/script>
This will never get old.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4555292/Study-mummies-reveals-Turkish-European.html
*S-shakes hands with Turkposters*
>bulletpoint news
why do britbongs do this
We also the cradle of civilization an shit, not Africa.
What a month lads.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4530630/Did-chimp-human-ancestor-live-Mediterranean.html
>>127745114
>Egyptians were Turkish
NOT EVERYONE WHO LIVES OR LIVED IN ANATOLIA IS TURKISH
FUCKING RETARDS
GEE GOLLY HOLD ON A SECOND ARE YOU SAYING THAT WE WERE KINGS AND SHIT?
>>127746210
What do you know, the common sense holds true once again.
Gee, no fucking shit.
>>127745114
So this is proof of what we believed to be migration patterns for ancient man? Basically north Africa is j1/2 influx back into Africa after genetic differentiation occurred in central asia spread to the me and then fanned out to populate n/s europe and med.?
>>127745114
Dr. Peterson just tweeted this out hahaha sorting out those delusional kangs in real time in mainstream, absolutely loving it.
>>127745114
WE WUZ KONIGZ N SHIT
Niggers btfo
>>127745114
WIR WAREN KÖNIGE LAN
>>127745632
Pretty sure they didn't even move to anatolia until like 900 ad also
How the fuck did Turks get over there back then? Are they referring to the Anatolians who were there before Turks?
>scientist find out Africa wasn't where humans originated
>also find out Africans weren't KANGZ
It's been a rough week for dindus
>>127748477
You think they know the difference?
>>127748703
Wait, what? Sauce?
show me some salt
>>127745114
Op, please stop spamming lame ass sources like the Daily Mail.
Anons will claim fake news (and it's not) just because of that.
>>127748703
>>scientist find out Africa wasn't where humans originated
>>also find out Africans weren't KANGZ
>It's been a rough week for dindus
Aww yeah lad. Everything is going in our favor these days. Like some kind of cosmic alignment>>127748883
Google first humans Europe.
>>127745114
WIR WAREN KÖNIGE UND SOWAS ALTER!
Oh, nice. Someone saved my edit that took, like, a *super long time* to make. Thanks, anon.
>>127748883
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/
>>127745114
why do you fucking retards use this line for whites?
we actually were kings. the reason we say it about blacks is because we're being sarcastic.
l2 meme
>>127745114
I've been saying this on /pol/ for ages now, Egyptian empire was great when it was caucasian, then the Africans came and tore it all down as they usually do.
It's history repeating its self again and again. Caucasians build it up, Niggers tear it down, just like Europe and USA.
As much as we celebrate it, I guarantee no nigger has heard this.
I want them all to know.
>>127749617
we say it about blacks because blacks say it about blacks you dummy
>>127749267
Specific dynasty, please.
>>127749267
I'll help.
https://phys.org/news/2017-05-genome-ancient-egyptian-mummies.html
>>127749733
Egypt also get KEBABED and they destroyed the Library of Alexandria. Westerners build something nice, muslimes destroy it, like 9/11.
>turkish
they mean people who liven in Turkey prior to the Turkish invasion
AKA Europeans
Mandatory.
>>127750499
>Neolithic Anatolia
>Europeans
Lmao retard
Whites don't need to sink to the level of desperate niggers. We shouldn't chimp out about this but maintain a stoic and low-key satisfaction.
>>127745114
Pic related
They wuz not white
/pol/ BTFO
>>127745114
OH MY GOODNESS!
>>127746890
>>127745114
>great society
>niggers get into it
>now it's something no one cares about
>>127751105
how do we save our grandchildren from the societal rot that will destroy every hope
>>127749444
>But two fossils of an ape-like creature which had human-like teeth have been found in Bulgaria and Greece, dating to 7.2 million years ago.
My ancestor.
Neat, might lend credence to divergent strains of homo-sapiens, otherwise I wonder if the Mediterranean is the cradle of mankind now.
>"I would be hesitant about using a single character from an isolated fossil to set against the evidence from Africa."
I know this is more a /his/ question, but what evidence is so prevailing that it overwhelms an even older find? It seems a pretty set thing to me, or is there doubt about the dating? Or do they think this one simply died out?
>>127751105
Wrong.
>>127751245
The ants are pleased, I am not.
>>127745190
wash that hand
https://archive.fo/LmsLe#selection-483.25-483.150
>no mention of roachs
>>127751245
Nooooooooooooooooo
>>127751783
>Neat, might lend credence to divergent strains of homo-sapiens
Hoo boy, what fun trying to print that story would be.
>but what evidence is so prevailing that it overwhelms an even older find?
I imagine because it's too soon to know (if it destroys the established narrative, that is).
>>127745190
>>127752542
Remember folks, by "Turks" they mean geographically speaking. Nothing to do with the Mehmets of today.
>>127745114
We always knew they never were Kangz. Most Dindus aren't even from the only african Empire(Ethiopia) that could even remotely scratch that Concept.
>>127745114
>that last bullet point
Fucking kek. I knew it. There's no way those sand niggers built the pyramids, and that Zahi Hawass guy is full of shit and lies about the Egyptians up to his teeth
>>127754880
This is old news shit. Tutankhamun was revealed to be some incestuous red headed brit
EMPEROR KANG