Why are women still allowed to vote?

>>128226053
Because we have a right to as humans.

>>128226163
people will reply to this bait

>>128226053

FEETS

>>128226053
Psssssst. They're votes don't really get counted. Shhhhh!

>>128226202
Not bait. I deserve the right to vote.

File: 1492195107280.png (84KB, 171x208px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 171x208px

>>128226163
>Because we have a right to as humans.
>as humans

>>128226053

The best description I've ever heard is that women are like overgrown children.

>>128226163
This. Fuck all the bitter virgins who can't deal with this.

>>128226386

retarded children maybe

File: IMG_7524.jpg (24KB, 650x380px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 650x380px

>>128226163
The Founders believed otherwise

>>128226363
>German intellectuals

>>128226514
Is everything the founders believed correct?

>>128226163

Exactly, why are the most beta men always the ones that want to dictate womens lives? Women have a right to their opinion, just like you do.

Because it's politically impossible to take away rights once you've bestowed them.

Just try and think of a practical way in which you could reverse suffrage in the year 2017.

>>128226449
>arguing with holes.jpg

>>128226620
>Is everything the founders believed correct?
A good portion of it is, so why question the rest?

>>128226620
Yes

actually i think only men should vote
and only women could run to office
democracy solved

>>128226620
>is everything the founders believe correct
Yes
women and niggers are not humans
Asian and white men should be in charge

>>128226163
Because all humans have a right to vote? According to the last census 22.9% of the U.S. population didn't have a "right" to vote. What puts women above children?

>>128226708
>A good portion of it is, so why question the rest?

...

>>128226748
No.
>>128226671
Because they don't want women to be independent. It lessens their own power. Also bitterness.

>>128226821
>women and niggers are not humans

Wrong

>>128226350
not really

the only thing you deserve is a stiff cock in your mouth you filthy whore.

go make me a sandwich now cunt.

>>128227238
Ask your mommy ;0

File: f75c3e492bff0aa391d08dc466559d36bf4a52c98db8cea94c5dbfd1c754d8c6.jpg (16KB, 197x255px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 197x255px

Voting should be left to taxpayers. I respect them as humans but women are just so stupid i don't have an easy solution.

>>128226053
Can always tell when chicks are British. Looks like fucking birds

File: 14819719871.jpg (12KB, 206x235px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 206x235px

>>128226620
>implying women are anything but objects

>>128226304
This.

>>128227400

This a joke? Those would be 12/10 in bongistan m8

File: hqdefault.jpg (12KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 480x360px

>This thread

Since when is this /r9k/lite?

>>128227067
shh logical question doesn't apply

File: roasties and democracy.png (595KB, 1500x3719px) Image search: [Google]

595KB, 1500x3719px

>>128226053
>>128226163
>>128226350
>>128226449

No you don't. And pic related is why.

Jews

>woman are dumb/easy to control
>theyll vote for your candidate
>more woman than mean= easy victory

>>128229282
>Bitter Jose believes this because no woman wants to fuck a 5'2 goblin.

LOL
>>/r9k/

>>128229539

Not an argument.

>leftist pozzies in charge of facts and logic

>>128227561
Dumb kraut.

>>128229282
One is retarded. You can use that excuse to restrict voting to any substantially different group because they have different needs. Didn't bother with the rest of it.

>>128229539
>leaf

>>128226053
Because they are affected by decisions and thus get to help make the decisions.

>>128229539
>DUDE YOU'RE VIRGIN LMAO
Fuck off.

>>128229638
>You can use that excuse to restrict voting to any substantially different group because they have different needs.

Not a refutation.

>Didn't bother with the rest of it.
>illiterate leftists in charge of reading

LOL

>>128229616
>>128229644
>>128229686

take a shower
hit the weights
get a clue

>>128229923
Still haven't said anything of importance, cuckboi :^).

>>128230008
Still haven't become a real man, diabeeto.

>>128229923
>>128229638
>this emotional butthurt and lack of arguments

Thanks for providing more examples of why women should now be allowed to vote.

>>128230090
Imagine being this butthurt and impotent. Top wew.

File: womenmerchant.png (54KB, 163x186px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 163x186px

>>128229638
>Dumb kraut.
More like Kraut who is fully aware what women in politics and women voting rights means.
If you want to keep your country, you better learn to shill against your own interest stupid cunt.

>>128229282
53% of white women voted for trump, just saying

>>128229539
>>128229638
Again
>arguing with holes
Lmao, it's really funny. Women are really like big children.

File: 1568941561.jpg (68KB, 300x250px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 300x250px

>>128229539


no 4'9 woman wants to fuck a 5'2 globin

>leaf

>>128226053

because they're pretty and a lot of men have trouble saying "no" to pretty girls

File: nise_kanbaru_02.jpg (605KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

605KB, 1920x1080px

>>128226053
Cuz we are suckers for pussy.

>>128226053

Because votes aren't counted anyway.

>>128229816
It shows how general and stupid the argument is. Politics is by nature divisive. Groups deserve to have their voice heard through votes and advocation.

>>Didn't bother with the rest of it.

When the first paragraph is retarded the rest is not worth reading.

>>128230283
What does it mean?

>>128230467
How is my argument 'arguing with holes'?

>>128230666
>What does it mean?
Lurk moar you demonic twat.

File: IMG_0758.jpg (61KB, 620x413px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 620x413px

Because of #clintonpussycigargate

>>128226053
21435

>Conservatives don't hate wo-
>/pol/ isn't secretly a bunch of bitter Mus-

Well would ya look at that?

File: 1456450814934.png (140KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 750x750px

>>128226053

Ever think about why any one is allowed to vote? I mean how can you adress the question of why women are allowed to vote, if you don't even adress why men, or any one else is allowed to vote?

Also who is allowing them?

This is a shit OP. Low Effort. Typical Nu-Pol garbage.

>>128231162
SEETHING

Because they're smarter than your dumbass

File: Skærmbillede (34).png (187KB, 1330x672px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 1330x672px

>>128226053
>Why are women still allowed to vote?
Because they are so dumb that no argument will work. You have to kill some of them to remove their suffrage.
http://archive.is/dBehg

File: ShareBlue_Sample_TrumpHat_12-05-16.jpg?__cf_waf_tk__=094375002lRJxQ4AleyND9k52bmF5YzbDOFI.jpg (146KB, 573x582px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 573x582px

>>128231215
At least I'm not a bitter neckbeard virgin like you. Enjoy dying alone!

>>128229923
I do all this and still think women shouldn't be able to vote, what now?

>>128231442
Wait to be invaded

>>128231521
By who?

>>128227582
Seconded

>>128226671
> Implying that beta men aren't the reason the government is bending knee to solve every retarded female non-issue

File: 1494443247343.jpg (721KB, 1725x1133px) Image search: [Google]

721KB, 1725x1133px

>>128231382
I'm not kidding. Churchill fought them in England with whips, but they kept pushing. Some even killed themselves and blame it on them not being allowed to vote. One ran out in front of the horses in a horserace and died. Others starved themselves. So, they got the vote. Because men felt sorry for the retards. They are simply to dumb to respond to reason. You have to kill some before the others understand it. They are to fucking dumb. It has always been like that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_the_French_Revolution
"Historians since the late 20th century have debated how women shared in the French Revolution and what long-term impact it had on French women. Women had no political rights in pre-Revolutionary France; they were considered "passive" citizens; forced to rely on men to determine what was best for them. That changed dramatically in theory as there seemingly were great advances in feminism. Feminism emerged in Paris as part of a broad demand for social and political reform. The women demanded equality to men and then moved on to a demand for the end of male domination"

"Most of these outwardly activist women were punished for their militancy. The kind of punishment received during the Revolution included public denouncement, arrest, execution, or exile. Théroigne de Méricourt was arrested, publicly flogged and then spent the rest of her life sentenced to an insane asylum. Pauline Léon and Claire Lacombe were arrested, later released, and continued to receive ridicule and abuse for their activism. Many of the women of the Revolution were even publicly executed for "conspiring against the unity and the indivisibility of the Republic" "

Women will have to die if you want to remove their suffrage.

>>128227399
O ya, women in general are the money drain for the system. Men are the ones actually putting money into the system. It's just like sex.

>>128231382
>Because they are so dumb that no argument will work.

What arguments?

>>128231162

Oh please, if we were Muslim you would love us.

>>128231408

>VIRGIN LMAO XD XD XD

Every females final (and only) argument

File: wallraising-web.jpg (40KB, 448x299px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 448x299px

>>128232356
>What arguments?
There is a pic and essay you can read. The arguments are there for you to read retard.

>>128231559
By the Muslims that women voted for, of course.

Wait, you're Polish. If you fall, we're all fucked.

File: Mozart kek .jpg (54KB, 886x376px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 886x376px

>>128226163
Classic female "argument"

>>128226053
Because nu-males tell them they should. Women are incapable of having their own beliefs or values. Women always reflect those of the authority in their life. In a healthy society that would be her father, then later husband. In our current society it's government (which instructs women to pretend they're men) and media (which instructs women to be consumers) and Chads (who instructs women to be whores). Women do as men tell them, regardless of what it is. If you want to change society, change the men, as a tribes women are a reflection of their men.

It's why you've seen women starting to all of a sudden hold racially far right beliefs. Enough men are doing it that you're starting to see women who have authorities in their life to reflect those beliefs. This idea that women are not capable of pursuing their own self interest independently, along with being unable to think as men do. Is one of the hardest redpills many here on /pol/ and the rest of society have.

Even the most far right people may often put women either on a pedestal, or think they're capable of being men (equality) they're not, never will be, and the longer we pretend that to be so, the longer we'll continue to go in the direction of ruin.

Women are mostly chattel, and should be considered as such.

>>128233519
>Women are incapable of having their own beliefs or values.

Proof?

File: 1487523091925.jpg (530KB, 1334x694px) Image search: [Google]

530KB, 1334x694px

>>128233519
>Because nu-males tell them they should.
No. You are right as individuals, a chad can convince a woman she should not vote. But, as a collective, some females will have to die. They are as a group simply to dumb. There is no helping it.
>>128232077

File: 1491498074012.png (678KB, 815x574px) Image search: [Google]

678KB, 815x574px

>>128233856
>Proof?
How about you sustain any kind of society for 1 month and show us males you beliefs and values and how they are expressed with no men around?
Pro-tip. You can't

>>128233856
>Proof?
What kind of proof would you like? The easy answer is to direct you towards anyone whose grown up or lived around girls/women for extensive time period. If you objectively observe female nature, it because evident that she does not question or think critically, but mearly reflect view points and wish to do things of her established authority.

As stated, in a healthy society this is father, then husband. However, a husband or father cannot know everything. So women fill in the gaps through information exchange, they speak to other women. In doing so they would traditionally acquire the information those women's authority had given them. In doing so women functioned greatly as a kind of self enforcement of societal values and norms.

Women have three primary roles they view people through
The Authority
Family
Children

The authority role is the ultimate go to for whenever she's told contradicting information. This is what many men view as 'shit test' when in reality the woman is simply serving as messenger for information she was told elsewhere and wishes to be instructed.

The family can often include a small number of female friends (or guys in this role and call it'friend zone') this is why women often have good friends, but not many, and those friends are 'like family'

Children, this can be anything too, the crying negro child, the crying puppy, the crying anon who is hoping for a pity fuck.

>>128226053
There is something about tht picture that just screams don't let me vote. Am I the only one that sees it? Not that they are women, or maybe it is... I wouldn't want them coting or having my kids. Super liberal looking whores.

>>128234774
*voting

>>128234536
>The Authority
>Family
>Children
Hmm. I view it as this. Women have 3 basic functions. Give birth/raise children, manipulate men and finally submit to men. But I guess your view works to.

>>128226350
Tits or GTFO

>>128226671
they can have all the opinions they want i just don't want them to vote

>>128234153
>A chad can convince a woman she should not vote
A chad is often time not husband material himself, a chad is someone who is physically attractive and socialable enough to serve as a mate. But, women are not good at pursuing their own self interests, remember? Dating is a new concept, it relies on the belief that women can and should pick their own mates. When traditionally it was done by her father (for good reason). A chad who cannot present himself as her authority, will have no influence beyond that, and if he sticks around will not see her reflect his beliefs/values.

>But as a collective, some females will have to die
Women are born with value, let's see 100 points of personal worth. Women only have to spend their life avoiding things which degrade their value. Men are born without value, 0, they have to spend their life to accumulate personal value. Women should not be killed, they are valuable, men are expendable. A tribe can survive with 80 women and 20 men, but not 80 men and 20 women (unless it plans to send at least 60 men to their deaths)

>They are as a group simply to dumb
Dumb in what regard? Modern intelligence is loosely defined between two things - the ability of information processing, and data memorization. While what we think of as knowledge is applying what it is we memorized, processed. Women are perfectly capable of doing the first two within reason, but not the last part.

A women is like a tool, she can be shaped to do practically anything to help the authority in her life. If a man is a merchant, she can learn accounting and assist, if he is a farmer, she can learn to work the field, if he is a genetic researcher, she can learn to assist in that way as well. The reason fail at stem is less because they're not intellectually inclined, and more so because they have no men to assist in doing so. Most men who go into stem tend to not be very knowledgeable (ironically) on the nature of things.

File: C714A9FC-8556-4BE9-8F9B-0D481FDCC89D-2836-000003C4211C0ED5.jpg (80KB, 1024x464px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1024x464px

>>128226449

Shut up, Leaf. People like you ruin this frigid warehouse country.

File: whew_zps6e15991b.png (144KB, 320x399px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 320x399px

>>128226053
Second one would be the mother of my children

>>128234890
Women's function is plainly to serve men, regardless of what that entails. Women will destroy themselves if their authority instructs them to. It's why you see career women running out their biological clock in an office miserable. Government told them them to act as men. Public school in the west was originally established with the intention of getting men from point a (childhood) to point b (job, aka provider) these instructions didn't change when women where admitted. Women generally have no use of formal education. Women also mentally mature much earlier then men, depending upon race, between ages 10-14 is when women peak. While men peak much latter, again depending on race between 18-21. It's why historically young girls married older men.

Father's knew it was a good decision to marry their young daughter off to a older man with his life together, then someone her own age who was still interested in drawing penises on the wall and telling fart jokes while goofing off and not fully realizing his way in the world. It's why sending our girls to public school has turned out so poorly.

Not only are they mislead on their role, but also often lose their value as they have causal sexual encounters from men without their act together.

>>128235173
>Women are born with value, let's see 100 points of personal worth. Women only have to spend their life avoiding things which degrade their value. Men are born without value, 0, they have to spend their life to accumulate personal value. Women should not be killed, they are valuable, men are expendable. A tribe can survive with 80 women and 20 men, but not 80 men and 20 women (unless it plans to send at least 60 men to their deaths)
You are leaving out the old barren women. Idiot. Civilization is millions upon millions of women. Not a tribe with 100 people. Women will not accept it as a group. Just like you are going to have some serial killers in a civilization, you are going to have some women who will not accept their suffrage be taken away from them. I just told you.
>>128232077
You fail to fucking understand anything if you cannot understand that simple truth. Might as well kill yourself and whatever shitty offspring that you have.
You act like you are the solution, but you are precisely the kind of man that allowed it to ever get this fucking far.

>>128235637
Yeah I get it, you have daughters, not my fucking problem.

>>128231026
>>128235599
4th is the hottest.

>>128235895
fifth

>>128235179
Not true, and this kind of picture really speaks to the problem we have today in the west. Because men are raised with the falsehood that women are their equals, the only way in which men start to question this is after dating and having lost (due to not knowing he needs to establish himself as her authority, and without doing so. She keeps looking for one) thus the 'redpill' on the nature of women is often caught behind a wall of bitterness towards the circumstances that lead up to the questioning.

If you view a women as they are, there should be no hatred, no bitterness. It's much like the negro, a negro is a animal, and the worst wrong humans (white and asians) have done to the negro is give it human expectations, and birth sub-human (those with negro mixture) through bestiality. If you accept the fact that negros only started having problems once we ended domestication, then there should be no hatred, just acceptance.

A women despite being chattel, has quite a lot of value.
-Birth your children
-Assist you in anything you need
-Re-enforce your values/beliefs within your social sphere

Being the main ones

>>128226053

to double my vote. to offset the demonic hordes.

t. married christian

>>128235954
u r gay

>>128235716
>You're leaving out the old barren women
I was speaking generally, for the specific example of women who're older. If she failed to establish an authority in which to birth his children, she can still be salvaged in a nanny kind of role for the authority. But this highlights another aspect that society must accept - the idea of polygamy. A marriage was originally a transfer of ownership from father to husband. In addition to wives, servants where also allowed to be owned. In order to allow eugenics to re-enter the picture, re legalizing polygamy is a must.

A man should however only take on as many women as he's capable of providing for, plus how many children he expects to have with them.

>Not a tribe with 100 people
It was an example to get the point across, that women are born with more value then men

>Women will not accept it as a group
Women will accept whatever their authority instructs them to accept. You want women to do x? Get men to tell them to do x, otherwise if you continue to tell them to do y, they're going to do y.

>Women who will not accept
Women do not have their own beliefs/values. If a woman is espousing her own value, it's because a man has told her to.

File: fluffy.jpg (47KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 600x800px

>>128226053
Tights are my fetish. That is all.

>>128226163
Women are allowed to vote because they play an integral role in society. The question is "Why has socialism been on the rise since the time women began voting? Why do women want to trade in their husbands, sons, and brothers for government?" Because they want freedom, just like men, and this is the first time they have had that chance to live safely without the protection of their immediate male relations. Meanwhile, they create a predator that hunts us all.

>>128226053
Mine voted Trump.

>>128236965
Most white women did. all is certainly not lost.

File: History, 9th centuray arab decline summaery.png (306KB, 1068x660px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1068x660px

>>128236950
>Women are instructed from Victorian era mentality to be independant in order to guard themselves from the perverse nature of man
>Women are told during the industrial revolution to be as men, as it would benefit companies for competitive labor
>Women are told by subverting Communists they're the same as men, thus to do equal work
>Business in the west creates 'labor saving' devices such as washing machine, dish washer, and other things to get women out of the home
>Women's right movement was funded, guided, and propagandized by others for their own personal interest
>Including women's marches being used to popularize cigarettes
>Women's current situation is nothing but the result of short sighted men instructing them to do something they can never do, be men
>Anon thinks women 'want freedom' or have ever 'wanted freedom' anon doesn't realize that freedom to women is scary, and makes them feel depressed, anxious, helpless
>Historically a 'free woman' was one without an authority to guide her, and as being unable to guide herself, she freaks out and continues to do so until an authority asserts itself and claims her as theirs

Anyone who blames women for their actions, does not understand the nature of women. You might as well blame a wolf for eating sheep, get mad at a negro when it fails to be human. Why would you get mad at something for acting in it's nature?

>Why has socialism been on the rise since the time women began voting
What kind? I assume you mean international socialism. Communism as an idealogy was inspired by the French revolution, which was inspired by the American revolution. Egalitarianism's roots go back much farther than anyone knows or is willing to admit.

File: 1490161962955.png (609KB, 1808x3731px) Image search: [Google]

609KB, 1808x3731px

>>128236596
>Women will accept whatever their authority instructs them to accept. You want women to do x? Get men to tell them to do x, otherwise if you continue to tell them to do y, they're going to do y.
No. You are leaving out the outliers that will naturally arise in a civilization with a million or more people. I'm not saying you have to kill many of them, I guess in the USA killing under 100 will do it.
>>128236596
>Women do not have their own beliefs/values. If a woman is espousing her own value, it's because a man has told her to.
They have a natural need to push boundaries, and as a collective, they will sacrifice some women to see if men as a collective have the balls to kill some. What do you think will happen if men removed their suffrage? Do you think they will just accept that? Or do you think they go back to doing what they were doing before the got the vote?
>>128232077
If you cannot understand that, if this simple fucking fact eludes you, you don't understand women. The mental gymnastics you are going through right now are pathetic. Remove women's suffrage and women will die, that is just a fact. Try and deal with it.
>>128236950
>Because they want freedom, just like men,
No, men and women think fundamentally different. You sound like a woman. They are not free, men are still paying for them.
>>128236965
So what? What is your point?
>>128237147
>Most white women did. all is certainly not lost.
Your country is 54% white faggot, I would say it's lost. Majority of children being born in america today are not even white, and you take solace in the fact that white women voted for Trump. You deserve to die over there across the atlantic, you guys are the biggest cucks of us all.

>>128237798
>The outliers
Exceptions to every rule includes the rule of exceptions to every rule. There is no outliers of women whom this does not apply. Just as there is no negro who is human, only ones domesticated enough to act the part.

>They have a natural need to push boundaries
Sort of, a woman is taught by her father on the ways of the world first. Often time a father in this day an age will instruct her to do so, so she takes this idea of 'testing the waters' to try and find her own authority, failing massively, but sometimes not. An outlier for woman, is one who got lucky enough to test and find an authority, this does not mean women are capable of pursuing their own interests independently however. To elaborate, testing the waters is when a woman will ask her potential authority questions, he will have to answer straight foreword and stand by his answers. If he does so, she will eventually accept him as her authority. Every follow up 'test' is simply her wishing to consult him for guidance, as she has encounter a contradicting message from the societal feed back (other women) or a competing authority (government, academia, etc)

>They will sacrofice some women to see if men as a collective have the balls to kill some
You assume to much of woman, they do not think as far ahead or plan as much as you seem to be under the impression of. There are some arguements to be made of women enabling Islam because it's their way of acquiring a proper authority without challenging their social standing. But for negros, or other such things, it's either viewing them through child lens "aww, those poor x" or reflecting the views of society.

>What do you think will happen if men removed their suffrage
Women would accept it, nu-males, white knights, basic conservatives who put women on pedestals or as a man ("equals) will fight it, which will then cause women to do so, especially if they where instructed by their authority that women should act as men.

>>128237798
>Go back to doing what they were doing before they where told to vote by men
If men tell them it's wrong, and to express outrage, they will do so. The ones told to act as men will do so without directly being told, and other women who see it being the societal norm to express outrage will also engage in the feed back loop I mentioned earlier, but otherwise if 100% of men said it, they would accept it over night.

But our fight with egalitarianism is one as old as recorded history. Going back to the disputes between Socrates and Plato on the concept of democracy, egalitarianism largely started off in the modern world as an anti monarchy movement after all.

>>128234536
>If you objectively observe female nature, it because evident that she does not question or think critically, but mearly reflect view points and wish to do things of her established authority.

I've seen this in many men too. Surely women are more prone to influence but it is madness to deny, let's say, a female doctor to vote but not a homeless alcoholic male? It would be better to match voting rights to taxes or IQ or whatever else, gender being too broad.
I'm also afraid that any concept of restricting voting rights for women will never happen in the United States.

>>128237798
>Remove women's suffrage and women will die, that is just a fact. Try and deal with it.

That won't happen in Denmark or anywhere else western short of an Islamic invasion.

>>128238604
>Exceptions to every rule includes the rule of exceptions to every rule. There is no outliers of women whom this does not apply
And yet.
>>128232077
>m not kidding. Churchill fought them in England with whips, but they kept pushing. Some even killed themselves and blame it on them not being allowed to vote. One ran out in front of the horses in a horserace and died. Others starved themselves.
You are denying historical fact.
>>128238604
>You assume to much of woman, they do not think as far ahead or plan as much as you seem to be under the impression of.
Nope. I never said any of the sorts. Pure strawman. What you seem to forget is that before the enlightment, honourkillings were practiced, also in Christianity. It has nothing to do with their thinking, and everything to do with their basic nature. I like how you tell me about how women think, when I am the one who came up with the experiments to prove the difference between men and women.
>>128238604
>Women would accept it, nu-males, white knights, basic conservatives who put women on pedestals or as a man ("equals) will fight it, which will then cause women to do so, especially if they where instructed by their authority that women should act as men.
We can agree on that. You have to kill more men then women. But at the core women will naturally push the boundaries, or as you say, "seek authority". Just keep in mind, the places today where women don't have the suffrage, are the places where some are regulary killed. That is a fact. Deal with it. I know you won't, and your former white nation is doomed anyway, enjoy the decline. Because you will clearly not be part of any solution. Just a christian conservative who looks on as your nation gets even more overrun by foreigners until whites become the minority in a not so distant future and eventually vanish entirely.
>>128238901
They have never done that in the past. All civilizations practiced honourkillings.

>>128239440
>gender being too broad.
3,5 billion women. One house with everything installed, you can't do it. Just because a lot of men should not vote does not mean any women shoud vote. Enjoy your talk over the Atlantic, I'm out.
>>128239440
>That won't happen in Denmark or anywhere else western short of an Islamic invasion.
Sadly, you are right. Congrats, it will happen everywhere. Also in USA, some men who dare to kill women will take over sooner or later.

90% of women are completely immune to rational discourse. They rarely understand anything but the most shallow points and are incapable of following cause and effect through to it's logical conclusion. Women's sufferage doomed Black America to the ghettos until the present day, destroyed the family unit, created an unsustainable nanny state to replace their husbands, destroyed public education, allowed Islamic terrorism to fester and grow, gave safe haven to refugees that hate our way of life. Women are usually emotion-driven simpletons and shouldn't be anywhere near the political process.

Need proof? Read any decision by a female Supreme Court Judge. Then read one by one of the Conservative males. It's like they aren't living in our fucking reality.

>>128239882
>Just because a lot of men should not vote does not mean any women shoud vote.

So, who should vote? That's the bigger question.

>Also in USA, some men who dare to kill women will take over sooner or later.

Who are these men? That's insane.

>>128239440
>I've seen this in many men too
It is different for men, a stupid man can appear no different mentally from a woman if you do not observe closely. But the stupid man will still be capable of guiding others, sticking by principles, thinking critically of the world around him and shaping his idealogy. A woman can do none of these things on her own

>A female doctor
A doctor is one who memorizes symtomps and their corresponding treatment. Women in the medical industry are notoriously miserable, as those who get ahead must be pioneers in their field (make new advancements in medicine) or think differently with existing methods.

>A homeless alcoholic
Alcohol is used as a form of escapism, why is this man homeless, and why is he trying to escape? You may be surprised to find a genius overly empathetic man might be behind that bottle on the street corner, or one who burned out his dopamine receptors and cannot feel happy as easily anymore.

>It would be better to match voting rights to taxes or IQ
In our current world, a negro who can kick a ball make surpass income of others. Does this mean the athletic negro is capable of working in the best interest of society?

As mentioned above, IQ is information processing, it does not mean someone can/will apply what they do process/memorize properly, or be capable of connecting it.

>Gender being to broad
Originally in the west only married men/land owners could vote. Coupled with gender roles this effectively meant every family/household was represented with a single vote. This meant to get elected, politicians had to appeal to the families and their stability. Now they simply have to appeal to individuals, personally I think democracy was doomed from the start and think monarchy is the way to go.

File: 517FBCB6-1DD7-42EE-A260-5D873ABC5880-4574-00000814504A96D7.jpg (346KB, 1590x1932px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 1590x1932px

>>128226304
Haha my thoughts exactly

Even zoomed in to see that one bitch's toes in da hose

>>128239440
Has nothing to do with intelligence. It is about how women arrive at decisions. There are brilliant women who have political views that have no grounding in reality. They just lack wisdom, forward-thinking and basic common sense. For example, every male doctor I know, knew that Obamacare would be a fucking disaster. Every woman doctor I know supported it because it was compassionate.

Not all, but most.

>>128239440
>I'm also afraid that any concept of restricting voting rights for women will never happen in the USA
It won't, short of collectively embracing Mormonism, Sunni/Wahhabi Islam, Orthodox Judaism, or Orthodox Christionity(less sure on this one still maintaining proper roles, there is enough reason to think it too has began the decline of other Christian sects) we won't see what needs to be done in this country happen.

The best hope the USA has is eventual balkanization, I say best hope because the alternative is full dissolutionment which will be a massive mess. At least with balkanization competing successors can compete with one another until a new nation is born. But yeah realisitcally the USA is finished

File: 28021C5B-0AE6-4838-B9BF-6227EB70818C-5795-00000A5BF148CC04.jpg (292KB, 1000x1334px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 1000x1334px

>>128231764
Motion is passed, anon

>>128240485
AAAAAAAAAND those women that DO tend to exhibit reason and logic also tend to trend toward cunning, sociopathic behavior a la HRC or the cunt at work trying to send everyone to HR.

File: 1495493026567.jpg (123KB, 600x739px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 600x739px

>>128226163
>women
>humans

Women have the same ability to use logic and reason as a child. Women live their lives based on knee jerk emotional reactions because being protected by men since they where living in caves has enabled them to be simple minded a naive creatures that live their lives in a childlike state. There are so many wonderful things about women, but their involvement in politics is for no reason other than their easy to manipulate and simple minds.

>>128226053
they honestly shouldnt be allowed to, but neither should men. we should just let cats vote. we'd probably have a more safer country by seeing which candidate the cat walks to.

>>128239616
>Churchill
Was neither well received, nor got the support of the majority of men in his time. The fate of the UK in regards to gender relations will not be resolved until a male monarch is sitting on the thrown.

“I am most anxious to enlist everyone who can speak or write to join in checking this mad, wicked folly of "Women's Rights," with all its attendant horrors, on which her poor feeble sex is bent, forgetting every sense of womanly feelings and propriety. Feminists ought to get a good whipping. Were woman to "unsex" themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen and disgusting of begins and would surely perish without male protection.I love peace and quiet, I hate politics and turmoil. We women are not made for governing, and if we are good women, we must dislike these masculine occupations.” - Queen Victoria, 1870

>Honor killings were practiced
Yes, and? Honor is/was a value of men

>Also in Christionity
Indeed, Christianity's original values would mirror those of modern Sunni/Wahhabi Islam

>You have to kill more men then women
Unfortunately this is probably true, one cannot expect to see their ideals spread unless they hold a position of power.

>The places today where women don't have the suffrage, are the places where some are regularly killed.
Yes, I do not dispute this, but I seem to be missing the point you're making here. Can you elaborate on how women suffering death more frequently in such lands is relevant?

>Your former white nation is doomed anyway
I acknowledge this, see ->
>>128240522

>Because you will clearly not be apart of any solution
There is no solution that can be realisitcally implemented at this point. Most efforts should be redirected towards softening the blow the eventual collapse will lead. Establishing 'life boat' communities around the nation to build back up from for example.

>Just a Christian conservative
I am not a Christian conservative

>>128239616
>Until whites become a minority
Provide criteria for what you view as white

Most of the world's population is mixed, I would personally doubt any blood line that isn't mixed at this point, if they do exist, they'd likely be in your nation or Sweden though

>>128226053
ITT: Kissless undesirable virgins jealous of sexually sucessfull women and mad at them.

Most women wouldn't even touch you with a stick, so you can hate them all you want hehe

File: 1495070003989.png (401KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 480x640px

>>128241545
>roastie with barren womb detected

>>128226350
fuck you, you're going to lose the right to vote no matter who wins the culture war

>>128226053
better question is why arent these women forced to put their feet on m face?

>>128240089
you're on your last leg, white woman. no one sees you as useful anymore, and you've betrayed the only group who had anything invested in you

>>128240343
>But the stupid man will still be capable of guiding others, sticking by principles, thinking critically of the world around him and shaping his idealogy. A woman can do none of these things on her own.

I agree with your generalizations generally. But it is insane to apply it to every male and female. The argument can be made that certain individual rights will have to be curtailed on the basis of gender for the greater good. But there are women who can think critically, and men who cannot. It's madness to deny that fact. There are smart blacks and dumb whites. It's all a matter of percentages and pragmatism after this but the generalizations can't be held to every single individual in that group as an iron truth. That argument won't work. It's crazy.

> Does this mean the athletic negro is capable of working in the best interest of society?

According to a tax model of voting, he should have a say where and how his money is spent. If we follow an IQ model, perhaps he wouldn't. Basically i'm trying to reconcile the reality of group differences while allowing exemplary individuals within any group to have their voice heard. Then what makes a person worthy of voting? That's the question that'll make the whole thing a meritocratic manner. But the idea of a smart tax paying law abiding citizen - black or women - not being allowed to vote despite their contributions and positive qualities bothers me greatly, especially while the worse of the better group is not better than the best of the inferior group. I tend to be more ideologically driven than practical but try to reconcile the two as best i can.

>>128240873
>>128241981
>>128242113

I was fucking with you.

>>128242327
>It is insane to apply it to every male and female
Why?

>The arguement can be made that certain individual rights will have to be curtailed on the basis of gender for the greater good
Dismantling divorce law, and the 19th amendment would be a good start.

>There are women who can think critically
There is not, there are women who where instructed by more intelligent men. A women is capable of becoming a lot more then she is, she is a tool to be shaped. A smart man will shape a smart woman, a stupid man will shape a stupid woman. A woman can generally be lead to fill any role her authority requires of her

Ask yourself this - does your dog work in your interest because it truly understands, and thinks critically of the relationship it has with you; or does it simply do as it was trained to do? The dog will likely will be capable of grasping it's role as your servant and property, it will view you as it's authority until you're not, same is true of women.

She can do amazing things, but she can never be your equal, and it's arguably cruel to expect her to, you will always be disappointed, and she will always be sad for disappointing you.

>Men who cannot
Sure, those born with mental retardation would be an exception, but those born without harmful birth defects would only choice not to think critically, or apply what conclusions they come to. This is why men practice escapism more, it's not that they can't think, it's just that it often makes them miserable to do so

>It's madness to deny that fact
It's realistic to acknowledge the nature of things

>There are smart blacks
The vast majority of Negros in the Americas are mixed to a medium to large degree. While those in Eastern Africa are also mixed to a small to medium degree, those in North are heavily mixed, those in West are medium to small. There exists almost no pure breed negro, a pure breed negro would have difficulty speaking and forming a thought at the same time.

>>128226053
Money. It elevates them and makes them more productive in the economy. Of course that just makes rich Jews richer and everyone else poorer. That is the whole point of democracy.

>>128226163
>humans
>women

pick one cunt

>>128242327
A 'smart' Negro is one that
-Has a medium to large degree of human (white or asian) admixture and
-Has been domesticated directly or indirectly. It's why rich domesticated negros cannot raise rich domesticated negros on their own. An animal cannot domestic an animal, their offspring will have to be domesticated just as their parents where.

>Can't be held to every single individual
There are multiple factors yes, but there is also a strict nature of things that must be acknowledged. A lion can be trained to eat vegetation, but it is not in it's nature to do so, and it does not mean you found the one vegetarian lion.

Acknowledging the nature of things is a framework for seeing the world. Knowing Negros are animals does not mean you're going to go out and murder all of them anymore then you would any other animal. Knowing women are incapable of pursuing their own interests does not mean you will beat all of them to death anymore then you would your other chattel.

It would be like killing your cow, sure you can, but why would you? You're only hurting yourself, and losing the benefits it provided you with and would do so. The acknowledgement of the nature of these things does not inherantly imply the destruction of them.

>He should have a say where and how his money is spent
While the poor scientists and scholars who'd have the knowledge ability to advise go without a say

>i'm trying to reconcile the reality of group differences while allowing exemplary individuals within any group to have their voice heard
Ask yourself why their voice should be heart, or if it is, to what degree should it be heard? Your basis for requiring it is egalitarianism - the presumption of sameness, which means equal treatment. Does your arm tell your brain it's views or what it should do? No, but it's an important part of the body. A nation is much like a body, requires a strict hierarchy.

>>128226821
this

>>128226821
Hey. Niggers, true, but leave the bitches be. OP simply asked why they are allowed to vote. That's because of the Jews. They want white women as first class citizens so that they are more productive and thereby consume more and drive down wages for everyone.

>>128242327
However, I would add ideally the model would absolutely have to have the cream of the crop rise to the top. I'll give a historical example - in Feudalism the lowest rung of aristocracy was a baron. The qualifications for a baron was to own land. As a serf if you found a way through ability to purchase or otherwise acquire land, you would join aristocracy. In which point through ability you could work your way up. In our current society one can climb the ladder to the top in a single generation, but wealth also lasts much shorter too, wealth averages 1-3 generations before the family line falls back to the starting point of poverty.

>Then what makes a person worthy of voting
Why should they be voting in the first place? A nation is an authority who owns land. A kingdom is simply an individual who claims ownership over a area of land and defends it when challenged. Why is a democracy required? It hasn't worked since it's implementation, and it's doomed to by it's very nature of denying the need for a hierarchy.

Think of it like this
Voters are children, they're electing their parents. Will children elect a parent who gives them icky broccoli that will be in their interest or the parent who gives them nothing but candy but that will make them sick and unhealthy long term? Even among human males there is an abundance of shortsightedness. In a democracy one who panders to the widest margin wins, not one who works for the interests of the nation collectively despite all inhabitants perhaps not seeing or understanding why the leader does what they do.

>I tend to be more ideologically driven than practical but try to reconcile the two as best i can.
Nothing wrong with that, you're eager to follow your idealogy and willing to adjust it when confronted with new issues or questions, that's a good thing.

>>128226053
They will either vote away their "right to vote" with a Nazi party, or they will destroy civilazation. We are in the period of time between action and result. Just wait a little longer.

>>128226053
ugliest living room ever

>>128226163
Good thread OP, I'm heading to sleep. Good night anons

>>128226350
I would like to agree but your constant fucking up suggests otherwise.

>>128230666
The only way women know how to argue is by denying a man access to their holes. On the internet they do it in proxy, by claiming other women will deny, or are denying a man their holes. This is literally all you do, every single time a man disagrees with you. Say he's a bitter virgin. Men have become so desensitised to that idiocy that they don't even roll their eyes anymore, we just blank mentally and stop talking to you retards.

File: 1487501357651.jpg (734KB, 1900x1364px) Image search: [Google]

734KB, 1900x1364px

>>128247772

I offer as proof of women needing the right to vote: this very thread. Men who see women as parisitic fuck holes can't be trusted to act on policies that will maintain good conditions for women, meaning there will be half of society that is made vulnerable by the system. The old arguments for why women didn't need the right to vote relied on the idea that their husbands would act in their interests, but even if that were true, how well does that hold up against the spite of pussy-starved outcast men with an overabundance of self loathing they've turned outward at women?

>>128226821
THIS.
Only White and Asian men, but only if they're land owners or have lived in the said country for multiple generations.

File: fixed that.jpg (32KB, 497x640px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 497x640px

>>128226053
Because. Vagina.

>>128249074
>and Asian men
Chong pls

>>128249367
Ye I suppose not asians. Although they're far more reasonable than any other non white race. Albeit non white themselves.

>>128226163
Women aren't human though.

>>128248947
>Projection
>Ad hominem
>Massive butthurt

You're either a self loathing, beta white knight cuck or an assmad women but either way you need to kys. Those weren't ad hominems, they were insults.

Women, at least in the US, don't deserve the right to vote for the simple reason that they don't have to sign up for selective service.

Because they are 1/2 of humans.

>>128226163
>Because we have a right to as humans.

Rights come with responsibilities.

>>128226350
>Not bait. I deserve the right to vote.

Typical female entitlement complex. You don't "deserve" shit. You don't have to sign up for selective service (like almost every man does) and by the very virtue that you would not be drafted in a World War (or if the US just decides to reinstate it), you don't deserve the right to vote.

>>128247724
>((((Betty Friedan))) and ((((((Gloria Steinem)))))
I'm sure it's just another coincidence, uh?

File: wymyn.jpg (137KB, 652x960px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 652x960px

>>128251185

Hans, you are destroying me. S-stop it. :^((

File: reaction103.jpg (32KB, 500x484px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 500x484px

>>128250745

>>128251185
Based and true

>>128226053
Kek, I know these girls!
Where did you get the photograph?

File: 1481433194411.jpg (795KB, 2542x2907px) Image search: [Google]

795KB, 2542x2907px

>>128226053
1,4,2,5,3

I don't think you could ever take away the right to vote from any group once it's there. There should be an IQ test at least, and no party listed next to the names so the useful idiots who just vote democrat down the line don't end up doing that. You'd have to know exactly who all the candidates are before you go in to vote.

>>128229478
This. The thread shouldhaveended after this post, instead we have a r9k discussion with one guy acting like a girl for (You)s and other ones falling for it.

>>128226350
No you don't

>>128226053
because jews want to destroy western civ

File: PaedoPonders.jpg (31KB, 259x349px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 259x349px

>>128236789
me too bro,
me too

File: women.jpg (232KB, 612x1083px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 612x1083px

Women really are the Niggers of gender.

File: 675656.jpg (61KB, 793x408px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 793x408px

>>128226304
oh my fucking god, that's heaven...

Also, "you just know" looking to how they touch with their bare foot feet.

>>128226053
>Why are women still allowed to vote?
>still
Cat's out of the bag, of course. It's not something you can just take back. What are you going to do, put it to a vote?

File: 1475178081492.jpg (977KB, 2560x1993px) Image search: [Google]

977KB, 2560x1993px

>>128256343
I hope this is true, she deserved all of it and more.
Not all women deserve to be treated like a princess. This is the root cause of modern women entitlement,

>>128226053
Real question is why are niggers and spics allowed to vote. 42% of women voted Trump to blacks 8%. and Mexicans 29%

Every day, I believe more and more that women should not vote. They are fucking illogical and retarded and are dragging men down along with them

With great power comes great responsibility (spider man quote I know, but it's true) Bitches have so much power but are super irresponsible

>>128226163
You have nothing that we don't give you, even your "freedoms" that some men "advocated" for were still literally given to you by men, you are fucked on your own and you know it

>>128226350
You do, more than one (you) gives you the right to vote in america, it was on one of those internet laws that no one reads.

>>128227067
Illegals are human.

>>128230452
those white women were married, and married women are sheep who vote with who their husband vote. No single childless white woman voted for trump

>>128226053
Because men want to fuck women, so we give in to their demands.

Besides, too late to change it now. Democracy has pretty much failed already.

>>128256295
yeah that looks fucking amazingggggggg
fuckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

>>128259707
redpilled bruder

wo are you from brother

>>128226053
Because men in power love pussy a lot.

>>128226053
Children are humans but they don't have a right to vote.

Human rights don't mean HUMAN rights they mean agent rights.

The solution is realizing (((democracy))) with it's inevitable ratchet towards granting suffrage to any easily controlled meatpuppet is itself bullshit along with the (((enlightenment))) philosophy that birthed it. What you want is a restoration. Restoration of patriarchy, restoration of one state church, restoration of nobility. Rebuilding the old institutions from scratch to replace the (((modern))) institutions. If you're not reactionary you're shit.

>>128226053
Too many beta males bred leading to love struct suckers making the majority of white males. Love struck suckers are the ones who view women as people.

>>128255284

This shows why it's a bad idea to date a girl with lots of guy friends, or any close guy friends

>>128260198
boi id love to see the show, anywhere i can watch the american / australian version?

>>128256295

>Bare foot
>Wearing either tights or socks

wat

>>128226053

>still allowed

Because men have been so pussefied that they cant even agree on irrelevant demagogy. How do you expect theyll band together and beat the 55% female population and the white knights together.

Since the 70s/80s most Western countries changed the law to see "forced sex" between husband and wife. Thats when women started using sex as a weapon.

If all women voted that, women would band together and starve men.

>>128226053
Because of the pussy pass

>>128226163
your not human at all!

>>128261566

Can you blame her?

How is "liking certain music" somehow relevant to the instinctive attraction to millions of years of evolution, where the strongest and most genetically fit males ensured the survival of the weaker females?

Furthermore both men want the same thing, but the weaker male beats around the bush talking about music, while the Alpha male says exactly what he wants, which is her pussy. Dominance is a highly attractive trait for women.

>>128226677
>Just try and think of a practical way in which you could reverse suffrage in the year 2017.

Just ask them; http://m.huffpost.com/uk/entry/3565164

>>128261566
A future mating partner has to show her and the world that the future offspring will be protected and well supplied. A beta is dont radiating that confidence.

File: 1460764399512.gif (494KB, 387x305px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 387x305px

>>128240343
>actually many women excell in pediatrics and especially with infants as they often have a more empathic communication with pre-speaking age children. I totally agree with your posts, btw, just thought to add some trivia.

>>128261489
While it is true that Pippa Bacca was murdered while hitchhiking in Turkey during a world peace effort known as “Brides on Tour,” this incident occurred in 2008 (not 2016), and her death was not tied to any religious motives

http://www.snopes.com/bacca-brides-on-tour/

>>128235975
this is the truth. Women should be loved and appreciated as the forms of pure beauty they are. They only stray from this archetype when men let them and as their biology dictates. Ultimately women just want a strong man that loves them and that protects them that they can follow and trust to protectt them from outside forces. It's the Mans job to worry about everything external while the woman should focus on the family and internal development, structured by the patriarch. It took me many years to truly understnad this and I abused and hurt women for my own hedonistic desires for a long time. The responsibility of men is hard to bear and especially in this day where a woman almost needs to be tamed and reminded of her role as a mother, but ultimately it is worth it and the women genuinely appreciate being put back where they belong provided you can assert your role effectively.

>>128249735
>>128249811
>>128249972
Maybe people are finally starting to see that women are parasitic leeches who need to be genocided. We literally have NO need for them

With artificial wombs around the corner ,keeping women around would be the gravest mistake.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/09/13/motherless-babies-possible-as-scientists-create-live-offspring-w/

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/09/14/europe/mice-sperm-reproduction-eggs/index.html

>>128269246
Please use archive
>http://edition cnn com/2016/09/14/europe/mice-sperm-reproduction-eggs/index.html
https://archive.is/w3i7E

>>128226053
>Why are most people still allowed to vote?

>>128226350
no you dont, love

File: 1496019016532.jpg (55KB, 536x411px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 536x411px

>>128226053
Because they are superior to your autistic kissless virgin ass.

>>128267306
> quoting snopes as an authority on a politically contentious issue

>>128226163
>women
>human
???

>>128226053
idk, but I vote for those legs

>>12822613 not a human right,
also un guaranteed rights are not enforced

>>128226053
Because we fell for the strong and smart womin meme pushed by the kikes.Look where we are today.Women vote liberal and they just jump on shitskin dicks.
The moment we gave them human rights we got cucked.

File: IMG_8069.jpg (96KB, 1024x709px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1024x709px

>>128226053
Reminder:
More women voted for Le Pen than men did.
More women voted for Wilders than men did.
Pew says that women are more likely than men to report that mass immigration is "unsafe".

File: germanwings plane cash 1427376221145.png (4MB, 1876x1528px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1876x1528px

>>128226053
because the jew is still allowed to rule

>>128226053

Why is any one younger than 25 allowed to vote?

>>128230551
only weak losers cant say no to women.

File: 1468498874869.jpg (918KB, 2560x1920px) Image search: [Google]

918KB, 2560x1920px

>>128226677
sharia law
soon
thx to the women vote
they are literally voting themselves out of the privilege

File: 1430489460062.jpg (43KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x375px

>>128229282
cumdumpsters ITT won't read this picture, way too "boring" i.e. hard to comprehend

>>128226053
Because men and women are at war.

File: 1355091928314.jpg (39KB, 640x401px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 640x401px

>>128230666
it means that as a woman you need to oppose yourself to the women vote if you want to keep your own white country
that was phrased clearly enough by anon, even if concisely

File: yet another hole 1464201645805.jpg (51KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 640x400px

>>128247772
this
they're holes, they argue like holes, behave like holes and die like holes
thanks for confirming why you should never have the right to vote, cunts

File: katy perry 1421529148790.jpg (81KB, 500x750px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 500x750px

>>128231162
you hate women by wanting them to vote
as it only makes them less happy and eventually destroys their whole civilization and source of protection and providing
<--- another brilliant executive

File: 1489503506707.jpg (375KB, 867x1000px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 867x1000px

Thread is still going.

File: 151092.gif (540KB, 480x267px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 480x267px

>>128241850
>Most women wouldn't even touch you with a stick
That's true, I touch them with mine!

File: Theroigne_de_Mericourt.jpg (19KB, 220x280px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 220x280px

>>128232077
>Théroigne de Méricourt

File: pauline_leon.jpg (12KB, 268x320px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 268x320px

>>128232077
>Pauline Léon

File: claire lacombe.jpg (16KB, 450x462px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 450x462px

>>128232077
>Claire Lacombe
that one's not too jewy (but may be insane anyway)

File: [email protected]_ (1).gif (139KB, 500x509px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 500x509px

>>128276015
Bad as bitch coming through! Make way! She is going straight to loony town!
Dumb cunts, I would take 6 months of concentrated fencing traning and fight any female fenching champ to the death.

I don't know about them being jews. Would not surprise me. But blaming jews on a problem that is cyclical in nature and has happened several times over several milenia in different parts of the world is getting old. No one tricked the white man into giving women the vote, it was fucking retarded from the start and white men can only blame themselves.
https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/essays/chapter5.html
"By this means woman will be brought back to her proper and natural place as a subordinate being, and the lady, that monster of European civilisation and Christian-Teutonic stupidity, with her ridiculous claim to respect and veneration, will no longer exist"
Jews push for it, but the idea was retarded to begin with. It should not have been hard to say no.
Pic related is ((alice due miller)). Reason number 5
Pic related.>>128231382
I mean, c'mon, how can we blame this on jews? I given several scientific options on how to remove their suffrage, and white men still cower, is that the jews fault?

>>128226053

nuh-uh!

>>128226053
Same reason idiots like you have the right to vote. Motherfucking quality! Don't like it? Kys Achmed!

File: Woman Building.jpg (221KB, 684x513px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 684x513px

>>128279933

>>128229282
I hate this pic, smug, retarded tone and very little insight yet it keeps getting posted

File: construction1.jpg (75KB, 420x280px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 420x280px

>>128281245
Agree. Women should not vote because they never grow up/are retarded. Everything a woman can do a 17 year old boy can do. It has nothing to do with "values", but simple reality.

4 > 3 > 2 > 1 > 5

File: image.jpg (16KB, 125x125px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 125x125px

>>128226163
>thinks human rights are a thing
umm no sweetie

File: aew 9.png (197KB, 998x1134px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 998x1134px

>>128281245
>>128281245
smug?

you must have missed the part where he states it would be better if only woman could vote, then both woman and men.


Either only men can vote, or only women. If you let both vote you get what we have today, the decline of the west, a weak and pathetic society that no longer cares for family values. We are being overtaken by Islam, and rightfully so. We need a wake up call.

>>128281245
Is it wrong?

File: 1496463840349.png (162KB, 642x642px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 642x642px

Look, I do believe in an a hole's right to vote. They are (barely) human, so I can't justify taking that right from them. But facts are facts, and as the Jew Emperor says, facts don't care about your stupid female feelings. And the facts are simple. Even a female can understand them, it's not calculus. Females, as a group, ALWAYS vote for a bigger state, because they are biologically wired for hypergamy. It is literally hardwired into women's brains to seek the easiest path to resources. When you have a state with the power to redistribute resources combined with female suffrage, you have about 100-200 years before women's genetic programming implodes society through over spending and debt. So, if there was no system of wealth redistribution, women voting wouldn't be an issue, because they would vote in ways that keeps wealth in their husband's pockets. But when the state renders a husband superfluous, that's when society is FUCKED.

>>128226350
Tits.

Tits now.

>>128226053
Same reason the Dems want felons to vote.

>>128282321
Yes. It is based on some kind of mutual understanding between men and women, which is false. There is none. It puts the blame on he free market, which is false. Women have always been allowed to work. The difference from old days and today is that most women work useless government jobs they voted to create, not that women are allowed to work. In Denmark, 70% of government jobs are occupied with women, they should all be fired. You don't think women helped worked the fields in the old days? You don't think women had an 8 hour work schedule in the old days? They did. Forbidding women to work is just plain dumb. The welfare state is the problem. Just stop giving women men's money through the state, and they will return to homemakers and you will have the odd woman who does not. Pic related.
>>128237798
>>128282724
>They are (barely) human, so I can't justify taking that right from them.
3,5 billion women. One house with everything installed, they can't do it. How is that unjust?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Subjection_of_Women
""Under whatever conditions, and within whatever limits, men are admitted to the suffrage, there is not a shadow of justification for not admitting women under the same"

Pic and essay related.>>128231382

>>128229282
wtf, I love mexicans now.

File: IMG_6892.gif (1MB, 480x287px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 480x287px

>>128226163

I'm voting that these fine ladies are making my pockets tight.

>>128226053
because some men lack the balls to make the shots

>>128226386
Most mature teenager in the host

>>128226053

Like all things in the world....because men with guns say so.

>>128226053
>much equality

>>128267306
>her death was not tied to any religious motives

But she was murdered by a fucking Muslim though. What you're suggesting is that it isn't Muslim related because she wasn't actually sacrificed to Allah.

Get fucked.

>>128226053
Why would this bother you people so much? 80% of the women I know vote in alignment with their husband, like my wife does. Weird?! I married a woman who has my same conservative ideals and we agree...wow.
Personally, whoever keeps feeding or providing this bait needs to look at how ignorant it makes them sound. For every dumb female I've met, I have met a dumb male equivalent. That bell curve for intelligence seems to be pretty spot on. We can't all be geniuses, the maths just say it isn't so.

File: Elect-Suffrage-3.jpg (86KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 850x400px

>>128288489
Please do the world a favour and kill your self.
Pic and essay related.>>128231382
After you read that, read this pic.
Pic related.>>128234153
And then why you read that, read this graph and try and understand it.>>128237798
Then, for gods sake, realise what a failure you are as a man, and kill your self.

>>128288489
At least try and read the thread before you just blurt out your shitty response, polluting the rest of the world with your shit sentences.

I underestimated the amount of angry virgins on this board.

File: 1274719594785.jpg (61KB, 1193x662px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1193x662px

>>128292095
>>128247883

>>128289370
And your Essay was nice. Good Work.
As Good as your Hot Dog Sauce.

For everyone else heres the link:
https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-58824.html

File: 1495859695246.jpg (173KB, 876x960px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 876x960px

>>128292095
T. Retard. Just so fucking dumb. Pic related.>>128261687
Just so immensely dumb.

>>128292095
>I underestimated the amount of angry virgins on this board.

Married with kid here, but to be quite honest the fucked up dynamics of modern dating is leaving a lot of guys out in the cold, since the majority of women are chasing after the same relatively small group of Chad's.

Goes back to that PoF survey where men determined that about 50% of women were below average in looks and women decided that 80% of men were below average in looks.

With fucked up and unrealistic attitudes as that is it surprising that the Male/Female dynamic is completely fucked up?

Who wants to date (let alone marry) some used up whore?

>>128292784
>And your Essay was nice
The essay is shit. Filled with grammatical and spelling errors. However, since it is a retarded subject being debated, it fits right in.

>>128226053
4, 2, 3, 5, 1 (only correct answer)