Islamic Inbreeding

>>128826210
they have a cave troll!

Too much heroin problems, paedos and transexuals in Pakistan with higher consaguinity.

>>128826735
>>128777202
More of that subhuman paedo and transexual culture in Afghanistan and in Pakistan:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eM-xe6wHjnw

And in subhuman Pakistan - South Asia

>In towns and cities across Pakistan, tens of thousands of vulnerable young boys have become the victims of paedophile predators who seem to have nothing to fear from the law. It’s an open secret that few acknowledge publicly and even fewer want to do anything about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMp2wm0VMUs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvehhXaFh8U
>. Maggie is a prostitute who dreams of becoming an air hostess, while Chahat was abandoned by her middle-class family to beg on the streets.

It's more or else in the middle-east with its highest frequency in Pakistan. Arabian gulf also has a high frequency. Inbreeding is non-existent in places like Malaysia, Indonesia, Central Asia, Balkans and turkey except for the Kurds.

it's impressive that the skin can accommodate something as big as a parasitic twin. does it actually repair itself if overstretched slowly like that over years? rapid deformation does shit like birthmarks but his head skin is looking good!

>>128828922
Source?

https://pjmedia.com/blog/the-problem-of-inbreeding-in-islam/
>400% more likely to be clinicly retarded (sub 70 iq)
>if the parrents are cousins, the iq goes down by 10-16 points
>increased risk of schizofrenia and other various mental illneses
I can't cite it, but I read somever that in amimals, it causes increased agrresive behaviours

>>128829841
what about the millions of years we spent as tribes, or hundreds of millions for other animal groups... biology has to account for it in other ways besides purely negative, retarded fish-frog monkeys

>>128830212
Steal other tribes women (like the rape of sabin women), "marry" outside of the tribe. They were a lotnless isolated than you'd think.

>>128826210
Those are indians in the picture....

>>128831229
>implying that Muslims arent stealing indie

>>128831321
India*

>>128830212
For animals, in monkey troops it's custumary for the males to leave the troop when become mature amd form a mew troop with their peers

>>128826210
thats india you stupid nigger

>>128831131
but on some level it cannot be avoided, and it's established from genetic analysis that we simply don't have enough ancestors to account for everyone fucking outside of the family. i wonder if the act of taking spouses (the behavior) led to intelligence. we can run the data backwards and find retardation, i mean

Let them inbreed even more.

eventually they will become so retarded, they they wont be considered human anyone, and so violent that not even libtards can defend them any more.

better their cousin than our sisters.

>>128828922

Somaila has the highest inbreeding of any country. Hence why it's a failed state and the people are deformed proto humans

>>128831532
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1936-magic-number-for-space-pioneers-calculated/
>only 160 people needed to create a healthy multi-generational colony
160 is not that many
Also yes, it's selection bias, we only know about the ones who had good enough genes

>>128831742
Source?

Oh, and here is a video about cousin marriage in th UK.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aAD0yJ3SdQ

UK:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/children/11723308/First-cousin-marriages-in-Pakistani-communities-leading-to-appalling-disabilities-among-children.html

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leeds-23183102

>>128832244
no, 160 is very little. there are troops of monkeys that herd. when i think of the native american's, i think of tribes of between two dozen and maybe 150. of course there were larger tribes, but again, there are the aboriginals, who can go decades between tribes. their lineages went east and west, and didn't meet for few thousand years again.

my first question though, was is there some way that our biology benefits the short term? obviously yes, more retards is apparently better for survival chances then few intelligent offspring.

File: InbreedingMap500.gif (54KB, 500x314px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x314px

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/08/the-individual-social-risks-of-cousin-marriage/

>>128832920
more retards is apparently better for survival chances then few intelligent offspring.
Well you know, there is strenght in numbers. Also the first generatiom is probably not that bad. You can still instruct a 70 iq guy to go there and scare the animals towards the trap