But muh Chiiiiiiinnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaa....

>>128137668
And there are five times more chinks than Americans. Therefore China as a whole is much more responsible

>The average American is more than twice as responsible for climate change than the average chink
The average American is worth 5 chinks and 10 leafs. So we're ahead of the game.

>>128137668
It's also important to note that China produces a hell of a lot more than the Americans do. The Americans don't need to heat their houses, they don't need to produce chemicals, electronics, plastics etc for the rest of the world like the Chinese do. They're just wasting it because they're such lazy, fat pieces of shit that they have to take their big, crappy, inefficient cars everywhere they go. Americans are the fucking worst. They're literally destroying the planet by being fat pieces of shit. Their laziness has no bounds.

>>128137668
>2013
>US is going down for 5 years
>Russia is going up for 5 years
>China is ramping up for 10 years
Got a chart from this year?

>>128137847
using your logic africans should burn baby burn, considering there are like 50 countries in there each entitled to a usa amount of emissions

>>128137928
we're getting closer to the correct answer

>>128137668

>china produces 11 million kilotons of Co2 every year
>US produces 5 million

>HURR DURR US IS REALLY TO BLAME

Fuck off, nigger.

>>128137668
>Per Capita

>>128137668
Fucking idiot.They have a bigger land mass and more population.

>>128137847
>>128138350
>>128138182
>>128137928
Sometimes it's hard to tell. Are burgers retarded or just willfuly ignorant.

File: abhorrent post.png (714KB, 1440x1352px) Image search: [Google]

714KB, 1440x1352px

Can we ban every Canadian IP?

I honestly don't think I've seen a good leaf post in my entire life.

>>128138350
How do we stop the developing world? When they finally catch up, we'll be way past fucked as far as emissions go.

>>128137668
kill yourself shill rat

>>128137668
>per capita
Sneaky little kike. What is the population of China? faggot

>>128138516
nah, that last one you linked is probably very close to the correct answer

yes an average US citizens emits more than a country bumpkin rice farmer. America sincerely apologizes for it's citizens being to well off. You really don't know shit about the issue if you are pulling these stats to argue.

Why are you not talking about the rest of the greenhouse gases lol, because China produces 30% to the USAs 15% of greenhouse gases.

>>128138247
They should. When they industrialize they'll stop breeding like rabbits and get a semblance of civilization.

>>128138526
The good leafs are being washed out by the dems

I wonder why World Banks' data stops at 2013??

Really activates my co2 emitting almonds

>>128137668
CLIMATE SCIENTOLOGIST
FAGGOT SHILL

>>128138516
You do not live in a truly sovereign nation you euro trash shut your mouth and keep trying to steal our money.

How about this burgers:
Stop buying made in china

2016 data please?

File: problem solver.jpg (53KB, 763x600px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 763x600px

>>128138618

>How do we stop the developing world?

>>128137668
16 tons is an amazingly small amount for an entire country to put out. Thats the weight of like a medium sized delivery truck. A Semi weighs 40 tons.


The total weight of the atmosphere is 1,162,556,043,264,000,000,000 lbs.

Divide 32,000 lbs into that.

a piss in the ocean.

>>128137668
you do know china hasnt been measuring theyre populace for some time

theyre renowned for lying about their emissions

>>128139133
Guess you should have read the tearms and conditions before ratifying the deal burger. It's good to know the world is finaly waking up to the unreliability of the USA.

>>128139133

now it's settled >>128138516

Isnt it funny how almost no media give a single fuck about climate shit until Trump said he wont show up in that thing

>>128137668
>carbon emissions

nice meme
carbon isn't a pollutant
if you make it a pollutant and allow the government to regulate it in any form then you've given the government power to regulate everything

>>128137668
Leaf, just stop. China is an environmental basket case. Plus we don't care. The Paris deal is a scam. We pay the 3rd World to pollute, most of the money will be pocketed by tin horn dictators, they will cheat, and only the suckers in the west will drag down their own economies. Fuck off thank you.

>>128138526
I like memes!

>>128139380
show some hespect

>>128139361
ARe you talking about the Paris Agreement, because it was unconstitutionally passed by the king limp wrist with the 2/3 consent of congress. We never had the chance to as a country.

Virtually no amount of carbon emissions by humans matters.

File: Carbon-graphic-001.jpg (337KB, 1200x885px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 1200x885px

>>128137668

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions

Found the Hongcouver chink defending the homeland.

The only reason you show up lower than anyone is because there are over a billion of you slime.

Where is the proof that carbon emmissions of humans has any affect on the climate?

>>128137668

per capita

population of China = 1,382,710,000
population of U.S.A = 325,120,000

keep crying bitch nigger desu

https://www.carbonbrief.org/how-much-of-chinas-carbon-dioxide-emissions-is-the-rest-of-the-world-responsible-for


I'm sorry, what?

>>128140072
I'm sorry you don't like the way representative democracy works.

>per capita
>china has 3 times the population

Are you trolling or just this retarded

>>128140656

97% of scientists agree, mumble mumble mumble, you're an idiot, mumble mumble

>pollution is heavily tied to industry
>b-buh per capita!

Just ignore China's billion rural farmers diluting their numbers.

>>128137668
>derp derp derp
>>128138526
>>128140328
>>128140751
Op BTFO

>>128137668
>America's emissions per capita have been decreasing since Bush took office

Why do we need the Paris Treaty again?

>>128137668
>>128137668
>per capita
But in all seriousness, lets just put aside all the mercury and lead and arsenic and cadmium that the Chinese dump into their farmlands rendering their food inedible. Instead lets focus on the real killer, the CO2 that people breath in an out every day that does absolutely nothing but nourish plant life.

>>128137668
Where is the evidence of these numbers? We all know Jewggle is a fucking shill company. You think cause Jewggle says 16 metric tons that that's just it? No questioninv? Jewggle also says 90% of American inventors are/were black...

Faggots like you question nothing and then demand we recognize "SCIENCE!!!"

Science is the idea of questioning things

>>128138516
>Implying the solution isn't going to be an American Reich keeping the "developing" hordes from ruining the environment with fire and sword.

Resource wars and/or WWIII: this time there actually is a Holocaust will happen if 1/2 of the liberal belly aching about climate change is real.

The one child policy has already demographically killed China, so we just need to keep their peasants in the dark and stop making products in their nation and wait for the 1 woman per 10 men to lead to 9 angry men and civil war against the communist party or a massive population collapse. Either way, self cleaning commies.

The pajeets need to get into a nuclear war with pakistan

Middle east needs it's 10th crusade

Sub Saharan Africa needs Afrikaners again, Chinese ones if necessary, and a severe reduction of negroes.

The future if climate change is as pressing, rapid, and dangerous as (((climate scientists))) have been saying since the 60's with the idea that we'd be in another ice age by 1990 then the future isn't wind turbines (that kill birds) it's eugenics.

File: 0734a49.jpg (40KB, 630x340px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 630x340px

I would just like to remind everyone that the scientific academia relies on models that do not include correct amount of carbon outlet through bedrock via hydrothermic processes because it is not known accurately. Thus these models are not accurate as we do not know how the total amount of carbon that is coming into atmosphere.

Pic related but that is not me.

>>128137668
>carbon emissions
Who cares?
The only thing that actually matter is dumping chemicals and trace chemicals still present in emissions

>>128137668
Can't believe the amount of people defending US by falsely claiming that India and China are doing nothing to prevent climate change.

Did the big oil or Breitpart hire a army of trolls to spread this bullshit?

>>128137668
How can Americans be responsible for something that isn't real?

>>128138033
Don't you have a refugee to suck off?

>>128137668
>per Capita
That doesn't mean shit.

>>128142006
nah, by nationality
1 american = 10 chinese = 20 indians
hence, china and india are overpolluters and need to be culled

>>128142006
The Chinese aren't doing shit because that entire race of bug-like chinks believe culturally that if you can cheat and get away with it it's the other guy's fault for not catching you. India is still having a hard time getting it's peasants to stop shitting on the street.

>>128137847
Fpbp check mate tree huggers.

Why do people think that this agreement would change anything?


If you believe in and want to stop climate change-be the change you want to see. No one else would do shit about it regardless.

File: 1430406929001.jpg (25KB, 231x231px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 231x231px

>>128137668

>>128142296
But shitting outdoors is part of their culture.

File: 800px-Energy_intensity,_2003_and_2013.png (169KB, 800x458px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 800x458px

>>128137668
> But muh America!!!

The USA's energetic efficiency is close to the world average. Canada however is one of the worst.

Pollution / country / capita are bullshit measurements, it's emissions per gdp that counts, otherwise efficient economies will look more polluting than they are.

>>128142006
China's idea of recycling is throwing computer towers into a pit, lighting them on fire, then having some kids pick out the silver, copper, lead, and gold from the ashes.

Waste disposal is burning it in a hole. They have even done this in the US after opening now closed "waste disposal" companies citing "it's what we did in China".

Ignore the billion rice twice a week chinks who still think mao is the chairman in rural China and the per capita emissions for the industrialized population would be several orders of magnitude higher than any western nation. Mainly because they do not follow international or even their few internal environmental standards.

>>128137668
yeah and it's going up, Murica is going way down.

File: image.jpg (37KB, 603x452px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 603x452px

>>128137847
Could be a bait, but americunts can be that retarded

>>128142849
Stay salty that you're stuck with the bill for bribing poos to stop burning tires for warmth while the Muslims are going to establish the caliphate of France once macron surrenders to them.

You'd have unlimited free energy if you could just harness how hard Charles Martel is spinning in his grave.

File: gw-graphic-pie-chart-co2-emissions-by-country-2011.jpg (64KB, 840x610px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 840x610px

>>128137668
>America has twice the carbon emissions per Capita of China.
But we are talking about COUNTRIES, you lying little faggot, not individuals. Here is the graph you OUGHT to be showing if you weren't a Jew-shill propagandist.

>>128143121
using your logic, if china broke into 5 countries, then made a CU equivalent of EU; the problem is magically solved

>>128137668
>per Capita
bullshit metric to measure carbon emission
>being mad that the US tax payer isn't going to fund your bullshit feel good program that will cost trillions and the most optimistic projection is reducing global temperature by 1/10th of 0.01 degrees by the end of the century.

china and eurocucks can eat shit

>>128138247
>using your logic africans should burn baby burn
Seems like high carbon footprint technology. But yes they should start working at reducing their numbers.

>>128137668
And yet their gdp per capita is almost 10 times less than america's. Where does all that gdp go to, I wonder?
Yes, it is the industry. People live like shit so that the government can keep spending more and more on industry including coal factories.

>China has 5 times the us population
>Only half of China is urbanized as opposed to 82% of America
>China lies about their emission levels like they do everything else
Have fun being stupid.

>>128143121
how much of that chinese contribution is from carbon intensive industries being supplying the US

>>128138033

Cry more bitch

>>128138516
they are a country by manchildren for manchildren
explains quite a lot when you think about it that way

File: canadian.jpg (49KB, 500x669px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 500x669px

>>128137668

>>128142647
This numbers are utterly pointless in the world of the global trade.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPbpfqBsv3g

>>128137668
global warming. A scare industry worth an annual $1.5 trillion has been built on the notion that anthropogenic CO2 is responsible for unprecedented and catastrophic changes to the world’s climate. Yet the scientists promoting this hypothesis are a fairly small, closed shop who validate one another’s work in a process which has been nicknamed ‘pal review’ and whose response to criticism from dissidents is to bully them, smear them and have them denied access to mainstream science journals.

>>128143330
No, then the peoples republic of developed China would be unbelievable super polluters as the hundreds of millions of people in rural China no longer obfuscate how ridicoulsly destructive China's complete lack of manufacturing standards is compared to any other industrialized or industrializing country.

>>128143778

http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/chinas-carbon-emissions-report-2015

>About twenty-five percent of China's carbon emissions are caused by manufacturing products that are consumed abroad. These, so-called virtual emissions, which are "embodied" in international trade, lead to China having the world's most unbalanced virtual emissions trade with its emissions associated to exports being 8 times higher than its emissions associated with imports.

Since the EU is its largest trading partner most of the carbon shame goes to them, with the US in second place. So total, yank products may be around 7, 8 % or so.

File: 1399084530567.gif (4MB, 261x261px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 261x261px

>He fell for the "carbon dioxide is bad" meme

>>128140827
>It's not their fault because you buy things
Well by that token, it's not our fault because they make things so cheaply that we can't afford to make them ourselves in an environmentally friendly way.

>>128138247
>malaysian education
The logic is that using per capita emissions is ridiculous when talking about a country that has serious population problems.

You suggest nation states be all treated equal as if it's impossible to measure in terms of land mass or economic output

>>128137668

>per capita

so all those poor rice farmers living stacked ontop of eachotehr helped you make an argument?

>>128141392
>Save the rain forest guys
Ok cool I hear plants love co2
>No stop you're killing mum plants

>>128144651
you do know that energy production makes up for almost the entirety of CO2 emissions, right?
they can relocate the energy plants anywhere they want within the union
(hint: the EU already does that, where do you think the news of X country has 100% renewables/ zero carbon output comes from)

>>128137668
>America has twice the carbon emissions per Capita of China

like that fucking matters, chinese live in a confined space that is like 2x2 meter, its not a good measure

>>128144995
pre-answered for you
>>128143330

>>128144995
also, pre-answered for you
>>128142260
no need to be PC on pol

>>128139266
Also, who said they are allowed to spam the earth with 1.2 billion copies of themselves? They want to be four times more numerous than Americans, this means they can only use one fourth of the resources per capita for an equal footprint.

>>128137668
>measuring emissions per capita instead of people working in certain industries or per product created
i bet Africa has great emissions per capita too.
that's what happens when your people breed like rats and only a few actually produces shit.

>>128145436
>>128143330
This is not at all my logic.

>>128142006
Can't believe retards like you are trying to make America out to be worse than China or India based on per capita emissions disregarding that they have 5 and 3 times our population with only 50 and 30 percent urbanization respectively in comparison to our 80 precent.
Essentially with only a small portion of their country even responsible for those levels, they manage to just barely be under us by dividing it out over 5 times the population.

>>128143778
>supplying the us
They are made in china. I don't have any power over chinese environmental policies

>>128137668
>per capita

Fuck off

>>128146430
>I don't have any power over chinese environmental policies
yes, you do
don't buy

shut up jew

File: paris accord.png (162KB, 1045x1567px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1045x1567px

China accounts for 20% of the emissions recorded in the Paris agreement. The USA accounts for 17%.

>>128146246
Per capita is misleading because a lot of china is still very poor.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_ratio_of_GDP_to_carbon_dioxide_emissions

Measured by gdp, you can see that China's economy is one of the least efficient in terms of how much pollution is required to produce a dollar

>>128137668
Look up global greening
>research global greening
Look up global greening
>research global greening

>>128137668
>average American

Is not responsible at all. Not even Leo DiCuckrio is responsible despite flying his big polluting jet everywhere. Huge wealthy companies are responsible, companies that have the American and Chinese governments in their pocket.

There is nothing you or I can do to stop climate change. So stop trying to pretend that we're all at fault because we are required to drive cars in order to keep our jobs while some CEO pays a government employee two million so that they can continue releasing literal toxin into the air.

We all know the solution to climate change, but there's not a government on Earth, including Trump's, who is willing to fix it. So shut the fuck up and take your retarded propaganda with you.

File: chinaco2gdp.jpg (124KB, 732x850px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 732x850px

>>128137668

a fucking leaf


because its a fucking chinese scam


>goal of the EU drop of TOTAL EMISSIONS by 40% of the level from fucking 1990
>http://sec.europa.euclimapoliciesstrategies2030_en

>goal of the USA drop of TOTAL EMISSIONS by 26% of the level from 2005
>http://www4.unfccc.intndcregistryPublishedDocumentsUnited States of America FirstU.S.A. First NDC Submission.pdf

>Goal of China drop of TOTAL EMISSION INTENSITY by 60% of the level from 2005
>https://www.c2es.orgdocUploadschinas-contributions-paris-climate-agreement.pdf


>Emission intensity is tied to GDP, so when GDP grows the intensity shrinks automatically.
>China can keep their Emissions at the same level and it will shrink automatically, they can even increase their emissions by a modest amount as long as it stays below GDP growth.

>>128137668
>Per capita
>China has 1.3+ billion people and growing
>They are still polluting way more than the rest of the world

http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/science/each-countrys-share-of-co2.html#.WTGB2-vytQI

nice try though

>>128137668
I don't care how much carbon we shit out, I don't want to be involved in globalist tax schemes. Fuck off leaf, fuck off forever.

Who made an argument about China? Oh you are projecting again and straw-manning.. Whoa. You told pol. Dang.

>>128142647
Op is a faggot, but as for your graph it's not our fault m8 it's cold as fuck.

File: 1280px-Co2-2013-top40.svg.png (104KB, 1280x1506px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1280x1506px

>>128137668
Literally WTF are you talking about? Did you check the expiration dates on your syrup before you chugged it this morning?

>shill
>the thread

>chinks constantly complain having to wear masks due to the smog
>china known for being the kikes of the east and even kiking their own people
>china known for being incredibly corrupt

How fucking stupid must you be to believe that China doesn't have the most pollution in the world. le-saged

>>128147748
Fuckin this. The chinese solution to pollution is to fire and gulag the guy who reported it then hire some inner party member's son for 6 figures a year to get on the news every night and say "EVERYTHING IS FINE! POLLUTION IS WESTERN CAPITALIST LIES, GO BACK TO MAKING IPHONES NOW!!!"

Seriously, I beg anyone who doubts it to read chinese state run news. Im not even joking, the current chinese position on pollution is "the west is afraid of our progress and industrial might, go back to work."

File: 1494948983337.jpg (7KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x250px

>>128143105
>You'd have unlimited free energy if you could just harness how hard Charles Martel is spinning in his grave

>>128139173
The only way that would happen is with incentive. Either:
1. Trump makes China stop devaluing so their prices rise closer to ours, making it a better deal to buy American over Chinese for the small difference in cost
2. They refuse to stop devaluing so we put tariffs on all their stuff and they refuse to sell a lot here so you have to buy American

>>128146877

Do we have more like this, because I love this shit.

carbon is good
more plants
biosphere BETTER
warmer=more life
democrats are wrong about everything
cancel regulations and people get rich
:)

>>128140963
>>derp derp derp
fuck. off. back. to. reddit

File: carbonemissions.jpg (15KB, 249x249px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 249x249px

>>128137668

WOW WOULD YOU LOOK AT THAT
A CONSISTENT, DOWNWARD TREND THAT WAS GOING ON BEFORE THE PARIS AGREEMENT, WHICH HAPPENED IN 2016

HOLY SHIT WOW IT'S ALMOST AS IF AMERICA DOESN'T NEED TO GIVE MONEY TO EUROPE TO FIX IT'S CARBON EMISSIONS

>>128137668
>per Capita
Fuck off Randy

>>128137668
per capita

art majors arguing using statistics and charts always fails

>>128144094
Its "me go wee wee....."

One 900 pound American releases more methane than an entire African family.

>>128137668
>>per capita
fucking leaf

>>128139361
>ratifying
Oops you're retarded and don't know what that means.

>>128151778
except when said African family dies in the hot sun and bloat up and eventually pop.

>>128140328
thats 7711 Million tonnes from 1.2 Billion chinks
against 5425 tonnes from 330 Million Burgers
The chinks are almost 3/4 more efficient than the Burgers

WTH ?

File: 4ae.jpg (36KB, 599x449px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 599x449px

>>128137847
how can possibly burgers be so autists KEK

File: Hansen-12-6-10-figure-1.jpg (90KB, 980x494px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 980x494px

hmmmmmm? someone explain this one.

>>128152258
Cause half or more of the chinks live like rat during the great plague Hans ? Nein ?

>>128138516
I pretend to be retarded for those sweet American education (yous)

>>128152258
No one wants to live like them, hans; that's why they are burning more.
I'm actually glad that Trump pulled out; people should be allowed to do whatever they want, like shitting on the street, which burgers seem to be so opposed to.

FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

>>128139249
>per capita

>>128137668
It's funny when we use per capita on co2 but not in terms of total crime when talking of the united states.

File: tmp_22201-14949006573601498235833.jpg (31KB, 615x456px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 615x456px

>>128145227
>omg greenhouse gases are bad!

https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/12226

>NO NO NO I MEAN BAD IN THE CHARTS, LOOK AT THESE CHARTS SAYING THERES TOO MUCH CO2

https://www.cgdev.org/media/developing-countries-are-responsible-63-percent-current-carbon-emissions

>BUT MUH FEE FEES, I WAS TOLD HUMANS BAD PLANTS GOOD WHY WONT YOU GIVE MORE MONEY TO GOVERNMENTS FOR CORPORATIONS. THEY SAID THEY'RE GONNA SAVE US FROM EXTINCTION, NOT LIKE THOSE EVIL CORPORATIONS THAT CONTROL OUR POLITICAL SYSTEM AND WANT TO TAKE MORE OF OUR WEALTH!

>>128137668

Fucking leaf.

What media should not be consumed to conserve CO2? What friend should not be seen or trip that should not be taken to conserve CO2? What is the proper temperature in your house or workplace to conserve CO2? What should your diet be like to conserve CO2? What things should you not have to conserve CO2?

If you don't want CO2, go nuclear or solar. Don't want to do that? Fuck off and die in a hole because that is what you want the rest of humanity to do.

>>128143105
damn rekt

>>128140751
hmm why isn't anyone responding to this post? could it be that they are BTFO?

>>128152258
because 3/4 of the chinks are living without technology

The third world with it's overpopulation is shatting up the planet

>>128137668
I don't know, man, you may want to look at the trend on the fucking graph (YOU) posted.

>>128137668
Australia outputs more per capita, where is the call for them to reduce?

>>128137668
Meh i will be dead before we see any real consequences of climate change (if it is real)

>>128137668
Emissions per capita is a stupid fucking figure when you compare countries as different as the United States and China.

Emissions per unit energy produced is the important figure.

>>128140900
Nope. But you tried.
https://www.heartland.org/_template-assets/documents/publications/12-04-15_why_scientists_disagree.pdf

"The claim of a 97% consensus on global warming does not stand
up.

>>128137668
>per capita
not a meaningful measurement in this context

File: liberal_votes_create_pollution.jpg (650KB, 1600x1952px) Image search: [Google]

650KB, 1600x1952px

>>128137668
75% of our carbon footprint is from liberal areas- maybe liberals should just stop polluting the earth and blaming people in farms

File: 2PRG1spsojg.jpg (20KB, 306x306px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 306x306px

>>128147748
>>128148165
you check amount of coal/ gas/ oil bought and mined to get your co2 figures
how idiotic is pol actually

>>128144189
>No curvature of the ocean line
Flat earth deniers BTFO

>>128137668
Thank you, Andy Chan, you have shown me the way

Clearly the country with smog covering it half the time is the smaller polluter.

>>128137668
go suck a dick

>>128137668
CO2 is not a pollutant

>>128137668
>2013

>>128137668
The planet doesn't care about per-capita.

>>128137668
>per capita

What a useless metric for this topic

>>128137668
>leaf
I can't wait for the day of the rake, this site has made me unironically hate leaf people, shitposting buzzkills. Leave it to the fucking aussies, faggot.

I can't believe that there are so many people falling for this retardation. Obviously this is an excuse to cap our production and give the developing world a free pass.

File: A FUCKING LEAF.gif (135KB, 960x200px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 960x200px

>>128137668
>per Capita