>>127820226
it doesn't
Like religion. One absolute ruler, no government.
>>127820226
It's like Anarcho-Communism, people think it works, but the only way to apply it would be to create a state to enforce whatever suffix it supports.
>>127820226
I've posted this idea in a few threads, I don't know if this is what you're refering to but this is how I independatnly came to the conclusion
without a Divinely founded monarchy, there should be no Government, people are responsible for themselves. and every person is taught they go to a tribunal when they die
only rule we follow is the divine right of kings, and the mandate of heaven (asia)
mwhahahahahhahaha
WE
Ask polish maoist anything
>>127821495
Why maoism and not M-L
>>127820424
But doesn't having a King imply that not everyone is equal, and that the King has absolute authority?
>>127820226
Simple, you just create a nation with only one member. Everyone is equal, yet you are also the most powerful person in your nation. Perhaps you're the weakest too, but no one exists to challenge your rule so you're still king.
>>127822037
Wouldnt you be oppressing yourself
>>127822200
Sure but you'd also be liberating yourself from your own oppression at the same time. Quantum kingdom.
>>127820226
You just hate the state, until your aristocracy rises again.
>>127820226