Time to prove if you really like Julian Assange

>x just said y and you should feel z emotion
what is it with these millennial headlines?

>>128676601
fuck off shill and your slide thread

>>128676730
They thought he was on their side because of the Hillary dumps, but now he's siding with someone who is leaking information about the Russian hacking. Now we'll see if they're just hypocrites.

>>128676757
>wahhhh I hope this thread doesn't knock off my thread about niggers

We dont care about free-flow of information as a main cause... we care about traitors to our country...

>Hillary Clinton
>John Podesta
>Reality Winner

All traitors.

Get the picture now? We dont support a traitor just because theyre some l33t, edgy "leaker".

As much as I hate to say it...we do need leakers. Would I like it even more with the gov to be transparent? Yes. Will that happen? Realistically, no.

I support leakers on either side. We need them to expose corruption. However, I do NOT support leaks that would endanger the lives of others (Ie. if there was a US undercover agent in some middle east shithole, or info revealing strategic war information).

desu I'm actually not even sure what this bitch leaked.

>>128677105
But you support a neo con jew lover? Fucking nigger your up against the wall too when the day comes. Trump is the biggest traitor there is a globalist, new loving neo con fat fuck faggot. Just like you, you dumb nigger

>>128676601
I thought Julian Assange was nothing more than a russian puppet? Hillary Clinton told us Wikileaks = Russia.

Whaaaa happened, lefties????

>>128677193
https://theintercept.com/2017/06/05/top-secret-nsa-report-details-russian-hacking-effort-days-before-2016-election/

They were trying to hack a voting software company.

>>128676601
I still like him. And honestly she did a good think, in spite of being a lefty.. all she did was show that the alphabets have LITERALLY NOTHING except some shitty phishing scheme at the last minute that couldn't have had any effect on the election and was probably just the CIA larping

>>128677193
>We need them to expose corruption
Right, that's the thing here. She didn't leak corruption. She just released top secret information that wasn't corrupt at all because >muh DRUMPFT HAS SMALL HANDS

>>128676601
Did she actually leak anything real?

>>128677668
Prove that it was Russia

All you have is secondhand hearsay

>>128677687
No, it was pretty flimsy shit.. basically a Nigerian tier phishing scheme

>>128677785
>Prove that it was Russia
He can't. Even the dumb article explains how the docs didn't reveal how the NSA knows this.

>>128677785
Literally, and I mean literally, every single piece of news, ever, in the world, will be secondhand hearsay. It will always be that way unless you see something with your own two eyes.

Since you're a nobody, like everyone else here, you will always, always have to rely on secondhand hearsay. So the question is, are you a paranoid cuck who is scared of news you don't like, or do you accept that you are a nobody and need information from people and have to trust that they're honest?

>>128677687

Yeah, it was a Top Secret document it's on The Intercept right now.

If it was nothing it wouldn't have been Top Secret. Trump News spin is it's nothing, but you can read it.

>>128677785

It's specifically states it was the GRU in the document.

What's with you guys are you afraid to read the document, knowing you're going to have to face facts?

Willingly ignorant is no way to be.

>>128676928
>they thought he was on their side because of Hillary dumps
WRONG
YOU thought he was on our side because of Hillary dumps. We have always known that he is on the side of exposing government secrets. I still side with him, these leaks are meaningless but leaking on corruption should always be encouraged. Also, kys

trumpfags can't handle when the news doesnt go their way
like their mophead in chief, they can't handle being triggered

literal sjw-tier faggots who want a 25 year old white woman to go to prison instead of making her a waifu. so many beta cucks who don't understand she is now prime wife material since she is humble

>>128680406
Delusion: The Post

>>128680487
go back to t_d and stop posting about how its ok to bed sheboons and asians

>>128676601
I do like Assange. Doesn't mean I have to agree with him here.

>>128680406
Go get some air Anon.

File: jfdnjdsinnsfis.jpg (234KB, 1080x1073px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 1080x1073px

>>128677105
>no mention of this traitor

>>128677452
Calm down.

File: 1984_part_II.jpg (252KB, 888x1248px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 888x1248px

>>128676601

>>128677976
heres the thing anon, assange already revealed that the CIA can make it look like anyone hacked anyone else. That means anyone can hack anyone else and make it look like someone else did it. so you cant really prove anything. you need to look at the vault 7 leaks, the origins of cyber espionage is not something that can be proven with hard evidence, not anymore. thats why this shit will never hold water. if it did than we'd have a coup on our hands.

>>128678405
"I saw a document that said it was the GRU, therefore it is real."

>>128676730
yeah I hate that shit. I only support people for their words/ideas. I couldn't give a shit about the person themselves. I don't know them personally.

File: IMG_2678.png (139KB, 284x240px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 284x240px

>>128677105
>Falling for the Trump meme hook line and sinker

>>128676601
I agree with him, but the reasons that this information isn't public is because isn't because of political corruption or national security.

A U.S. intelligence officer who declined to be identified cautioned against drawing too big a conclusion from the document because a single analysis is not necessarily definitive

The government itself is trying to understand this and the information is very vague.

She leaked it for political reasons as a smear job, it's a great example of how overgrown the deep state is. The NSA is likely toying with another intelligence agency while thinking it's Russia.

>>128683394
>>128683394
>>128683394
>A U.S. intelligence officer who declined to be identified cautioned against drawing too big a conclusion from the document because a single analysis is not necessarily definitive

>>128681629
I can't wrap my head around how the left fell in love with the CIA as soon as it became apparent it was going after Trump. The left has had nothing but scorn for the CIA up until now.

File: 1474850226430.gif (1MB, 250x231px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x231px

>>128676601
Isn't she a Bernie loving socialist?

Nah, I hope she gets the fuckin' needle.

>>128681070
Most Trump supporters are too retarded to realize this.