Who is a bigger leach on society: welfare niggers or welfare

Niggers because this isn't their country

White trash at least have a place in this country. Their ancestors helped build it. Niggers have no reason to be here.

>>128164443
THICC

saggy boob is my fetish

She has aged like milk.

>>128164556
Damn boy that's real mental gymnastics

>>128164443
and here's an article, pissed me off:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/local/2017/06/02/generations-disabled/

4 generations of the fucking bums sitting around all day abusing rx meds.

>>128164443

i have a chronic back injury and i can't do manual labor but i'm studying in school.

am i a welfare nigger?

>>128164706
You forgot to archive that shit
>http://washingtonpost com/sf/local/2017/06/02/generations-disabled
https://archive.is/u1MmQ

>>128164680
Go back to Africa subhuman

File: rat race.jpg (62KB, 504x360px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 504x360px

>>128164443

>>128164900
no.

File: Sofi2.jpg (13KB, 199x300px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 199x300px

>>128164580
>Not into Sofi

Get out of Finland, Russkie

>>128164556
>Niggers because this isn't their country

Bitch do you speak Cherokee? Also, who do you think brought them over from africa? They weren't voluntary leisure cruises

>>128164443
welfare niggers of course

>>128164443
>dumb fuck burger logic
Who is the biggest leech
poor people on welfare or mega corporation hiding asset paying their employee like shit
or maybe the banks system that just print money out of thin air ?
Never a banker or mega corporation family could be bigger leech than the poor on welfare.

>time to go kill yourself fucking wast of space

>>128164443
Both are pretty useless, niggers smoke crack with the welfare they get tho.
At least whites wont kill their neighbors for pot

>>128165312
Cherokee had no country, it's time to grow up andstop posting this meme

>>128164443
Welfare niggers have a higher percentage in proportion to their population. Welfare whitetrash are more numerous overall and therefore cost society more.

File: 23423df.jpg (33KB, 477x640px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 477x640px

>>128164443
welfare niggers of course.

whitetrash can still do what only 10% of the world can accomplish, have white babies. We can always take a white baby and turn it into a successful contributor to society. A nigger will aways produce more niggers, even if they marry a white person.

>>128164443
Both. The real redpill is the reason you don't like immigrants is because they are uncultured and low-class, in fact not too different from your own lower classes (they are but those are not the reasons you hate them for). Low classes don't have ideals and are a drain on society, and the growing lower classes and disappearing middle classes will become a huge economical problem for europe and the US in the future.

>>128164934
Fuck your archive faggot stop spamming every thread

>>128165312
native americans literally tried to destroy the country we built. fuck them

>>128165655
this

>>128165133
They get 100% of the money from their husbands wallet

File: IMG_2326.jpg (63KB, 1024x552px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1024x552px

>>128165996
WTF is that?

>>128164556
It is as much as their country as it is yours as long as they have citizenship. That's how countries work. It's refugees who should be thrown out

>>128166177
But even our low classes aren't so bad. West Virginia's average iq is 98, for instance. Compare that to the hispanic average of 88

File: 1445454658871.jpg (183KB, 1240x1142px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 1240x1142px

USA would go bankrupt if it had 300 million blacks, too large % of them would be on welfare.

>>128164443
welfare whitetrash, they have a supposedly higher IQ and hence welfare should not be a career option.

File: 1437455146369.jpg (10KB, 243x207px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 243x207px

>>128164443
>ywn fugg Road Trip -era Tara Reid

wel

>>128164556
Please tell me this is b8

>White trash ancestors helped build the country
>Most whites arrived as immigrants from 1860s onwards.
>Most blacks ancestors have been in america since before 1800 and were literal slaves working for free to boost the countries economy

>>128164443
Which is more likely to get off of welfare and get a job?

>>128164706
these people need to be taken out the back, lined up and executed.

>>128166991
>working for free to boost the countries economy
I'm sure they would have been fine even without those cotton workers.

>>128166991
Country would be the same without slaves. After a certain point, slavery held it back.

Your second point isn't true. Over 13% of whites are descended from the mayflower pilgrims alone.

>>128164443

welfare niggers.

Welfare niggers are statistically more likely to commit crime than welfare white trash.

>>128166991
>slaves boosted the economy
Yeah, I remember all of the rural and suburban retards up north using their powerful slave based, agrarian economy to BTFO the urbanites in the south who didn't rely on slave labor.

Welfare doesn't even exist anymore that shit was gutted in the 90s.

>>128166654
Thats because they are averages. The lower classes of Virginia are probably around an IQ of 70-80, which makes them barely able to function in society. The hispanics in Virginia will be mostly low class, as half their country is probably low class compared to us.

>>128166991

At best, slaves maybe contributed 5% to the GDP back then. To pretend like we would all be living in shacks and favelas if it weren't for the black people picking cotton is just asinine.

>>128164443
she looks like that fucking creature from pan's labyrinth

>>128166806
I know this feel.

>>128164900
i have a blood clot aka deep veinus thrombosis in my arm. if i life over 50 lbs i risk an embolysim shooting into my brain. lung or heart.

think i qualify for disability?

>>128166365
Stop spamming every thread with direct links to your blog and there's no point in what I'm doing.

>>128167750
Slaves were worth about half of all the property owned, one of the biggest reasons against abolition.

>>128167509
>The lower classes of Virginia
West VIrginia itself is lower class.Of course the dumbest of the dumb are dumb, what is your point? Mine is that even the poorest whites score fairly well.

>>128167444
Check'd and kek'd

File: MAIN-Tara-Reid.jpg (52KB, 615x409px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 615x409px

>>128164443
HOLY MOTHER OF T H I C C

>>128164443
White trash, obviously, since there's way more of them.

>>128167509
>>128168267
Also forgot to add: west Virginia whites earn less than blacks on average, but score 98 to their 84

>>128168267
You are confusing social-economic class with IQ, which is exactly the issue here. They're not the same bit highly correlated. And low socio-economic classes suck in all cultures, including white

File: 1496356005140.jpg (20KB, 398x352px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 398x352px

>>128168472
>>128164443
What does this to a body?

>>128169024
Anorexia.

>>128166177

I think hatred of immigrants from working class people, especially on welfare, stems largely from the fact that they are projecting themselves onto them coming into whatever country they live in and giving better treatment then them. That's it, pure selfishness.

>>128164556
>Black people are humans.
>A black person born in the US is by law a natural born us citizen

Only had to activate 1% of the almonds to figure that out, which means you must be pretty stupid.

>>128168932
Lad, you need to be more clear. I've proven that even "white trash" outperform blacks by far. My point is merely that it's stupid to blame people who's average is 98 when we're importing millions of third worlders.

File: 1491957374409.jpg (89KB, 540x675px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 540x675px

>>128164556
>Because this isn't their country
It became their country when we brought them over.
Most of the construction and economy was done by slaves.
>>128166388
Clarify, are you referring to a specific event or...?
>>128167215
Why would you think that?

That's like saying "I'm sure China would be fine even if they had to pay their workers a living wage, I'm sure they'd still grow into the economic juggernaut they are today"


>>128167444
The North beat the hell out of the South due to mechanization, but we were only able to get to that point because the country was so wealthy due to how much capital extra capital was flowing due to slavery.

As >>128167217 said, at a certain point slavery became less useful for labor compared to mechanization. But mechanization takes investments which would come from capital. Capital that is generated from excess wealth from slavery.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/economic-impact-slavery-south

It's like how start up businesses basically won't pay anyone and take a disproportionate number of interns since it allows them to grow without losing capital needed for other infrastructure and R&D.

Welfare Niggers are still a larger sink because, simply put, they tend to live in or near cities where the cost of living is higher by default (even when their neighborhoods are shit).

Welfare whitetrash live in trailer parks and the country where the cost of living is much lower.

That's just a per capital analysis though

>>128164443
Welfare blacks are worse. Welfare white trash usually grow out of it if they're given the opportunity. Welfare blacks never do. When's the last time a bunch of white trash rioted and tried to burn a city down here in the US?

Beaners are nearly as bad with the gangsta shit.

Being a racial minority if/when SHTF is usually not survivable. Think of your kids future. You really want them living in a place where they're like 10% of the population when a major crisis hits and the shitskins chimp out and start killing whitey like they always do?

>>128164443
I know someone who works two jobs yet still qualifies for food stamps.

Who pays the taxes?

>>128169725
Therefore who is the leech?

File: 1495107893767.gif (1MB, 250x244px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x244px

>>128164443
Whites account for under 12% of welfare, niggers 31%, asians 8%, hispanics 39%.
illegals account for over 71% of welfare programs usage.welfare is 1.3 trillion dollars each year.

>>128169264
This, but also the fact that they are confronted with different cultures so close to them. It basically creates a permanent culture shock in their own communities

>>128169264
I don't think it's that. That seems like an easy cliches, especially considering immigrants remain much poorer than them on average. It probably has more to do with the fact that a poor white community still has its advantages- decent iq, family structure, relatively low crime, homogeneous culture,etc

>>128169323
Um you haven't proven anything, you just said everybody in west-virginia is lower class. Thats dishonest and obfuscation. We should blame both. The problem is social class and although race is correlated, it is not the issue itself

File: 1491957198607.jpg (101KB, 640x781px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 640x781px

>>128167750
We wouldn't be living in ghettos but we certainly wouldn't have generated as much capital for growth in other areas as quickly as we had

We were initially a fairly agrarian society so given that our main exports were crops and grown goods, it only makes sense that without the cost of hiring workers, there was more capital flowing for other investments (into universities, technological developments, government taxation for projects).

The North only really grew in strength when automation became more common and allowed for wider profit margins on goods produced there with the raw materials from the South.

If I had to say what the US would look like without the initial economic boost of slavery, I would wager we would have acquired a lot less land through purchase and/or war since we wouldn't have had the cascading profit over time

(Less government dosh to buy land with/build an army, less ability to gain more land for expansion. Less expansion means fewer citizens overall and fewer goods being produced, less dosh for the government and businesses to collect on and re invest in more expansion).

I wager we wouldn't have acquired the Louisiana territories until later when the French lost the strength to hold it properly and their leverage decreased significantly. We probably wouldn't have fought with Mexico, or if we did we would have taken much less territory from them.

>>128169910
[citation needed]

>>128170379
>you just said everybody in west-virginia is lower class.
No, I've said that the West virginia average is equal to he black average.That does not imply that everyone in west virginia is poor, you fucking moron.It does imply, that, given the same socioeconomic status, a white man outscores a black one by 14 points.

neither of them are leaches compared to the rich and the ruling class, who are the biggest parasites in society, so who cares?

>>128169852
The question isn't if white people or black people are more of leeches on society, the answer is black people are more of leeches.

The question was that of the two demographics, whose leeches are greater leeches, and it's still the blacks simply because the cost of living in urban areas is higher as is their welfare.

Simple math and basic pattern recognition, guys

>>128165996
You ever been in a white trailer trash public school? Low IQ x 2 = low IQ retard delinquents

>>128170448
man that niggress must have a name

>>128170691
I've been searching for it for a while but have come up short.

My colonization sense tingles every time I post her

File: 1456696927927.jpg (80KB, 482x641px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 482x641px

>>128165996

>dat pic

>>128165312
>who do you think brought them over from africa?

Other niggers

>>128170312
This is not true in most western countries. Asian and middle eastern immigrants outperform lower class whites. The thing is most people with high IQ in the west escaped the lower classes with social mobility programs (affordable education mostly), and what is left is a genetic cesspool of mental disorders and addiction. In eastern europe it is different, but in the west welfare whites have none of those traits

>>128170448
Sweet baby Jesus, I do love oiled up and/or sweaty thick women in bikinis.

>>128164443
>>128164556
GAS THE KIKES
RACE WAR NOW

>>128169378
>Why would you think that?
Because cotton pickers isn't what USA was built on.

>>128164556
niggers are a plague on society. Whitetrash don't seem to be as prone to rape and gang violence compared to nigger. (Depending on what type of white trash, as in country trailer whitetrash or innercity wigger whitetrash)

>>128164443
niggers cause more damage to society. crime an all that

>>128168267
>>128170571
Read your own post?

>>128170843
>Asian and middle eastern immigrants outperform lower class whites.
And so do average whites. Moreover, these people constitute only a small minority of immigrants.
>The thing is most people with high IQ in the west escaped the lower classes with social mobility programs (affordable education mostly
I've already proven this wrong. Poor whites score fairly well.

>>128171103
>Read your own post?
You first, mongoloid. I shouldn't have to teach you how to wipe your ass

>>128171208
No hate on Finns.

>>128165312
>Doyouknowwherewearerightnow.jpg

>>128170978
The US's initial wealth WAS built on agriculture. That's what we were doing before we even declared independence. Everything in the country was to help ship raw resources to Britain, who would assemble them into goods and sell those back to us.

Our initial nest-egg was built on agriculture, it was only over time that we used the resources from that nest-egg (plus loans from the Treasury) to invest in a greater manufacturing sector that eventually led to the urban North becoming more powerful economically than the South which itself led to Abolition and the Civil War

The North and the government only went after abolition when they thought we were economically independent enough without the free labor of slavery

It's a damn shame welfare isn't in a credit system.

Could you imagine how great life would be if you owed money on everything you "owned".

>>128171593
>The US's initial wealth WAS built on agriculture.
Yeah, but they would still be fine without all that extra cotton.

>>128171764
Not sure if you're being sarcastic, are you saying it would be great for everyone else because true property ownership would be a stronger status than those who are on welfare and therefore don't own anything until they have paid it off?

>>128171996
I guess what I'm getting at is what everyone is too afraid to go right out and say it bluntly.

Wouldn't it be great if we had just continued to called it slavery?

>>128171107
>I've already proven this wrong. Poor whites score fairly well.

Yup. That's one of the reasons there used to be so much class mobility in the US. A family would go down for one generation, but they could claw their way back out if they worked hard. We were to the point where we nearly didn't have or need an underclass. Then they flooded the country with immigrants. Now we have a large pissed-off underclass and are setting ourselves up for some serious social unrest.

>>128171945
But nearly every crop was picked by slaves, given that a majority of the agriculture in this country was done in the South.
Why do you think slaves only picked cotton? That's just one of the most common ones that was grown in the US due to the climate and soil-quality we had. Slaves picked the tobacco and sugar too.

We would be fine but we wouldn't be the super power we are today since having wealth means you can re-invest to generate more wealth. Without that initial seed-capital generated from not paying the slaves, we wouldn't have been able to snowball in strength over the years as much as we had

>>128172351
We most certainly would be the super power we are today. We would simply have hired white laborers as the north did

>>128172166
It'd be called servitude since you could theoretically pay it off some day.

But yeah, it'd cut through a lot of the bullshit when people consider what it means to owe money to someone else.

Like until you pay off your dues, you can't pull extra money out for larger investments, you can't waste money as easily.

>>128165133
>Women spend 85% of their husband/boyfriend's money annually.
>Including everything from being too mentally incompetent to negotiate with a mechanic, to being pregnant and having tons of vaginal problems because they're too stupid to take care of themselves.

I want to see a graph like this made for who makes more money annually. Guarantee it will be males and correlate with how much women squander cash.

>>128172534
This, all the subhumans always spout this fake "competition" faggotry because they haven't realized kikes have given them the whole world at the expense of whites.

>>128172534
Yeah except the white laborers would have to be paid a ton.

Like almost half of the South's population were slaves in 1840. The South would have less than half of its working population if they didn't use slavery, and that's not including the economic cost of having to actually pay the white workers that were around.

So we would be at a disadvantage from a slavery-having South on at least two fronts: half of the population wouldn't be present and all the labor that would be done would have to be paid for.

That's a lot of capital and federal revenue you're losing

>>128171996
Don't mind>>128171764
He's just an idiot.

>>128172781
Not sure what you're saying, when do non-whites talk about competition?

>>128172971
No, they were paid dirt, and they didn't have to be fed, clothed, and taken care of in old age. They were simply permitted to rot when their use had come to an end.

>>128172619
So in a way, if those on welfare knew for a fact that they had to pay back the money they essentially "get for free" they'd be more conscious on what they spend their money on or invest their capital in.

Skip the credit system entirely and just educate them on how their money doesn't actually belong to them.

This would also mean that governments can sue their welfare recipients for wasting their money on drugs.

On top of that, lets make it a contractual obligation that you must recycle everything you borrow or face prosecution which will indefinitely increase your debt.

Don't lose hope, though, you might just be able to capitalize on that.

>>128172982
I'll take your word for it I suppose

>>128164556
>Niggers because this isn't their country

Literally brings the niggers from one side of the planet to here, then refuses to send them back.

This is why white-niggers aka welfare white trash and welfare crime niggers are the exact same thing.

File: f88ff0a29eee151b02661d9a8cd150b175e8dd59d63c3e3960a5501c93719125.gif (197KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 500x500px

>>128165996
Wtf is this shoa?

>>128173359
Except the white ones score 98 and have won nobel prizes
Nice try

File: tara-reid-beach-bod.jpg (50KB, 468x533px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 468x533px

>>128164620
Life comes at you fast man.

>>128172971
Also, on your second point: the institution of slavery itself had retarded the modernization of the south. An industrial south with half the population would probably have been a much greater economic asset

Justification of slavery is a simple question away:

How do we keep people working?

>>128173070
That is the whole "whitey can't compete" meme. They think they are actually equal to whites so it is competing to them when in reality they just ruin countries by being given economic opportunity that whites would be doing while also causing chaos. Subhumans are always acidic to the structure of white countries.

>>128173131
The north had a per capita income of about $141 where the South had a comparable income of about $101. A decrease to be sure but still in that area.

The cost of food and clothing are minimal when you buy in bulk. They didn't have to be taken care of, they were often just shot or killed when they couldn't work the fields anymore.

Are you making the argument that the South chose to breed new slaves for labor (therefore generating an initial sunk cost) rather than just hire immediately able-bodied white workers?

Business owners soon realized that even when rented from a planter, slaves cost significantly less than did their free counterparts. As historian Robert Starobin explains: "The cost of free labor … totaled about $355 per annum, including supervision. The annual average maintenance cost per industrial slave was … less than one-third the annual cost of wages and supervision of free common labors [sic]"

>>128164443
damn

she was so cute in van wilder

what happend to her?

>>128165996
im agefluid# as fuck
should i start date sjw daughters and tell them im #transage so its ok

>>128173843
I agree but my point is not that the South had it so great and were spoiled or anything.

My point is that the capital that was built up in the later 1700s and early 1800s (and the portion that was taxed) was paramount to the US being able to expand as quickly as it did.

Consider how much wealth was generated by the slave trade and how much of that was taxed by the federal government. Now consider how much extra wealth was eventually generated from the territories we acquired in the Louisiana Purchase.

The north only became rich because of the huge quantity of raw materials the South sold to be manufactured into goods. Without that massive number of raw materials (and the slaves and their labor that allowed for the expansion of the agricultural sector), the North would have had fewer resources to mechanize with.

>>128174110
>were often shot
Not really
>The South
"The South" didn't choose anything, the wealthy class did.
As for the rest, see>>128173843
Savings of 2/3 are nothing compared to the long term cost of slavery- postponed industrialization, a civil war, and a permanent lower class

>>128164443
Women are the worst of them all sucking the welfare, nigger and white trash men combined cannot compete with women on welfare.
>>128164556
>Their ancestors helped build it. Niggers have no reason to be here.
Negros picked cotton and it even if whitey had ancestors who did shit that is not an excuse for not doing shit.

>>128165312
>being this jewed.

>>128168472
>>128169024
>41 years old
I'm just only slightly really depressed now. feels like her nipple slip wasn't long agp and that got me well through jr. high

Living on borrowed time.

>>128174632
woah are you telling me going from a few hundred thousand violent niggers to more than 12 million was a bad idea?

>>128174596
This is speculation based on a false dichotomy. The choice wasn't betweenslave labor and no labor, the choice was between slave labor and more expensive white labor.

>>128174632
But my point is that the postponed industrialization, civil war and permanent lower class were only brought about after the usefulness of Slavery had run its course, but it was INCREDIBLY useful for the period before.

By the time those long-term costs had set in, a new and larger wealthy class was being developed in the North and West. But that larger wealthy class was a direct result of the initial surplus of Slavery-driven Agriculture

>>128164443
I know Tara Reid had a few botched surgeries, but that seriously has to be photoshopped. I mean, look at her arms, she looks like Angelina Jolie when she was anorexic.

File: 1474310074655.jpg (66KB, 680x538px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 680x538px

>>128164680
>>128165312
>>128166605
>>128166991
>>128169265
>>128169378
>>128174645
>>128173359
You can always tell when reddit is here

>>128164556
america is a mongrel nation desu your right is as good as theirs

>>128174996
check out that nigger sports thread with all the "breed to be physically stronger" or "bigger tibia bone" cucks.

>>128174999
Sure thing ahmed.

>>128174910
I agree. But not having slavery means you lacked the ability to literally grow labor as a prerogative.
Given that we bought and bred slaves as we needed them but that we can't do the same for free-commons laborers, I'm arguing that we would have had a much lower laborer population in the South in general. Less labor means fewer crops.

To add to that, those laborers would still have to be paid and supervised, arguably more than slaves since you (at least on paper) can't use violence to intimidate grown free-commons laborers to work harder or stay on task.

I'm arguing that the surplus dosh generated from the use of slaves, over the period where we were heavily dependent on the agricultural sector for our national wealth, was critical in allowing and motivating us to develop our Urban Industrialization and Western Expansion, both of which provided even more wealth to the US in the future

>>128174910
Dude, you're getting your ass blown out. Half of what you're saying doesn't make sense and the other guy is just completely destroying the argument you've been trying (but failing) to make.

Just take a break from the computer for a little bit.

>>128164443
White trash is at least white so they don't bother me as much. I'm not against taking care of poor whites.

Both are leeches though.

>>128174999
t. Moorish intellectual

>>128166666
First of all.... ^Check That

Second. Congratulations native born niggers. You are the only ethnicity lazier and who takes more assistance than your immigrant cousins.

Fucking Niggers.

Also: Build That Wall.

>>128175865
He doesn't want to admit that subhumans will always be a net drain on white countries no matter how hard they try. Niggers were never worth the future cost.

Incentivize slavery by calling it everything else.

That's real smart.

>>128169910
souce faggot

t. spic

>>128175865
Why not be specific instead of making general statements? It would make your half literate posts worth something.
>>128175655
Again, this would have been postponement at worst. The south, even during slavery, was inefficient and poorly managed, I doubt if a good deal of its labor wouldn't have been supplied by other means.

>>128164443
Military

>>128176155
I don't admit things that are demonstrably and empirically false.

>>128176599
It is false that niggers have been a net drain on america?

>>128164556
Holy shit the unawareness!

>>128176155
Also, he and I are having a fairly civil conversation, fuck off.

>>128176064
Nice. I didn't realise I had such an awesome GET.

>>128176684
No but the argument we were having was whether slavery (and by extension, bringing Africans to a country they didn't want to come to on their own) was paramount in establishing America's future strength and I am arguing it was critical.
>>128176564
Right, and I would say slavery allowed the South to power through its inefficient infrastructure and poor management given that any abuses or inefficiencies could be offset by the economies of scale that came from the expansion of those plantations.

I believe that they WOULD have found other labor sources but it would be labor sources they could not control or produce as readily as they could with people they literally owned and could command to do anything. It would be entirely up to them to bring in either laborers from the North (unlikely since Northern wages seemed to be comparable or bit more than those in the South) or immigrants (who would have been an even greater supervision sink, not to mention that at that point, the plantation owners would rather just have slaves for short term benefit).

>>128176564
Don't get mad at me. I'm just trying to tell you that you suck at explaining and debating shit. It's your fault you can't structure a coherent argument.

But honestly the other guys is hitting you with pretty reasonable arguments.
>My point is that the capital that was built up in the later 1700s and early 1800s (and the portion that was taxed) was paramount to the US being able to expand as quickly as it did.
> not having slavery means you lacked the ability to literally grow labor as a prerogative
>etc.

You're just saying bullshit.
>This is speculation based on a false dichotomy

You sound like a bitch. But dont take that too seriously. That just my opinion.

>>128164556
First post best post.

>>128177715
No need to be rude, just point out specifics of his argument where he could be more persuasive with particulars, or if he needs to explain the chain of causation of his theoretical.

No need to be a dick

>>128169378
>Most of the construction and economy was done by slaves

No it wasn't. Nice "narrative", too bad it's bullshit.

>>128177697
>bringing Africans to a country they didn't want to come to on their own
Weak and prisoners of war don't get a choice tho. It has nothing to do with them being African the slaves it could of all been Irish and it would of been better because we wouldn't have them committing 50% of all violent crime.

>>128178362
>Irish
>Not committing 50% of all violent crimes
Try again.

>>128178464
Well I never see on the news how a Irishmen robbed a store at gunpoint for a sack of potatoes.

What do capitalism and slavery have in common?

Was capitalism born out of slavery?

Are we trying to detach from the origins of capitalism by rewriting history?

Gosh the slave word is such a travesty.

Only if it could be deleted somehow.

>>128177715
What's bullshit about my statement? You still haven't posted anything of substance. You seem like a moron who just doesn't understand what I'm saying, especially considering you left half of it out. I'm sorry le ebil big words frightened you.
>>128177697
Yes, but the inefficiency was largely a result of that insitution. Without, I think they would have made great leaps forward after a temporary inhibition of growth. There's no doubt our growth would have been slower, but land acquisitions would have come nonetheless.

And even if some of them hadn't, I wouldn't be bothered. The war with mexico, for instance, was immoral.

>>128164443
Both are leeches. Meritocracy prevails. Race doesn't matter when deciding between individuals. Now if the Nigger is violent, then you might have something on table.

>>128164443
>welfare niggers
>or welfare whitetrash
Spic take more welfare than both groups, then take jobs on the side and don't report their incomes.

>>128178619
You haven't lived in Boston then.

Also they committed a HUGE number of crimes; then they assimilated into the rest of the population, became indistinguishable from other white people save for surnames and businesses stopped discriminating against them.

Also the Irish Mob is still fairly active on the East Coast, it just knows how to pay off the local authorities to avoid the spotlight.

That's like saying "I don't hear about Italian American crime on the news on the East Coast"

African Americans have been cannibalizing themselves since the 70s-80s. Had they established a formal mob, they might have risen to prominence like the Italians and Irish did

>>128179439
This, 150million spics took the jobs that white and black children would of been doing years ago.

>>128179107
That's an interesting idea. Why do you say that slavery promoted inefficiency in agricultural management and production? Do you think it's maybe a "Rubber Playground" scenario: The buffer to take abuses and inefficiencies was there so the plantation owners got used to it, whereas they would have been more savvy with management if their labor was more pricey?

That's an interesting interpretation. Also, can you forward me sources about Inefficiency in the South in the period before the Civil War? I just want to get a better idea of what sorts of inefficiencies were present

>>128169265
>Black people are humans
Top kek

>>128179277
>Race doesn't matter when deciding between individuals.
Not entirely true. Nigger offspring will have higher risk of ending up in welfare.

>>128180621
But he's saying that, if you consider how each race has a bell curve of the expression of different tendencies (physical athleticism, intelligence, sociopathy, etc), then anyone from a given race who meets a benchmark will succeed where those that fail to meet that benchmark fall into the 'leeches' category.

Not exactly related to the question of the thread but whatever

>>128164443
you'd think with all that sharknado money she could get those things fixed.

>>128180621
What if the Nigger leech has higher IQ than white trash?

>>128181188
>IQ is the only difference
POO

>>128181188
There is lower probably for that.

So what's it going to be?

Whips or bait?

You treat people like animals and... well... you get viciously torn to shreds by those same animals.

>>128164443
that is the most hideous..
why would someone waste their time to shop something so disgusting

>>128181684
>like animals
They are animals that stopped evolving hundreds of thousands of years ago.

>>128180073
Yes, precisely that. I first noticed this when reading biographies of some prominent southerners on wikipedia. It seemed that none of them could keep hold of his wealth. Later, I read Lodge's life of washington where I learned that it was almost a tradition for slave owning families to go bankrupt every other generation.

The preface to Lodge's book is a good intro to virginian society imo

>>128182012
That's actually what Tara Reid looks like these days. That's not shopped

>>128182335
How deplorable of you.

Close the trap, bait it is.

File: Untitled_e89485_5670302 (2015_09_01 21_09_01 UTC).jpg (72KB, 452x804px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 452x804px

>>128165312
Fuck off back to le plebbit, retard

>>128181481
Well IQ is the most reliable predictor of success of a
person known to mankind, roughly speaking. Higher IQ would make Nigger less likely to be on welfare than white trash.
>>128181558
I'm not asking you, I'm telling you that white trash has lower IQ than Nigger leech. Then, would you support the Nigger or white guy?

niggers obviously because they believe they deserve it for being enslaved. The white trash might still feel gratitute for their country.

>>128164620
More like sun- ripened mayonnaise.

>>128164443
anyone who leaches of their government is a cancer to their country.

>>128174843
>>128182567
Im 30 and dating a 40 yr old and shes 100% /fit/. If thats not a shop, Tera ried must have all of the AIDs cancer and meningitis in the world

>>128182520
Thanks for the source, I'll read into it.

The main inefficiency I could conceive of was that abused workers don't work as hard as well-treated, paid ones.

Why would the slave owning families go bankrupt? Was it how the money was handled or was it because they would use up the fertility of the soil for a year and they had to wait another year for it to return/?

>>128164556
The majority of replies speaks out in FAVOR of african americans
>is this the right timeline?

>>128182833
>I'm telling you that white trash has lower IQ than Nigger leech.
When you introduce multiple variable, then I can too.

the nigger leech's child will have higher probability of ending up as trash. So his IQ won't matter, especially if he fathers 5 children.

>>128183135
I wager she had shit genes and doesn't work out and did all the drugs and booze.

I mean looks at Lisa Ann...I wager I'd knock her into her 50s

Welfare is a virus.

No time to sanitize.

Run away as fast as you can.

>>128183638
Fair enough...I would've killed both. You see, I'm not racist.

Welfare niggers because they're less likely to get off it at some point.

>>128173737
That's what she gets for dumping Kevin so she could ride the cock carousel in college guilt-free.

>>128165312
natives came from siberia, tell them to go bitch to russia about stealing their homeland

>>128164443
Welfare niggers for sure judging by northern europe which was a kind of paradise until it got blacked and muslimed.

>>128183627
The southern ruling class was carefree and indolent. They did not regulate their slaves, they failed to manage their estates, and they lived beyond their means. Typically, they spent their days in leisure and their nights getting drunk.

File: 1496022682725.png (27KB, 476x541px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 476x541px

>>128184223
>I'm not racist.
This sentence means less and less to me over the years.

I realised being racist is just to be realistic about nature.
Some races are objectively better in some ecosystem niches.
Other races are objectively better in other ecosystem niches.

I don't even see the word as an insult anymore.

Also: Welfare is a catch all term defined as a system of receiving money from the government.

Sorry you're so narrow minded.

File: m560105a_P1MB6XL.jpg (121KB, 873x582px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 873x582px

>>128165996
>whitetrash can still do what only 10% of the world can accomplish, have white babies.

So it doesn't matter how capable the parents are of raising their kids? As long as a person is white, they should just pump out babies like a bunch of Tyranids, regardless of their individual traits?

>>128164443
Kelly anne conway is fucking hot

>>128165312
>My great-grandma was a Cherokee princess type

Fuck off, /pol/ is too hard on white trash

>>128164443
Niggers because they commit the most crimes.

>>128186074
White trash needs to be redefined because it lines up more with liberals,cuckservatives and useless bong niggers than actual "white trash" because not being cosmopolitanism scum seems to be the only real factor here.

File: 180px-SR-creature-Draugr_Female.jpg (14KB, 180x180px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 180x180px

She looks like a fucking draugr holy shit

>>128165312
You can tell when you're right because every reply was just Ad Hominem. Good call, nigger.

Here's a great question:

How do you bait someone out of a trap they've been convinced to call their home with the same bait?