Just A Reminder

Good. I hope they end up owning 100% of everything in the world. I trust the central banks to deliver and always help out the consumer when possible

I'm not sure what this means, please explain more.

>>128728377
"Quantitative Easing" (QE) is how we "recovered" from the 2008 financial crisis. it means central banks buying financial assets like stocks and corporate bonds. It helps prop up the market, but now they own over a third of the entire market. They have to sell eventually and when they do, the effects will be unavoidable

>>128728749
Where's the problem.

>>128729017
the problem is that when central banks "buy" something the money comes straight off the printing press, diluting the currency and creating a false sense of growth that is only sustainable in the short term. Keynesian economics on a grand scale is a pretty easy game to play but how do you stop once the "recovery" is complete? you can't because all that growth disappears if the fed ever normalizes the balance sheet

>>128729471
Still not seeing the problem. You clearly don't know what you're talking about.
/thread

>>128729578
maybe make an argument about how everything is awesome in this scenario?

>>128729785
(I already /thread'd this thread which means it's over.)

>>128729924
haha ok good point you win

Daily reminder that the Rothschild's own nearly all central banks.

>>128729578
If the central bank ends up owning all of the assets, how the fuck is the economy going to work?

Monopoly style reset or something?

Otherwise it will just become something similar communism with a bank at head of state.

>>128728241
It'll continue until it can't.

>>128730023
2 possibilities: 1) the CBs continue their printing and buying scheme, diluting the currency like a rug being ripped out from under you and your cash buys a lot less than it used to, which is another way of siphoning real value from the economy and consolidating it at the top. or 2) they are ending the scheme soon and sell off assets resulting in a 30% market correction. which is more likely?

>>128728241
Zim- I mean, Rhodesia - they bailed out their banks with printed money too. For a while (quite a few years actually) it stayed in the banks and didn't get out into the general economy, just like what is happening with our banks now.

However, it eventually served as a 2nd or 3rd stage of the hyperinflation rocket later on, when the banks realized that all that printed money was inherently worthless and they shat it all back out in desperate move to acquire tangible goods, anything that would hold value.

>>128730023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x72w_69yS1A

>>128730674
sounds familiar. phase one in the US was bailing out the banks with printed money. phase two pumping the stock market happening now.

File: ANewHope.webm (3MB, 1000x426px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1000x426px

>>128729017
See: Inflation
See: Higher interest rates

>>128731021
That too also happened in Zim- Rhodesia. Stock market became almost bulletproof and went up up up up.

>>128731090
higher interest rates are indicative of a functioning economy. We can't raise them now because free easy money is the only thing keeping it going. we're at historically low rates and even now people are fearful of any increase

>>128729471
In US QE bought Gov. bonds so when they mature the gov. will pay the gov for what they bought. This should mean that they will have to stop printing new $$ for what they already got. It is insane thx Obama...

>>128733644
well, the fed isn't necessarily the government though they work hand in glove