What if guys?

>>128236699
But muh poor oil sultans

>>128236699
lies are not the basis of rational action.

>>128236699
what if we destroy our economy and it turns out to be a lie?

>>128237768
>Schulz to Trump: Dropping Paris agreement means no trade talks
http://www.politico.eu/article/schulz-to-trump-dropping-paris-agreement-means-no-trade-talks/

It's over folks, USA is no longer the leader of the free world.

>>128238262
Not a lie and the economy will only grow.

>>128238319
>Not a lie and the economy will only grow.
how is our economy gonna grow if we give trillions to other countries and elon builds his solar panels in india?

>>128238390
>trillions
more markets for us to capitalize on. New clean alternatives energy source technologies for nations to buy.

File: IMG_0492.jpg (98KB, 960x694px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 960x694px

>accepting allegiance with the (((Paris Accord)))
>not investing in nuclear energy

Anyone who spends just a few days researching nuclear energy knows that it presents all the characteristics necessary to undercut the false dichotomy surrounding climate change.
-zero carbon
-enough fuel to last tens of thousands of years
-the safest form of energy
-all fears seriously overhyped: melt down, proliferation and waste protip: no one has died from Fukushima's radiation and likely no one ever will…don't listen to Jonestein
-advanced reactors will be abundantly cheaper than all current forms of electricity production because of the ability for modular production in a factory like a 747 then shipping to finish assembly on site
-advanced reactors can provide industrial heat to inexpensively synthesize fuels and desalinate water, manufacture cement, fertilizer etc.
Whether climate change is real or not I happen to be fairly convinced that it is there has been huge lies around the technology that they were unable to suppress quickly enough once the Zionists began to heavily occupy our government after world war II.
Nuclear energy is the monkey wrench in the whole carbon credits/global warming narrative that must (((be deflected))) by disinformation and obfuscation so that the white man does not wake up to realize that this is the stepping stone to the stars.
There are many small coalitions trying to raise awareness about advanced nuclear energy technology. Gordon McDowell has an excellent youtube page with anything you would ever want to know in digestible videos.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXIdM7ABQ8b9FI495vbsHkA
Obviously, if conservatives knew there was a
free market solution to the dominance of the fossil economy, they would be more amenable to doing something about climate change. Certain websites like Forbes.com have had a lot of articles about nuclear energy. But mainstream scientists and notable celebrities are completely ignorant.

>>128238931
After Fukushima fuck that shit. Forreal fuck nuclear.

Nuclear power is kept out of the narrative because it would be a technology nearly as disruptive as the steam engine, turning all sorts of power structures and false dilemmas into dust. It must be a platform from which we launch our assault of logic, reason and order.
Also vid related is James Hansen, founder of Greenpeace.

>>128239010
t. inbred literal retard

>>128236699

What if you didn't spam the board with this same comic bluefag

>>128238931
There was a giant nuclear power plant near where i lived in (((Miami))) and we got super cheap energy. Everyone always complained like "oh they probably make the ocean all dirty" (the plant was right by the water) but we drove by on a fishing boat numerous times and the water was just as clear and clean as any of the water we fished in.

>>128236699
>trillions of dollars for nothing
>"better world"

>>128238319
>replace reliable fossil fuel generators and engines with expensive, unreliable shit
>"Not a lie and the economy will only grow."
>what is: broken windows fallacy?

>>128236699
Livable cities
Saving the rainforest
Clean water
Not part of climate.

Nuclear power would be better for the environment than miles and miles and miles of wind farms and solar farms. And as far as safety goes: you can put the damn things on boats, packed to the brim with sailors. they are safe.

>>128239010
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HOgkzZc4Co

>>128239311
Do these retards not know how deep our ocean is?

>>128239666
Silence Satan! You will not influence me!
>innovate and improve technology
>rely on century old technology that we know causes harm

Here's a reason to curb CO2 emissions, regardless of climate change, it lowers the pH of the oceans. http://ocean.si.edu/ocean-acidification

>>128238319

"""Trade talks""". Kikes tricking white nations into signing away sovereignty.

>>128239010
fearful retard
only with the power of the stars and atomics would humanity have the energy to colonise the galaxy!

>>128240275
Aren't the kikes part of this agreement?

>>128239805

I honestly support nuclear power as a stopgap measure to curb carbon emissions, other environmentalists are being retarded about this. Nuclear waste disposal and the meltdown risk are problems, but it's not as if, say, mountaintop removal is all that much better for the ecosystem.

We do ultimately need to shift to renewables, but if we're not ready to go full Iceland we should do what we can to cut CO2 in the interim.