[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

"Cultural Marxism" is a hoax

This is a red board which means that it's strictly for adults (Not Safe For Work content only). If you see any illegal content, please report it.

Thread replies: 141
Thread images: 19

Why do so many people on /pol/ constantly parade around the term "Cultural Marxism" to refer to anything they don't like? Notice how they never cite the works of the Frankfurt School themselves but merely go off on conjecture about the members' Jewish origins, or vague accusations about the mainstream media being allegedly owned by communists? Well this Jewish Marxist has debunked the myth:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_y0LxcANic
>>
>>128233690
>da joos
fucking nazi larper shills

SAGE
>>
>>128233806
The video I linked is pro-Frankfurt School. She's obviously done her research, unlike /pol/.
>>
Words evolve. Whether or not the term "cultural marxism" originally meant to mean what we use it as today means shit. Liberals do this all the time: "racism" never meant "prejudice PLUS power" yet ask any cultural marxist in academia and that's the definition they'll give you.

"Cultural marxist" evokes images of forcing equivalence in the value of cultures even where there is none. It works. Fuck off with your deconstructionist jewish bullshit.
>>
>>128233938
It's still foolish to blame the Franks for modern identity politics. They only come up because it's easier to blame da jooooz than it is to actually read.
>>
File: MormonPower.jpg (12KB, 300x253px) Image search: [Google]
MormonPower.jpg
12KB, 300x253px
>>128233690

Why do Mormons and Jews look so similar but have diametrically opposed worldviews - at least on the surface?

The guy on the right reminds me of Spencer W Kimball.
>>
>>128234216
>conceding my point
>"but it's still silly!"

It's silly to think that if you can convince people that identity politics aren't actually marxist that people will be more open to the communist bullshit you're trying to peddle.
>>
>>128234216
ok read his post and try again now.
>>
>>128234344
Identity politics and things like "privilege checking" have nothing to do with Marxism. If anything, they're the result of the death of Marxism and the assimilation of the radical left into mainstream culture. Even all the hype surrounding Bernie Sanders is nothing more than a shadow of what the left used to be.
>>
>>128233690
>Notice how they never cite the works of the Frankfurt School themselves


we do whats your point?
>>
>>128234675
They don't read. They attack something they barely understand.
>>
>>128233690
i see people referencing the frankfurt school all the time on here

lurk more kike lover
>>
>>128233690
>anything they don't like

this is a political board which sole purpose is to rip the shit out of content anons find funny or retarded. Much of today's politics, like policy in western europe for example, is enacted by ppl who were taught socialist policy is muh utopia.

>is surprised when pol/acks with brains find source of thought by which these ppl were taught
>asks fatuous questions on /pol/

go to your college sociology department in the humanities and talk to a lecturer. They refer to the frankfurt school and the postmodern intellectuals who were influenced by it in the last century endlessly in their content.
>>
>>128234859
If so, then they should know the Franks had zero interest in identity politics or attacking whites.
>>
>>128234716
Cultural Marxism ≠ Frankfurt School
Also I can't listen to this bitch's chipmunk voice, and paired with the desert music this video just makes me want to blow my brains out.
>>
>>128233690
>cultural marxism is a hoax
yet programs that favor minorities, females and those deemed 'marginalized' exist, and are very clearly favored by colleges all across the board, all the way up to the ivy leagues.

Affirmative action and other laws forcing equality actively demand companies to host diversity, lest they risk getting a lawsuit for 'hosting prejudice' against the females or minority workers that failed to be hired, despite their inherent lacking in the company.
>>
File: 1482883584334.png (3MB, 2225x961px) Image search: [Google]
1482883584334.png
3MB, 2225x961px
>>128234716
>>
>>128235172
>yet programs that favor minorities, females and those deemed 'marginalized' exist,
What does this have to do with Marxism or Critical Theory? Affirmitive Action is capitalism.
>>
>>128233690
>Why do so many people on /pol/ constantly parade around the term "Cultural Marxism" to refer to anything they don't like?
Because the Frankfurt school has produced some of the worst monsters of the 20th century and some of the dumbest people of the 21st century.
The fact people genuinely believe that the world can be saved and it's up to the first world to do it is the dumbest concept ever conceived. Why people continue to parrot the teachings of a school that killed millions of people, even more than Hitler himself, is beyond me.

Nazis to you, humble liberal, are like frankfurt school acolytes to me.
>>
>>128235281
Because everyone is a citizen, or comrade, in Marxism, equal opportunity is a Marxist principle, how fucking dense are you?
>>
>>128235281
It has to do with marxism in the cultural sense in that it acts as an attempt to achieve 'equality of outcome,' which is an inherently marxist belief.
>affirmative action is capitalism
Prove it then
>>
>>128234716
t. Idiot who probably thinks the Soviet Union and Leninism wasn't "Real" communism.

Please call me when that wonderful marxist utopia rises from the ashes of the working class and doesn't produce a totalitarian shithole. Come on, any day now. I'm sure that utopia is just around the corner if you go to more antifa rallies and smash garbage cans! Fucking nazi garbage cans!
>>
File: humanzoo_story.jpg (635KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
humanzoo_story.jpg
635KB, 1920x1080px
>>128233690
Ridiculous.

Marxism has been irrelevant since the fall of the soviet union, or even farther than that.
>>
>>128235410
It's equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity. They want the rate of men and women in the workplace to be 50-50, across the board.
>>
>>128233938
This. Fuck people trying to rob white people of institutions that benefit them
>>
>>128235585
Sorry, you're right
>>
>>128235410
>Because everyone is a citizen, or comrade, in Marxism
lol
In reality, Everyone is a subject in Marxism. It requires a higher power in order to function, because the concept of "The People" in itself is a higher power.
It's really just exchanging one form of totalitarianism for another. Proof: The nonexistence of any true Marxist society that doesn't collapse into a dictatorship. At least in Monarchies you can state the name of your kings.
>>
>>128233690
Cultural Marxism is a way to push society away from traditional values. JEWS push for single parent homes and feminism as a way to bring down the birth rates among whites. Why can't u see that?
>>
>>128233690
So tired. Nothing is happening. This is all so untrue. Time for bed. I can't post anymore. Probably going to go to bed. So tired of this untrue stuff being posted. Sleepy.
>>
OP you are of course correct and I thank you kindly for making this thread
>>
>>128233690
Cultural marxism is the fight of the classes applied to different groups of individuals with different cultures.
I don't give a fuck about what you think it means.
>>
>>128235630
No need to be sorry friendo. My point is that in an equal opportunity world, the best get the opportunity to go the farthest as they will be given the opportunity to do so, just as everyone else - where as in the equality of outcome, only those who are either deemed worthy or deemed 'victims' of some sort will be given the opportunity.
>>
>>128233690
Looks like she got deconstructed multiple times in her own comment section.

It doesn't matter, though. You'll keep making this thread like the brainless drone that you are.
>>
>>128235693
>Cultural Marxism is a way to push society away from traditional values. JEWS push for single parent homes and feminism as a way to bring down the birth rates among whites.
Prove it using actual sources, not infographics.
>>
Please fuck off back to leftypol. Marxism is about abolish class, racial and cultural differences.
>>
>>128235223
>Marx was a Rothschild cousin
Who cares? Does ANYONE keep in touch with their third cousins?

>>128235385
>Because the Frankfurt school has produced some of the worst monsters of the 20th century and some of the dumbest people of the 21st century.
Again, prove it. Explain to all of us using legitimate scholarly sources that the Franks are responsible for the "dumbing down" of the West and/or identity politics.
>>
>>128235897
>implying the shiddi would give away their greatest secret
Stupid got, just read the fucking Talmud
>>
>>128235897
Cultural marxism is the attempt to create equal outcome amongst the masses.
As in, 50-50 for men and women in the workplace, and such.

you still have yet to prove that Affirmative action is capitalist in nature.

>>128236022
>you're incorrect because 'nobody keeps in contact with their third cousins, Right?! RIGHT?!'

Lol
>>
>>128235410
>>128235488
Affirmative Action only helps women and people of color who are QUALIFIED get hired in elite positions or accepted into elite institutions (like Ivy League unis). It doesn't change the fact that elite institutions and social hierarchies EXIST in the first place. It helps capitalism, because it puts a sheet over contradictions which emerge or are accelerated by capitalism (such as white supremacy, colonialism, patriarchy, and the like).
>>
>>128236142
>just read the fucking Talmud
Is that why Chassidic and Hareidi Jews who actually read the Talmud and take it at face-value have extremely strong family structures and treat their women like cattle?
>>
>>128233690

I LOVE THESE JEWISH KIKE DAMAGE CONTROL THREADS, LEAF, KEEP THEM COMING
>>
File: amused scottish freedom fighter.png (142KB, 315x300px) Image search: [Google]
amused scottish freedom fighter.png
142KB, 315x300px
>>128236192

>because it puts a sheet over contradictions which emerge or are accelerated by capitalism (such as white supremacy, colonialism, patriarchy, and the like).

Never stop posting, leaf. This is too good to cease.
>>
>>128236192
>it helps capitalism
The fuck it does, if anything it hinders capitalism because businesses are FORCED to hire someone based on color rather than skill
Example:
Candidate A has 10 years experience in said field and was even a project manager on very successful projects
Candidate B is a minority with 3 years experience and was let go from his company due to downsizing
Candidate B will be hired in order to meet their AA quotas to ensure they keep a good image/don't lose money
>>
>>128236191
>Cultural marxism is the attempt to create equal outcome amongst the masses.
Great, so can you point to anything in the texts of the Frankfurt School which promote this?
>>
File: 1493285288281.jpg (42KB, 1024x928px) Image search: [Google]
1493285288281.jpg
42KB, 1024x928px
>>128233690
Oh yippee this thread again. Debunked every time and still coming back for more.
Don't forget to sage.
>>
>>128236192
>affirmative action only gives the places to those who deserve it
Incorrect. With affirmative action, you are MORE likely to be accepted to an IVY league colleges or jobs than a white of the same intellectual caliber. Those of the christian church are specifically targeted when it comes to accepting scholarships in that churches cannot give their attendees scholarships, however this is not the case for jews or muslims.

When it comes to jobs, if you are black and there are no blacks in that company, they will HAVE to accept you regardless if there were a million other potential hiree's that outranked that black man by 100-fold. Thus, it is NOT picking out the people that are MOST QUALIFIED, but rather enforcing an ideology that puts other races in favor of those who are actually better.

>Affirmative action is capitalism because of X Y Z social issues

Incorrect. Capitalism is about exchanging products/services for monetary value. Whatever culture or ideals that stand overhead are irrelevant and thus are not inherently 'capitalist.'
Again, prove it to me. 'muh culture' is not proof.
>>
>>128236849
>of the same intellectual caliber.
Yes, this is what I mean. AA only benefits people of color or women who are already qualified. Black kids with shit grades aren't being accepted into big schools over white kids with stellar grades.
>>
>>128236849
>Incorrect. Capitalism is about exchanging products/services for monetary value.
No it's not. Capitalism refers to a specific historical period marked by specific property relations and relations of production. You can't claim capitalism is "free exchange" because "free exchange" exists in every society.
>>
>>128237081
>Black kids with shit grades aren't being accepted into big schools

except they are.

>>128237161
Incorrect. Capitalism refers to the concept of the exchange of monetary wealth for goods or services. You still have not proven how some government social plan is 'capitalist' in nature.

http://www.academia.edu/26390448/Cultural_Marxism_An_Introduction
>>
>>128237688
>except they are.
Proof?
>>
>>128233690
This video has been posted here dozens of times. The cute music and large words are nice but this video states nothing profound.
>>
>>128237744
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/418530/what-ivy-league-affirmative-action-really-looks-inside-david-french

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2014/11/affirmative-action

They make it harder for the best to get in, and make it easier for the worst to get in, in order to create the equality of outcome that I have said as posted.
>>
>>128238122
How many of those people of color are dirt poor though?
>>
>>128237935
Well it would be nice if /pol/ could actually cite instances where the Franks were advocating for wiping out white people or promoting the death of the family.
>>
>>128238215
Your economic value is irrelevant when applying to college, only the fact that you can apply, and qualify for the various scholarships that exist SPECIFICALLY for your race/religion (note; there are no scholarships SPECIFICALLY for whites, nor have there ever been any that have been allowed to exist)

You still have not proven how some government social plan is 'capitalist' in nature. How about you prove yourself rather than dodging the demand for proof to back your statements up

>>128238438
>pol is one person
Nice, another fallacy. Way to go, 'intellectual'!!
>>
>>128238518
>there are no scholarships SPECIFICALLY for whites
Because whites aren't at a disadvantage for being white.
>>
>>128238612
>whites aren't at a disadvantage for being white
Prove it
>>
>>128238669
Look at the history of the US or Canada. Whites were always on top and still are. The only places in the world where whites face bullshit for being white are racist Asian countries like Japan, or southern African countries which have a brutal history of colonialism and white supremacy.
>>
>>128238612
This is bullshit, not all whites are connected and in it to screw darkie, most come from middle of the road or less than
>>
>>128238802
History is irrelevant in the present, which is what the question demands. Prove to me that whites are not presently being disadvantaged for being white.

You also have not proven how some government social plan (affirmative action) is 'capitalist' in nature. How about you prove yourself rather than dodging
>>
>>128238808
Yes, my ex-gf grew up in western Maryland in outright poverty and she's white as snow, so I'm well aware of the problems the white working class faces. But her childhood wasn't shit because she was white, her childhood was shit because she was poor.
>>
>>128238612
Descendant of Irish genocide refugees reporting
>>
>>128234216

The Frankfurt school is only important and relevant b/c of the systematic approach they took to deconstructing western values. It's almost universally agreed they were largely unsuccessful as a group, even if a few of their members slowly built up prominence in other regards.

Edward Bernays was probably 100x more successful in subverting the culture than anyone that came out of the Frankfurt school. It's just a convenient horse to kick to demonstrate the lengths these people will go and how academia becomes a cesspit of irrational thought.
>>
>>128238983
Ok, and how many scholarships, jobs was she given on the basis of her economic background compared to an equivalent person of color? Zero, as in the sense your argument is making currently
>>
>>128239016
The Irish weren't considered "white" for a long time, Patrick.
>>
File: alt-right.png (273KB, 434x428px) Image search: [Google]
alt-right.png
273KB, 434x428px
>>128233938
>Words evolve

All it's accomplished is make the right look fucking retarded. You have 15 year olds who watch youtube videos and take "le redpill" taking about Cultural Marxism and they don't even know what it means. It simply makes no logical sense.
>>
>>128239150
Prove to me that whites are not presently being disadvantaged for being white.

You also have not proven how some government social plan (affirmative action) is 'capitalist' in nature. How about you prove yourself rather than dodging
>>
>>128239224
>Prove to me that whites are not presently being disadvantaged for being white.

wew
>>
File: bait.png (55KB, 520x377px) Image search: [Google]
bait.png
55KB, 520x377px
>>128233690
Jesus, we've seen this exact same god damn thread, verbatim, 100 times in two weeks and you simpletons still bite.
>>
>>128239261
he made the claim, he must prove it. It's this amazing concept called 'burden of proof.' using proxies to mock me will not make him any more correct
>>
>>128239224
Why should I prove a negative?

If anything, you should prove whites ARE at a disadvantage for being white overall. Citing AA is a selective sample fallacy. Same with citing "muh Afrikaaner geeeenosaaaid" in South Africa.
>>
>>128239424
Nope, you made the claim, you must prove it.
>>
>>128239705
I see no reason to think whites are disadvantaged at all BECAUSE they are white.
>>
>>128239334
>using proxies

wew
>>
>>128239810
I already proved to you previously: Whites cannot have their own scholarships simply because they are white. White dominated religions cannot have their own scholarships because they are christian, where as this is not the case for islam or judaism.

http://www.ontheissues.org/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg.htm
-education section

>>128240071
>acting like someone using proxies on 4chan is some amazing new concept

It's really blatant and obvious that you're using a proxy
>>
>>128240071
I'm an American on vacation. Not a proxy.
>>
>>128240189
>White dominated religions cannot have their own scholarships because they are christian,
There are plenty of scholarships specifically made for Christians.
>>
>>128239016
>Irish genocide
lolwat
>>
>>128240342
-Ok to deny scholarships to divinity students. (Feb 2004)

You still have not proven to me that whites are not presently being disadvantaged for being white.

You also have not proven how some government social plan (affirmative action) is 'capitalist' in nature. How about you prove yourself rather than dodging
>>
>>128238983
So you realise that having a shit childhood is because of being poor, but you still think people have a disadvantage based on their race? Despite the fact that two people of equal intellectual calliber from the same economic background are accepted into a college or job based on whether or not they're white or not due to some affirmatove action which you think is capitalist in nature even though it's a government social program? That seems like a disadvantage to white people if you ask me
>>
>>128233690
There's a cosmic irony in all of it. One example is that Adorno was very discerning in his aesthetics and critical of the banality of popular culture.

http://www.icce.rug.nl/~soundscapes/DATABASES/SWA/On_popular_music_1.shtml

In this essay he specifically exalts Beethoven and what makes a classical work ineffable and measures that in opposition to popular music which he tears apart for its valueless ephemerality. Yet it can somehow be traced back to the Frankfurts that they want to subvert those same values.
>>
>>128240826
Again, I don't see how being white leads to poverty. Poor whites generally speaking do better than poor blacks.
>>
File: negativ-dialektik.jpg (15KB, 227x346px) Image search: [Google]
negativ-dialektik.jpg
15KB, 227x346px
>>128240847
/pol/ would love Adorno if they could comprehend him.
>Kant BTFO
>Hegel BTFO
>Marx BTFO
>Heidegger BTFO
>muh feels BTFO
>subjectivity BTFO
>>
>>128240901
Being white does not lead to being in poverty, however being black does due to the typical low IQ and ineptitude that comes along with the race. Unless you believe that we all act the same (which indirectly makes the claim that groups have not evolved to have different IQ's and behave differently in order to survive in their environment), it should be clear as to why a typically low IQ race cannot surpass typically high IQ races - unless you're anti science.

If you're anti science, then it only further helps us conclude that you're just yet another blithering retard who cannot see the world beyond the blinders in your eyes put in place by your brainwashing communist teachers
>>
These vids also debunk the conspiracy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHblTcIwhLA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odhhGmwxZ5I
>>
>>128233690
You're a persistent little faggot, aren't you?
>>
>>128235572
Economic Marxism?
Yes.
Cultural Marxism?
That's when it started, fucking Derrida.
>>
>>128241546
Derrida was explicitly anti-Marxist.
>>
>>128241430
Considering how you're just another anti-science retard, it should be expected that you'd refuse to respond to queries.
You still have not proven to me that whites are not presently being disadvantaged for being white.
You also have not proven how some government social plan (affirmative action) is 'capitalist' in nature. How about you prove yourself rather than dodging
>>
>>128240901
A difference in outcome is not an inherent disadvantage. It's like you're pointing to incarceration rates and saying that blacks must be being discriminated against, ergo they are disadvantaged. The lifestyle they choose that leads them to do worse than whites of the same economic background is not an example of them being disadvantaged. It's just a typifal leftist idealistic way of looking at things by saying whites>blacks, we must throw money at them to equalise the outcome! It's marxism, not capitalism
>>
>>128233690
t. Communist + Cultural Marxist
>>
>>128241695
Whites have degenerate lifestyles too. Rich white kids are perhaps the most un-dignified people on earth.

>It's marxism, not capitalism
lol no
>>
>>128241695
Multi-culturalism is about distorting reality in favor of subjective ideals, like 'equality' and idealism. A key example would be the feminist movement in the west, alonside the 'sexual revolution,' etc.

Worst of all, these jews actively believe that they're doing good.
>>
>>128241881
>Multi-culturalism is about distorting reality in favor of subjective ideals, like 'equality' and idealism.
Congrats, you've just described postmodernism.

>Worst of all, these jews actively believe that they're doing good.
The only major Jewish PoMo was Derrida. Foucault, Lacan, Lyotard, Baudrillard, Deleuze, and Irigaray are all Gentiles. Paul De Man was a literal Nazi collaborator.
>>
>>128233690
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69wBG6ULNzQ
>>
>>128242060
Gaddafi was an Arab fascist.
>>
>>128241636
See but even in the video the girl explains how the frankfurt school influenced contemporary marxism. Here's a simplification for you;
Frankfurt school + nietzche - post structuralists - contemporary cultural marxists. It's denial to claim the frankfurt school didnt influence the modern leftists, be it intentionally or unintenionally
>>
>>128241695
For example, they're as of recently trying to push pedophilia as a 'positive' thing. The SJW movement is also another example, as well as the assets that the people such as Soros use to further secure the existence of cultural marxism in the west.
>>
>>128241790
>lol no
Amazing rebuttal, i guess thats that then
>>
File: 1483437509gn241.jpg (90KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]
1483437509gn241.jpg
90KB, 1024x1024px
>>128233690
YAWN
\
faggot
>>
File: Race&IQ.jpg (27KB, 640x421px) Image search: [Google]
Race&IQ.jpg
27KB, 640x421px
>>128242292
Why not turn this into a redpilling thread to BTFO that commie COINTEL fag?

Pic related is part of the reason as to why whites and blacks cannot and will not operate safely with one another.
>>
File: ss_flag_s.png (6KB, 256x192px) Image search: [Google]
ss_flag_s.png
6KB, 256x192px
Dam Jew GTFO you do not belong here , now git faggot feet .
>>
>>128242292
Marxism is about class struggle, not about "equality of outcome".
>>
File: 1491661118317.jpg (246KB, 619x682px) Image search: [Google]
1491661118317.jpg
246KB, 619x682px
>>128242550
Prove it lol
(Protip: jew cant)
>>
>>128242207
They assume because Marx it's in the curriculum, but no one really reads into him, even the thesis about Marx are not really about him, it's some kind of umbrella term used to describe class issues.

Habermas or Adorno are something different.
>>
>>128242205
>socially democratic system where the people vote on policies
>socialised healthcare and housing
>subsidization of land to set up farms
Truly a facist dictator...
>>
>>128233690
Because people need an explanation as to why OPs are such tremendous faggots.
>>
>>128242639
Breeds =/= human races
>>
File: 1492893815197.png (618KB, 743x1769px) Image search: [Google]
1492893815197.png
618KB, 743x1769px
>>128233690
>>
>>128243013
Why?
>>
>>128234558
Marxism relies on a worker class that uses approval as social capital. Since the enlightened working class will only use agency as social capital, anything which subverts this system is violent and abusive. When the enlightened system is eschewed for the abusive system the movement is socially marxism. Anything or anyone which attempts to unseat agency in any way is socially marxist. The problem is that you fail to realize or admit that there are people out there trading in different social capital than you. If you or anyone else tries to limit another person's agency then this is socially marxist, also abusive and violent. This usually takes the form of insurgent propaganda, disinformation, and psychological abuse. If it limits individual agency it is socially marxist.
>>
>>128243092
>the institute of social research in Frankfurt never existed, they did not immigrate to Columbia University because they weren't majority Jewish in the Third Reich/Western Marxists because all of those things are 'conspiracies' when they arrive at conclusions I dislike
>Douglass Kellner doesn't exist, nor has he contributed anything because the field doesn't really exist
archive.is/YzkIS
Archived version of the Wiki entry before it was selectively edited to use the "everything that I don't read about is a conspiracy and other strawmen" meme. This is about as bad as whining about scientific thought being paramount, yet denying the existence of divergent evolution applied to human cognitive ability.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrt6msZmU7Y
>it's the fault of muh aut right for pointing out "globalists" that constitute the majority of the "1%" are Jews
>bash the fash, revolution now stop stealing my means of production we must revolt
>even though that makes you anti-semitic for attacking the 1%
>>
>>128243147
>everything I dislike is a conspiracy
>the Overton window doesn't exist because it's in my favour, but does exist when it's against my beliefs
>video illustrating the history of the Frankfurt school and their migration from Europe to NA has nothing to do with the teachings of said school
>waaa don't use outdated terms to address my special pet minorities
>I can discard any point while simultaneously adding my input as if that constitutes a rebuttal
I mean, a great start would be disproving the migration, as that would mean nothing of the sort ever occurred. Try: www.columbia.edu/~lnp3/mydocs/modernism/kovel.htm
But discarding the post while putting in a quip=refutation. I guess there is good reason you act as you do. Diverting from the actual discussion and opting to make non-sequiturs masked as actual points is useful when you've been backed into a corner: either everything is a conspiracy laadeedaa and the members of the Frankfurt school were not doubly despised for being Marxists AND Jewish (in the Third Reich, which is what lead to their exodus to Columbia University), or they weren't Jewish and the Frankfurt school never even existed. Remember: arguing for the latter="conspiracy". Historical accuracy=mean conclusion; ergo, it is "discarded".

From:
https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/culturalmarxism.pdf
>>
>>128243163
"Many 20th century Marxian theorists ranging from Georg Lukacs,
Antonio Gramsci, Ernst Bloch, Walter Benjamin, and T.W. Adorno to Fredric Jameson and Terry Eagleton employed the Marxian theory to analyze cultural forms in relation to their production, their imbrications with society and history, and their impact and influences on audiences and social life. Traditions of cultural Marxism are thus important
to the trajectory of cultural studies and to understanding its various types and forms in the present age."
Emphasis on "employed the Marxian theory to analyze cultural forms in relation to their production, their imbrications with society and history, and their impact and influences on audiences and social life".

"The economic base of society for Marx and Engels consisted of the forces and relations of production in which culture and ideology are constructed to help secure the dominance of ruling social groups. This influential "base/superstructure" model considers the economy the base, or foundation, of society, and cultural, legal, political,
and additional forms of life are conceived as “superstructures" which grow out of and serve to reproduce the economic base."
>>
File: 8125263735362532.jpg (54KB, 366x328px) Image search: [Google]
8125263735362532.jpg
54KB, 366x328px
>>128243013
>strawmanning the argument
Never expected any less from a jew

Dog breeds are considered sub-species. The picture argues that there are other subspecies in the human race- which conclusively, there are.

It's just you commies trying to say otherwise
>>
>>128234558
>>128243132
Since identity politics and privilege checking limit agency, they are violent, abusive, and socially marxist. Next troll please.
>>
>>128243181
>"Cultural Marxism" is a hoax
"In general, for a Marxian approach, cultural forms always emerge in specific historical situations, serving particular socio-economic interests and carrying out important social functions. For Marx and Engels, the cultural ideas of an epoch serve the interests of the ruling class, providing ideologies that legitimate class domination. “Ideology” is a critical term for Marxian analysis that describes how dominant ideas of a given class promote the interests of that class and help cover over oppression, injustices, and negative aspects of a given society. On their analysis, during the feudal period, ideas of piety, honor, valor, and military chivalry were the ruling ideas of the hegemonic aristocratic classes. During the capitalist era, values of individualism, profit, competition, and the market became dominant, articulating the ideology of the new bourgeois class that was consolidating its class power. Ideologies appear natural, they seem to be common sense, and are thus often invisible and elude criticism."

"While Marx’s writings abound with literary reference and figures, he never developed sustained models of cultural analysis. Instead, Marx focused his intellectual and political energies on analyzing the capitalist mode of production, current economic developments and political struggles, and vicissitudes of the world market and modern societies now theorized as “globalization” and “modernity.”"
>>
Same retarded thread every day

Do you get tired of shilling this nonsense?
>>
>>128243249
"A generation of Marxists, however, began turning concentrated attention to cultural phenomena in the 1920s. Perry Anderson (1976) interprets the turn from economic and political analysis to cultural theory as a symptom of the defeat of Western Marxism after the crushing of the European revolutionary movements of the 1920s and
the rise of fascism. In addition, theorists like Lukacs, Benjamin, and Adorno, who instituted a mode of Marxist cultural analysis, were intellectuals who had deep and abiding interest in cultural phenomena."

"The ultra-Marxist Lukacs of the early 1920s
intently developed philosophical and political dimensions of Marxism before returning to cultural analysis later in the 1920s."
>>
>>128243264
"The work of the Frankfurt School provided what Paul Lazarsfeld (1942), one of the originators of modern communications studies, called a critical approach, which he distinguished from the "administrative research." The positions of Adorno, Lowenthal,
and other members of the inner circle of the Institute for Social Research were contested by Walter Benjamin, an idiosyncratic theorist loosely affiliated with the Institute.
Benjamin, writing in Paris during the 1930s, discerned progressive aspects in new technologies of cultural production such as photography, film, and radio. In "The Work
of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" (1969), Benjamin noted how new mass media were supplanting older forms of culture whereby the mass reproduction of photography, film, recordings, and publications replaced the emphasis on the originality
and "aura" of the work of art in an earlier era. Freed from the mystification of high culture, Benjamin believed that media culture could cultivate more critical individuals able to judge and analyze their culture, just as sports fans could dissect and evaluate
athletic activities. In addition, processing the rush of images of cinema created, Benjamin believed, subjectivities better able to parry and comprehend the flux and turbulence of experience in industrialized, urbanized societies."
>>
>>128243286
""Max Horkheimer and T.W. Adorno answered Benjamin's optimism in a highly influential analysis of the culture industry published in their book Dialectic of Enlightenment, which first appeared in 1948 and was translated into English in 1972.
They argued that the system of cultural production dominated by film, radio broadcasting, newspapers, and magazines, was controlled by advertising and commercial imperatives, and served to create subservience to the system of consumer capitalism.
While later critics pronounced their approach too manipulative, reductive, and elitist, it provides an important corrective to more populist approaches to media culture that downplay the way the media industries exert power over audiences and help produce
thought and behavior that conforms to the existing society."

This is in direct contradiction to the "conspiracy" bit as the purpose/goal is about as open as could be. Just because Breitbart said it doesn't mean he was wrong about it; it is the injection of a Marxian lens of analysis to the Western traditional culture, specifically capitalist culture."

Keep in mind, hoax and conspiracy assume a guise of secrecy: the application of Marxist egalitarianism and the dichotomy of privileged versus dispossessed could not be more clear with respect to the "cultural studies".
>>
>>128243341
""The Frankfurt School also provide useful historical perspectives on the transition from traditional culture and modernism in the arts to a mass-produced media and consumer society. In his path-breaking book The Structural Transformation of the Public
Sphere, Jurgen Habermas further historicizes Adorno and Horkheimer’s analysis of the culture industry. Providing historical background to the triumph of the culture industry,
Habermas notes how bourgeois society in the late 18th and 19th century was distinguished by the rise of a public sphere that stood between civil society and the state and which mediated between public and private interests. For the first time in history, individuals
and groups could shape public opinion, giving direct expression to their needs and interests while influencing political practice. The bourgeois public sphere made it possible to form a realm of public opinion that opposed state power and the powerful interests that were coming to shape bourgeois society.""
>>
>>128233690

Why do you constantly make this same thread when you get BTFO even more than obama leaf?
>>
>>128243092
Fantastic work my friend, your efforts are important not because we need to convince OBAMAleaf, but rather because it's an argument that people are watching, and must be finished. Every time they are proven wrong, we are proven right. Every time we are proven right, we get stronger. Every time people get tired of this thread, we simply change it to something we find more suitable, intellectually sound, and redpilling.
>>
>>128243363
""While the Frankfurt School arguably articulates cultural conditions in the stage of state monopoly capitalism or Fordism that produced a regime of mass production and consumption, British cultural studies emerged in the 1960s when, first, there was
widespread global resistance to consumer capitalism and an upsurge of revolutionary movements, and then emergence of a new stage of capital, described as "post-Fordism," postmodernity, or other terminology that attempted to describe a more variegated and
contested social and cultural formation. Moreover, the forms of culture described by the earliest phase of British cultural studies in the 1950s and early 1960s articulated conditions in an era in which there were still significant tensions in England and much of
Europe between an older working class-based culture and the newer mass-produced culture whose models and exemplars were the products of American culture industries."

Pointing out the "cultural studies" of the Brits is not akin to a "conspiracy" simply because you feel as it is/strawman the critiques. The only assertion is what the "studies" profess openly. "
>>
>>128243389
""But British cultural studies, unlike the Frankfurt school, did not adequately engage modernist and avant-garde aesthetic movements, limiting its attentions by and large to products of media culture and “the popular.” However, the Frankfurt school engagement with modernism and avant-garde art in many of its protean forms is arguably more productive than the ignoring of modernism and to some extent high culture as a whole by many within British cultural studies.""
>>
>>128243409
"There is much more, I suggest you read up on the topic you seek to "discuss". It is quite simple to assign strawmen and proceed to attack those.
Cultural Marxism was NOT founded by pink-haired vegans, or limp-wristed antifa manginas. The assertion is that, through the introduction of various criticisms against bourgeois culture of consumerism and capitalism, various side-effects and echoes can be observed. For example, the introduction of "critical theory" to the Western sphere of influence/mainstream has had its effects: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_theory#Subfields
From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_theory
"Concern for social "base and superstructure" is one of the remaining Marxist philosophical concepts in much of the contemporary critical theory.[4: Outhwaite, William. 1988. Habermas: Key Contemporary Thinkers 2nd Edition (2009), pp. 5-8] While critical theorists have been frequently defined as Marxist intellectuals,[5: Leszek Kołakowski's Main Currents of Marxism (1979), vol. 3 chapter X; W. W. Norton & Company] their tendency to denounce some Marxist concepts and to combine Marxian analysis with other sociological and philosophical traditions has resulted in accusations of revisionism by Classical, Orthodox, and Analytical Marxists, and by Marxist-Leninist philosophers."
But I presume the wealthy, primarily Jewish Marxian intellectuals you fantasize about "did not exist" to put forth these concepts, nor did the think-tank migrate away from Germany (remember: this is a conspiracy because....)."
>>
he's a jewish marxist.
>>
Oh vey! Rabbi Goldstein is here with another disinfo thread
>>
>>128243432
>>128243409
>>128243389
>>128243363
>>128243341
>>128243286
>>128243264
>>128243249
>>128243181
>>128243163
>>128243147
>>128243092

OP has made this exact thread. First under a French flag, then an American, and now a leaf. Never responds to the point and continuously applies the strawman assertion that "Adorno was a fat vegan feminist". I want to emphasis this one point takeaway.
Even under the "critical theory" subfields, all the common fields of thought are associated with Marxism. Remember, if it is all a conspiracy/hoax, this would all be done in secrecy. But that is the exact antithesis of what is occurring. In fact, the "hoaxers" wear their heart on their sleeves.
It is precisely because they are Marxist egalitarian in origin that they take inspiration from the Frankfurt school's critical theory.
>>
>>128243637
>expecting leftypol to not simply spread disinfo and not actually argue
>>
Every time this retarded leaf makes this same shill thread he copypastes bullshit and ignores the Authoritarian Personality, the only work relevant in Cultural Marxism that shows how kikes destroy society, through deconstructing and claiming every natural, healthy social interaction is "evil fascism" or a "mental illness" and then pushing the same degeneracy by claiming it "prevents holocausts"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarian_personality

He never bothered reading "Culture of Critique" because he's just a Marxist shill.
>>
>>128243637
you are a god among us, anon. Thanks again, regardless if these jews will keep at it. I'll make an infographic just for you and anyone else to use in the future for a quick rundown against these fags
>>
>>128244063
Make sure you do one more big reveal. PLEASE do not forget to spam this: archive.is/YzkIS.
That's an archived version I came across of the OLD version for the Wiki entry, before it was edited to be more kosher.
And the old fashioned redpill video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrt6msZmU7Y

Not to mention, the easiest one.
Do some link image post to show this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_theory#Subfields
Shows you entries like "black feminism", "critical race theory" (take a look at the definition given: CRT recognizes that racism is engrained in the fabric and system of the American society. The individual racist need not exist to note that institutional racism is pervasive in the dominant culture. IT'S JUST THE OLD MUH WHITE DEBIL IN GUBMENT SHIT), "gender studies", "queer theory", etc.
It's clear as daylight, yet this shit is denied by the same crowd who loves the (((truth))).
>>
File: megaphone.jpg (131KB, 1182x684px) Image search: [Google]
megaphone.jpg
131KB, 1182x684px
>>128243637
Dude
THIS is old /pol/.
I remember the old JIDF raids, exactly like fags like OP if OP isn't JIDF on some kind of new raid.

Thanks for helping bring the magic back family.
>>
File: cultural marxism.png (313KB, 1528x2412px) Image search: [Google]
cultural marxism.png
313KB, 1528x2412px
>>
File: 149612555838023.png (357KB, 730x480px) Image search: [Google]
149612555838023.png
357KB, 730x480px
>>128233690
don't be mad my millenials are so woke
>>
>>128244871
Good stuff. This was a post I initially made in response to the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odhhGmwxZ5I
I posted that response around one month ago, but I've yet to see a response because the disagreement amongst all of this is rooted solely in the strawman. In fact, I'm not even the one making any assertions, I'm just pointing to the literature and the history they published/put out themselves.

It is a coincidence that the OP stopped tagging the video I just linked in the usual faggy copypasta, though. Perhaps because it's been addressed before. Notice how the OP just left, though?
>>
File: cultural marxism.png (1MB, 2260x2632px) Image search: [Google]
cultural marxism.png
1MB, 2260x2632px
>>128245589
Here's a better version

>he left
Haha, I saw lol. If anything, a lot of their stuff is entirely just strawmen; they typically cannot come up with anything
>>
>>128234289
Mormons fucking love Jews. Mormons larp as being Jews. Initiation into Mormonism involves being symbolically adopted into one of the tribes of Israel. They are not diametrically opposed views.
>>
I notice the left is always chafed by the label 'Cultural Marxist' ...they say Marxism is about economics...bla bla ..and we show how dumb we are by using this term...etc., etc..

That's why I like it. Because they hate it. It attaches that scary 'Marxist' label to them making them sound creepy and dangerous (which they are).
Thread posts: 141
Thread images: 19


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.