W-what did she mean by this??

It's called lying, Abdul.

>>128797027
>implying they have a human right to be there
what a dumbfuck

>>128797027
She meant intent to do something about terrorism, unlike Khan who literally responds to terror attacks with "well we just gotta get used to it"

File: london-bigbrother-eyes-52124-o.jpg (575KB, 1024x1441px) Image search: [Google]

575KB, 1024x1441px

>>128797027
>Orwell was right
UK really is playing 4D chess

>>128797027
Deport Sadiq Kahn for his ties to the Muslim Brotherhood then we will talk. Can you imagine the butt hurt.

File: may_be_not.jpg (210KB, 684x960px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 684x960px

>>128797027
>some of them actually believe me

Fuck human rights

>>128797795
of course she is. she knows muslims aren't human thus have no rights.

>>128797027

Okay, Im on board with the communists now, clearly were making headway by threatening the country with the worst candidate. Corbyn ftw.

>>128797027
She is going to send all of brit/pol/ to australia

>>128797027
"Human rights" = Jewish made up drivel that protects muslims and prevents their deportation. There was never any such thing as human rights, governments will always find a way to fuck us if they wanted to.

>>128797027
She doesn't know what she fucking means.

She's just as clueless about how to deal with this as everyone else is.

>>128797940
What do you mean by this?

File: 93f2fbfa26aa74fc5e7746c4e0e55441.png (10KB, 604x109px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 604x109px

>terrorist suspects

>>128797027
She meant:
>My poll numbers are going through the floor; I've cut police numbers by 20000 and people have realised this is not a good idea; I don't have a fucking clue what I'm doing in this job - I know I'll say it's the fault of the ECHR, that'll get the kippers back on side.

>>128797027
Basically judges here in the UK have made rulings that disallow for the deportation of terrorists and foreign criminals for bs reasons such as the 'right to family life'

She's sending Tommy Robinson back to Ireland.

File: 1486925118318.png (161KB, 480x476px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 480x476px

>>128797294
>when you take 1984 as an instruction manual instead of a warning
Good going, bongistan

File: 1494420943656.jpg (51KB, 468x484px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 468x484px

>>128797027
>tfw internment camps will be a reality in your lifetime

File: IMG_1090.jpg (15KB, 313x422px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 313x422px

>>128797027
England shall prevail!

>>128798400

>implying we won't just put them in the camps and then send them to America so Trump can deny them entry and send them back to the U.K. like we do with the brown ones.

File: 1401048491777.jpg (11KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 251x242px

Honestly, we're pretty fucked. It's not like we have any real freedoms anyway, but she's openly saying this stuff now.

You just know that rhetoric like >>128798580 is going to be used against people like us.


>>128798870
>>128798962
>>128799044
You can come off like a shill m8

>>128797027
interdasting... very interdasting. torys arent above pandering but may has been all over the place. who gives a fuck about the internet if your going to deport them?

seems like this was last second change in direction. if in fact she said it

Wish she were telling the truth but you can't trust politicians before elections because the truth is "humans rights" is a meme from the left, only the victims from the left receive any attention the rest just can go and cry far away! Look all the bs they talk about Pinochet's "victims" how about the victims of Fidel Castro, Mao or Pol Pot? Well no one cares!

>>128799044
lose vb. tr.
To fail to retain (something)

>implying may ever had the plot to begin with

>>128799089
for white males maybe. they arrest you for insulting islam in the uk. they won't be putting mudslimes in those camps for sure

>>128798718

It is the fault of the ECHR.

And the fault of May.

And Mi5. And Mi6.

And Labour. The Tories.

Basically everyone in charge over there has no idea what the fuck they are doing and refuse to deal with the situation because it's ugly and uncomfortable.

I mean...rather than allocating enough police to handle terrorism cases...she suggested telcoms log what porn sites you're visiting.

She's clueless and confused.

>>128797027
Followers of islam are no longer human so it will be easier to deport them.

>>128799089

They already were in mine. For Potato Niggers.

>>128797224
If terrorism is an everyday part of life. Why isn't stopping terrorism and everyday part of life?

File: 7e245d7aaaa26b55650555e5a046b8db.png (46KB, 713x649px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 713x649px

>people being banned from using the internet or mobile phones
>clamp down on internet firms that allow extremist material


W A K E
T H E
F U C K
U P
L A D S

>>128797027
What an idiot.
I'm not saying that this isn't necessary, because without re-migration western countries will have to act like muslim countries to keep basic order.

But saying that bluntly, seeming to reject the human rights values the brits were brainwashed into, that will cause a rejection toward her.

>>128797191
Who gives a fuck what stupid RURTARDS think

>>128799578
Your last three lines actually made sense. With some hard work, you might be able to make a fully coherent and sensible post.

Good job, fella.

>>128797191
They do thanks to the ECHR (European Court of Human Rights).

>>128797169
Not really though. Most tory policies could be seen as breach of human rights. If they tear up human rights laws they are free to fuck over everyone in this country all in the name of beating terrorism..... while still selling weapons to Saudi and allowing Saudi funded mosques be built in Britain.

Basically, anyone voting Tory is a fucking mong.

>>128797027
Human rights laws are shit anyway. Terrorists have a "human right" to stay in Britain. Fuck human rights.

File: 1478942865139.jpg (63KB, 490x497px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 490x497px

>>128797027

Rip and tear

File: thisfuckingtimeline.jpg (8KB, 246x200px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 246x200px

>>128798766
Underrated post

/OURMUM/

>>128799448
Ofc you are fucked, but it's honestly the only way to even start dealing with the muslim problem and you know it. Allowing muslim immigration itself already destroyed Europe, cleaning it up will probably be impossible, but it doesn't mean you just let in and bend over.

They have avoided to poke to fire, once they actually start rounding up radical muslims, which is a great number of the actual muslim population, you are gonna see the start of a civial war, moderate muslims support these radicals just like they did in Syria.

>>128800046
Then what is the UKIP doing?

>>128800252
The post has one approving reply; so it's already overrated.

File: 1490653183386.gif (2MB, 540x603px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 540x603px

>>128799723
>get banned from the internet and using mobile phones for shitposting on 4chan

being a bong is suffering

>>128797027
is she actually pushing this or is the media trying a smear campaign like they did with the american elections?

>>128800428
Imploding

File: c4a.jpg (23KB, 680x558px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 680x558px

>implying you guys now suddenly care years after prism, snowden leaks etc
fuuuck you. I told you a thousand times.

>>128800366
She doesn't fucking care about any actual problem! What don't people get? Immigration rose to its highest ever level under her, she's praised Shariah Law in the past.

Do you know how I'm not gonna bend over? By not letting my fucking basic rights being taken away because some cunt is using Islamic terrorism as an excuse to do so. She proposed all of this before the 2 recent attacks, even.

>>128800625
She gave a speech on it today. Also human rights is not the same thing as rights generally, it refers to a specific group of laws passed post-1997 by Tony Blair, mainly to protect minority groups.

File: To be alive...to walk this earth....jpg (103KB, 780x846px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 780x846px

Just nuke this country already.

>>128800628
Can't Nigel come back?

File: IMG_2376.gif (407KB, 220x220px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 220x220px

I would unironically have passionate sex with her.

>I'm going to tear up human rights so we can deport terrorists
>looks like I won, wrongthink is now a crime
>islam is a great faith, nothing to do with terrorism
>more islam for the UK

>>128800625
I think most people are willing to take the risk of cracking down on human rights for the sake of cleansing mussies, even if the chances are rather small that it actually happens. So pushing this as a 'smear campaign' will probably just earn her more votes.

File: human rights.jpg (29KB, 399x399px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 399x399px

She should call up Duterte to get some pointers.

File: english-faggots-england-faggot-british-demotivational-poster-1222233346.gif.jpg (68KB, 336x378px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 336x378px

so much fun watching you cunts go down. its a pity i cant share my blogs and contributions, you cunts would love them.
vote may goy
for england

>>128797027
She is desperate, to think people criticized Corbyns comments earlier this month about terrorism when this cunt is leaning into it full force now because she knows its her only way to win, she likely will too, genuinely disappointed in my country.

>>128800428
UKIP can't compete.Tories have stolen UKIP voters by copying their policies. UKIP are too pussy to call out the Tories because all right wing media outlets will turn on UKIP the moment they do.

>>128797294
This is creepy as shit. I would ask if these people have ever even heard of 1984 but then I remember I wasn't required to read it in school, either.

>>128799723

No-one gives a shit about you going on 4chan. You're not special. memes don't win elections. Kek didn't will Trump into power.

This is specifically saying don't let little Ahmed download a bomb instruction guide from www.jihadsRus.com all in the name of free speech.

>>128800567
>can't voice opinion online

Time for soapboxing and pamphleteering again.

>>128797704
This would be a sign of actually doing something.

>>128797027
Question the government? That's right you're a terrorist now.

How retarded do u have to be to vote for nasty old cunt

>>128797027
nothing.

She's completely empty, her only qualification to be PM is that she is a professional woman.

>>128800811
He's already suggested it. Once a limelight-monkey, always a limelight-monkey.

>>128800743
No european actually cares about the european people, we have all been sold out anon. But both you and me knows that there's no other way to deal with this shit than rounding up mussies, but every single law forbids it. You have no choice, labour is literally infested by muslims, Rotherham was fucking silenced by Labour members.

File: 1474219921999.jpg (379KB, 1230x1358px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 1230x1358px

>>128797027
>3rd generation quintessentially British gentlemen
Deported to where? Scotland?
>being deported by Shariah May
Just like she deported millions during her 7+ years of being in charge of the Home Office...

File: MUMMY MAY LOVES YOU LOTS.jpg (145KB, 1122x669px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1122x669px

Terrorists Talk


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndYPp-3cvbk

>>128801306
european politician*

>>128799260
They still own your country so they will just open another penal colony. Plus why would you refuse entry of your kin and /pol/acks?

>>128800997
So this is real?!

I thought it was from a dystopian future movie.

Hmmm...
>introduce danger
>don't fix danger
>create a surveillance state

>>128801028
>removal of human rights protections
>specific to some people only

pick one.

>>128801342

>all 7 years under EU Law

We created Australia last time we decided to clear out the country of criminals. Qatar will be a smoking hole by the end of 2017, why not there.

File: Secure.jpg (40KB, 375x500px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 375x500px

>>128801519
>So this is real?!
Yes.

>>128801543

>don't plan on committing mass murder
>don't go to jail

pick both.

File: 1472917293341.png (72KB, 523x700px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 523x700px

>>128801568
>EU law forced the UK to import millions of Commonwealth jihadis
Damn, if the EU's so powerful it may be better to collaborate.

>the very moment the uk leaves the protection of the european treaties its government turns into a totalitarian dictatorship
It's like pottery. GG no re, bongs.

>>128800046
you people need to tear up human rights only when it comes to muslims and discriminate them specificaly.

When a specific group is the problem, you target and focus on that group.

>>128801519
like I said
It's literal 4D chess

>>128801731
Fundamental rights are not the same as penal codes. Except in this one respect:

They apply to everyone or no-one.

>>128800865
that would be overt hostility to the native population right (as if the last few years have not been)

This generation is looking for the greenlight from a propaganda medium of its enemy before reacting

KEK

>>128801607
Horrifying...

this is part of why you don't let dumbies import every kind of immigrant they can get their hands on, because eventually you are going to have an equally extreme reaction.

Brits deserve this tbqh though. They have become genuine failures. Fucking dumb cunts.

>>128801767

>Youssef Zaghba

Moroccan Italian

>Rachid Redouane

Irish based with an EU Permit

What is EU freedom of movement?

She means she is gonna take away everyone's rights to keep you "safe". Remember remember the fifth of November .

>>128801306
No shit, but the only thing that will come out of the Conservatives doing this is whitey getting into more of a cucked state.

I'd rather have Labour, at least they'll speed up the inevitable.

>>128797027
This is how it starts. They suspend rights so that they can get rid of the problem. Then after the problem is gone they never give the rights back for "your safety". Enjoy your totalitarian state, this is the future your people chose.

File: 1461262274864.jpg (41KB, 688x456px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 688x456px

>>128798504
>"Human rights" = Jewish made up drivel that protects muslims and prevents their deportation
>yes goy, give up your human rights and let us take care of you hehe

File: 1484374818469.jpg (70KB, 700x535px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 700x535px

>>128802120
>What is EU freedom of movement?
The UK doesn't have free movement you retard. You're not in Schengen, you've got border controls, you've got a totalitarian surveillance state that has the dirt on everyone and literal lists of people not allowed to enter the UK. Pic fucking related!

And your sovereign government let in these fine gentlemen and the others before them. Why aren't you mentioning the 3rd attacker, the quintessential Brit?

File: 1422427479191.jpg (49KB, 616x699px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 616x699px

She'll be cracking down on those evil right wing extremists of course. All extreme material on the internet, including anti-semetic websites like 4chan will be banned. Meanwhile shitskins born in britbongistan will count as "natives" and thus won't be deported, allowing them to continue the terrorist attacks while what little freedom you've had will be eroded.

File: 1491546487794.jpg (353KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 640x480px

Anyone here played Orwell? I think it's a good example of what the UK is going to look like in the next years.

>>128801856
You can't tear up human right laws for a certain group of people. It applies to everyone.

It won't be long before they're monitoring the entire fucking country just to "keep us safe"

>We're going to remove specific blocks on our ability to detain and/or deport dangerous criminals who are intent on killing people.

>THEY WON'T LET ME LOOK AT IMAGEBOARD HENTAI

>4Chan

>>128797795
8/10 would smash

>>128800743
Shut up Corbyn you Subversive Alinskyite cunt that uses lawfare to push your bullshit.
Maybe you idiots should not have abused these things to the benefit of terrorists.

>>128802636
>>128802120
>>128801731
>>128801568
>>128801028
Do you get paid to be a retarded bootlicker?

>>128800567
More of these gifs please

>>128797294
>>128801607
The joke is that the surveillance is as strong as a wet paper towel, as soon as someone starts banging on it, it breaks like a twig and if anyone actually started doing some infrastructure damage they would find just how centralized this entire state of surveillance is, to the point that the entire system can be shut down by a single person with the right point of insertion
The mentality behind it was that perceived surveillance would discourage crime, and if crime were to occur they would have evidence of it quite easily. The sad reality is that the system itself is insufficient even on the standards of operation in other countries, and it is covered up by the smokes and mirrors of this kind of propaganda.

So bongstan is gonna turn in to v for vendetta
USA is turning in to transmetropoliton.
How fucked are we?

>>128797027

Sounds like a condescending cunt. Its all the world really makes these days.

>>128802120
>Salman Abedi
British born son of Libyan refugee parents.
Member of LIFG.
Allowed, with his family, to return to Libya to help overthrow Gaddafi.
Return of passport sanctioned by Home Office, run by one T May.

Still an EU problem?

>>128802628
>It won't be long before they're monitoring the entire fucking country just to "keep us safe"
they already are...

im out, if I get any more disappointed tonight I might an hero. and no, I will not spoonfeed you the fucking details.

>>128802808
>hur

>>128797224

I'm gonna get used to it all right. I'm gonna shoot some leaders and get my self feeling right at home!

>>128801028
>what is the do/k/ument
My dude, 4chan is getting banned in the UK once mummy may gets in.

File: May the new boss, same as the old boss.jpg (352KB, 976x768px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 976x768px

>>128802636
I'll be laughing my ass off when Shariah May puts all the Bongposters in internment camps in Birmingham for extremist hate speech.

>>128802914
considering people on leddit get locked up for hate speech despite using pseudonyms should say something about how misguided that view is

>>128802865
t. achmed

if it was a vague law that allowed increased government surveillance or power, then there would be cause for alarm

considering it seems to be specific to the context of islamic terror suspects, the only people that could possibly be against this are islamic terror suspects, islamic terror apologists, or young libertarians with more ego than rationality

>>128797027
THis fucking cunt. You don't deport terrorists, you fucking kill them.

>>128802628
You see, that's where you're wrong.
Theoretically speaking, it's possible to write into constitution "Muslims are exempt from all legal protection and constitutional as well as non-constitutional rights." provided you've got enough support.

File: 1335914115317.jpg (26KB, 325x314px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 325x314px

>>128801028

Don't tell us what we can't do but feel free to tell us/pol/ what you can't or cannot do.

>>128803373
yeah, it's cheaper than airfare too.

>>128797027
Now there's no excuse to not vote Tory

>>128797027
Obviously right wing terrorists from Poland and other EU countries to protect the innocent minorities.

Just look at the london bridge incident - savage eastern european cowards ambushing 3 muslims that had a cultural and religious coming out.

>>128802502

It has laws provided by the EU which force us to allow EU citizens entry to the UK as long as there is no (EU) lawful reason not to.

As for the "direct from Pakistan" style of immigration - you need to look just to the 2000 Blair government whose relaxed anti-discrimination laws combined with very relaxed immigration & asylum laws completely fucked us.

But there's no way Corbyn would do that this time.

Nope.

File: 1431908804082.jpg (421KB, 1189x1023px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 1189x1023px

>>128802924
>USA is turning in to transmetropoliton.
It's going to be a wild ride, please livestream the blockwars!

>>128799448
Listen man, it isn't the early 2000's anymore. The establishment in both our countries did a lot of scare mongering about terrorism to get boobus to go along with their shit. Now everythings fucked and we see ISIS or ISIS inspired attacks every month.

You still can't trust the establishment but at this point it's no longer lip service. Terrorism is a real problem now. Islam needs major reform or else it should be pushed out of the West entirely.

>>128802971
My bad, I meant they'll have us monitored and everyone will be aware of it.

Combined with the internet restrictions, anyone with a brain will know it's not about terrorism. I imagine Wikileaks will be the first website to get a ban in the UK.

>>128797027

she meant you're a terrorist.

File: stirner.jpg (33KB, 500x550px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x550px

>>128797027
What do I care?

Human rights are a spook.

File: 1496331377263.jpg (296KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 1280x960px

>>128803305
>being against a totalitarian state makes you a muslim
lol

>if it was a vague law that allowed increased government surveillance or power, then there would be cause for alarm

>considering it seems to be specific to the context of islamic terror suspects

>the only people that could possibly be against this are islamic terror suspects, islamic terror apologists,

my sides

>>128799723
>>128798580

>>128803066
that islamic mayor that essentially said its normal while living in a global city, that you have to get used to it etc (islamic terror, terrorism in general) is telling white people that its a "normal" means of achieving political goals, that it essentially is a new playing field.. are they trying to breed white terrorists?

wait, yes they are that has been known for decades
that will be the true catalyst for totalitarian police state takeovers
logic would state that they would try and funnel these desired attacks away from theirselves, their political class - and onto their tools the islamists

I wonder how well they considered it backfiring, how likely they perceive that to be

File: 1468572054897.jpg (149KB, 590x639px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 590x639px

>>128797027
>W-what did they mean??

Goyim are so gullible

>>128797027
Sometimes you need demons to hold back the devil.

File: 1422494168137.png (406KB, 587x550px) Image search: [Google]

406KB, 587x550px

>>128803120
>some bongs actually downloaded the do/k/ument while living in their police state
Wew lad.

>>128803305
>it seems to be specific to the context of islamic terror suspects, the only people that could possibly be against this are islamic terror suspects, islamic terror apologists, or young libertarians with more ego than rationality
>the state would never overstep their bounds or exploit their power
We're talking about a jewish controlled government and a cunt that was against Brexit, are you retarded?

>>128802914
unsafe beneath the wandering eyes

File: barbarakike.jpg (132KB, 1023x838px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1023x838px

>>128803687

Wouldn't it be nice if someone shut a cunt like her up with some lead. It would send a message to other cunts too.

>>128803596
>Terrorism is a real problem now. Islam needs major reform or else it should be pushed out of the West entirely.
Neither of this will happen through the government or democratically. They will offer no solution to it - their only "solution" will be used against disgruntled whites.

>>128803760
t. achmed

all you did was greentext what I wrote and add "lol", that isnt an argument achmed

keep crying about how islamic human rights are getting btfo though as if it makes any fucking difference for actual brits

kys queerboy ;)

>>128803407
But Islam is just an ideology. If there's no proof they're Muslim all they need do is say "I'm not a Muslim" and they've gotten around that entire concept.

>>128797027
Its called bait and switch to totalitarian state with even more muslims with even less hopes of your peoples survival

>>128803196
That's on the ISP, not really on the government. If my government started cracking down, and the ISP was composed of spineless shoeshiners, IPs, physical addresses and names would start flying pretty fast
On the other hand, actual visual surveillance is quite lacking in UK
There are ~102 installed cameras in a square kilometer around my house, 93 are store-owned, 11 are private security, and only 5 or 6 of them actually have a direct view of the street (mostly because of the banks) without counting the IP cameras (some are always on, some aren't, the almost totality of them go through wi-fi) and the drones (3 licensed, 1 abusive)

This is what surveillance looks like, total access to the entire infrastructure, private or public.

>>128803869

Sorry the HOSTILITY WILL NOT BE MISDIRECTED!

THE ELITES WILL BE HUNTED FROM COAST TO COAST ALONG WITH MUDSHITS AND ANY ANTI WHITE ANTI WESTERN EXCUSE MAKING FUCK BAGS. MANY JEWS WILL BE SENT TO HELL THAT DAY!

>>128798400
Have fun on our concentration camp island off the mainland lmao

>>128803914
Are you retarded, champ? Do you not understand that law is quite specific, exact words and phrasing to establish context and restriction? Why would they even bother pushing through law if they were able to successfully and consistently do whatever they want, shielded by an ignorant masses that has nothing but an assumption of power and jurisdiction afforded?

cry more you islamic shill

Well the current system lets Muslims go to Syria openly, be trained by ISIS and come back without being stopped because of Muh Rights

I prefer the more rights option myself, i want both myself and my family to own guns. If i did i wouldnt worry about terrorists as much, as at least i would have a small chance to defend myself

But that has zero chance of ever happening, so may as well try a bit of 1984

File: city rain.gif (2MB, 464x750px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 464x750px

>>128802878

>>128804299
free speech is one hell of a drug

>>128804022
>be japmoot
>recognise that aussie shitposting is becoming a major problem
>can't ban all aussies, because racism
>ban shitposting
>all aussies now banned by default

>who's next

>>128797027
>>>128797027
>W-what did she mean by this??

she means that when citicens speak up against islam or government, or like something "not OK" on facebook, she will insta strip them their human rights and turture, kill and eventually dump them into the sea, somewhere outsode the countries borders

>>128804280
Well this potential government has already put in their manifesto the intent of cracking down through legislation ISPs that do not adhere to their internet regulation.

Are you using an Italian proxy or are you Italian? Because here in the UK visual surveillance is possibly one of the worst in the world. Not to mention that its outclassed by internet surveillance.

File: 1352681237126.gif (810KB, 225x183px) Image search: [Google]

810KB, 225x183px

>>128797294
Literally no one watches bus CCTV unless you file a complaint against the company
Most of the time the driver turns his screen off because its distracting/they aint paid enough to give a fuck

It's one thing to import inbred goat humpers and give them lots of gibs, but to not deport them and spend lots of money surveilling them after they've been proven to be terror risks is a whole other level of crazy.

>>128797027
>Theresa May: I'm also going to change the definition of terrorist don't worry about it bong ;)))

File: 7687687.png (10KB, 208x243px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 208x243px

>>128797027
>i'm gonna deport terrorist
>does absolutely nothing she promised

>>128804280

Holy fuck. That is scary. Just privatize and incorporate everything. That way people will think they are not being watched by the government, when they are. The government is not doing it, it is private companies!

>>128804410
Get a gun license, anon. You can still get some decent guns in the UK to protect your home. There's just a lot of loop holes to go through to get one.

File: 1421660482059.jpg (98KB, 640x630px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 640x630px

>>128804371
>Do you not understand that law is quite specific, exact words and phrasing to establish context and restriction?
If that were the case why do lawyers exist to "correctly" interpret laws and find loopholes in them. Their party is filled with anti-whites who are saying sort of what people want to hear but their proposed law will likely use blanket terms to cover all extremists, not just shitskin islamists.
You're way out of the loop if you think any of the two major parties have the best interests of white brits in mind.

>>128804022

Patriot act and anti terror legislation in Australia are vague as fuck.

Human rights is a meme. All you need to say is "human rights" and whatever the content it is sacrosanct and beyond reproach see paris climate agreement or eu and un rights

>>128797027
is she /ourgal/ again, or is Corbyn still /ourcomrade/ ?

File: 1458682958645-1.jpg (49KB, 373x527px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 373x527px

>>128797027
Good. (((Human Rights))) only protects criminals.

>>128804371
>he thinks laws aren't written purposefully vague

This good goy

>>128800997
The problem is that the Labor party would probly implement it anyway. So you can go 1984 under conservatives, or under socialists. Though both being typically two hands of the same body. Besides the terrorist body, the brexit deal should be the biggest focus.

>>128805492

Untils brits keep electing Muslims politicians in power and the state start to arresting you for blasphemy or executing you for "degeneracy".

Nu-pol is so retarded. Laws stays, politicians don't.

>>128805461
Depends whether you have recently enjoyed a (full) frontal lobotomy.

If no, then Corbyn is still the sensible choice.

>>128804729
>cracking down through legislation ISPs that do not adhere to their internet regulation
a recipe for disaster
It's like these people never had to deal with organized crime
>>128804896
an infrastructure not designed to prevent tampering and external entry points on intermediate stations is a weak infrastructure. It is like this here, but it doesn't have to be

>>128805691
>probably
There's a greater chance the commies won't do this, yet, than the party who constantly openly endorses it.

File: 8628976539745307840.png (745KB, 950x605px) Image search: [Google]

745KB, 950x605px

>>128797027
Why does looking at mummy make my willy go all big?

>>128805461
Corbyn is /ourcomrade/

Only people that support May are privileged pricks born with a golden spoon jammed 15 inches up their ass, or 60 year olds who believe newspaper headlines.

Don't forget to factor in costs associated with policing, surveillance and the courts when you calculate cost of terrorism. In addition to lives lost, property damage, lost productivity etc etc

Muslims aren't economically viable

>>128800001
Doesn't Brexit mean you're not a part of that anymore?

>>128805873
They have no view outside of their ivory towers. Their only intention is societal destruction and profit. She even wants to ban VPNs that don't play ball, and ban encryption altogether.

>>128805691
>both being typically two hands of the same body
Except, for once, this is an atypical election. Corbyn =/= Blair.

File: 1200px-Emmanuel_Macron_par_Claude_Truong-Ngoc_avril_2015.jpg (936KB, 1200x2000px) Image search: [Google]

936KB, 1200x2000px

>>128805698
Huh? If you elect Muslim politicans, they won't keep (((Human Rights))) either, dumb frog.

(((Human Rights))) has NEVER protected whites, it's only been used by jews to stop the lynching of undesirables.

>>128806050
Good luck with that
Cheers brits, this one's for your imminent awakening, good or bad it be

>>128805143
>>128805652
You guys are idiots
If the laws in question are specific to islamic terrorism, they are not vague opened ended attacks on civil liberties of the common man, they are acts to protect the society and common man from existential threat

you would have islamist terrorists continue to move around freely because you value their human rights to civil liberties more? Are there any actual changes being proposed yet, or is it all rhetoric? In which case we're arguing potential, and I would agree that a multicult globalist government would push to gain more power using the justification of the terror it sustains via immigration rather than keep it rational, so the real argument or point of contention here is keeping the proceedings transparent so the public actually knows the extent of proposed changes to law, so that it is clear that it specifically targets islamic extremists, and does not leave any ambiguity about interpretation of its target

I've been posting for eleven years here and before that, a decade of conspiracy sites and the like, I'm not out of the loop m8, I get NWO concerns and the fact this was planned

that does not mean I give two shits about islamic human rights, niggers

now for breakfast

>>128806035
No, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is the ultimate court for judgements relating to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The Convention was established by the Council of Europe in 1953. Both predate the EEC/EU. Brexit takes us out of the EU only.

>>128806521
>If the laws in question are specific to islamic terrorism
yes, ONLY islamic terrorist vpns will be banned, and ONLY people using well-known islamic terrorist suppporting ISPs, such as BT, Virgin Media, etc. shall be required to log and forward to the Gub'mnt their users every last fart. Together, we shall make Britannia safe, strong and stable, and finally free of IT in which we cannot meddle.

>>128804472
These are so good, where to find more?

>>128797027
good lass

>>128807684
Not forgetting WhatsAyatollahApp. Meaning end-to-end encryption can be banned for your target audience only.

>>128801028
Look what happened in USA, anti terrorism laws were used against the DAPL protestors, they monitored their social media and other itnernet activity. You delude yourself if you think it would not effect you. And seeing that those 3 attacks were not prevented, they would not use to prevent actual danger.

ITT: Shortsighted bootlickers

>>128800997
>This is creepy as shit. I would ask if these people have ever even heard of 1984 but then I remember I wasn't required to read it in school, either.
Did you ever question that you were ever required to read it in (((school)))?

>>128797027
>UK
>Human Rights

>>128808216
>>128807684
Funny, guys! Too bad you didn't factor in the established practice of "racial profiling", soon to be back in fashion near you!

>>128808570
my 5th grade english teacher was based as fuck and made us read Fahrenheit 451.

>>128797027
I have no doubt that the government will not abuse such powers and will gladly relinquish them after the threat has passed.

>>128797027
hi every1 im new!!!!!!! holds up spork my name is Theresa may but u can call me t3h riGhTwiNg cOnTrOLLd oPpoSiTioN of ZiOn!!!!!!!! lol…as u can see im very alt-right!!!! thats why i came here, 2 meet the new right ppl like me _… im suddenly in the spotlight (im mature 4 my age tho!!) i like 2 get rid of muzzies w/ my girlfreind (im bi if u dont like it deal w/it) its our favorite agenda!!! bcuz itsSOOOOrandom!!!! shes random 2 of course but i want 2 meet more random ppl and get elected =) like they say the more the merrier!!!! lol…neways i hope 2 submit 2 israel here so give me lots of commentses!!!!
ANTI-MUSLIIIIIIIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <--- me bein random again _^ hehe…toodles!!!!!

Love and waffles and rising right wing britain,

t3h riGhTwiNg cOnTrOLLd oPpoSiTioN of ZiOn

>>128808797
Racial profiling is a mechanism to direct application of the law towards a particular group. It doesn't mean that the law itself is limited to that group. And, more importantly, it is extremely unlikely that any directed legislation would pass judicial scrutiny. Therefore, the only way to get such laws on the statute books is to couch them in such a generic way that they are subsequently open to massive abuse.

File: 1459806991419.jpg (35KB, 229x343px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 229x343px

>>128797027

>real version of v for vandetta incoming

>>128808797
stop LARPing

>>128799723
>implying anyone with a basic understanding of web proxies cant get around those blocks.
IT will hurt the bongs on this board but it will hurt the mudslimes worse

>>128809545
larping as what, achmed?

>>128809399
The major issue here would be the inclusion or likely exclusion of framing the law as "islamic terrorism" as opposed to "terrorism" in general, which of course would be abused. I reject the idea that we are in a cultural climate where the idea of limiting "extremist" islam is a controversial issue - the debate needs to focus on explicitly targeting islamic extremism, within the context of cultural enclaves that exist within the jurisdiction, considering it is a by their own description "fringe, extremist demographic"

>>128810091
I can't believe you cannot see the danger of the naive believe that stripping away human right would not be abused.
Your safeguard of
>profiling
is much easier to change than the fundamental right.
We saw this happen with patriot act. In the beginning it was just about library info, but soon they extended it to all the aggregated internet information.

File: 1469843724044.png (203KB, 600x550px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 600x550px

>>128797027
Not happening, there will be no crusade for England or Europe.

File: 1466730117675.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>128799723
How the fuck did it go from image attached to fucking this. You have a choice between communism and 1984.

>>128810788
the problem never went away... the traitors are still in power and all the problems they brought still remain and the people once again have to pay for their cucked attitude

>>128797027
she'd probably tear them up for nothing.

>>128800428
honhonhon what est-ce que THE Ukïp doing?

Learn to use definite articles, Pierre.

>>128797027
I'm all for human rights, as long as we redefine which groups constitute as "human".

>>128810600
I didnt agree with the patriot act when it happened. Still dont. You don't really seem to have an argument against explicitly targeting islamic extremism via specific, targeted language structuring law beyond the fear that it will not be structured so and will in fact be generalised to the point of being able to target constitutionalists, civil libertarians, and the general populace in resisting government tyranny. I agree that this is a concern, considering it has been for decades, generations, centuries even. But that is not a valid reason on shutting down discussion of creating law or relaxing restrictions on law that was created by a certain people around a certain peoples moral and behavioural systems considering the demographic crises these societies face today

its no justification for not considering, discussing and moving to implement ways we can start to protect ourselves given that islamic terrorists and their sympathisers are moving around freely and with impunity because of age old structures of law that give them the benefit of the doubt

you can't possibly have a problem with specifically targeting islamic extremists, or advocating so, unless you are islamic yourself, or a very young civil libertarian that does have a full comprehension

>>128797027
I guess she doesn't like Julian assange

>>128797027
>Those hips.

>>128797027
saying whatever will help her win the election

>>128811578
Yeah, you are right. I disagree with the feasability not the content. On the same page communism is a great idea.

I actually would try Macrons approach of a state Islam. Either you follow state sanctioned imam or you are treated as member of terrorist group and will be deported or thrown in jail

>>128812912
if that state islam is highly controlled and essentially censored or rewritten to neuter it of all aggression, I'm all for it

>>128800077
Swallow a cock ya brain dead RURTARD

>>128813397
>highly controlled and essentially censored or rewritten to neuter it of all aggression,
that's exactly its point

File: 1473019518699.gif (37KB, 866x400px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 866x400px

>>128797027

Bongs are that dense... what a cuckiest country

>>128799448
Look. We can use this space to make sure America stays genuinely free.
If everyone is muslim and defaco-compliant anyway. What is the point in freedom?

File: 1489889207513.jpg (124KB, 600x878px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 600x878px

>>128803134

>that kike

>>128798400
Fuck off were full

>>128803407
>https://en.wikipedia org/wiki/Liangshaoyikuan
china already tried that

>>128797027
its just more words and no action

She means

>terrorists=white nationalists

>>128797027
So then she'll tear up the constitution and deport herself.

Congratulations Terry May u played urself.

>>128797027
Fuck "human rights", only property rights.

>>128815020
This is the most idiotic policy ever made.

>>128810600
>Those who sacrifice their freedoms for security deserve neither freedom nor security

>>128805884
Correct me if I am wrong for being a simple burger, but (if) the majority or parliament is Tori with Jeremy as Prime Minister wouldn't they still go along with mass 1984 but with jeremy's preference of sensorship?

>>128807384
that's why she said she's gonna leave it and change laws so we can deport, this is the best thing I've heard her say tbqh terrorists shouldn't have any rights

>>128809405
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flBpsyFbEOs&t=2s
That's a bad thing?

>>128816894
>Correct me if I am wrong
Yup. Your Wrong.
>(if) the majority or parliament is Tori with Jeremy as Prime Minister
Jeremy 'Comrade' Corbyn is the leader of the Labour party, Theresa May leader of the Conservatives (Tories). If the majority of seats went to the 'Tori' (sic) party, they (Tories) would form the government, Theresa May would become Prime Minister, and Jeremy could have all the preferences he likes, over censorship, sexual partners or otherwise - much as now, no-one would GAF what he thinks, hes not Prime Minister, nor a part of the Government, and has sweet fuck all to be preferencing about.

>>128797027
this is the same insane cunt trying to censor your internet. expect full on 1984 if she gets in and no deported muslims.

>>128819982
>Internet censorship isn't much easier to get rid of than years of unchecked immigration under (((Corbyn)))

Either way, we have no Trump.