your thoughts on monarchy?

When properly limited by strong law and an effective parliament, it's the greatest and most stable form of governance in existed.

When not properly limited it's a countdown to implosion.

>>128706003
its a political system that can work
keeping a monarchy without the political system is pretty cringe though
They are basically just overrated celebrities at that point

I want to end it now.

The British monarchy have shown that they are willing to stand back and watch their country fall apart for the sake of diversity.

>>128706132
>When properly limited by strong law and an effective parliament, it's the greatest and most stable form of governance in existed.
What? (((Parliaments))) are what destroyed the West. Absolute monarchies with strong Estates are better.

But strong ethnic nationalism is a must, in any case.

>>128706003
It is the best political system in the history of mankind if it has a KICKASS monarch.

It is the worst political system in the history of mankind if the monarch is a retard.

>>128706480
And then you get an heir born who is stupid, paranoid, sadistic, or all three.

The American parliament (which is not subject to a constitutional monarchy) introduced degeneracy. The British Empire was many things, but nowhere near this degenerate, even in death.

>>128706003

Jesus is our only King.

>>128706003

monarchy is the best. but you also need to remove right to vote to all foreigners in all affairs. and deny jews and muslims in politics/law/education/culture/bank etc

>>128706349
Wait, what?
You want the commonwealth monarchy to end because it isn't enough of a monarchy for you?

Shouldn't you just want the monarchy to be strengthened?

File: download (2).jpg (6KB, 290x174px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 290x174px

>>128706003

Prophecy :

This summer leonor will grow breasts. This is the one.

File: serveimage.jpg (59KB, 625x441px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 625x441px

>>128706003
having people rule over you because of their bloodline, can have a lot of repercussions

>>128706837
>And then you get an heir born who is stupid, paranoid, sadistic, or all three.
It's much easier to overthrow him than a rotted "democracy."

We should secede from democratic society and create small, private monarchs united by trade. Citizens will migrate away from the worst monarchs in support of the better ones. Vote with your feet. The monarchs would protect its people from invasion, degeneracy and crime. Instead of welfare and socialist policies, churches will regain the responsibility to collect and distribute resources to the disadvantaged - a more accountable and efficient method due to the church's inability to rely on a fixed income via taxation. The monarchs as long-term owners will have a vested interest in sustaining their kingdoms, with the added accountability of the people's free dissociation. Confederations will eventually be established as kingdoms seek military protection. Some kingdoms will be very free and some will be dictatorial. Some will be small and some will be large. A variety is necessary in order to keep social interests separate and satisfied. There's no need for people to fight over laws or land if free association can be maintained.

>>128706003
Ancient relic of our dark past

>>128706003
Fancy Inbred Fucks

>>128707628
why do you need a centralized state to begin with? why can't people govern themselves indvidually and pay for their own protection?

File: IMG_0477.jpg (154KB, 736x1024px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 736x1024px

>>128706003
Monarchy is shit, all "royals" should hang.
Except the cute princesses, they should be cloned and put in petting zoos so everybody can go and see them and give them headpats.
>>128706480
>implying a monarch gives a shit about the nation
Their only concern is themselves, the people are only a tool to maintain their position and keep power over their rivals.
>>128707324
No, don't say that, she will never grow breasts. NEVER

>>128707820
>Mountainjew

>>128707820
t. shlomo shekelberg

>>128706132
What if inbreeding causes mentally decrepit monarchs

>>128707628
And if there were no need for either? That's the beauty of constitutional monarchy.
The monarch keeps the parliament in check, limits their corruption, makes damn sure they're working for the nation not overseas interests.
The parliament gives the common people some voice (essential in reasonable doses for long term stability), limits any truly useless parasite aristocratic types, and carries on through the occasional disaster child.

Again, it worked for the Empire before the Germans had one of those idiot disaster princes and burned down Europe.

>>128708109
Read the thread

>>128707739
Because I can pay some people more to takes things from that person. All the while people then pay me not to attack them and so I rule above them. Oh look another government.

File: 1348340571700.png (366KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 640x480px

>>128707820
>headpats
Like we'd fall for that pedo. You just want to rail them Muhammad.

>>128706003
Its gay. They should be guillotined and a fascist dictator should replace them.

>>128708109
This. monarchs wont just breed with random people and soon enough you'd have a Joffrey from GoT

>>128706349
The royalty is supposed to represent the nation. There's a reason why they can't vote nor express their political beliefs.

>>128707739
Decentralised peoples have had a tendency throughout history to be annexed by their centralised neighbors. Unfortunate, but there it is.

File: Screenshot_20170606-102919~2.png (700KB, 720x916px) Image search: [Google]

700KB, 720x916px

>>128706880
Nah, Poland already claimed Jesus as king and Mother Mary as Queen.

File: 1496655367193.jpg (207KB, 900x615px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 900x615px

>>128708084
>oh man, he doesn't support the worst form of government
>what a jew
>>128708098
>not wanting to be able to go to the local princess zoo and give the cute little princesses headpats and feed them oats out your hand
>>128708294
Princesses are for headpats and feed kissing.
>>128708316
>The royalty is supposed to represent the nation
You be got a weird idealized view of royalty.

>>128708172
Further: American checks and balances system is an attempt to recreate this balance. Running into trouble due to political families beginning to develop and the over-politicization of the supreme court.

>>128706003
>>128706003
total shit, fuck it

>>128706003
Why the fuck I should obey to some faggot just because his parents, grandparents, were rulers?

>>128708514
I meant the British royalty in its current form. You should see the ones here, they do just about whatever they want.

>>128708514
>feed kissing
wut

File: Princess+Sofia+Princess+Leonor+Spanish+Royals+TaIkqXreVGxl.jpg (107KB, 391x594px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 391x594px

>>128708690
Isn't yours that country where the king looks like some gymrat fucker? What a joke.

>>128706003
I like the monarchy. Worth every penny.
I love to see how the commies and liberals gets triggered every new years eve when the queen delivers her annual speech to the nation.

>>128706003
>your thoughts on monarchy?

better than demoncracy

>>128706003
Useless, the damage a single stupid monarch can do to a country far outweighs the positives of an enlightened one.
Still more functional than communism though.

someone raised from birth to hold a position of power, every day learning from generations of experience. not bothering with the irreverent and only focused on the security of theirn ation. doing what they were born to do.

then you get cunts with no care for the nation or its people doing whatever to hold their position in government
only caring about their ego and pension

If I were king I would risk it all and call for a deportation of all Muslims.
At least in Britain the monarchy still has the people backing it up. If the Queen said that all Muslims must convert to Christianity or get out, would the British people listen?
I bet Sikhs and Hindus would be the only ones trying to follow through this goal.
Bring in some gurkhas and they would be finished in a week.

1 gurhka could single handedly kill 30 armed Talibans even when he ran out of ammo.

File: Princess+Leonor+Spanish+Royal+Queen+Sofia+MJq6WMIfnn_l.jpg (69KB, 377x594px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 377x594px

Does anybody have a video of Princess Leonor speaking? I want to hear her voice. Why are princesses not required to make videos showing their cuteness to the people and telling them stuff?
>>128708815
Feet kissing. As in kissing the princess' feet as a sign of deference and mode of worship.
Don't you just want to bow down to her and kiss her feet while she calls you a worthless peasant?

>>128706349
>stand back

Prince Charles is bff with the Saudi royalty.

No more kings.

Being someone's son doesn't mean you'll do well in the same role as your father.

File: 0.jpg (35KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 480x360px

>>128709028
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1393355/Hero-Gurkha-handed-bravery-medal-Queen-said-I-thought-I-going-die--I-tried-kill-I-could.html

>>128706003
Japan had the most stable monarchy.

The Shoguns actually cared about Japan.

When Japan saw how degenerate the rest of the world was, they shut down their borders for hundreds of years until America sent Commodore Perry to force Japan to open their borders.

>>128709106
Back then, you had a lot of sons and the son who killed them all was expected to be smarted and fitter and more cunning since he survived the succession battle.

>>128706003
I can see the positive side of monarchy because it removes all the political maneuvering to get into power just to have power. You have a kid raised from birth and taught how best to serve his nation, and then placed into power when it is his time. He's wealthy and there's no reason to do shady deals to line his pockets with money at the expense of the people.

The only downside is I don't like the idea of a class system put into place. I mean with nobles who live the high life and have no purpose other than to consume and tell everyone how much better they are than them because of their birth.

>>128709053
she's already ugly which is weird because lolis tend to have qt faces simply by virtue of being lolis. she is already man-faced

>>128708997
>focused on the security of theirn ation
A nation is it's people. A monarch doesn't give a shit about the nation. To him the people could all die and he wouldn't mind except that he needs to use them.
>>128709028
>must convert to Christianity
What the fuck would that change? They'd still be foreign scum.

>>128708834
They're all old guys anyway. Furthermore we have plenty of them, 9 monarchs actually, for 14 of the states.

>>128709186
>Back then, you had a lot of sons and the son who killed them all was expected to be smarted and fitter and more cunning since he survived the succession battle.

A lot has changed since then. I'd rather have a larger pool of contestants for the leadership role than a single son of someone.

Also, do you think nepotism and corruption is going to be better under a monarchy?

>>128706003
institutionalized incest.
How can anyone be against that?

File: images (1).jpg (10KB, 276x183px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 276x183px

>>128708514


Take a deep look that left ones eyes and have one minute silence for mourning hairy wrist genes.
White Queen when.

>>128709395
That larger pool of contestants are going to say and do whatever they have to, to get into power. Enter the politician, who is pretty much universally understood to be a lying snake yet people have to vote for them.

>>128709395
At least under monarchy, you would know who is corrupt or practices nepotism since they would have a more limited pool so singling them out would be easier.

Meanwhile, a larger pool means having to shine spotlights on more people which diverts focus and attention.

>>128709506
And I'd rather be able to vote for any one of them than be bound to a single person who is to be leader merely based off the fact that his father was leader.

File: Princess-Leonor-Infanta-Sofí-2012.jpg (123KB, 682x1024px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 682x1024px

>>128709223
Hey, that's not entirely true. She's not as cute as she used to but shes almost 12, she's getting older. She's still cute just not as much.
>>128709402
Institutionalized (non-breeding)incest is good. Father/daughter is the purest form of love. What do you expect a man to do when his wife gets old and busted? Not fuck his daughters? Please.

>>128709622
>At least under monarchy, you would know who is corrupt or practices nepotism
Monarchy is nothing but straight institutionalized nepotism.

File: Attributed_to_Jacob_Hoefnagel_-_Gustavus_Adolphus,_King_of_Sweden_1611-1632_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg (805KB, 1200x1636px) Image search: [Google]

805KB, 1200x1636px

>>128709744
Yeah but sometimes it's just perfect.

>>128709651
yes I agree faggot. but mom son breeding incest is top tier.

incest monarchy's are best monarchy's

>>128709651
11-12 is peak age for qt

she already has small eyes+big jaw+big nose

File: tmp_4460-14965650070011964104492.jpg (100KB, 600x815px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 600x815px

>>128706003
>i want to _______ princess leonor

>>128706003
It's silly but people long for a King so it works if it's balanced out correctly.

I think representative democracy is the best government when the right prerequisites are in place, which right now, they aren't. Monarchy is completely outdated.

What the fuck Macri is doing in this photo

>>128709923
>mom son breeding incest is top tier.
That's disgusting, don't ever say that.
>incest monarchy's are best monarchy's
If we're talking breeding incest in the context of a monarchy it has to be brother to sister, like them pharaohs. Keep the blood the purest.
>>128710003
Worship

File: Bulgaria.png (6KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 420x420px

>>128710003

>>128706684
>It is the worst political system in the history of mankind if the monarch is a retard.
Not really, in that case the ministers and regent will rule and the king won't have any power.

File: laptop knight.jpg (29KB, 524x617px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 524x617px

>>128710003
swear fealty to

>>128710003
She's got a look like "goddammit, when I am queen in going to execute every fucking photographer".
Her teeth are so hot. Little girl teeth are so good.

Fuck the throne, my dudes.

>>128709651
>Father/daughter is the purest form of love.
Like Fritzl? You Germans are sickos.
No wonder you loose all your manly energy for fapping and then simple muslim can just beat you up, because you are faggot.

File: HolyCommunion.jpg (191KB, 467x700px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 467x700px

>>128706003
I unironically believe Princesses Sofia and Leonor will lead the West during WW3.

The thought that they will be married to some low-blooded globalist terrifies me.

>>128710316
>Her feet are so hot. Little girl feet are so good.
ftfy

>>128706003
Only organic true form of government

File: rs_1024x731-161212151847-1024-queen-letizia-holiday-photo.jpg (127KB, 1024x731px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1024x731px

>>128710408
Only Leonor holds the title of Princess, she is the Infanta Sofia.
They'll probably be married to ones of their cousins.

File: harald.jpg (76KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 850x400px

>>128706837
>And then you get an heir born who is stupid, paranoid, sadistic
getting rid of a problematic monarch is easier than getting rid of stupid voters

File: kungafamiljen-1.jpg (421KB, 1200x844px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 1200x844px

>>128710734
they look whiter than swedish (((monarchy)))

>>128706003
Useless welfare queens.
Not different than niggers.
Just more expensive

>>128710610
Little girl feet are good but also i like little teeth, they really turn me on. Probably cause mine are all fucked up.
I like little girls with gapteeth especially, it's super cute and makes them look really kissable.
I could stare at a girl with cute teeth all day.

>>128706480
It always sparks a tinge of irony in my perspective when Americans actually support stricter monarchies.

The bloody Statesmen praising the Kingsmen.
Although I do have to agree on a more paramount position of monarchy control, but absolute does more often give rise to retards and ill offspring.

Even Frederick had gay undertones so he was somewhat mentally not-there.

>ITT: degenerate republican mountain jew rejecting the best political system

A politician's first interests are his offshore accounts (run by our Swiss friend here). He is only in office for a few years, taking the opportunity to line his own pockets as best he can. Job conplete, he departs to join a board of directors somewhere.

A monarch's first interests are the people. Their status is tied to the country. If it goes under, so do they. They are groomed to be rulers and role models from birth, and the high cost of living is the price paid for a government that actually cares, instead of one who profits off the nation before leaving it a shell of its former self.

>>128711186
Ours are French fucks and the queen is half Hur/Nazi german.

Sucks, should have taken some peasant from the countryside. Would have been 100x better.

>>128711760
Half huemonkey/Nazi german

>>128706003

A stupid cult. Man should only bow to God. The ruling class are nothing to aspire to.

>>128711186
Asturian genes, my friend.

>>128711186
We should find some old Vasa relatives from Poland.
Would be interesting.

File: 1492016712090.jpg (41KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 657x527px

>inb4 she gets blacked to be seen as a progressive monarchy

>>128711962
It's when she starts walking around in hot pants that we lose her.

I wonder if the an-caps ever realize that they're monarchists. An individual owns their land as personal personal property which they have full sovereignty and control over; they can physically remove people from their property if they don't follow their rules, and they can pass their property on to their children. Monarchy.

Constitutional, parliamentary monarchy is pretty retarded; real monarchy in the neoreactionary sense has potential, it would certainly be far preferential to democracy for whites at this time.

File: fff3ae20a242d46516c5345c15f1aff8.jpg (19KB, 640x619px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 640x619px

Stop saying such things bout my princess

>>128706837

Monarchy doesn't need to be hereditary. Nearly every successful corporation in the world is a monarchy, they just call the king CEO.

File: jw2015_0.jpg (56KB, 677x793px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 677x793px

>>128712173
This, our real monarchy in Sweden is called Wallenberg.
Our king is a poor peasant compared to them.

>>128712173
>Monarchy doesn't need to be hereditary.
so just a authoritarian regime?

>>128707820
>medkit

File: Leonor a cute.jpg (32KB, 653x302px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 653x302px

>>128711962
>blacked
too late for that, she already has a taste for Iberian men
just look at her

There is exactly one absolute monarchy in all of Western Europe. One. It also happens to be literally the single best place on the entire continent. I would live in Liechtenstein over any other country in Europe without question. It makes even Switzerland look like Sweden by comparison on the chart of cuckoldry.

Singapore is also effectively a monarchy, and is doing great.

>>128711724
>A monarch's first interests are the people
Do you actually believe that?
>>128711799
God isn't real.
>>128712037
She already wears booty shorts.
>>128712109
No.
Have you ever heard her voice? Is there a holiday over there where citizens can give her presents and kiss her feet? If not there should be, why have a princess otherwise.

File: KingAragorn.jpg (559KB, 1920x800px) Image search: [Google]

559KB, 1920x800px

As the Arthurian Mythos tries to convey archetypally, the only correct form of political organization for humans, the only one who can lead the masses towards objective good and against moral decay, is the Good Wise King. The truly good, honest Dictator, that uses force to keep objective evil at bay and encourages goodness in all his subjects.

But, as the Arthurian Mythos also shows, the big problem is that a historically long lasting positive Monarchy is almost impossible to achieve for the flawed and treacherous race of humans. Good Kings can be corrupted and become Evil Emperors. Lesser men can organize and destroy the Good King and use his power to destroy the civilization he built.

>>128712698
Too bad your mongrel genetics would turn it into Nigrenstein

>>128712791

A man's interest is his property. If you're a monarch, your country is your property. You treat it like you treat your house. A democrat treats their country like a hotel room or a rental car.

>>128707646
>monarchy
>citizens
Pick one

what's up with british people and disgusting teeth and 1000+ forehead wrinkles?

must be a mix of inbreeding and living in a shitty island, the Japan of Europe.

>>128713181

You live in one; how is it? Do you see any liberal countries that seem like a better option? I certainly wouldn't pick Korea or Japan over singapore.

>>128712791
>God isn't real
i wonder the color of your fedora

>>128713000

And, I should mention, why wouldn't they? They're just a temporarily transient caretaker of the land; why make the difficult and painful decisions necessary to affect needed change when you won't even be in power at the time of their results? And even if you wanted to make the tough choices, why would the masses (who, at BEST, might have an average IQ of 100) re-elect that instead of voting for the guy who says he will give them free shit?

File: 1496600858670.jpg (124KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 900x900px

The princess of Asturias, Gerona and Viana is not for pedos. SHe is a pure girl who likes Kurosawa movies

>>128712963

I'm 100% Northern European and I'll go where I think I can provide the best life for my children and grandchildren. I can give you an ironclad 100% guarantee that it will not be Sweden.

>>128713341
Singapore isnt monarchy its more like an oligarchy actually quite similar to the way china is an oligarchy.

File: zM4NuUV_d.jpg (38KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 640x360px

>>128713546
The purer they are the harder they fall

>>128713546
Someone in the world is fapping to her pictures right at this moment and now you have to deal with knowing that.

File: alfred-eisenstaedt-nuclear-physicist-dr-j-robert-oppenheimer.jpg (44KB, 366x488px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 366x488px

>>128713579
Oh no such a loss, no american degenerate culture

>>128713000
>If you're a monarch, your country is your property
Yeah, exactly. To a monarch the people aren't people, they are things that he owns and that exist for him to use. I don't know how you think that's a good thing.
>>128713341
>I certainly wouldn't pick Korea or Japan over singapore.
What the fuck?
>>128713546
Leonor a cute. CUTE

>>128713583

Singapore is effectively a monarchy. You basically have an absolute sovereign, and it's the son of the previous absolute sovereign.

>>128713546
She will look great on her sex tape with a black schlong deep between her cheeks.

>>128713000
>You treat it like you treat your house
And, no, a monarch treats the nation like one treats cattle.

>>128706003
probably the only way to get rid of the Jews
get woke to the ultimate red pill and tell others
https://www.quora.com/Is-there-physical-scientific-proof-that-Jews-were-gassed-to-death-in-Nazi-concentration-camps/answer/Damian-Graves

>>128713781

I'm pretty sure you folks already got it all, and made some personal touches. Sorry about that.

File: 1496589424001.jpg (324KB, 765x1024px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 765x1024px

>>128706003
why settle for a princess when you can have a queen?

>>128706003
it's cool

>>128713808

Have you been to Korea and Japan? Cuckolded, feminized, Americanized liberal colonial outposts of the International Community.

>>128713941
You do know she's just a typical rich Hague slut now, right? She hangs out with niggers and mudslimes. Probably smokes.
That's why I pretend she's dead.

>>128713925

Liechtenstein is better than every single liberal democracy on the face of the earth, and I don't see the prince butchering and eating his subjects, possibly because this wouldn't benefit his property.

>>128706003
Parasites just like the rapefugees
we all used to be kings and queens now we have a few faggots saying only they are and people believe in that, what a joke

File: 1260317133966.jpg (11KB, 353x355px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 353x355px

This thread is making me feel funny feelies.

>>128713847
So did america then

>>128712791
Yes, I do. I just explained why.

If the situation is bad, politicians kan quietly leave and go back to their firms. Monarchs are tied to the country, and liable to become a scapegoat or the laughing stock if things go bad. A monarch's best interest is the welfare of the country. A politician's best interests are his pocket.

>>128707646
>Vote with your feet.
>Protection from invasion.
Pick one

>>128707739
>why can't people govern themselves indvidually and pay for their own protection?

You end up with warlords roaming the countryside killing everyone. Anarchy/Libertarianism only works when you have no neighbors.

File: wearewhite.jpg (56KB, 460x407px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 460x407px

>why did you not save us /pol/?

>>128714655

The US has never had anything close to an absolute sovereign

File: Romanov sisters with their father.jpg (176KB, 690x691px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 690x691px

>>128714981
>commies murdered this

>>128714753
But immigration policy is so much more nuanced than that

>>128714981
Too busy voting in politicians who want to genocide the white race.

>>128706003
Like National Socialism and Communism, it has empirically failed.

>>128706003
I FUCKING LOVE IT

>>128708872
Me too

>>128706003

Absolute monarchy is best. Constitutional monarchy was better in the past, when parliament was ruled by aristocrats.

The individual ruler doesn't have to be spectacular, or even all that good, as long as they appoint a capable right-hand man. Someone who is bred to rule usually produces much better results.

Also, it keeps the kikes in check, or better yet: out.

Is she a los magos del tiempo?

>>128706003
Monoarchy only works with a redpilled king.

A great system and we should become one

>>128707628
yeah it only took a world war to remove the idiotic german and russian monarchs

>>128717761
>weimar republic failure
>bolshevism

I'm not saying the examples you mentioned were great, but what followed was arguably much worse. Wilhelm II should have kept Bismarck. Stalinism might as well have been a monarchy, but more brutal and without the hereditary part.

File: 613464294.jpg (576KB, 770x1024px) Image search: [Google]

576KB, 770x1024px

>>128706003
Her grandmother was a qt
She looks a lot like her

>>128706003
Incestuous family and pedo ring

>>128710003
kiss cheek*

>>128710734
When did Dennis Miller become King of Spain?

File: 1467127788940.png (24KB, 601x695px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 601x695px

>>128709651
>>128708514
>>128710003
>tfw never going to have a such a beautiful daughter