (22KB, 1024x511px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 1024x511px

>>128852204
Well isnt that the pot calling the kettle a nigger

>>128854385

You seriously want forced access to view someones account you hate..... And you wonder why you guys are going insane. Technically speaking the account is on a private website which means that the law would fall onto a company to dictate. Until there is some legal precedent which there will never be you need serious fucking help.

>>128861894
>wrong
It's like a 4chan downvote

>>128860768
Even if it were the official account where is the issue? What is preventing people from logging out to read his tweets, or making a new account to tweet him/writing him a fucking letter? They're literally not being preventing from doing anything.

Captcha: watchman swift

>>128851793
>First world problems
Tell that to Russians who are friendly banned for live, to ever use their hands again.

The media reports on literally every one of his tweets. Thisnis akin to demanding access to the white house press briefing room instead of just watching it on tv.

Yaaaas Plimp is finally finished slay me

>>128852204
What is your preferred pronoun?

>>128851793

-(((lawyers)))

File: SBfEoOF.jpg (937KB, 1920x1032px) Image search: [Google]

937KB, 1920x1032px

>>128851793
Eat a nigger dick faggot

>>128862110
Bump for an answer, I seriously don't understand this outrage at all

Wtf? I hate trump now

>>128851793
So when lefties block people it is fine because much private company, but when Trump does it it is a problem

>>128851793
that's dumb as fuck

File: fightBankers.jpg (71KB, 600x622px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 600x622px

Get Bent.

If that's the case twitter will collapse under the financial burden of mass civil rights violation lawsuits.

>>128865310
Leftists are histrionic if you hadn't noticed.

>>128851992
>Drumpft loses because (((Ginsburg)))
>copy paste shitlib Trump spam to Democrat politicos
>get blocked/bant
>sue for violating muh first amendment
I'm fine with this

>>128852204
>entire national identity is not being American

Sad!

>>128851793
This is not a precedent libs want to set

Twitter is a private owned website and doesn't have to follow any rules.

>>128852326
Is this supposed to be a real shill, or some faggot pretending to be a shill?

>trump moves to gab.ai

>>128853790
>If Trump claims his tweets are official US policy he's obstructing citizen access to that policy by blocking their twitter accounts.
Spam every politician's account with MLP shops, claim 1st amendment rights to do so. Easy peasy.

>>128851793
>"- lawyers"
Cheeky RT.

Anyone can view his tweets.
This is so stupid, it hurts.

File: 1494432320668.gif (328KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 500x281px

>>128851793

>>128851793
>Blocking someone on Twitter gets people riled up
>abandoning borders and forcing your people to subsidize their invasion doesn't
Really makes you consider suicide

>>128862505
LEAF

>>128851793
>It's over for you drumpfags!!!!!!!!111!!!1
>W-what? You're ALLOWED to do that? REEEEEEEEEEE
>Pack your bags up fellow cucklords we lost.

When will people stop confusing rights with privileges? Twitter is a private forum with rules. You are not guaranteed any rights in a private forum. Also, he's blocking from his personal account, not even the POTUS account

I really hope these lawyers names and firms become public knowledge, and they get BTFO and ridiculed for their ineptitude.

File: just rake my shit up.png (122KB, 456x385px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 456x385px

>>128852204

>>128852204
I know. I hope the Russian coup rumors are true and they plan to burn it all down out of spite.

>>128852204
please stop

>>128851793

>Privately owned corporation
>public democratic forum

>>128852204
Lel, America could become Mexico 2.0, Cartel Boogaloo and I would still prefer it to fucking Canada.

>>128857176
I would actually love this. Filters fags get fucked. Triggering bitches is fun.

File: scoopcity.jpg (32KB, 505x490px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 505x490px

>>128853066

>>128852204
>Bill 89
Day of the rake soon

>>128872267
It's hard to tell nowdays

Apologays!

>>128852204
Sad burger with proxy.

>>128852254
yes and anyone who blocks you the scum.

>>128860488
People got sent to jail for that, the same people who were mad about that are happy about kaphy griffiths display and vice verse. Pot calling the kettle black and then the kettle calling the pot black in rebuttal

>>128851793
I didn't know that spam bots had a first amendment right.

>>128873131
True. Let's hope

File: 1411043853060.jpg (1MB, 3500x2455px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3500x2455px

>>128857078
This. Same way a lot of liberals still scream "TRUMP WAS CHARGED FOR CHILD RAPE" even though it never went to court and the plaintiff silently dropped the case. They will now scream "TRUMP WAS CHARGED WITH CENSORING CRITICS".

It's all about the optics and what the masses will remember.

>>128857078
Didn't the CNN headquarters in Turkey get shot up during their attempted coup last year?

>>128853790
And we are prevented from entering federal buildings if we don't pass security or if we start a riot, or if there's too many of us. Get a FOIA request and move on.

>>128854385
So should all emails be public domain too?

>>128860892
>The media is shilling it hard as fuck 24/7 but the adoption rate among Germans is really poor.
Is there a reason for that? Or is it just usual German autism combined with it being mostly English site? Pretty envious senpai, it's getting bigger and bigger here I find.

>>128851793
Then twitter violates conservative 1st amendment rights every minute.

Is this real life?

>>128854735
so the framers of the Constitution could never invision an AR-15 being available to the people

But responding to the presidents Tweet is your God given right

>>128851793
>PRESIDENT Donald Trump violated first amendment rights
>CONGRESS shall make no law... abridging the right of free speech.

So by this logic Twitter is liable for millions in damages for every one they have banned

>>128852204
>Our country is a fucking embarrassment

What you actually meant to say.

File: 1493131847073.jpg (96KB, 659x689px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 659x689px

>>128858501
this is a perfect 10. oh wow

>>128851793
>It's ok to harrass Trump on Twitter but only I can block anybody I want

>>128852204
>Your country is a fucking embarrassment
>a leaf
the irony

>>128854385
Brb, heading to my safe space at uc Berkeley with my maga hat.

>>128871611

Lol, if he loses, it would be the most spectacular suicide ever, as it would mean Twitter and all other social media are now public utilities.

No more unfair banning, no more disappearing right-wing hashtags, no more increasingly draconian speech terms of service.

File: oh_my_effing_sweetie.jpg (96KB, 603x579px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 603x579px

>Honeypie is so distraught over having her twitter spotlight taken away that she's seeking legal protection for her sweetie-tweeting

Love it. Loooooove it.

>>128851793
Ignoring someone didn't affect their ability to speech at will.

>>128851793
https://www.rt.com/usa/391180-trump-tweet-first-amendment/

fuck off with your autism

File: 1486569588241.jpg (41KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 657x527px

>>128851793
does this mean i can get my ex to unblock me now

>>128851793

I think it would be funny if Twitter shadowbanned Trump.

>>128860488
>people where sent to jail for goign out in public with obama masks and nooses around their necks
>bunch of random nobodies make a picture on the internet

>hurr totally the same as a celebrity with a a segment in a prominent news network

File: Screenshot_5.jpg (12KB, 322x287px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 322x287px

>>128875710
>having an ex
NORMIES GTFO

Right wing twitter accounts get shut down on a daily basis all the time yet one shitlib gets blocked by a person and suddenly its anotha shoah. They are hypocrite pussies, they dish it out but can't take it

>implying social media is public space

Fucking idiots

>>128851793

So twitter violated the fist amendment by introducing that function in the first place.

Interesting...

File: Autism.gif (128KB, 728x426px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 728x426px

>>128851793

No one is forced to read your bullshit.

Also what do leftists usually say, oh right. "You have free speech but you aren't free from the consequences of that speech."

smugpepe.jpg

what about now?

File: a reddit user.png (105KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 500x375px

>>128851793
>I HAVE A RIGHT TO BLOW SHIT ONTO MY COMPUTER SCREEN!!!

Just because a lawyer says it's true, doesn't mean it is, and if President Trump is violating the first amendment by blocking people, so was Obama and so is everybody on Twitter.

>>128854385
Oh, okay, so social media sites can't ban anyone now.

Sounds good to me.

>(((lawyers)))

theyre just kikes that the twitter fags ran to

>>128851793
>media pushes bullshit to create tensions and then they stop
>RT keeps pushing for the lulz

Its nothing, they just like to write about Trump and then they stop but RT wants to have some fun and will push a bit more and see what comes out of it, the truth is that every single twitter politician blocks users...

>>128875418
>>>128852204 #
>>Your country is a fucking embarrassment
>>a leaf
>the irony

>a burger using a proxy to bait
>20 other dumb burgers taking the bait
>this happening on a constant basis on /pol

leftists everywhere be like free speech doesnt mean you get to have a platform

>>128851793
He's not stopping them from shitting up Twitter for other users, they can still use the same hashtags as before. Not a violation.

File: mourning_angel_wallpaper_35d79.jpg (178KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1024x768px

>>128858987
Seriously I hate what they do to trump's tweets. You look at comments and its always ALWAYS those blue check mark shitlibs making some asinine rude smug or virtue signal comments. Always. Never an exception. I understand why Trump would block them, they contribute nothing. Even when he posts completely neutral tweets like about helping vets the first comment is a blue check white cuck saying typically "resign moron" with 10k likes and rts. And you have to scroll down forever with similar tweets until you get to one comment that isn' pure text bile from like a trump normie.

>>128852204
At least I won't have my kids taken away for refusing to let them cut their dicks off.