Trump's Budget Plan: Take from the Poor, Give to the Rich

Here's a (You)

>>128250489
How is cutting corporate income tax helping the rich? Last I checked it just makes products cheaper in a capitalist system, benefiting the whole of society.

>>128250489
70% of corporation, aka general business, tax is levied out of wages, studies find.

Meanwhile, welfare programs are a combination of ineffective, outdated beyond their expiration date, exploited, corrupt and creating the next generation of unemployed. It IS the vicious cycle of poverty.

File: 1494291495183.jpg (66KB, 562x633px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 562x633px

>>128250788
Holy fuck how do you exist in Germany? This type of thought is a crime in every major country. You can't just tell the truth like that!

File: 1493435984345.png (491KB, 476x492px) Image search: [Google]

491KB, 476x492px

>not taking shit from someone is stealing

>>128250788
You need to get out of Germany fast before you get lynched for having common sense

>>128250489
Cutting the corporate tax rate is the most vital thing Trump needs to do during his term.

>>128251268
interesting, please provide citation. that may explain our system here.

>>128250489

your own biased chart even proves you are wrong

WHY WOULD YOU FUND LOW INCOME PROGRAMS

LOW

INCOME

why not help the programs making the majority of your profit?

>>128250489
What do I care, I'm white so the welfare system doesn't give two shits about me in the first place.

whats better for america?

-corporations doing better and generating more revenue

-jamal and tyrone getting more gibs while they do nothing

pick one

File: White Oppression.png (240KB, 550x411px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 550x411px

>>128251664
I heard you guys used to make good watches. What do you provide now that mechanical time keeping is irrelevant? Also you stopped banking practices that were tempting the world, its like you don't even want investment anymore.

>>128251824
You really think Walmart and McDonald's need more tax cuts? Despite their tens of billions of dollars in revenue each year?

>>128251971
Cheaper products and services, fuck the niggers.

>>128251971
Have you ever heard of small businesses? Or what an operating environment is?

Companies are increasing investment because of a welcoming business environment, and it has nothing that will help established entities like McDonalds and Walmart. They will at best receive more consumption because of the uptick in disposable incomes.

>>128251971

what helps the economy more?

yes, they do. and if companies are taxed less...products can be sold at more competitive prices!

>>128250489
fuck the poor

This. National socialist here. Taxing the rich is a good thing.

File: 1.png (2KB, 161x132px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 161x132px

>>128250489
Yeah we should have voted for the warmongering sjw cunt, owned by every bank and kike in the states. I'm sure we would have been so much better off now.

>>128251309
The alternative to redistribution programs is that money accrues to the top and we get a fuedalistic society.

We need taxes and the like to prevent a defacto aristocracy from forming.

>>128251759
You know what poor people do with money?

They fucking spend it.

You know what you need for a functioning economy? People spending money.

>>128252675
This never happens, ever, it's just a communist meme.

File: C--cTP7XUAAFo1I.jpg large.jpg (37KB, 610x413px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 610x413px

>>128252675
>to prevent a defacto aristocracy from forming.
Motherfucker we are multiple levels past oligarchy, how young are you?

File: Impossibru_f09079_1388779.jpg (26KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 300x300px

>>128250788
>capitalist system
>benefiting society

>>128252745

corporations doing better = good economy

good economy = jobs

more jobs = more money spent = more disposable income

for plebs to thrive, we need a strong economy. you can NOT build from the bottom up, the CEOs are the ones that create all these jobs.

>>128252593
Or you could vote for someone you believe in. The lesser evil isn't cutting it anymore.

It's a shame the third party candidates were all shit this round. If the election was today I'd write in Ron or Rand Paul, although I disagree on tarriffs and I'm more liberal on Healthcare I still think they'd do a lot of good.

>>128252988
... You're retarded.

>>128252934
You think Venezuela is just a meme?

In 'muh jewpitalism' people calling the shots in economy are supposed to know what they're doing

In grorious Gommunizm they are supposed to lick grorious Leader's boots

>>128251302
>thats my bike
Kek

File: 1494453215819.jpg (7KB, 250x241px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x241px

>>128253011
Ron was acceptable, Rand will never elevate above the level of Kucinich. The fucking turtle senate leader Mitch has more charisma then Rand.

>>128252988
>you can NOT build from the bottom up
Most companies in the US are built this way. CEOs being responsible for board creation is typically comes from mature companies and large corporations, which often times started out as small businesses. Artificial "top down" company creation, or incubation as it's called, is a recent phenomenon and I personally believe is the work of Marxist Jewish gypsy magic. It's also a horrible way to build a company.

>letting someone keep more of their money is taking money from other people

>>128253098

how?

ok lets pretend we tax the shit out of corporations, and make things really easy for people flipping burgers.

how does that help the economy? you have to make things better for the people hiring for MEANINGFUL jobs. the economy cant thrive otherwise.

>the guy making $5 an hour can now spend $10 more a week!

versus

>the corporation will make 10 billion dollars more this year!

which has a bigger impact on the economy?

>>128253305
>number of guys making $5 an hour vs number of corporations making billions per year

>>128253011
Well, I didn't like Bernie, Gary or Jill.

File: americunts.jpg (98KB, 537x720px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 537x720px

This is a TYPICAL AMERICUNT THREAD
BURGERS, LOW IQ, AND DIABETES WILL INFEST YOU IF YOU STAY HERE
Please move on.

>>128253475

if corporations do bad, jobs get cut, stocks tank, dollar goes down. we NEED our businesses to thrive. for everyone. after all, they hire us.

even that min wage worker wont have a job if they go out of business, right?

>>128253136
I was joking, but you are on point.

I like you, Poland.

>>128253475
>Using number of corporations
You know that's not how that works.

>>128250788
Op's a faggot, but people do need to understand that in capitalism prices generally don't come down because of things like this. Reducing overhead only means soaring profits. Prices tank when no one is buying your shit. If businesses got by with a skeleton crew of employees while taxes were high, they will continue to do it while taxes are low to squeeze out that extra profit.

>>128253136
stupid slav nigger :^) poland got colonized hard exactly because of introducting unlimited capitalism e.g. everything was sold out and >25 years after capitalistic transformation you guys are still wiping old nazis asses and you supposedly won the war :^) meanwhile china and south korea didnt introduce full capitalism but were heavily protectionist for last 25 years and every fucking year they had 10% GDP growth, south korea now being at the wealth level of western countries and i'm talking france and germany here, not fucking spain or greece.

you polish white niggers bought this crap about capitalism and you will be slav niggers forever because you fucked up the last and only chance to develop your country, it was literally the only chance you will ever have and you fucked it royally 25 years ago.

File: 1395799034382.png (213KB, 423x500px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 423x500px

>>128252249
>Cheaper products and services
That right goy we ALWAYS pass on our savings to the little guy.

>>128253136
Venezuela sits on one of the largest oil reserves in the world and they're still poor.

>>128253608
>b..but muh corporations
liberals don't understand this. Also the US corporate tax rate is one of the highest in the world already.

Show me some evidence where lower corporate taxes led to lower real prices of goods and services.

>>128250489
"Take from the poor"

Isnt that an oxymoron or some shit?

>>128255768
Better yet, show me when lower corporate taxes led to an increase of jobs with static demand.

>>128250489
Well McDonald's do the same.

>>128255241
i found an epic kike in a music video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSZAeEN_dLc

File: IMG_0183.jpg (77KB, 667x397px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 667x397px

STEVE BANNON IS AN ECONOMIC GENIUS!!!!!!!!

>>128252934
Last I checked it was the only working system, so yes working>broken.

Would you rather go back to the feudal system?

This is what you get for electing a businessman. That's like hiring a Wendy's employee to do your plumbing. Sure Hilary may have been the antichrist but at least she had government experience.

How dare that awful trump cut US corporate taxes. They should be raised to help pay for new scehemes to help the poorest in society.

You Americans should put them up.


(To any corporate or large business owner listening, come to Ireland, we have the lowest corporate tax rates - you better believe it - see you soon).

But yeadh tump is just wrong. You need to put up those rates in the US 2% to help with social programmes and shit.

>>128250489
Give a child a check for $5, meh. Give a child a check for $1 Quadrillion and he is ecstatic. He doesn't understand that one is more real than the other.

I like the small promises of a politician who tries to curb the debt more than the big promises of one who doesn't.

>>128253305
>you can NOT build from the bottom up
Literally how everything worthwhile in this country was built. What we're living in now is a marxist sim of the old pre-NAFTA system. It would die without defacto state-sanctioned monopolies or with some healthy protectionism - and we'd all be better off for it. Muh neofeudalism that resulted is absolute shit.

>>128252675
>from forming
Nice joke.

>>128258982
Feudalism worked

>>128261419
Not good enough, capitalism won.

>>128261570
Feudalism was capitalist

>>128259252
(You)

>>128250489
I know he's super liberal. Taking from working Americans to give to welfare queens with new iPhones and 3 baby daddy's.

>>128261978
It wasn't, not even close.

>>128263088
Yes it was.
>strong property laws that allowed private owners to make profits?
Yep

>>128250788
Lol. That never works.

Trump budget is based as fuck.

>slashes entitlements
>food stamps
>medicaid
>foreign aid

Too bad the establishment cucks aren't going to go for it.

>>128263267
>no currency
>private owners included less than 10% of society
>also a political system
Stop being retarded, if they were the same thing they would have the same name, feudalism is one thing and capitalism is another one

>>128263556
None of those things are a necessity to capitalism

>>128252745
Oh hey, It's Keynes! Tell me brilliant man, if you could increase the goods and services by increasing the paper currency in the economy, why not triple the amount currently in circulation?

Also can you explain why Modigliani Miller theorem exists?

>>128263626
Capitalism is an economic system not a political one, and the fact that less than 10% of the society were even capable of owning anything prevents a free market from ever existing. There are wild differences, things aren't the way you want just because you say so.

>>128250489
Why the fuck would you even tax heirs in the first place?

>>128256101
Hello

>>128253584
Thank you anon.

>>128250788

must be sarcasm.

the old "if corporations make more money, workers will get more too" is just wrong, but on pol everyone will defend trump no matter what.

>>128250489
If Trump is so good for rich people, why did they all support Hillary you moron. Also, where do you think these loopholes come from? The one paragraph conservative flat tax code, or the fucking 70,000 page liberal code?

>>128250489
On the slight off-chance you're serious:

Giving less money to the poor is not taking from them. Stealing less money from the rich is not giving to them.

>low income programs
>not giving people free money they didn't EARN is stealing from them

>>128252745
>poor people "fucking spend" all their money
I wonder why they're poor? You dumbass?

>>128251971
>fuck the rich mega corporations
>also fuck the brick and mortar store getting the same 35% tax rate

File: 2017-06-03 04_59_27-(35) _pol_ - Trump's Budget Plan_ Take from the Poor, Give to the Rich.png (19KB, 89x84px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 89x84px

>>128253584
tell me about this man

>>128250489
he's not stealing from the poor, retard, he's just not giving them as much free shit at the expense of the rich. what is with liberals being so unbelievably ignorant of economics?

>>128250489
>Money that never belonged to poor people means you're taking it from them

Loooooooooool>>128250489

>>128250788
Shut up asshole. When cut their taxes it's clear they Rev up prices

>>128266141
>He thinks people earn the money when an estate tax is applied.

Now are you just echoing what you see on pol or do you not understand basic tax code

>>128265746
How is it wrong? Statistically prove that it's wrong. I know during Regan's era trickle down DID WORK.

Liberals hated it though because Rich people got richer. They'd rather have the poor poorer than benefiting anything>>128265746

>>128267069
It's theirs is their families. How retarded can you be? I'm sorry some people have money and others are too stupid to figure how.

>>128267175
From what I know, they hate it beacuse the rich got richer while the middle class and lower class's wages became stagnate. It wasn't until reagan did wages start stagnating