Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
File: 1495250013488.png (366KB, 619x409px) Image search:
[Google]
366KB, 619x409px
Would you all be opposed to giving President Trump full powers for a certain period of time?
>Not unlike the Enabling Act of 1933
Obviously there's a risk of him becoming a dictator, but I wouldn't mind with him. Trump could accomplish everything he wanted: healthcare, the travel ban, whatever.
Tell me, /pol/, does history repeat itself?
>>
self bump
>>
File: trump agenda ruined by trump.jpg (126KB, 732x422px) Image search:
[Google]
126KB, 732x422px
>>128661159
he has no powers at all now. he couldn't pass a kidney stone.
>>
>>128661159
No. One man should never have too much power.
>>
File: aVP8o4d_700b.jpg (110KB, 500x641px) Image search:
[Google]
110KB, 500x641px
>>128661159
Yes , Make Trump Emperor
>>
File: antifa btfo 2.png (1MB, 1632x1087px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1632x1087px
>>128661159
>Would you all be opposed to giving President Trump full powers for a certain period of time?
No
>>
>>128661159
No give those powers to Bannon.
>>
>>128661159
Nah. A Trump dictatorship would result in massive civil unrest, if not an all out civil war, that would cripple the nation drastically resulting in it's downfall. Plus Trump is a 110% kike lover so there's that.
>>
>>128661159
I'd give them to Bannon. Dictatorial powers for Trump would be too risky if the Jews get to him. I'd give him full powers if it only pertained to domestic affairs I guess.
>>
>>128661159
nah, trump is a faggot, and you OP, are a bigger faggot for suggesting this.
he's literally an orange nigger,
>>
>>128667102
>>128668233
The more I read about Bannon, the more I realize he's like me. It's a little scary.
Trump would be more likely to institute Bannon's policies if he could get away with it without obstruction and not have to play deal maker to get anything done.
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4