Out of Africa theory BTFO

>>127959954
>7.2 million
Jesus christ.

TWO "pro-Europe" stories in a week. I'm starting to get suspicious. A third will make me paranoid. A fourth will confirm it.

>>127959954
Sahelcuckthropus BTFO

>>127959954
BUT WE WUZ KANGZ!!! *steals a car*

*assaults an individual in a MAGA hat*

WHITES IS A SUB SPECIES!!! WE DA ORIGINAL!!!

>>127959954

And this does what exactly?

>>127960778
That human life didn't start in Africa

>>127960778
If true lefty faggots can't say we are all niggers from africa

>>127960778
we didn't come from niggers we are our own superior race of beings

File: bane fish.jpg (31KB, 750x545px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 750x545px

>/pol/ tries to science

The Out of Africa theory refers to the idea that modern humans, ie homo sapiens sapiens, evolved in and left Africa.

This discovery is about the original homo splitting off from other great apes.

You're several million years off from disproving out of Africa.

Fuck's sake Neanderthals are literally named after a place in France, homos existing outside Africa is not a new discovery and has fuck all to do with disproving OoA.

How many times do we have to have this thread? The find says absolutely nothing about the origins of homo sapiens because it dates from several million years prior to the earliest human remains.

Some little monkey fellas made their way to land that would later become Europe, wow.

File: FB_IMG_1491938623916.jpg (13KB, 460x383px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 460x383px

>>127961322
NO WE WUZ KANGZ! EVERYTING WHITEY DUZ IS IMMITATION OF THE ORIGINAL MAN! THE BLACK MAN FRUM AFRICA! THOSE "SCIENTISTS" WHO SAY EVOLUTION STARTED SOMEWHERE IN MODERN BULGARIA ARE JUSSSS TRUMP LOVING RACISTS BCUZ WE WUZ KANGZ NIIIAAAAGGGAAA!!!

I can't think of the proper theory name, but there was a theory that mankind basically evolved in their own isolated groups, across the world.
That's always made sense to me, I don't know why 'out of africa' is pushed hard, especially after Mungo man.

>>127961642
>>127961567
The title was more of bait. I'm not too well versed on genetic origins, but I thought the article was worth discussion.

Doesn't Out of Africa indicate that since Black people are the progenitor, they should have the highest capacity to evolve their children when bred with other races?
When in reality, when you look at the single mom thread a few hours ago, whenever they breed with another race, the children will always be black.

The theory must have its root in old views that Africa is the origin of all life because wilderness and primitive civilizations and shit a few hundred years ago compared to Europe, and to top it off they wanted to get religious people who believe in Adam and Eve to bite.

>>127961322
>99% DNA shared with chimps
different species
>.14% variation between humans
one race; the human race

that's not what this discovery suggests

>>127961664
>I don't know why 'out of africa' is pushed hard, especially after Mungo man.
Probably because it's been scientifically proven with genetic markers and shit.

And a quick google of the Mungo shows that they rechecked the DNA a few years later and the short version is it was an aborigine, and the long version is the only reason they thought it ever evolved separately was because it tested as having different DNA than aborigines, but upon further testing, it turned out the sample was just contaminated by modern European DNA, ie someone fucked up.

>>127961567
this
that is why niggers are so unevolved, they are primitive versions of us

>>127961664
>mankind basically evolved in their own isolated groups

that's nonsense. isolated species do not evolve into the same species.

>>127962237
Yakuum would disagree.

>>127959954
Europe is the birthplace of humanity? That means it belongs to everyone!

File: b437fa5c1449d0aef4f2a04f720e179252b1c8a777c81d91799d1c8aafea1159_3966575.jpg (156KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1600x900px

WE WUZ
http://news.sky.com/story/egyptian-mummies-have-european-and-turkish-dna-scientists-10898867

>>127961567
Lol I just find this shit pretty entertaining and a pretty good meme. The ancient Chinese were redheaded caucasians, humanity originated from Europe. Good bantz man.

>>127961322
Doesn't that mean blacks evolved out of us then?

>>127962256
...they knew it was aboriginal to begin with. It challenged the out of Africa theory, 'Modern man' probably started as aborigines that then moved up through Africa

>>127962237

> .14% Variation

Lewontin's fallacy

>>127960778
Proves niggers aren't human.

>>127962293
When they interbreed they do

>>127959954
ANCIENT ARYANS

>>127962237
If 1% is the difference between a human and a chimp, then .14% is pretty huge.

>>127963025
viably interbreeding species essentially have to have common ancestry

>>127962801
>'Modern man' probably started as aborigines that then moved up through Africa
No, no it did not.

What the fuck gave you that idea?

>A fossil of a modern human dated to 54,700 years ago was found in Manot Cave in Israel, named Manot 1,[18] though the dating was questioned by Groucutt et al. (2015). Fossils from Lake Mungo, Australia, have been dated to about 42,000 years ago.

>>127959954
Its probably why slavs act like niggers, we are all descended from slavs SHIIIIIIIIET

File: estryukjhggbf.jpg (104KB, 640x616px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 640x616px

>>127959954
DICKWASHERS BTFO

>>127961175
>>127961175

>English is their mothertongue

>>127961290

So then Africans are Europeans.

>>127961322

No silly fatman. This means Africans are Europeans.

>>127962738
>"evolved"

>>127960778
It means that Jews can say, "see everyone wuz once European!! We wuz all European. Europe for all :)"

>>127962970

Except science does exactly that silly kid.

File: 1492734819866.jpg (13KB, 227x225px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 227x225px

>>127963046

>>127963997

So are you not of European origin lardo?

>>127963458
>t-that fossil was the very first one to live there!
I had read somewhere that aborigines and Pacific islanders have unique mitochondrial dna, and that and Mungo man made researchers question out Africa theory

File: koko's IQ.jpg (1MB, 1152x1329px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1152x1329px

>They didn't cross the Saharan desert and thus didn't mate with Neanderthals nor Cro-Magnon.

>Literally sub-human.

File: 1469669833724.jpg (130KB, 845x403px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 845x403px

>>127959954
This is old-news. The Out-of-Africa meme was long-debunked before this 'new evidence' was submitted.

>>127960778
Evolution theory and out of Africa theory have taken a huge blow and should not be taught in elementary school anymore

>>127961664
The gods seeded the earth with different human types in different areas.
Its a part of the game.

>>127962738
>>127961290
>>127961322
Even IF this race of humans actually became homo sapiens later down the line (which is highly unlikely), we still have nothing to indicate that homo sapiens wasn't concieved in africa, since that is where the earliest skeletons of our race has been found.

trust burgers to be scientifically illiterate.

The whole out of africa thing does t really imply we are all black.. just that humanity started in africa.. why u guys so obsessed with skin color??

>>127962276
Not how it works u fucking stupid white trash american.

>>127959954
>7.2 million
>literal monkies

The genus homo is only 2 million years old. Furthermore there were multiple out of africa waves, including the first one which was with H. Erectus who is a predecessor for both Neanderthals and Humans. Europeans have been trying to prove for literal centuries that humanity originated here, but all evidence points to the opposite. Furthermore Neanderthals, abeit having white skin, were retarded as a rock and prolly almost as dumb as current day niggers. The proof for this is that their material culture doesn't evolve for ages only until they are exposed to H. Sapiens.

tl;dr: it doesn't matter where man originated from because if we evolved from niggers, how come there's still niggers?

File: dinos.png (734KB, 700x459px) Image search: [Google]

734KB, 700x459px

>>127959954

Humans are BILLIONS of years old and are NOT NATIVE to Earth. Here is merely SOME evidence (though DEFINITELY not ALL of the evidence) suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago:

* A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago
* A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years
* Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old
* Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years
* Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years
* Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years
* An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years years (eoliths -chipped pebbles, thought to be the earliest known tools- at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old).
* A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years years
* Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy
* Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years
* Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years (end of part 1)

>>127968430


(start of part 2) Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years.
How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of:
* Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years
* An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years
* Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old
* More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago
* Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years
* Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years
* An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago
But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years.
There's still more.

>>127968449


(start of part 3) In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years.
In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints.
In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations.
But some other discoveries do.
In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today.
In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age.

>>127968476


(start of part 4) A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old.
In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old.
On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old.
Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries.
According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years.
In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago.

File: stasisgiant.jpg (556KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

556KB, 1200x1200px

>>127968494

(start of part 5) What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species. (end)

>>127968533
Yeah I'm an archaeologist and I'm calling bullshit

File: kangz.png (359KB, 500x572px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 500x572px

any day i get to post this is a good day

>>127959954

Suddenly /pol/ acknowledges Greece and Bulgaria as part of Europe.

File: nampafigurine.jpg (11KB, 311x197px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 311x197px

Gentlemen, I present to you the Nampa figurine (placed next to a coin for size comparison). The Nampa figurine is a tiny figurine made of clay found in 1889, when workers were drilling near Nampa, in southwest Idaho.

“The record of the well shows that… they had penetrated first about fifty feet of soil, then about fifteen feet of basalt, and afterwards passed through alternate beds of clay and quicksand…down to a depth of about three hundred feet when the sand pump began to bring up numerous clay balls, some of them more than two inches in diameter, densely coated with iron oxide,” geologist of Boston Society of Natural History, George Frederick Wright (1838-1921) reported in his book “Origin and Antiquity of Man” (1912).

The Nampa figurine appears to be of a female human and was discovered at a strata dated to about 2 million years.

File: abo-vs-slav.jpg (13KB, 288x240px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 288x240px

>>127968064
>Dhimini Skull found in Georgia is 1.8million years old and completely blew the fuck outta the whole homo erectus cult years ago
cling on to your tree little monkey, hate those white people all you want time tells the truth

>>127968893
>Dhimini Skull
Dmanisi skull* fucking foreign names speak english

>>127968592
Ha, fpbp.

File: 1496104617240.png (383KB, 500x701px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 500x701px

>>127968592
you are a liar who peddles leftovers

>>127968840
that thing spooks me, it really does.
like, dont look into its eyes

>>127968064
If dogs evolved from wolves, why are there still wolves? Fucking dumbass...

File: coin.jpg (19KB, 260x242px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 260x242px

A coin with curious and indecipherable inscriptions was discovered in Illinois in strata that would date it between 200,000 to 400,000 years ago. The finding was reported in 1871 by William E. Dubois of the (((Smithsonian Institution))). What makes this coin so significant is what Dubois said about it - he described the UNIFORM THICKNESS of the coin and concluded that it must have "passed through a rolling-mill; and if the ancient Indians had such a contrivance, it must have been pre-historic." Pic related (it's a depiction of the coin).

File: miracles .jpg (92KB, 1628x828px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1628x828px

But didn't that one nigger with a big head create white people in Egypt

File: three young bulls.jpg (169KB, 1220x1002px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1220x1002px

>>127969214
idk

>>127968893
Lmao all the humanoid fossils we found pre-dating humans can fit in two shopping carts.
>Implying we'll ever know the full story
>Implying it matters because niggers are still a problem

>>127969034
>Date rock
>oh shit the rock is millions of years old
Also some of your sources refer to 1852, top kek

>>127969157
>Implying niggers ever got domesticated

>>127969136

Dunno if it has eyes, bruh. In any case, I doubt a hunter-gatherer made that figurine since hunter-gatherers, well, hunt and gather. Hunter-gatherers are in the business of survival, they don't have the time to engage in works of art.

>>127959954
Considering the shifting of the continents and the various ice ages that have happened, it is literally impossible (and also pointless) to tell which exact piece of land we originated. Plus, it was aliens.

Which means black people evolved from white people? I've always wondered which came first.

File: 1401840273560.png (251KB, 980x595px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 980x595px

>>127969214

WE

>>127969202
Sauce on that? Seems interesting

>>127969321
It turns out hunter-gather tribes only need to put in 20 hours a week of work to survive.

>>127969424

Black people evolved from monkeys / gorillas / whatever they look closest to in regards to region.

White people?

Go read the emerald tablets of thoth. Explains much.

>>127969294

>Also some of your sources refer to 1852

That makes it MORE credible, NOT less! Why? Because there was less (((censorship))) in 1852 than there is now. Also, 1852 was 7 years before Darwin published his theory of evolution to the public so archaeological evidence of extreme human antiquity from before Darwin's theory of evolution is not coloured by Darwinist bias.

File: Next_level_leftism.png (204KB, 500x873px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 500x873px

>>127969256
>>127969214
Just going to assume he's white due to his geographic location, and by white I mean under his hair or whatever would be roaming back then.

>>127969519
Can you give me a quick summary? I'm too lazy to do research.

>>127969496

It's in the book 'Forbidden Archaeology' by Michael Cremo and the late Richard Thompson.

>>127969557
You enjoy your wonders of the industrial revolution, I'll just stick to modern tech.

>>127969294
there were until some retards decided to give them equal rights...

File: V5jqyY7JcwB2Jt2sCY.jpg (77KB, 600x565px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 600x565px

>>127969294
>moving the goal posts
>implying you weren't buttblasted wrong
>Europeans have been trying to prove for literal(!) centuries that humanity originated here, but all evidence points to the opposite
lol the opposite of europe?
your anti-white bullshit is so blatant and old, die already you white hating cuck

>>127969644

I'll do both, pal.

File: 1488083525486.png (48KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 800x800px

>ancient humans looking more and more realistic

Its a odd feel.

File: lascaux-horses.jpg (32KB, 400x293px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 400x293px

>>127969321
>they don't have the time to engage in works of art

Really? Coz in my view white people when they were hunter gatherers made some the greatest art fucking ever

>>127969568
The interesting thing about Nation of Islam is that the same idea comes from some interpretations of Summerian mythology.

Enki, created Enkidu(the one from Gilgamesh, except in original it's in plural form, ergo there were many Enkidu - for our purposes you can call them white people) who as opposed to simple people(niggers) and their overlords(jews, Gilgamesh was one of them) was much more capable and independent from Enki's control.

>>127962293
common ancestor spread OoA not homo-negro

File: (((eightteen))).jpg (76KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 640x640px

>>127969644
El Graeco is the oldest known potential hominin. He is several hundred thousand years older than the oldest potential pre-human from Africa: 6–7-million-year-old Sahelanthropus from Chad,” Spassov stated as Seeker reports"
>I'm an archaeologist
>Belgium is a real european country

>>127969705
Do you think whites are more evolved than niggers? or less evolved. Because I'm pretty damn sure we're further evolved than niggers. keep in mind that archaeologists and historians are usually conservative by nature. That's what studying old culture clashes does. You can't unite two cultures or people, because in the end all it comes down to is a competition of genes.

>>127969740
Forbidden Archaeology is a bad book and you should feel bad. It tries to discredit Darwinism, which is amusing at first, but it gets stale fast.

>>127969596

The Great Pyramid exists at the center of the planet's land mass.

All ancient megalithic structures can be directly traced back to the great pyramid upon lines that intersect across the planet and all lead back to the original pyramid in egypt.

Thoth was part of an ancient race of highly evolved humans that existed before the great deluge, which destroyed ALL of the nations of the world at the time. He was given a mandate to re-civilize the planet after the deluge had receded, and he did, beginning with Egypt.

It is thought that the ancient sites we found all over the world were created in homage to Thoth, as he gave out individual replicas of his original emerald tablets to disciples who then left to try and raise up the new humans all over the world.

Supposedly, Thoth is an immortal, and has volutarily 'died' three times already. He is currently "dead" and has promised to rise again.

TLDR White people are part of an ancient anti-diluvian race of advanced humans and survivors of a world wide destruction.

We're being kept in the dark about it because to have this as public knowledge would destabilize the planet and cause massive riots and killings of white people by the inferior races.

>>127959954
>Mankind

keyword in all of this

>>127969991
>Chad
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>127968064
its like im back in 1990, read some current findings, grandpa

>>127969991
Got sauce? Can't find anything on El Graeco.

File: Tejha5XRB9xLQdHyuxyGBei_GKk.jpg (69KB, 532x461px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 532x461px

>>127970066
this obscurantism bullshit, back peddle more you fucking belgian bitch resorting to we're all white in the end arguments. you couldn't keep the goalposts still if you tried

>>127959954
I always suspected that niggers were a degeneration from something better

Never believed we humans evolved from a subspecies of monkey

>>127959954
This is more intriguing than the average /pol/tard could understand.
Sub-Saharan Africa has huge genetic diversity. Groups of people there are genetically farther away from each other than from europeans and asians. They were full of various early humans interbreeding with each other and creating huge amounts of different human groups.
The idea of multiple hominids evolving around the same time on possibly three different continents (Australia) and overflowing in one (Africa) is pretty difficult to explain.
It was aliens.

File: get.png (731KB, 866x593px) Image search: [Google]

731KB, 866x593px

>>127970243
you fucking retard it's literally the article of the thread! And I quoted that it's in Seeker Reports!
>I'm an archaeologist
>I do real research durrr herr

>>127969875
Man, religion really has a way with twisting stories and fables into fucked up shit. I really pity these people to be so damn gullible.

>>127960778
Proves the theory of devolution.

>>127970066

>Forbidden Archaeology is a bad book and you should feel bad.

The bibliography of Forbidden Archeology is SO BIG that it could be ITS OWN BOOK. Forbidden Archaeology is THE GREATEST BOOK OF ALL TIME and I feel good, Belgcuck.

>It tries to discredit Darwinism

No it doesn't. Darwinism discredits itself. Next! :)

File: 1496247668793.jpg (71KB, 590x713px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 590x713px

>>127970465
James Cook took his third journey on July 1776, taking sailboats Resolution with the crew of 112 people and Discovery with the crew of 88 people. He sought to discover the way in the North-East, connecting the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. He searched for the shortest sea route from Europe to Asia. Along the way, Cook’s ships have discovered the Hawaiian Islands and reached the Bering Strait after two years. In autumn, the ships could not sail further because of ice and decided to come back for supplies and ship repair in the Hawaiian Islands.

Hawaiian natives met travelers with respect. They thought that their mythical generous god has returned. James Cook was unable to satisfy their expectations. He asked for some food of the natives and in such a way impoverished them. When sailors decided to leave the natives after a month, the natives were happy to let them go. Strong winds forced the ships of James Cook to come back and some sailors were sent to inform the natives about their visit, but they were disappointed to know that the natives decided to cease all the contact with the visitors.

File: 452b34899c7fb.jpg (63KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 800x533px

>>127970465
>>127970736

On February 14 1779, the British noticed that one of their boats was stolen. James Cook has ordered for his troops to go on and destroy some canoes and take hostages. Accompanied by armed soldiers, James Cook himself has decided to pay a visit for a local tribal chief. There was an unpleasant scene when Cook has decided to force the chief to come into the boat, provoking the tragic fate of captain himself.

Cook’s death is described in detail by Lieutenant James King. According to him, James Cook foresaw that it will be impossible to take the chief as a hostage without bloodshed. That is why he decided to come back to the boat. Sailors have started shooting at the natives and managed to kill some of them. Hawaiian natives, armed with spears and stones attacked the English sailors.

“Our unfortunate commander stood near the water. While he was looking at the attackers, no one dared to touch him. When he turned to stop his crew shooting at the natives, he was wounded in the back and fell into the water. The natives quickly removed him from the water, dragged on shore and started stabbing his body,” – wrote Mr. King.

Charles Clark became the commander of expedition. He sought to retrieve the remains of James Cook from the natives. After his tries were unsuccessful, he decided to use force. Troops and sailors climbed from the ships upon the cannon fire and managed to defeat natives and destroy their village. The natives were afraid of English retaliation and brought a casket of meet and a skull. This gave way for a legend that Captain Cook was eaten by the natives. It may be the truth that they have managed to eat some parts of Captain because the natives were doing the same with their defeated enemies.

On February 22 1779, the remains of James Cook were buried according to marine traditions in the sea

File: dec-17-1773-cooks-crew-killed.jpg (43KB, 615x450px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 615x450px

>>127970736

In Between worlds, Anne Salmond describes the scene:

Nearby on the beach they saw about twenty food baskets tied up. When they cut these open, they found them packed with roasted meat and fernroot, still warm from the fire. Burney hoped that this might also be dog’s flesh, but soon they found more shoes and a hand tattooed ‘TH’. This was unmistakeably the hand of Thomas Hill…. Behind the beach they saw a circle of freshly dug ground about four feet in diameter, almost certainly a haangi, or earth oven.
The crew hurried back to their launch and rowed to Grass Cove, where they found hundreds of Māori gathered. Some of the crowd taunted the marines, but quickly dispersed when shots were fired. On the beach they found one of the cutter’s oars and ‘such a shocking scene of Carnage & Barbarity as can never be mentioned or thought of, but with horror’:

Dogs were chewing at the discarded entrails of four or five men, and they found the eyes, hearts, lungs, livers and heads of their comrades … various feet and Rowe’s left hand (identified by its scarred forefinger) roasting on fires or scattered on the ground.
Burney’s crew had probably interrupted a whāngai hau ceremony, in which the participants consume the spirit of an enemy (and his ancestors). The crew quickly gathered up some of the body parts and hurried back to the launch, firing some parting shots and destroying three waka on the beach. The Adventure sailed early next morning.

Although nobody knows why the Europeans were attacked, Burney concluded that there was probably no premeditation. There had been a few minor incidents and misunderstandings in the preceding days. Jack Rowe, who had previously tried to kidnap local people at Ūawa (Tolaga Bay), may have started a quarrel that got out of hand. Returning to the area three years later during his third voyage to the Pacific, Cook resisted the urgings of his men to take retaliatory action and even hosted Kahura in his cabin.

>>127970709

* The bibliography of Forbidden Archaeology is SO BIG that it could be ITS OWN BOOK.

File: 0028b64cdf1f8.jpg (56KB, 800x527px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 800x527px

>>127970736
>>127970803
>>127970929
james cook read about it
https://nzhistory.govt.nz/ten-crew-of-cooks-ship-em-adventure-em-killed-and-eaten
http://jura.diena.lt/en/news/other/is-it-true-that-captain-cook-was-eaten-by-aborigines-407046

File: iceagemap.png (544KB, 853x440px) Image search: [Google]

544KB, 853x440px

The red parts of this map used to be land. Daily reminder that sea levels around the world were 400 feet lower just before the end of the last Ice Age.

Near the end of the last Ice Age 12,800 years ago, a giant comet that had entered the Solar System from deep space thousands of years earlier, broke into multiple fragments. Some of these fragments struck Earth, causing a global cataclysm unseen since the extinction of the dinosaurs. At least eight of the fragments hit the North American ice cap, while further fragments hit the Northern European ice cap. The impacts, from comet fragments a mile wide approaching at more than 60,000 miles an hour, generated huge amounts of heat which instantly liquidised millions of square kilometres of ice, destabilising Earth's crust and causing the global flood that is remembered in myths all around the world.

A second series of impacts, equally devastating, causing further cataclysmic flooding, occurred 11,600 years ago, the exact date that Plato gives for the destruction and submergence of Atlantis. The evidence for all of this shows beyond reasonable doubt that a civilisation at least as technologically advanced as 19th-century England at the onset of the Industrial Revolution (if not more) that flourished during the last Ice Age was destroyed in the global cataclysms between 12,800 years ago and 11,600 years ago.

A distant memory and a warning to the future - for the comet that wrought such destruction in remote antiquity may not be done with us yet.

File: universalform.jpg (237KB, 600x750px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 600x750px

I'm interested in the cyclical conception of human history that pre-Abrahamic cultures had. The Ancient Greeks had a cyclical conception of human history that was similar to the cyclical conception of human history that the Hindus had (and STILL have). The Ancient Greeks had a Golden Age (equivalent to Satya Yuga in Hinduism), a Silver Age (equivalent to Treta Yuga in Hinduism), a Bronze Age (equivalent to Dwapara Yuga in Hinduism) and an Iron Age (equivalent to Kali Yuga in Hinduism). I call the model of human history that is currently dominant among historians 'the linear-progressive model of human history'. The linear-progressive model of human history basically says that the further back in human history you go, the more primitive that humans, their cultures and their technology becomes. The linear-progressive model of human history embraced by modern historians and modern anthropologists actually has its roots in Judeo-Christian beliefs, ironically enough. Virtually EVERY pre-Abrahamic culture WORLDWIDE embraced a conception of human history that was CYCLICAL, with civilisations rising and falling one after the other over VAST periods of time and humans being EXTREMELY OLD. Take the Puranas (a collection of ancient Indian writings), for example. The Puranas describe human lineages going back over a BILLION YEARS into the past and we have PHYSICAL EVIDENCE (in the form of fossils and artifacts) that confirms this.

>>127959954
We were kings!!!!

so how did we leave Europe, go into Africa then devolve into a more ape facial structured, homo-erectus state? Just seems stupid.

Besides, If thats true then the 6 million African migrants waiting to entire Europe are entitled. Cause "We wuz Europoid an sheet"

File: 10686ec9f68a4512e2070f76a004b212.jpg (130KB, 736x628px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 736x628px

>>127969810
These Lascaux paintings sure are mesmerizing to look at.

Damn I wish I could visit there before the muzzies destroy the place.

>>127968430
so why aren't we native to earth?

File: image.jpg (127KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 768x1024px

the earth is only ~6000 years old
take the breadpill

>>127971896

Because our species is older than Earth. Our ancestors from the distant past had a spacefaring civilisation and colonised many worlds, including Earth.

>>127972103
What the hell happened then?

>>127970666
Thank you, Satan. I had my doubts, I even entertained the idea of design of one kind or another, but your trips of truth helped me see the light!

>>127972378
whitey came and took they technulhugi cracka

>>127972069
This

File: big boss jesus.jpg (120KB, 500x713px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 500x713px

>>127972069
Take this one instead. He died so we can get rid of the (((Patriots)))

>>127962237
Human species then human races

FTFY - we are notthesame as niggers or chinks

>>127962237
97% dna shared with a banana, % dna shared means little

>>127970437
>They were full of various early humans interbreeding with each other and creating huge amounts of different human groups.
>It was aliens.

You're right it started somewhere (but not aliens) and speciation isn't that hard in other mammals. But for humans, it seems to be hard since we use tools not our genes primarily to live.

how about. no one knows jack shit. and little pieces of evidence suggest, but not prove the idea. and everyone is going to bullshit so they can get some credit and make their name known to the world

so we wuz adam n shiet?

>>127973365
nobody knows shit about anything until we find clues, these clues change what shit we think we know. The genetic history of humans is still very much a mystery with a few theories supported by a few or even a single specimen.