>anti-usury >pro-capitalism Explain yourselves /pol/

>>127941044
The two are not mutually exclusive.

Whats the alternative?

>>127941044

Yeah, I'm definitely ready to live on the street after the owners of my apartment close them because they make no money. It'll be fine though because my job will definitely still exist after the investors in the company realize it's literally illegal for them to see a return on their investment.

File: IMG_0141.jpg (82KB, 1315x535px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1315x535px

If you take away surplus value then you will throw the country into an economic tailspin. Nobody will start or run a business if you can't make a profit. Which would be DEEPLY PROBLEMATIC.

File: IMG_0251.jpg (61KB, 750x411px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 750x411px

>>127941252
Yes they are, you commie

>>127941314
The third alternative, T_D fag

>>127941314
everyone living in the jungle

>>127941314
Socialism

>>127941383
The ideas is you, or the state, will own the apartment and the company

File: USSR 1928 to 1970.png (36KB, 640x399px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 640x399px

>>127941947
The USSR wasn't in a tailspin
Apart from that famine, which was caused in a large part by climate and only partly by policy

>>127941044
Socialism can only work if it is coupled with eugenics and state managed reproduction. Free reproduction cannot work with socialism.

>>127942650
>The USSR wasn't in a tailspin
>literally collapsed and the entire area was shit for two decades

>>127942426
Ah yes so they can take it from me when I show up to work 10 min late as punishment.
Or so they can take it from me and give it to some black guy because hes "oppressed"
Or so they can burn it down and say i was taking up too much space.

Read a fucking history book idiot.