YOU DONT FUCK WITH ZUCK

They trust me. Fucking idiots.

>>127721183
I mean trump did it with only the
>billionaire
>beta male sex symbol
so why shouldn't someone with that and more do better?

>>127721183
why should anyone try to convince you?
youve already made up your mind.

The jews are supposed to control the US from the outside

>>127721183
Zuck will be good, Trump will boost the economy and then Zuck will come in with the free gibs
I know hearing that is heresy on this board but free gibs is necessary to a degree especially because the mass layoffs automation will bring

File: 1492119593692.gif (3MB, 480x338px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x338px

>>127721183
I find it mildly Hillaryous of you wanting another rich progressive crook with zero charisma to run. You know what? Fuck it, it's a great idea - Trump will go for the second term.

>>127721183
>Charisma of an amateur stand-up comedian
>Supports Universal Basic Income, i.e., free money for everybody
>Laughably out of touch with average folk (look for his recent photo-ops)
>Has about as much reason to run for president as any other celebrity/Silicon Valley techie: fame and social brownie points

File: 1485446602392.jpg (52KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 900x900px

>>127722169
That does image make you feel big and strong like a real man?

>>127721183
Sure.
>horrible speaker that would get killed in debate
>rich, and out of touch with real world issues. To acquire more land in Hawaii, he sued people instead of offering them market value
>he saw the "bernout" vote immediately loves gibbs, so his platform is gibs. No idea where the money comes from, but he's already promising gibs.
>has a history of lying and stealing. It's how he made Facebook, he stole the idea.
>zero political or business experience, not even clubs in college like young dems.
>barely old enough for the job, lacks life experience
>would put more taxpayer money into his own special interest, than actually fix the things that are never fixed (infrastructure, draconian laws, drug policy, profit prisons).
>no grasp of economics, foreign policy, subsidies, and no political connections to anything like that.
>he doesn't believe in personal privacy, and had been quoted on this many times. Americans won't sacrifice freedom.
He might run, he might make it far, but in the end he's pandering to the people who couldn't get Sanders elected. He will end up with the same result. A fanatic fan base that won't go to the polls.

File: gzcifut4c2xah95x0ewd.jpg (16KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x300px

>>127721183
> Convince me he would lose!