Why are the globalist carbon tax shills so afraid to discuss the actual data? Cognitive dissonance?
>>128047527
What is accounting for the historic spikes in CO?
>>128047527
If you line up those two graphs, you'll see that the temperature went up first, then the CO2 levels rose.
Therefore, CO2 is a reaction to increased temperature, not the cause of it.
>>128048119
believe it or not, planets are not like a stable temperature controlled apartment, there are always fluctuations
more C02 get released as temps rise (NOT the other way around)
temps are controlled by a plethora of factors from orbit position, sun activity, oscillation, sunspots, land mass movement, volcanic activity etc. etc. etc.
of total CO2 released annually, man accounts for about 3%
oceans and organic decay are the top two contributors many times over
>>128047527
and they get this very accurate data from the quran i suppose?
>>128049679
what in the fuck is that even supposed to mean?
It's such a scam. Tax a bunch of people. And then when nothing happens they will say it's because we taxed people. That caused nothing to happen. When in reality nothing was going to happen anyway.
>>128047527
fuck off oil shill
notice the carbon tax shills avoid discussion of the actual data like the plague
>>128051363
case in point
K
>>128047527
Oil and coal shills back at it again with the "b-b-b-but muh oil and coal companies gonna pay heavy taxes!" shilling
>0.02 cents have been deposited in your accounts
Could anyone post links to some scientific papers published on the subject rather than random graphs with no description or interpretation?
>>128049323
True, it is called a positive feedback loop. When there is a big enough rise in temperature, greenhouse gassen can get released. This then continuous to increase the temperature. To see the science, watch this:
https://youtu.be/zQ3PzYU1N7A
>>128047527
CO2 is already nearing levels of saturation
the relationship between CO2 and temp increase is logarithmic and it's all but plateaued -- with each doubling of CO2 the corresponding temp increase is ever smaller
it's not global warming, it's global greening
since the 1970s Earth has gained a continental increase in greenery
>Royal Society Global Greening climate lecture
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5M1qtN62yk
>articles
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth/
https://phys.org/news/2017-05-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-global-greening.html
Carbon narrative is a scheme for world government.
We should fight pollution and bad environmental policies, not the goose chase which is carbon warming.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQwHi3VxOww