Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
U.S. Files Emergency Supreme Court Appeal for Travel Ban 2017-06-02 08:30:11 Post No.
[Report] Image search: [Google]
U.S. Files Emergency Supreme Court Appeal for Travel Ban 2017-06-02 08:30:11 Post No.
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: supremecourt.jpg (3MB, 5986x3990px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 5986x3990px
U.S. Files Emergency Supreme Court Appeal for Travel Ban
Anonymous
2017-06-02 08:30:11
Post No.
[Report]
Does this have any chance of winning? If it doesn't what powers of the president will this condemn? Which 5 would vote against it?
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-immigration-idUSKBN18T2SK?il=0
Arguing that the temporary ban is urgently needed to protect Americans from terrorist attacks, the government has asked the court to stay quickly the lower court actions. If the court agrees, a 90-day ban on people entering the United States from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen will be immediately revived. The court could also put a 120-day ban on all refugees into effect and allow the administration to consider new vetting procedures.
Even if the court allows the travel ban to take effect, the bigger constitutional questions of religious discrimination and presidential powers raised by the March 6 order would not be considered by the nine justices until long after the ban periods have ended. The court begins its summer recess at the end of this month and would not give the case a full hearing until its return in the fall, by which time the ban would have lapsed.
The administration filed emergency applications with the high court on Thursday night seeking to block injunctions issued by judges in Maryland and Hawaii. The Maryland order was upheld on May 25 by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. The government's appeal of the Hawaii injunction is currently being considered by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. That court could issue its decision before the Supreme Court acts on the emergency application.
>>
>>128183626
the three jews will vote against for sure
>>
>>128183626
bump
>>
Was there any other argument by the appeal courts beside "drumpf said it was a muslim ban during the election so this travel ban that has nothing to do with muslims should be stopped"
>>
>Kennedy
>Roberts
If either of these fags waiver on this...
>>
>>128185317
No I think that was the main one.
>>
>>128185317
No, that was literally it. If that bullshit is allowed to stand as precedent, it will fuck up lawmaking in ways that can't even be quantified in anything other than jokes about how retarded it is.
>>
>>128185317
simply astounding judicial overreach.
my one concern is roberts - he cucked out on Obamacare - AKA was spied on. I'm sure the deep state will be looking to do that again.
>>
realistically, every single justice should support the legality of his travel ban. simply citing the first amendment just doesn't hold any water, especially when 1A was only designed to protect americans.
>>
>>128183626
Has the 9th circuit made their decision yet? If they say no ban along with the 4th circuit, there is little chance it gets heard.
>>
>>128185317
No that was literally it and even then IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER
the clause in the united states law states EXPLICITLY that the president can for whatever fucking reason and for as long as he wants ban travel from ANY GROUP OF PEOPLE
Trump could literally wake up and declare that people with outie bellybuttons aren't allowed in for 500 years and it would go in effect until the next president or himself overturned it
banning muslims from the country is constitutional and it wasn't even muslims, it was people from certain countries
There is no way this doesn't get overturned and his travel ban go into effect
>>
>>128183626
It will pass the SCOTUS. The border wall is a bigger hurdle however.
>>
>>128183626
It's way too high profile and concerns some fundamental issues of presidential power and judicial oversight, so there's no way SCOTUS doesn't take the case.
They'll rule in favor of Trump, and overwhelmingly too. Even the leftards like Kennedy and Sotomayor will vote with the majority. Ginsburg and Kagan will dissent, probably Souter too.
Ginsburg should probably recuse herself to be honest. After everything she said about Trump during the campaign, it would be impossible for her to be impartial here, especially in case that is going to hinge on campaign rhetoric.
>>
>>128183626
bump
>>
>>128183626
bump
Thread posts: 15
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1