Would you shoot a surrendering Soldier?

>>127799772
Would you tell a defeated nigger to put his mouth on the curb?

No. People act like theyre the next Hitler. Shooting a wounded / unarmed man is ultimate cuckery

>>127799772
If commie, black, mexican or any sort of nonwhite or asain male, sure.
Good riddance to bad rubbish

yes and yes, vie victus

>>127799772
Gladly.
Especially if it's Jerry.

depends what vibe I got off him

>>127799772
I'd shoot only the non-white ones. Especially Mexicans.

Only if they were a rat. Generally no.

>>127799772
yes.
if you leave him alive he will remember you and remain your enemy in spite of your empathy.

>>127799999
>>127777777

>>127800088
Is....is Kek back?

>>127799772

Depends on my orders. Not that I'd ever be in the army. Fuck that.

really depends on the situation

generally no

>>127800111
Also if you're fighting as a guerrilla you don't generally have the luxury of taking POWs. So there's that too.

>>127799772
No you need to torture him first or pretend to be his friend

>>127799772
No, because once word gets out that I accept no prisoners my enemy will fight harder to avoid capture.

>>127799772
I would if they were a machinegun crew or artillery

>>127799772
Using a different image doesn't make your thread any less of the same old spam

>>127799772
lmao did you not see Saving Private Ryan? Thats exactly why you waste any prisoners of war.

>>127799772
no, that's something a nigger would do. Only situation I can see otherwise would be if they'd just killed a loved one.

Obviously if you're going to do this you have to execute them at the POW camp. If you shoot them as they surrender they will stop surrendering.

>>127799772
Why shoot a bargaining chip?

In the coming chimpocalypse, three ragged, starving, unarmed Antifa soldiers climb out of a trench and beg me for mercy. I shoot each of them in the face and sleep better than normal that night.

>>127799772
Depends. Muslim - definitely. White - most likely not.

>>127799772
Probably not.

Unless there were extenuating circumstances. Something along the lines of: Guy shoots my friend in the face, turns and sees me with a gun pointed at him, knows he's fucked and surrenders.

File: 1496100354710.jpg (338KB, 1300x867px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 1300x867px

>>127800088

>>127799926
Faggot. You are fighting the war, your Co will make you keep fighting and you will die. Meanwhile this pussy will go back after the war and breed, lie about how he fought valiantly, and will outbreed you after you died. Kill them

>>127800399
That was 100% a war crime at the end.

>>127799772
no, but he better be able to surrender in American I'm not learning to any foreign shit

>>127800426
Theyll stop surrendering because theyre dead you unbelievable moron

>>127799926

War has its own rules.

>>127799772
depends on race

if sandnigger, then yes

101% chance there is a suicide vest under the clothing

>>127799772
depends, are they people (white)?

>>127800495
Because, you have to feed, water, and bandage that bargaining chip. It's expensive if the goal isn't to keep collecting chips.

File: IMG_8364.jpg (25KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x400px

>>127800516
I wouldn't shoot them. Negan showed us the way. Line them up. Get them in their knees. And let Lucille sort them out.

File: 1482192886480.jpg (31KB, 718x637px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 718x637px

>>127799772
>Would you shoot a surrendering Soldier?

Yes, if it were a marxist or communist. They are not human.

First off I would not be a part of any "military" as such, so your nigger rules of some treaty or another don't apply to me.

I am the local warlord of the area I reside in, or barring that I would join up as a soldier of another local warlord...provided that local warlord made me minister of information or Master at Arms.

File: 1495788671660.png (684KB, 840x558px) Image search: [Google]

684KB, 840x558px

>>127799772
Don't give him a chance to try and surrender.

Depends if your enemy would do it or not.

>>127799772

Seen lone survivor.
> lot of good men lost

>>127799772
Is he white? If so, no.

>>127800567
War crimes are just laws that rarely get enforced. Have some mudslims up in the hills hooting and hollering all night? Call in some whiskey Pete to clear out brush. Hell, chemical weapons were illegal on wwi. Did that stop their use? No, because it was illegal only or shot by shell. They would shoot canisters, drop them from airplane, or run them into the dead man zone and release them.

>>127799926
>No. People act like theyre the next Hitler.

"act"

>Shooting a wounded / unarmed man is ultimate cuckery

Why? that mans lives he can return to the battlefield to kill me one day.

>only cowards surrender..two bullets through the head.

>>127800807
good goy

File: image.jpg (23KB, 300x163px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 300x163px

>>127800569
https://youtu.be/VCbW7Gkgu2U

>>127800993

What about a white communist who hates America?

>>127800399
(((Saving Private Ryan)))

File: 4u.jpg (76KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1280x720px

>>127799772
Only if I were about to throw him from a plane

>>127801213
a big plane...

>>127801021
tell me about your worst day that you have had in your life.

>>127801269
uuuu

>>127801130
This happens to niggers ever day in the streets of America. Germans are no better and deserve no special treatment

>>127799772
If you fight for the enemy, you can die for him. Besides, surrender is shameful, I'm helping him preserve his dignity.

>>127800088
This is the only answer.

Why would a shoot a brother who, just like me, got caught up in a kike war?

>>127801342
they were czech

>>127799772
after I rawdog his boipucci into oblivion

>>127799772
Depends on whom I'm fighting. If we went to war with say Denmark/Norway/Finland I wouldn't shoot.

File: Bodies_of_U.S._officers_and_soldiers_slained_by_the_Nazis_after_capture_near_Malmedy,_Belgium._-_NARA_-_196544.jpg (194KB, 1024x1143px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1024x1143px

>>127800930
You fucking Krauts pulled shit like this in WWII:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malmedy_massacre

>>127801130
Did you know these guys are speaking Czech and not German?

Easter Egg

>>127800304
That's why you dont officially take no prisoners...but unofficially however...

>>127799772
only if they are muslim

>>127799772
No, it's against the Geneva Conventions.
It's a war crime.
For you to even consider it shows you've lost your way or never been in the military.
Word gets out we did that - our troops would get the same treatment.

>>127801400
Implying that's different from being a nigger

>>127801131
Commies aren't people, don't be silly.

>>127799772
What colour is he?

>>127801012
>surrendering soldier
>SURRENDERING
how will he go back?

>>127801551
You do realize that it still happens...frequently...right?

>>127800088
>Mexicans
>In war

Go die for the eternal jew, gringo

>breaking the Geneva convention, which is treated as a war crime

Don't want to go to the gulag

yes
send the refugees to heaven, everyone needs more immigrants, right Merkel!?

Wether you should shoot or not depends on circumstances and the type of war you are fighting. However with our overly optimistic, altruistic education, I'm pretty sure nearly all of us would spare the guy.

Combat Vet. Agreed. Surrendered soldiers are worth more info. Torture works. Then kill them. Don't be a bitch, give them a chance (knife, set free, ultimate game).

>>127799772
Nah, I have respect for my common man and the conduct of war.

I'll ask him to hand over any weapon he has, strip so I can be sure he isn't carrying anything dangerous and that I can't see, tell him to put his clothes back on, and then take him over to an officer.

>>127799772
It's a context thing.
Am I in a position to watch/bring in a prisoner?
Do I have an objective?
Might he know anything?

If he has no tactical value, he is a liability.
Eliminate the threat.
It's war, we don't stop because someone has had enough and wants to go home.
There is no "sorry" when you've been firing lead at me for days.
Trying to blow me up with mortars/IEDs.
Fuck that. You're the enemy, if you have no value, then you are worm food.

>>127799899
Underrated

>>127799772
Only if they're Japanese.

>>127801484
They fucking deserved it. Nigger.

>>127800559
Now that is hot.

>>127799926

Hitler would rather have put unarmed prisoners to work in German factories than kill them. The thing is, Soviet soldiers were shot if they retreated by the "special companies."

Not saying it was good, but that's what happened.

>>127799970
Die eeuwige engelsman

>>127801130

The two guys are speaking Czech, not german. Lots of Czechs were forced into the german army after they were invaded. They are saying "we a czech, we didnt kill anyone."

>>127799772
Not a white man.

>>127802154
>Edge: the post

>>127799926
Dominate men dominating is cuckary now?

>>127802262
looks cold to me

Most likely not.

idk if I'd have the balls to shoot an ATTACKING soldier, very few people are made for war.

File: 1488749250870.jpg (95KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1080x1080px

>>127802262
I'm fond of the unorthodox hot one on the right.

>>127799772
I would ask (with interpreter if necessary) "do you hate cats?"
If he answers yes.
BOOM

>>127802354
Same

>>127802615
I like her too. I'm looking at their blog now, bretty gud!

>>127799999
>>127800000
>>127777777

File: 1454121271011-1.jpg (58KB, 442x331px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 442x331px

>>127802609
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zViyZGmBhvs

File: bf-109-pilot-franz-stigler-b-17-pilot-charlie-brown.jpg (56KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 480x360px

No. Even if you hate them, whoever you're fighting with are just people in the same boat as you.
Killing them because you don't like them is faggotry.

>>127799772

it would depend on who was surrendering.

civilized rules are for civilized enemies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7tbetJwHco

I dont know how crazy they are so probably yes.

>>127799772
No. It's dishonourable

>>127799772
We want them to surrender. We should make them think they are going to be better off surrendering than in the field fighting.

>>127799926
>if you kill your enemies, they win

>>127799772
depends on the soldier. if he was an honorable lad who didnt want to be there and i understood his plight, id probably disarm him and not kill him unless the others planned on torturing him, as a mercy kill only. if it was a sandnigger hellbent on killing us and raping my wife and he surrendered he's getting domed regardless lol. theres probably a lot of other factors too but not necessarily would i shoot him. get some nuance you edgy cretins or else you might be a nigger at heart. proud boys only

>>127799772
No I couldn't, how could I kill a handsome young man

>>127801551

It's only a war crime if you're in the military.

If there is no military, then it's open fucking season on your enemies.

>>127801662
>how will he go back?

When the war is over and prisoner exchange begins.

>>127799772
Watched the Patriot on Memorial Day. Gotta say, the best part is when the militiamen shoot the surrendering British soldiers, and Heath Ledger says, "What are you doing! These men were surrendering!" And the French militia man says, "Perhaps... We will never know."

>>127799772
depends
does he have more use to me alive? probably since i can extract info from him, trade him for some of my own captured soldiers, and/or convert them
if none of those apply then yeah, why would i spend the resources keeping the fucker alive if there's nothing to be gained from it?

>>127801857
>Combat Vet. Agreed. Surrendered soldiers are worth more info. Torture works. Then kill them. Don't be a bitch, give them a chance (knife, set free, ultimate game).

You have changed my mind. I didn't think that I could practice my torture methods on the enemy soldiers that we capture.

Then arm them with a knife and set them free in the woods and me und mein Kamarades will go shoot the ultimate game for sport.

File: download (33).jpg (15KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x168px

>>127799772
Yes, death to those who stand in the way of my agenda! hail victory!

>>127803170
>if none of those apply then yeah, why would i spend the resources keeping the fucker alive if there's nothing to be gained from it?
Because it'll make your enemies fight till the bitter end, making the war harder to your side.

>>127801213
what if he flies so good?

If they also surrender their equipment yea. Man probably has a family

File: 1460589969423.jpg (45KB, 512x397px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 512x397px

>>127799772
>Would you shoot a surrendering Soldier?
No but he'd have to strip from far away to make sure no bombs or hidden weapons are on his/her person, they'd get some spare clothing later

>>127802782
Seems like humanity, and decency are a white trait

>>127802782
lindy comes off as a cuck imo but I've seen this video and it's pretty good.

He doesn't really talk about the dehumanisation of enemy soldiers. Would be really interesting to see what the effects are.

it depends what he's done

sometimes you must be the arbiter of life

>>127799772
Depends, if it were an active battle he might be toast. But if it is at the end or it seems no trap no I would no shoot.

A lot of war is tit for tat. If we kill their soldiers surrendering they will kill ours. And if they have a history of killing ours you better believe I would plant their fuckers in a heart beat.

>>127803612
maybe i believe in total annihilation of my enemies? no mercy no quarter motherfucker, and in this coming war i WILL ensure all of my enemies are eliminated once and for all, long overdue justice WILL be metted out

only if it was a sandnigger, you just can't trust a muslim

>>127799772
Only if you're absolutely confident your side will win the war. If not don't make war crimes a habit.

>>127799772
If he's a fellow European, no. A non-white, yes.

Only if I was 1 kill away from a MOAB

>>127799772
if the solider:

1. drops his weapon
2. strips to his underwear
3. begs for mercy and concedes defeat

then i would consider sparring him. otherwise, nope, no mercy to a resistant enemy.

>>127799772
No, that's barbaric sadistic and pointless

Of-course not. It's dishonourable. People who say yes have no respect for soldiers and are uncivilized barbarians that would be rejected/kicked out by every military as soon as they caught wind of it.

>>127799772
In the fawklands, the argie unit put out white flags and then when our (the british i wasn't there) co went up to accept the surrender, they shot him and his aide down in cold blood.
Also if it's the french there's always a chance they're just waving their national flag.
In reality, it prob depends how much of a rush i was in and how many of my mates he'd just killed.

>>127802099
But the Japanese never committed war crimes

>>127799772
Impossible to say how I'd feel at the time but I'd like to think that I wouldn't, unless it was a Jew.

>>127804823
You guys know that there are international laws

>>127804968
falklands

I hope all the people saying "yes" are never actually planning on joining the military.

>>127800855
>Yes, if it were a marxist or communist.
>First off I would not be a part of any "military" as such

Look at this tough guy

>>127799772
really don't see myself fighting in any wars where the enemy would be a good person worth sparing

no. you will have to go back to hell and the fucker goes into a nice jail with bread and water while you get shot and your wife fucks a nigger.

There's nothing honorable about shooting a prisoner. I was in the army, if you even joked about it you were considered scum of the earth

>>127805292
shit i mean yes i would shoot. war is hell get over it.

>>127799772

I would shoot a surrendering enemy soldier in his balls and then leave him there to suffer as a eunuch faggot for the rest of his life.

>>127801484

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chenogne_massacre

If it is so bad why retaliate with doing the same?

File: 1495831679712.jpg (166KB, 600x900px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 600x900px

>>127800560
>>127800582
>>127801012
It shows zero respect. If we're talking about a war between Europeans you're a fucking subhuman for shooting a man surrendering.

Although It really depends on the type of war and who you're fighting. If your nation is invaded and population being genocided or something then yeah honor is understandably thrown out the window. But it should only be discarded when the situation calls for it.

>>127800576
Nice reading comprehension you autist
They as in the enemy as a whole, not the individuals

File: En Gaurde.jpg (198KB, 950x977px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 950x977px

Yes, especially if he's a haji or communist

>mfw Marines during WWII shot japs on sight after Guadalcanal
>reports from the battle of Peleliu say that out of the 10k defenders, only 7 Soldiers were taken prisoners
>tfw Marines or Soldiers who fought on the Pacific technically got away with it all

Feels gud

>>127805445
last man who got to live by mercy became Hitler and managed to change history.

>>127800318
Machine gun teams and snipers/ spotters are always to be killed if they ever surrender.

>>127805622
Why?

>>127801130
further proof Americans were just as bad if not worse. SPR is a blatant propaganda piece, Spielberg hated Germans and desensitized every single one of their deaths, while making every American death extra heroic and tragic.
Anyone who says Saving Private Ryan accurately shows "the horrors of war" has no idea what they're talking about.

>>127805310
he's not a prisoner though he's just surrendering.
I was assuming it was in a firefight and he just threw his hands up.
I'm glad real soldiers are more honourable than me though. Props for your service and honour.

>>127805622
Why?

>>127801551
>Word gets out we did that - our troops would get the same treatment.
Captured American soldiers get much worse treatment in the modern wars they fight in.

only if it were a mexican

>>127801213
Why would you shoot a man before you throw him out of a plane?

File: emu war.jpg (79KB, 502x640px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 502x640px

>>127799772
No, and neither would all these edgelords saying yes.

It is far more useful to take that person in to be questioned by those higher up in the ranks.

File: IMG_1015.jpg (84KB, 640x618px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 640x618px

Why should you shoot a surrendering soldier when they can make a high quality slave?

>>127799772
1. If he was black or brown, I would shoot him

2. If he was White I would spare him

>>127806136
French were the first to use chemical weapons.

>>127805065
>giving a shit about "international laws" when your very life is on the line

i don't throw this around a lot, but that absolutely sounds like cuckoldry.

>>127799772
Once I start my killing I will never stop again.

File: SuperManlet.jpg (123KB, 500x719px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 500x719px

Depends on the situation.

If it was Russians invading Finland? Absolutely. Russians aren't human and aren't worth pissing in the snow to melt it to hydrate them with.

File: hades amirite.gif (94KB, 240x180px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 240x180px

>>127799772
"He wasn't surrendering, he totally had a gun."

>>127799772
Hell no, I can barely deal with my other regrets much less shooting a man dead

>>127804882
Have you been in the Military in the last three decades? If you have you're either some POG, or in the occupying force (Army)

It all depends on the enemy.
Vietcong as well as Islamic Terrorists would strap bombs onto themselves and children. Spare a strangers life and it could end with your comrades dead.

>>127799772
Is he black?

>>127806235
FrENcH wEre ThE FirSt To USe CHeMiCal WEapOnS.

>>127806435
11b here. I wouldn't ever shoot a prisoner. Ever

>>127799772
depends

>>127805893
Because they most likely have killed guys on your side. The average rifleman is just there he is nothing special. The more specialized roles cause the most casualties. Also for this war anyone caught with an rpg launcher would be killed as well.

File: grapevine.png (128KB, 558x593px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 558x593px

Do this instead, and when your enemies march down a road with dessicated corpses wrapped around street lamps they'd lose their morale fast

If they were a nigger

>>127806582
So Army...that's what I thought

>>127799772
Depend on how much his life worth.

>>127806582
Plus we aren't talking about Prisoners, we are talking about someone attempting to surrender. These two things aren't the same.

>>127799772
No, the Saving Private Ryan style relishing of death is nothing but upper class propaganda against the serfs.

>>127806737
I'm not the person you were responding to.

>>127803011
UNDERRATED

HAAAHHA

>>127799772
this was a very obvious shill thread trying to exact which users of this site were radicals

all statements were satire

>>127799772
is commie?
also depends on the context
if ideological based - always
if this scuffle started because of some other thing (rare) then - how much did it cost us? if they were cunts and dishonorable I'd save us money and shoot in stomach

>>127799772
A better question is why wouldn't you.

>>127801484
>eisenhower starved to death 1.7 million Germans in his open air camp

>>127799772
No but I'd kneecap him and leave him where he falls. Now two of his buddies are out of the fight carrying him back to the aid station.

If their Mexicans yes.

>>127806940
It's pretty clear when someone is actually a noncombatant as opposed to simply tossing a firearm to play civilian

>>127806435
No, why would anyone join the Canadian military?

File: iraq my digi 107.jpg (1004KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1004KB, 1600x1200px

Like any of you faggots would last 2 minutes in my world.

>>127799772
are they muslim?

>>127799772
Are they white? If so then no.

>>127799772
No.

>>127799772

Only in the back.

>>127799772

It depends on the rank and billet of the prisoner. If it's a low level grunt, no quarter given. "A broken enemy won't pick up a sword; a dead enemy can never again pick up a sword."

If it's a staff-level soldier or an officer that might yield actionable intelligence, then he would be kept long enough to extract what is required. When he/she outlives their usefulness, they would be gotten rid of.

File: sabrina-getting-rammed-american-psycho-2000-film.jpg (37KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 1280x720px

>>127799899
fpbp

also check'em!

All the people here who answered yes: ALL YOU ACHIEVE IS THAT YOUR ENEMIES WILL FIGHT TO THE DEATH
Commissars were fucking crazy.

Do whatever is most efficient, not morally correct.

>>127799772
>wasting valuable slave labour
Even in the ancient world this was a no-brainer.

>>127807351
Great job losing that war faggot.

Hope your dead friends were worth it.

>>127805617
>implying that's a bad thing

>>127799772
Only if I had to to survive

>>127805445
when we have to go fight the muslims in france, surrendering french will be shot on sight.

File: 41BFF656-5A29-4EF9-A295-0D4872F8D3CA-7405-00000AD9E2DED52D.png (494KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 1280x720px

>>127799899
Kek

>>127807619
Then honestly there is no point to saving whites or anyone else. If you're unprincipled niggers then you deserve all of the ethnic replacement coming to you. Simple as that.

>>127807828
Ill gladly remove kebabs from Europe but the french surrender meme is overdone. They have an impressive military history outside WW2.

>>127799772

I would make them think they are going to live.
But have to tie them up and be really friendly to them.
Then I would proceed to slowly cut away pieces of their body with a potato peeler or small sharp object preferably with a tiny scoop.
Slowly scoop away their body just enough for them to stay conscious.
Piece by piece. Preferably get them to the point they beg for death.
These are enemies afterall and the soldiers should get to enjoy and bask in the fallen enemy.
Just my opinion though. I guess that's why I wasn't put into a leadership position.

>>127799772
That depends on a lot of factors.
If you don't have the facilities to keep him prisoner and have no use for him, clearly you execute him because he could escape and head back to his camp or kill you. But if you are able, then you keep him for labor or leverage.

It all depends on how securely you can keep him.

>>127799772
Fuck Id shoot a democrat for fun

File: 100_0036.jpg (712KB, 1632x1232px) Image search: [Google]

712KB, 1632x1232px

>>127807731

4.4k dead US over 1 million dead sand fleas. Yup we lost. Don't really care that we turned it into a shit hole. They can all die fucking goats.

pic of sandfleas playing chicken with a tank

File: Dindu nuffin.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>127801342
sure it does

>>127806161
pretty sound logic here. i kekcur

>>127800318
I only know Air force but I'm assuming the army is similar if you kill machine gunners you're killing 1/3 of every squad you come across (assuming you count automatic rifles as machine guns)

>>127799772

If they surrender before battle, spare and treat kindly.

If they surrender after battle, kill/imprison.

That way more enemies will surrender without fighting.

>>127808056
Fbi watchlist just got 1 brick taller lol.

>>127807631

Most white men would sooner die than be enslaved. Hence American revolution literally happening over a minor tea tax.

>>127808354
i dont get these answers tbqh. You would honestly show mercy to white trash but waste anyone else?

Mercy should be given to anyone you believe would do the same in return. so probably not any niggers.

>>127808254
Are people seriously pissed off about this? Pretending to aim a weapon at an officer instead of surrendering? No shit he got shot, he's an idiot.

Honestly if they were a Muslim or a nigger or some other kind of malicious shitskin yes I probably would. Cannot be trusted under any circumstances

>>127808354
>>127808952
reeeeee why is it crossed out

>>127801012
It's dishonorable. Nigger tier

File: maxresdefault.jpg (126KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1920x1200px

>>127799772
if its a hot female soldier sure life is negotiable with those starting terms

>>127808597
>assuming you count automatic rifles as machine guns
Obviously no.
I don't understand the hate against the machine gunner though. His main role is suppressive fire.

>>127799926
spbp.

Being dishonorable is worse than being a nigger.

>>127809330
GET THOSE SWEATY GOOK TITTIES OUTTA MY FACE

File: kek.png (349KB, 640x300px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 640x300px

>>127799772
nah. in warfare, it is objectively better on all levels to capture rather than kill. theyre better alive for intel and propaganda/humiliation. what good is a corpse other than to fertilize the ground.

>>127799772
if i have been in combat with them... click clack BLAM.

else no

>>127799772
yes

>>127799772
Only is he was a Jew. Show your enemies no more mercy than they would show you.

>>127809806
Why not both?

>>127799772
No, unless he blatantly broke the rules of war.
If he was in a unit murdering civilians and he surrenders, I'd be sure to kill him extra painfully.

>>127800088
>88

Welcome back kek

>>127799772
Yes. So that the red cross wouldn't fix him up and bring him to Sweden to be given a free house and food.

>>127809806
What if they're lying on the ground badly wounded, and you need to pass them. Would you clear his weapons and leave him for the men in depth to save? Or just finish him off.

I was taught contradictory things about this in the army. On one hand you can't kill him if he's not a threat anymore. But on the other hand if you crawl up to a pit you don't know whether there's a threat still down there or not. You drop a grenade in, double tap the remains, and then shove your bayonet in whatever is still wiggling.

If they're traitors then yes

>>127799957
this.
German SS surrendering? No kill.
Nigger? Yes kill.
Muslim/ISIS? Yes kill.

Just nuke Africa already. Fuck.

>>127799772
Only if I had to eat him or he tried to overpower me.

>>127808970
The officer might see jail time iirc
Truly the end times

>>127799772
Were it not against the current law of war, yes. It saves us a shitload of resources and saves them the shame of living with their cowardice.

>>127809354
I think that's more of a movie thing since the rate of fire gap has closed a lot, honestly the heavy gunner is usually only the 2nd or 3rd target now a days anyway

>>127809354
More of a movie thing because they usually focus on ww2*

>>127813286
Define traitor.

>Antifa? (I'm with you: show them the mercy their beloved Stalin showed Estonians in 1944)

>Confederates or Yankees, depending which side I was on? (No. Forgive those on the other side of the Brother's War.)

>Purple Bellies? (Fuck no. Fuck The Alliance. Browncoat 4 Life. Never forget Serenity Valley.)

>Soviets in the Winter War? (Kill them all.)

>>127799772
id break the geneva if it meant muzzie blood on my khaki's

Yes.

>>127800559
This turns me off for reason reason. I guess white girls just dont get it up for me anymore

>>127809354
In a conventional battle around defensive positions they kill a lot of men. General purpose or heavy guns on tripods shooting at the open ground, even shooting indirectly at the ground where the enemy will have to cross using mortar sights and posts, so they can switch to hammer another area in the darkness and confusion when ordered. A hail of indiscriminate bullets to pass through while also suppressing the first pits

>1944
>im starving or your starving
yeah better just shoot him
>2017
>1hr air mail
better not, i'll just get comfy

>>127799772
Yes if they are non-White.

>>127799772
Depends if we have a way to transport/incarcerate him. If it's too much of an inconvenience, or if it involves him eating some of our food, then yes I would kill him.

The question becomes a hell of a lot easier when you have survivors of a shipwreck swimming in open water. Taking a machine gun to them is actually moral considering how traumatic slowly drowning to death would be or being picked off by sharks

>>127805537
Japs didn't surrender

>>127799772
Depends, are we fighting the race war to determine society, or are we just both pawns of the jews?

File: VJJ9oE9.jpg (211KB, 324x490px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 324x490px

In today's vietnam style "wars" no. Too easy to get fucked for it.

Global world war? Depends on the enemy. If it were WW2 and germans? no, they look like me, and they surrender with dignity. Japs? Fuck no, not after fucking Wake island.

Only depends if:
A: I know 100% he is responsable for the death of a person from my unit or he comes from a unit known for being barbaric
B: I can't do otherwise
And that's just for conventional warfare, in a civil war or let's say ethnic war, maybe I'll do it, you never know.

>>127799772
what race is he

>>127799772
I mean yes. Most of the time they surrender it's so they can be executed instead of die some brutal death on the battle field. It's the cordial thing to do and would expect the same from my enemies.

>>127815188
Also, you have to keep in mind the conditioning of the perception your common grunt will have of the enemy. If it's like WW2 propaganda with todays "training" methods, I don't think surrendering soldiers would be something you hear or see a lot.

File: female special forces.png (729KB, 777x659px) Image search: [Google]

729KB, 777x659px

>>127799772
Would you rape a surrendering soldier?

>>127799772
What's he like? Did he fight hard? Did he kill one of my own?
If he's Aryan I'd take him prisoner.
If he's not, Doesn't even matter anymore shoot him.
If he kills one of my guys then shoot him twice.

>>127799772
"The only rules of war, are the ones the winners write"

>>127814192
Sweden, no!

>>127815148
Yea but the Japs willing to surrender were usually the ones who wanted to be our friends and not fight, maybe help our side win.

>>127815506
what about rape then execute a surrendering soldier?

>>127815506
this is reaching gaddafi levels of absurdity

>>127815506
Hope they have been deployed in Syria.

File: No.jpg (781KB, 1692x1267px) Image search: [Google]

781KB, 1692x1267px

>>127815778
omg forgot the smut

depends what treatment his side gives me in case i surrender

>>127799772
>>127799899
>>127799926
Depends entirely on Race

>>127813782
>>127813830
Pretty ironic. The German MGs were not the killing weopon they were made out to be.
German battle tactic was
>find enemy
>haul bullets at them
>they are scared shitless
>call for reinforcement
>reinforcement flanks
>win
That fucked us over later, because once the enemy has the upper hand, your enemy gets the reinforcement.

>>127799899
>>127799988
>>127800088
>>127800111
>>127800233
>>127800399
>>127800855
>>127801400
>>127802099
>>127802988
>>127803011
>>127803099
>>127803544
>>127805511
>>127805622
>>127806988
>>127807288
>>127815188
>>127815399
>>127815822

I think it's safe to say that KEK has smiled on this thread.

>>127815698
absolute bullshit. Japs were known to pretend to surrender then launch an attack. As a Grandson of 2 grandfathers who served in the Pacific, 1 Okinawa marine Infantryman and 1 navy corpsman, I can safely say fuck the Japanese. I used the term Jap when I was in the Army and got counselled for it. I didn't even know Jap was a bad word. My family used it regularly. Thats the family I came from.

>>127799772
Depends on if you're able to take prisoners, I suppose.
I bet you have orders declaring such.

>>127803303
You're a stupid nigger, torture doesn't fucking work. You're not a combat veteran obviously, don't claim to be something you're not you stupid fuck.

>>127799772
No, at times I was tempted but even the smelliest, dumbest MK or FAPLA might of had some intel on him that could save our guys. Tag and bag, let intelligence deal with them.

Guess that's one of the differences between professional soldiers and ideal driven loons.

>>127799772
No, it's counterpunching. The easiest way to defeat the enemy is to guarantee an exit.

>>127805790
Are you an idiot or something? Those were czechs. This scene is literally there to show the horrors of war.

>>127815506
>Out of necessity.
I fail to see how that's necessary or even desireable.

>>127799772
>fighting in kike wars
>year of our Lord Two Thousand And Seventeen
I did this while young and impressionable. No one wins except the filthy hooknoses

>>127816377
This, commies give up easy because they know their own guys value them even less then we did.

>>127799772
Yes if communist. Or black. Or muslim. Or a cuck.

not if you can imprison them pretty easily but if you're in the middle of fucking nowhere with low supplies yeah he's dead

>>127799772
I would treat him well and recruit him to my army.

T. Sun tzu

>>127800560
nigger reply. An honorable white man doesn't act like a bloodthirsty nigger.

>>127805065
>(((international laws)))
sure has worked out well for us

>>127816155
>>127816344
>>127816377
>>127816411
>>127816499

WOW

File: Doubt.png (85KB, 492x280px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 492x280px

>>127816573
Are you sure 100% he said that ?

Depends

>>127799772
no . intel can be collected. though most at the bottom know nothing and he may give inaccurate info he could still be used with others as a bargaining chip

or at the very least used to lure enemy forces to a known location. if they want them back they may lose more men than they save. thats a win win for my side. even if they dont lose more than they save it can draw them away from a better position

Never.

>>127808245
the war isn't over
an iraqi always gets his revenge

>>127799772
If he was uniformed and not a sniper and hadn't killed anyone I wouldn't shoot him. If there was danger in the area I would have to though eh?

>>127806676
Unless your prisoner is strong enough to lift himself back off the ground with his hands

>>127799772
That's nigger behavior, surrendering and prisoners is part of the war, no need to be savages. Plus, if its a war its probably not for my interests, the lad in the other side of the gun did nothing wrong to me.

File: 8780.png (520KB, 382x464px) Image search: [Google]

520KB, 382x464px

>>127816518

File: german_commandos_american_uniform_4.jpg (294KB, 1254x1600px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 1254x1600px

>>127816155

You sound perfect for the marines haha. Single minded killing machine.

Take a step back. And think about why would the Japanese soldier use such shitty tactic? The military culture and propaganda used painted the american soldier as barbarians coming to invade japan. There was even propaganda saying that American soldiers would kill the torture if they captured any civilians or soldiers. If you did your research you would know that Okinawa familys jumped off cliffs.

White pigguru

>>127799772
Only if i have stressed.

>>127816518
Same here.

File: kCCJyZK.jpg (74KB, 688x573px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 688x573px

>>127799772
Yeah I'd kill POWS. No mercy for the enemy. Gotta take after Hitler and Stalin's brutality.

>>127799772
Nah. If he were really a dick, I'd probably hit him a time or two, but at the end of the day we'd both have families we'd have to provide for.

>>127816518
>communist. Or black. Or muslim. Or a cuck.
so basically all humanity

>>127799772
Killing a surrendering POW is one of the most dishonorable thing you could do.

It's proof that you are a barbaric animal with no capacity of human emotion, basically just a military dog and not an actual human being.

File: 12186739_10153229089470665_2143250313406609574_o.jpg (391KB, 2048x1361px) Image search: [Google]

391KB, 2048x1361px

>>127817408
They used it because they were desperate fucking mongrels. I was in the Army not the Marines for one. I did my time as an 11b and now I'm out.

>If you did your research
No thanks, we all saw the vague 15 seconds dedicated to families committing suicide on Oki in whatever ww2 documentary you and I probably both watched. TV doesn't mean you fucking lived it. Japs WERE fucking savages. If you cant understand that you cant understand shit.

>>127807539
MY enemies will all be marching to their death regardless simply by the virtue of being my enemy. I'll be killing all of them eventually no matter what. Protip: Don't align yourself diametrically opposed to me, it automatically makes you wrong for I am the one person that is /pol/ and I am always right.

>>127817408
>The military culture and propaganda used painted the american soldier as barbarians coming to invade japan. There was even propaganda saying that American soldiers would kill the torture if they captured any civilians or soldiers.
>propaganda
the americans did just that....
how is it propaganda if it's truth

>>127808056
>teleports behind u
>cuts u into a million pices with katana
>heh, nothin personell, kid......
You're the most coldsteel faggot here.

>>127799772
Depends on the colour of their skin

If he is a German he can fuck my wife, at least then my children will be half Germanic

>>127808056
>the soldiers should get to enjoy and bask in the fallen enemy.
you know only an american/western would enjoy doing that
what a degenerate soul-less freak "people" you are
the sooner the world is rid of you the better

Yup. Can't be sure he's disarmed.

File: reallymakesyouthink.jpg (42KB, 518x280px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 518x280px

>>127817408
You know why they believed the propaganda? Because THEY were killing and torturing en masse. They'd rather die than be captured by a white version of themselves

File: 1484744264975.png (272KB, 577x382px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 577x382px

>>127799772
Only if the order to "Take No Prisoners" is given. If I have to capacity to incarcerate the soldier until the conflict is finished, I will endeavor to do that. If I do not have that capacity, I will do my job and eliminate the liability. I will also deal the mental stress that comes with that, but that is what I singed up for If I am wearing a uniform at the time.

>>127816155

>I came from an asshole redneck family so I'm gonna be an asshole redneck too

File: Jews_NAACP.jpg (182KB, 1262x988px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1262x988px

>>127817909
Your grandfathers were good goys. They fought for their jewish masters.

And now you have blacks kicking you out of your own schools

>>127815506
If I was being for es to execute them and they said they wanted to have sex before they died then sure, not really rape though

File: lone_wolf_and_cub_4_40.jpg (112KB, 750x1050px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 750x1050px

>>127817408
they were the people who were literally NINJAs. They wrote the fucking book on using ever cheap nasty trick in the book. Pretending to surrender then attack sounds very Japanese. Holy shit read some of Date Masumes military exploits if you want to learn how much of a rat bastard a Japanese general can be. Or read loan wolf and cub if you want an historically accurate depiction of assassins tools and techniques. God damn

>>127815506
>surrendering
>rape
you can't rape the willing
by surrendering their life to you they are willingly making their boipucci legally yours to feminize with depositing your seed inside

Depends who is and why are we fighting.

If it's a gayreek *rmenian or k*rd i would wound him and let him suffer to death.

Otherwise if we are invading somewhere, i wouldn't shoot.

>>127818294
Fuck off Norway, come back when you are relevant.

>>127818339
stormweenie cant think for himself.

File: ostfront.jpg (144KB, 896x572px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 896x572px

The problem with POW's is that although they surrendered, the rest of their compatriots press on. So valuable resources, personnel, food, etc have to be expended on the prisoners if they are to be treated humanely... it is almost like a strategy to bog down your opponent with large masses of surrendering men

>>127799772
It depends on the political context of the war you're fighting.

If it's just some territorial disputes or whatever, then no. Just take him prisoner, there's no need for him to die over stupid bullshit like that.

If it's an enemy deserter away from his platoon, shoot him. Cowards don't deserve an honorable death.

>>127801484
>Dresden
>Execution of SS Officers
>American raping their way through Europe

File: 4879863+_6afed956182f57e8d5966007cf74e2af.jpg (446KB, 1710x908px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 1710x908px

>>127818520
Not an argument. I have a proof of jews starting both NAACP, and Black Panthers along with being behind Martin Luther king,

Without jews you would never have blacks rioting in USA

>>127818565
>He doesn't know majority of POWs die in camps
>He doesn't know POWs are often traded for your own compatriots taken as POWs by the enemy

You should always take POWs. Governments always tries to trade POWs, it's been done in nearly every war in history, including the Afghanistan war where the Taliban traded in some American officers for top Taliban officials.

>>127818747
how is this bad really
the jews are angles sent from heaven to wipe the filthiest kind of "people" that ever existed, that is the snow niggers

>>127818747
wow man your NAACP nigger consiracy totally has place in a thread about executing prisoners.

wow im so redpilled now, tell ur handlers at the daily stormer how u converted me.

>>127816155
Grandfather served on Kokoda.. He said the exact same thing about the japs. Said he would disown me if i ever married one. Don't let their demeanor fool you, they are fucking animals and even other asians hate them collectively.

>>127799772
If I'm given explicit orders to take prisoners under I won't shoot a surrendering soldier. If I'm not given explicit orders to do so then I will shoot. You kill your enemies in war.

File: NAACP_leaders_with_poster_NYWTS.jpg (253KB, 1280x1032px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 1280x1032px

>>127818885
They will whipe you out too you moron.
In the end you will mix with Africans too. You will lose your culture and your race.
>>127818945
How the hell is it a conspiracy when NAACP was founded by 6 jews? It is a jewish organisation.

File: kektus.jpg (5KB, 182x122px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 182x122px

>>127804980

>>127816411
It's not necessary, but it is desirable. If the girls want to play soldier, let them do it in their own unit where they won't get real soldiers killed.

>>127818954
it's like nigger hating other races
you know they're better than you
you and your grandparents know your snow nigger kind is inferior to the honorable Japanese man
you know you're hardly human at all while japanese are super humans

>>127819153
Oh man I had no idea omg, wow SLOVENIA, thanks for caring about the AMERICAN NAACP. Had you not, I would have never known they were a bunch of Niggers with no leg to stand on. WOW!

>>127799772
If the opposing foes are known for their sense of honour, I wouldn't.

>>127819277
Nahh, those nips were owned by headhunter natives whom we payed $1.00 AU for every jap they bought us. Tribes got rich and we collected heads, similar to the way we collect the body parts of of your faggot cousins when they try and fail to bomb a checkpoint by blowing themselves up too early.

>>127799772
Probably not, wouldn't have the heart. Besides, pows are super valuable.

This is assuming my company had the capacity to capture them and ship them off for processing. If capture isn't an option for whatever reason and babysitting them until it becomes an option is untenable and it's clear that when released they'll just run off and kill more of my buddies I would be obliged to. Kind of like >>127800282 said

There are other situations where I might consider it. Though those would all be case by case.

So I guess the short awnser would be that I would prefer not to, but I would if I felt that it would pose a significant risk to myself and my fellow countrymen to do otherwise.

>>127819634
this is where racism makes the world make sense. Those with honor will have theirselves and kinmen rewarded.

>>127819750
based japs put a good 40k subhuman Australians under ground

>>127816155
In Australia we have jap pumpkins. They're trying to change it though