Nearly 1 in 10 Milennials Now Identify as LGBT

have their parents do it to make it uncool to youth

>>128496887
why fix it? The genetic defects by default cannot procreate lol

>>128496887
homosexuality is pushed by the culture

interesting.

LGBT=/= homo though

>>128496887
make it a social and political taboo again. thats not possible right now sadly.

>>128496887

I doubt the actual number is that high, they're just memes. Every single girl alive these days defines herself as bisexual, even though 90% of these girls have never been evenly remotely attracted to a girl.

>>128497095
its not just homos, but those who identify as other made up genders, they still procreate.

File: Carmen-Carrera.jpg (134KB, 650x781px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 650x781px

>>128496887
LGBTQQIP2SAA
>GET IT RIGHT DAMMIT

File: homonogamy.png (484KB, 431x575px) Image search: [Google]

484KB, 431x575px

>>128497095

Yeah honestly I think that's what'll wind up happening: Liberals are going to go extinct by their own designs.

Their platform is based on being allowed to kill their babies and have sex with other men or other women.

If we can do something about their imported votes and their brainwashing "education" system, victory would be a 100% chance

File: oy vey.png (144KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 800x600px

>>128497263
y did u do this to us schlomo?

>>128496887
that isn't any different from the early 90s. it had always been 1 in 10 since i have been alive.

>>128497393
the point is that only sanity allows for more kids in the long term. Sanity is not part of this crowd, and like all evolutionary unsustainable behavior, it will wipe itself out.

>>128496887
It's for attention. LGBT is the new Goth.

>>128496887
They are doing it to fit in with social groups. When people started making being oppressed a desired commodity people naturally sought out to be oppressed.

File: two-scoops.jpg (64KB, 737x750px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 737x750px

>>128496887
>>128496887
DOES ANYONE HAVE THE INFOGRAPH OF SECULAR ARGUMENTS AGAINST QUEER FAGGOTS

>>128497263
This. What's weird is that saying your LGBT, or whatever, became a positive.

Nearly all of those LGBTQ+-\| individuals are remarkable examples of why their type is degenerate and appalling. Anyone with a modicum of sense realizes this. Thus nothing of magnitude needs to be done - just keep them from molesting the youth.

>>128496887

>By age 18,.. 35% will be diagnosed with an anxiety disorder,
>25% will be diagnosed with a substance addiction
>20% will have a behavioral disorder. Accounting for overlap, one of these disorders will affect 1 in 2 young people.

http://fortune.com/2016/04/28/young-workers-anxiety-depression/

>>128497737
This. New emo

>>128496887
man, millennial generation is absolutely fucked.

File: 1439835438995.jpg (3MB, 3100x1855px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3100x1855px

>>128497826
tis?

>>128498115
they don't even know how fucked they are

>>128498173
Not bad, I'll save it

But this one is about four to five times as long and has a Dinosaur costume or something dancing at the top

>nearly one in ten
But this is one in fifteen isn't it? That's a large difference.

>be gay but straight acting
>meet another gay guy at a rally
>he's right wing too
>super cool dude, we both get punched by Antifa and laugh about it later
>share a hatred for flamers

Tbh most gay people are disgusting. The arguments against homosexuality are the same arguments a child could make against straight sex. "Omg, she pees from there, and if she's a irgin she'll bleed everywhere! And once a month she has a period! Oh god it's icky!"

But for real, when I came out (which I now regret), I wasn't expecting the outcome. Nothing but support and applause and messages from people I hadn't talked to in years saying I was so brave. But the telling one was a friend who told me when he was drunk, "I wish I could come out as gay. I'm not, but then people would notice me." This is how I view everyone with weird made up genders who still are basically straight, sleeping only with the opposite gender.

>>128498624
that sounds really neat, would love to see that graph as well then.

File: 2017-have-gay.png (463KB, 800x798px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 800x798px

>>128496887

1 in 10 kids are molested by faggots too. What a ((((coincidence))))

File: 1491674879122.jpg (117KB, 1024x748px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1024x748px

>>128497263

File: Slippery_Staircase.jpg (278KB, 784x768px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 784x768px

>>128497826

I don't have an infograph but I do have some. Even without scripture, we could see that homosexuality is objectively inferior to heterosexuality and that it is a disorder.

It's a scientific fact that homosexuals do not form pair-bonds that are as strong as heterosexuals.

>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2906147/

Found that in their study, "[Homosexual] Couples with monogamous and open agreements did not differ significantly in their relationship satisfaction. This is in line with previous findings (Blasband & Peplau, 1985; Kurdek, 1988; LaSala, 2004)…"

>http://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/01/24/waite-joyner/waite-joyner.pdf

Shows that this is a stark contrast to heterosexual couples. Their research found on page 257 that "the more exclusive the sexual relationship, the greater the emotional satisfaction reported".

So clearly something is different. Research allows us to see what.

>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2387250/

Studied the effect of strengthened pair-bonds in a species of apes that mate for life. . It was observed that “males [who] had…been part of a previous [brain] lesioning experiment…which resulted behaviorally in increased interaction with their pair-mates and apparent ‘strengthening’ of the pair-bond. Specifically, post-lesion the males were more often in physical contact with their mates, were less likely to break contact, and spent more time grooming their mates. They also displayed less behavioral arousal (arching, tail-lashing) towards strange females than they did pre-lesion”.

However, we can see that homosexuals have a weak pair bond as they have extreme interest in other mates which only increases as their relationship goes on, instead of decreasing like a relationship with the pair-bond was strengthening would.

(Part 1 - continued below)

File: @[email protected] (16KB, 468x241px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 468x241px

>>128497826
>>128500033

>See pic related in >>128497520

According to the book The Male Couple (written by two homosexual psychologists who were themselves a male couple - so as unbiased a source as could possibly exist), in their study, "all [homosexual] couples with a relationship lasting more than five years have incorporated some provision for outside sexual activity in their relationships".

>http://journals.lww.com/aidsonline/Fulltext/2004/06180/Primary_HIV_infection_as_source_of_HIV.10.aspx

Found that even among homosexuals in relationships, their number of outside sexual partners stays very high. In their study "Men with and without a steady partner had [an average of] eight and 22 casual contacts per year, respectively".

>http://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/01/24/comparative-demographic-and-sexual-profile/comparative-demographic-and-sexual-profile.pdf

Found that, among older men who had engaged in homosexual activities it was reported that just "2.7% had had sex with 1 partner only" (which was even lower than the number who said they were straight, at 3.9%)

So on an emotional and behavioral level, we can see that same-sex relations are inferior to heterosexual ones. They do not form proper sexual bonds, if they form them at all.

File: 11648259420409.jpg (499KB, 1079x2283px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 1079x2283px

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/govt-provides-gender-service-for-kids-who-fancy-themselves-as-transgender

https://inews.co.uk/essentials/news/health/pregnant-women-progesterone-sex-hormone-bisexual-children/

https://stream.org/yes-childhood-sexual-abuse-often-contribute-homosexuality/

>>128500033
>>128500221

I've been meaning to turn these into an infographic, but I'm not sure what the overall look of it should be like. Anybody have any suggestions?

File: 1496524723739.jpg (97KB, 1024x710px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1024x710px

Question for /pol/acks born in 1995-1997(cusp of Millennials and Gen Z).

Do you associate your childhood more closely with Millennial things like Blockbuster, Jimmy neutron, Recess, The Weekenders, Invader sim, Yu gi oh, PS1, PS2, N64, Pokemon Gens 1-3, Gorillaz, Discman, Malcolm in the middle, Cyberchase, Tamagotchi, Osmosis Jones, Kim Possible, playing outside, remembering 9/11, and having crushes on Avril lavigne, Britney spears, Jenny wakeman, and the Dark magician girl?

Or Gen Z things like streaming movies on Netflix, CN Real, Hannah Montana, PS3, Wii, Xbox 360, Bakugan, The Dark knight, Pokemon Gens 4-6, Justin Bieber, Twilight, Chowder, Marvelous misadventures of Flapjack, Adventure Time, Silly bandz, not playing outside, not remembering 9/11, and having crushes on Justin Bieber, Harry Styles, and "thick cream-filled qt trapbois" - NOT girls, because Vice and Huffingtonpost told you it was "hip" and "cool" to be gay?

>>128496887
>1998's the cut off
>tfw getting stuck with millennial instead of based gen z

>>128501407
Latter, I don't even know what/who Cyberchase, Recess, The Weekenders, Avril Lavigne or Jenny Wakeman are.

My sister was born in 1994 and she's definitely the former.