Tips on Debating Leftists?

>>127996202
Best tip: Don't waste your time

>>127996548
Surprising that /pol/ thinks they're so smart yet don't have any examples of owning lefties.

>>127997592
>arguing with people who are substantially less intelligent than you

watch one of jordan peterson's videos where he talks to an entire crowd of people that disagree with him. it's basically a real life reddit debate scenario. don't waste your time stupid. stop trolling yourself

you have to go back

File: lefties 345345345.jpg (58KB, 667x741px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 667x741px

>>127996202

why waste time and energy with trying to reason with literal mental degenerates ?

better put yo time and energy into constructing resistance and fighting FOR freedom ( not against something ).

alternatively : ridicule them.

git gud fagit

File: poland pepe smug.jpg (220KB, 735x790px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 735x790px

>>127997592
That's not how it works, senpai. Leftists aren't rational. You can go line by line through actual hard data to debunk all their ideologies and show that our ideas are correct, and it'd all run off them like water off a rain coat.

There's no point in debating leftists. You meme at them and bully them.

>>127996202
Ben Shapiro wrote a book about it
https://www.amazon.co.uk/How-Debate-Leftists-Destroy-Them-ebook/dp/B00JRJQ7Z2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhdUHVJ1F6o

My only complaint about Shapiro is he frequently pulls the 'muh holocaust' all to often

>>127996202
Debating doesn't work. Instead, try to troll and no-platform them.

>>127996202
also is this your pic OP? you should have told shimmy that the bell curve was published in 1994, not the 19th century. that's literally all you needed to do to own him but instead you started to argue some stupid semantics shit. typical reddit argument. go back stupid

>>127998465
>>127998465
Just make them feel bad about themselves and their unjust policies.

>>127996202
terrible argument.

instead of clearly stating the scientific evidence for the mean differences between subsaharan africans and europeans/east asians you instead attacked the claim "race is a social construct" with "oh yeah well in that case all taxonomy is a social construct"

Does your rebuttal show what you really originally wanted to show?
No. at best it says "your rebuttal is dumb" but fails to say why your original insinuation is right.

easy to shrug off. to an onlooker it does not look like you won.

File: 1496327749736.png (689KB, 1891x4901px) Image search: [Google]

689KB, 1891x4901px

semantics are such an ignorant persons argumentation. i have only seen people do it if they aren't familiar with the subject at all with the related studies/books to cite. instead this is replaced by media articles, argued from a position of authority, and then semantics are used to detract from any intelligent discussion. it's defining pseud behavior of which reddit is plagued with

True story arguing with pack of lefties:
>transgenderism is mental disorder because the suicide rate is 41% and in fact after the surgey the rate of suicide increases and does not help them
>but it's because of the systematic bullying of telling them where they can and cannot piss
>no, jews in nazi germany (Shapiro kike stats I know but it's supposed to work on these retards) had the only comparable suicide rate
>yes because the nazis wanted to attain aryan and if you didnt fit in you were not included

It is actually impossible to reason with them, that and during this argument "WOW, where did Nazi Germany come from, that has NOTHING to do with this argument" came up. They think with emotions and it is impossible to reason with them