>/pol/ on a daily basis

>>127830199
>pol is one person

You're just jelly because Canada came too late to the conquer party.

>>127830199
>top: secular, imperial expansion by civilized nations
>bottom: religious, allahu snackbar expansion by sandniggers
Gee, I wonder why pol supports one and not the other.

>>127830199

When white people spread it is good because white people are better than other races (besides maybe some yellows).

When shitskins spread it is bad because shitskins are bad.

Conquering lands from shitskins is good and Europe should return to that instead of inviting them here.

File: 1489106950542.jpg (131KB, 1024x745px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1024x745px

>OP on a daily basis

>>127830967
>civil nations

AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

>>127831196

critisizing from sweden or canada :)
we need an algerian from france and a paki from england now

File: 29084029.jpg (91KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 640x400px

>>127831187

>>127830199
>caring about your own people's prosperity over others is somehow a bad thing
>implying i am required to fair and should be respectful to shitskins conquering my country

File: 1495356570170.png (315KB, 498x376px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 498x376px

>>127830346
>someone exposes a weak argument by /pol/
>"pol is 1 person"
>someone exposes a weak argument by the left
>omg libtards are so dumb pol is always right

>>127830199
so what's so confusing here? superior christians need to rule the heathen dogs, when it's vice versa it's an abomination to god

>>127831813
This.

>>127830762
If only they were on time like Poland but still achieved nothing like Poland

>>127830199
>leaf posting
The worst thing about it is I feel like you don't even try.

Should leafs be rangebanned from /pol/?

>>127830199
Literally spot on I was thinking about this earlier
/pol/ in a nutshell
>DEUS VULT: reclaim holy land!
>Native Americans lost GET OVER IT
Also /pol/
>MUSLIMS NEED TO STOP CONQUERING EUROPE
>Mexicans absolutely must go back, whites were here first! We built this country!
Can /pol/ ever not be hypocritical? Even on the JQ they are based but then support (((Trump))) and his kike handlers.

File: 3.jpg (164KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1920x1080px

>>127832859
Do you feel in charge?

>>127830762
>Implying Poland conquered anything, ever.

>>127834808
they conquered moscow

>>127833162
I would be fine with muslims trying to conquer europe if we were invading them ourselves or shoot them on sight.

>>127833162
It's not hypocritical at all.

The Crusades were a response to centuries of invasion by the Muslims.
The Indian Wars were due to the savage nature of the tribesman on the frontier and their capacity and constant nature to break and shatter treaties.

Muslims are out to invade.
Mexicans are out to invade.

File: 1494193755719.png (1MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1440px

>>127833378

>>127830199
>defending yourself is wrong
>accept your invaders just because you invaded others

File: 1489866247774.jpg (511KB, 2011x1716px) Image search: [Google]

511KB, 2011x1716px

>>127833162
You don't get it. We don't make moral arguments.

This is our land, we won't be replaced, and the kikes can either go to Israel peacefully or otherwise.

>>127830199
Ofcourse, it's perfectly natural.
You are glad when you win and angry when losing.

but ofcourse OP is a

L E A F
E
A
F

>>127833162
Our countries conquered through warfare. Mexicans and muslims "conquer" by using our limp-wristed liberal politicians against us. At least in the U.S. we can buy guns and eventually fight back, don't know if most of Europe can do that.

File: remove.jpg (22KB, 429x645px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 429x645px

>>127830199
Muslim colonization tend to destroy shit and enslave/exterminate people to replace them with their own people

Muslim also never gave up on their imperialism and invaded/raided europe till the 19th century, where they were forced to stop

It's very much two kind of cultures, we could probably recolonize all of Africa/middle east today and there's not much they could do to stop us, but our ideology and morals prevent us from doing so

However it's not a stretch to believe that if the roles were reversed, and the muslim world was the dominant empire, they wouldnt be so kind

>implying I don't despise the British empire for what they did to both the Boers and Germany
I have NO sympathy for anglos, if I had to choose between saving one Aryan or one million ANGLOS, I would choose the Aryan.

File: 1492289794653.png (920KB, 949x1103px) Image search: [Google]

920KB, 949x1103px

>>127835633
I don't give a fuck if the crusades were giant barbaric rapefests. Nobody on /pol/ makes the moral argument.

We point out the issues and want them solved. I don't give a fuck if some inbred kike wants me to play by his carefully crafted (and personally ignored) rules he's going to the desert and no amount of weasel words will change this.

We are counter-semitic, not philosophers.

>>127830199
name 2 (two) countries that got destroyed because of the white population

>>127835720
^this, OP is a total faggot like always

>>127835941
Get out of my Anglo country then fuck witt
Like it or leave it. Success breeds jealousy and your looking pretty jealous

>>127835808
Because Europeans didn't enslaved anyone right?

>>127831816
>/pol/ is one person
All day, buddy.

>>127836243
Europeans banned slavery. If not for us you niggers would still be selling each-other. (And you still are)

>>127836237
No. I was born here but I am NOT a filthy anglo. I am ARYAN, a mix of Irish, Scottish, German and Afghan. I am not jealous, you should be the jealous one ANGLO we Aryans are superior to you!

>>127830199
But when snowniggers do it, its with less raping and more "contributing valuable science, medicine, technology, architecture, math and more science shit". Ha! I scoff at their contribution to destitute desert lands.

>>127830967
>Secular
Only a retard who's never read history thinks European colonizers and imperialists were secular.
>What are crusaders
>What are conquistadors
Why do you think half of Europe and most of South America is Christian now?

>>127836785
Half of Africa*

>>127836404
It's not like white people got together at a round table and all agreed to ban it at the same time. They each banned it in fits and starts.

That's also a moot point because the vast majority of slaves were:
1. Bought by Europeans
2. Kept as slaves long after the slave trade itself was banned, like in Brazil and the US

It's like the drug war, it wouldn't have even existed on such a large scale if the demand wasn't even there. The fact that the UK and US banned the trade itself a few hundreds after they transported millions to the Americas is of little consolation to the slaves that were still slaves.

Slavery was also banned here long before the US banned it.

>>127836883
A few hundred years*

>>127836669
So a mongol okay.

We wuz superior
Germany has never won a war
Ireland was raped by the Brits for centuries
And the Scots are basically English men with dresses
I don't even need to mention Afghanistan

You might fit in in Sweden though.

>>127830199
Success breeds jealousy. Muslims just can't deal with the fact all their empires got their shit pushed in by Europeans.

>>127830967
>He thinks pre WWII Europe was secular
Your caravan elder gave you a shit education.

>>127830199
Stupid b8 leaf thread, SAGE SAGE SAGE THE SHIT OUT OF THE THREAD
Sage
Saged
Sage
Saged
Sage

File: Leaf.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>127837030

>>127830199
I never did this, I am firmly against expansionism and violations of private property and the NAP. I can't help but add though that the expansion of classical western cultures has produced the most successful and technologically advanced civilizations to have ever walked the earth, by practically every metric imaginable we outshine various arab cultures. We live longer, are happier, have access to more resources, have more efficient industries, more robust militarys, more freedom, superior technology and the list goes on, and on, and on.

While I wouldn't condone either Arab or European expansionism, European nations and America are in my opinion dramatically better places to live. A goodly portion of Arab nations can't even hold together without collapsing into infighting unless they are held together in the iron fist of a brutal dictator.

>>127836243
Slavery already existed when they stepped on the African continent, mostly from the previous muslim colonization

If anything, they're the reason it stopped at all

>>127836785

>implying most of /pol/ is fucking spanish

Kek, the crusaders only fought a few battles, mostly in Syria and Anatolia.

File: 1475952516615.jpg (78KB, 517x650px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 517x650px

>>127830199
the leaf
sage

>>127836883

>majority bought by Europeans

False! The majority of slave owners in the United States were black.
----------------------------------------------
Go here and download 2 LARGE PDFS
https://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html#y1860

Download these two:
Population of the United States in 1860; comp. from the original returns of the Eighth Census...
Title Page [PDF], Full Document [ZIP, 113.7 MB] (Download the FULL Document)

Agriculture of the United States in 1860; comp. from the original returns of the Eighth Census...
Title Page [PDF], Full Document [ZIP, 58.9 MB] (Download the FULL Document)

Now look at the Population of the United States in 1860 at 1860a-02.pdf and page xii
Now look at the Agriculture of the United States in 1860 at 1860b-08.pdf and page 247

Now there where 384,884 TOTAL Slaveholders in the US in 1860
of those 261,198 were Black or Mulatto, 155,148 were Black, 106,770 were Mulatto
So 261,884/384,884 = .68
155,148/384,884 = .40
106,770/384.884 = .277


68% of Slave Owners in 1860 in the entire USA were Black or Mulatto
40% of Slave Owners in 1860 in the entire USA were Black
28% of Slave Owners in 1860 in the entire USA were Mulatto
32% of Slave Owners in 1860 in the entire USA were WHITE


In other words, black people oppressed eachother more then white people! Impressive, isn't it?

>>127837129
>European nations and America are in my opinion dramatically better places to live. A goodly portion of Arab nations can't even hold together without collapsing into infighting unless they are held together in the iron fist of a brutal dictator.
Gee I wonder why that is?
Not like Saudi Arabia was just Arabia before the Americans propped up the House of Saud.
Not like France put in bigoted constitutions that caused both the Lebanese & Syrian civil wars.
Not like ISIS is a huge problem because the US destroyed Iraq, put their 9 leaders in Abu Ghraib prison, tortured them, & set them free.

>>127836883
Slavery is as old as human civilization, so it's stupid and nonsensical to blame it all on Europeans and only Europeans.

>>127831006
I've nothing to add.
Concise and precise.

>>127836883
Europeans ban slavery, if they didn't no one else would off. You should be kissing my feet for bringing you to civilization letting you post here instead of raping babies to cure aids and getting Ebola. In fact whites didn't even capture slaves one of your ancestors friends sold him to a White man.

We just showed up on the beaches and you were already lined up in chains and in cages just waiting for us to dump some shitty furs or something off. Your lucky a European brought your ancestor and not a Muslim or left you to rot in Africa

>>127836785
Crusaders only (re)conquered a small portion of the middle east and the baltics
Conquistadors were motivated by riches, not Christianity

Almost all of Europe is Christian now, if you ignore the more recent ravages of atheism and islam. Exceptions include Albania and Bosnia, but they're the clear exception and not the rule.

South America was heavily colonized by europeans who were inevitably Christian. This does not make the motivation for colonizing South America one of conversion - at best, it's an afterthought to convince the pope.

>>127837021
Secular motivations, not secular.

Also, arguably, by WW1 most of Europe was pretty secular, unfortunately.

>>127836966
Umm, Franco-German war of 1871? lol maybe you should learn some history ANGLO SCUM

>>127831187
Well he's a leaf

>>127830199

>be arab
>conquer the areas and forcefully convert them to islam (why is africa MAJORITY islamic? you know why now)
>enslave the native populations and castrate ALL of them for no particular reason at all
>destroy anything relating to the host culture

>be most of europe (unless you're spain/portugal)
>colonize parts of Africa and Aleruca
>don't really eradicate the host culture, rise local chiefs to positions of power there
>buy slaves/land from a bunch of them
>sometimes there is conflict between us and the natives and we win because of superior technology

REEEEE MASS MURDERERS

>>127837908
No that was Prussia. Germany didn't even exist at that stage, and has won no wars

File: 1495082712931.jpg (225KB, 964x761px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 964x761px

>>127830199
always a fucking leaf

>>127837737
Muslims enslavedand shipped 15 million Africans and more than two million Europeans to Arabia and India.

That is more than all the slaves shipped to the Americas by all the European nations put together.

They also bred white boys as sex slaves

File: image.jpg (42KB, 557x308px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 557x308px

>>127838038
are you stupid? PRUSSIANS ARE GERMANS!
>Anglo education

>>127838220
Yeah and if NSW won a war in 1856 it doesn't mean Australia won because Australia wasn't even a thing

Try again find me one war where modern Germany has won. Just one war

>>127837976
>unless you're spain/portugal
There's literally nothing wrong with genocide

>>127832803
Oh god my sides.
>>127830967
Romanian education system.
>>127837976
They didn't forcibly convert that much, especially in comparison to Christian empires, you still have Christians and Pagans in the Middle east to this day as a result.

If anything they were more considered with plunder than some grand religious campaign, Europe would have probably gone the same route if it weren't for muh pope

>>127840262
>you still have Christians and Pagans in the Middle east to this day as a result.

Give it 600 years, which is the time advantage Christianity has had. There won't be any Christians and pagans in the Mid East.

>>127830199
>not rooting for your opponent is immoral

Egalitarianism is retarded

File: liberal muslims.jpg (318KB, 1438x1428px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 1438x1428px

>>127830199
>when europeans conquer other peoples it's evil, even though the "conquest" involved massive improvements and advancements to the conquered societies
>when muslims conquer other peoples it's good, even the conquest is accompanied by slavery, bloodshed, pillaging and the destruction of civilisation

Liberal logic in a nutshell.

File: australian education.png (56KB, 506x940px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 506x940px

>>127838220
The state of Germany didn't exist until after the Franco-PRUSSIAN war.

There was no "Franco-German War".

>>127830199
us vs them mentalitiy. Read some Jack Donovan, leaf.

>>127840366
There is a historical difference though, there is no clergy in Islam which really takes away a lot of the incentive of forced conversion as there is no labour force dependent upon it.

This is a pretty salient factor, it was pretty much the main reason that Rome never returned to a republic after the Praetorians.

>>127838712
>>127840512
Just because there wasn't a German state doesn't mean there wasn't a German people. That war created Germany and technically Germany did exist by the end of the war soooooo...... ANGLOS AND THEIR FRENCH LACKEYS BTFO!!!????

>>127838712
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bafut_Wars
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Maroua–Miskin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herero_Wars
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maji_Maji_Rebellion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokehs_rebellion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Civil_War
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silesian_Uprisings#First_uprising_.281919.29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boxer_Rebellion

>>127835808
>Muslim colonization tend to destroy shit and enslave/exterminate people to replace them with their own people
Not really, Spain, Balkan, and India retain native Christian / Hindu majority under Muslim rule, in contrast, Native Americans and Australian Aborigines got pretty much wrecked for good under western colonisation

>>127838220
napoleon III got rused

>>127830199
If you don't like it you can always leave

>>127830199
It's a dog-eat-dog world, always has been, always will be. No amount of holding hands, singing about diversity, and rewriting history is going to change that. If you put moral superiority over your own survival, you're next on the menu.

>>127836834
christianity used to exists in africa cause one of the apostoles went there. there use to be more christian nations in some parts of africa like ethiopia but they were bullied into submission and enslaved by guess who that is right islaaaaaam.

>>127830199
We are REALLY hypocritical, we LIKE to conquer but HATE getting conquered.

WOW. HOW COULD THIS BE? Maybe getting conquered is bad and conquering is good, for your own people????

>>127844858
no they werent the reason why greece for example is more greek is cause the muslims were kicked away from greek. there is a reason why alot of turks have greek blood in them cause their ancestor were islamised greeks that were islamised through things suck as slavery, having extra rights to muslims but not enough for a rebellion and the child gathering also you do know that 1000 years after christianity there was still plytheism in greece it vanished a few hundred years later like you know around the time of the ottaman empire.

>>127830199
>taking your own side is bad
go away rabbi