terror attacks since 2001
can you prove any of those were done by muslims? of course you cant. The dots are probably made up
>>127659554
When did Venezuela and Haiti piss off ISIS??
>>127659554
yeah your wireless coverage sucks.
>>127659790
that's Colombia
>>127659745
most of these were muslims, all data from here https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/
>donbass
>terrorist attacks
>>127659554
Yep. I notice Poland is pure. I notice they even had to steal the word "terroryst" from English because their language didn't even have the concept.
It's surely is not a terrorist map attack, macaco.
>>127659891
im about to win several arguments on kikebook, thanks
>>127660283
anyone who denies the vast majority of terror attacks in the world are done by muslims is beyond fucking hope
>>127659554
None of the attacks in my country were caused by muslims though. We barely have that filth over here.
>>127659554
What's going on in Columbia?
>>127660884
Commies
>>127659891
This supposed "terror attacks" are bullshit though, every incident in Mexico have "No group claimed responsibility for the incident".
I live here, and most of the time is just cartels doing the killings or just plain accidents because of corrupt goverment allowing un-safe shit going.
>>127659554
Oman safest place in Middle East
Kek
One island
One Ireland
>>127660884
ISIS=Farc and the other communists groups
Muslims= leftists
>>127659554
>terror attacks since 2001
Those terrorist attacks from 60's-70's in Republic of Ireland (Southern Ireland)
That map is probably wrong
>>127660962
if a cartel blows up someone to create terror or for political gain, it's still terrorism
>>127661098
come to think of it, we never see them on TV. Are ibadis ourkebabs?
>>127662508
these aren't in the database
They mention these as unsuccesful attacks
https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/Results.aspx?search=ireland&sa.x=0&sa.y=0&sa=Search
Better, newer map with larger timespam
>>127659554
Looks like sub-Saharan Africa needs some diversity
>>127660962
Criterion
Criteria 1
The act must be aimed at attaining a political, economic, religious, or social goal. In terms of economic goals, the exclusive pursuit of profit does not satisfy this criterion. It must involve the pursuit of more profound, systemic economic change.
Criterion 2
There must be evidence of an intention to coerce, intimidate, or convey some other message to a larger audience (or audiences) than the immediate victims. It is the act taken as a totality that is considered, irrespective if every individual involved in carrying out the act was aware of this intention. As long as any of the planners or decision-makers behind the attack intended to coerce, intimidate or publicize, the intentionality criterion is met.
Criterion 3
The action must be outside the context of legitimate warfare activities. That is, the act must be outside the parameters permitted by international humanitarian law (particularly the prohibition against deliberately targeting civilians or non-combatants.
https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/more/Criterion.aspx#one
>>127663637
There is accidents added there too, and by those criteria the site is missing then at least 80,000 killed people by cartels.
>>127663538
>>127659554
>Mongolia
>>127659554
Yeah, I should move to Greenland
>>127664455
Mongolia, Oman and Greenland are the only countries without terror incidents
What are they doing right?
>>127665480
>mongolia
>greenland
being irrelevant
>oman
no fucking clue
>>127665706
well, most irrelevant countries got terror attacks too, so it can't just be that
>>127665480
You can't plan attacks if the yurt community keeps moving
>>127663538
Fucking commies. The 80-90s were fucking awful.
>>127659554
What am I supposed to notice? That Bangladesh is way scarier than I thought it was?