Why does /pol/ not seem to believe in tolerance as a virtue?

>>127634233
because it's not

>>127634460
Why?

>>127634539
The slope is slippery

>>127634539
You need to make the case for it being a virtue. Things are not virtuous by default.

File: Tree of Virtue.jpg (459KB, 914x1206px) Image search: [Google]

459KB, 914x1206px

Because tolerance is not a virtue.

Temperance
Justice
Prudence
Fortitude

those are virtues.

An argument could be made that tolerance is an aspect of the true virtues, as it takes a measure of fortitude and temperance to deal with people that you personally cannot stand.

File: 1476540933228.jpg (4KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 200x200px

>>127634233
>prove that X is not Y
That's not how it works. Why do you seem to believe that tolerance is a virtue? Let's watch you fail.

>>127634233
tolerance is basically another word for sloth

knowing what needs to be done but not doing it

File: Tree of Virtue English.jpg (404KB, 1224x1584px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 1224x1584px

>>127634885
As I suspected.
Tolerance is a lesser aspect of Fortitude.

>>127634233
You don't want tolerance.
You want acceptance.
The first step to an honest dialog is for you to stop lying.

You mean tolerance for other people's opinions or points of view, or do you mean some other kind of tolerance?

Why do you consider tolerance a virtue? What should be tolerated and to what extent?

File: aristotle knew the jew.jpg (534KB, 925x1076px) Image search: [Google]

534KB, 925x1076px

>>127634233

>>127635127
It is treating other people well as opposed to treating them poorly. Loving thy neighbor and all that shit, as the Sky-Jew would say. I'm an atheist *tips fedora* but tolerance does seem to be promoted by most religions.

Survival is slavery .

>>127635257
I'm accepted already. I'm a straight cisgender (I don't care for that word but it's applicable) white male.

Tolerance of vice is no virtue.

Also: Lurk moar faggot new fag.

Tolerance is counter intuitive to morality. People act out because they crave discipline, not because they lack it.

>>127635359
Tolerance for people who are different from you, in general. Other races, religions, sexual orientations, etc.

File: bizarro-world.png (459KB, 490x358px) Image search: [Google]

459KB, 490x358px

>>127635451
> treating other people well as opposed to treating them poorly
What makes you think "treating other people well" is, in and of itself, inherently a virtue?

Because tolerance is a disbelief in your own ideals.

/Thread

>>127635669
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you, to borrow from the Sky-Jew again. Not honestly sure if this was yours or if it was added in Christianity, but I appreciate being treated well by others, and I know others appreciate being treated well by me. So I don't know why my default behavior would be to do otherwise.

>>127635424
This quote is not an argument.

>>127635941
Prove you treat other people well.

Or are you holding other people to a standard that you cannot even live up to?

>>127635941
>muh bible quotes
That's not much of an argument. If treating people will is inherently a virtue, then treating bad people well is a virtue.

Why do you consider treating bad people well to be a virtue?

Tolerance is the reason that there are Trucks of Peace plowing through the streets and people that are already proven to be terrorists are still free to do what pleases them. Tolerance is the reason for declining birth rates since being homosexual or any other of your Lgbt-Mental retardations is not seen as an abnormality anymore.

Being tolerant is what is fucking us over right now

>>127635665
>tolerance for people who are trying to rob you, kill you, steal your country, rape your children, drug and mutilate your children, destroy your culture, and ruin everything you and your people have worked for
i'm fine with intolerance thanks

>>127636081
That's right, it can't be argued with

>>127634233
Do you understand that some things aren't tolerable?

>>127636225
I don't know how to prove that on here, but I do my best. It doesn't really matter though. All it would mean if I didn't treat people well would be that I'm a dick. It wouldn't change anything about what's right and wrong.
>>127636272
Do we mean bad people as in people who do shit like steal and rape and kill, or just bad people as in people who don't look like you or believe as you do?

>>127636531
Like non-Christian religions and gay buttsex, or...?

>>127634233
Patience is a virtue
Fortitude is a virtue
Temperance is a virtue

Taking it up the ass from people who hate you is not a virtue.

>>127636531
Should not/must not be tolerated would be a better way of putting it.

>>127636610
what the fuck are you talking about? these things are perfectly tolerable.

File: pepedoll.png (2MB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1000x1000px

>>127636536
>Do we mean bad people as in X or Y
It doesn't matter. Do you believe that treating those whom _you_ consider to be bad people is a virtue? If so, why?

>>127636610
Nobody here gives a shit about either of those.
you know what we are referring to as "intolerable"
You're just posting noise

>>127634233
Tolerance just for the sake of it is depravity

>>127636531
This. Fucking liberals have this stupid mental gymnastics crap (we can't tolerate the intolerant!) without ever realizing that it invalidates their own assumptions.

>>127636898
>you know what we are referring to as "intolerable"
No Hiro, I don't.
>>127636828
They are? I think so, but I didn't think you guys did.

>>127635451
You know what religion explicitly promotes intolerance? Islam. That makes it incompatible with other world religions. Tolerating intolerance is not virtuous.

>>127636850
It very much does matter, you point-and-oven-dodger

>>127636850
I mostly just ignore bad people and avoid them tbqhwy.

>>127637108
>I mostly just ignore bad people and avoid them
You didn't answer the question. Do you consider it a virtue to treat those people well? If so, why?

>>127637061
Islam is faggotry but on an individual basis, they're just people.

>>127635582
>white male
you are hated globally and everyone wants what you have. they choose to ignore that every amenity in their own life comes from your people. they feel entitled to your wealth because your ancestors were better than their ancestors.

>>127637047
>I don't know
refer to >>127636408
you nipple-gripping mouth breather

>>127637188
They're a bunch of faggy people by your own admission. That doesn't mean you should tolerate them.

>>127637185
If I don't need to be an asshole to them then I shouldn't. Why, what do you think?

File: Z.jpg (4KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 225x225px

>>127634233
Potatoes don't accept intolerance, so tolerance is fake.

>>127637327
You avoided the question again. Do you consider treating them well to be a virtue? If so, why?

>>127637188
and individual piranha are just little fish

>>127637415
I just answered your question and now you are avoiding mine.

>>127637327
Nobody disagrees you goof, the issue is they're bringing the fight to you. I guess you never "need" to do anything, you can just die off. But Sharia is coming. White minority homelands are coming. You will be victimized for your skin. Prevent it.

>>127634233
Used to. All the intolerance from the cultists has thrown that out the window, though.
I'm a former Prog. Dem, nigger, and your kind has taken for granted the gracious invitation extended by our parents and grandparents and started speaking badly about me based on my sex & the color of my skin.
Now all the shitskins can gtfo. Islam is a cancer that will destroy the West.
And YOU, personally, are responsible for my current attitude, Nigger.
Fix the problem members in your community or you can all gtfo. America will once again be a white nation. Every day you don't act that goal comes closer and closer to reality.
Sort yourselves the fuck out, and be quick about it.
saged.

>>127637559
Why would they do this? What's their endgame? Why do you think they want anything different from life than what you and I want?

File: ebin.png (9KB, 642x371px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 642x371px

>>127637500
>If I don't need to be an asshole to them then I shouldn't
The question was: "do you consider treating bad people well to be a virtue?"
Your "answer" is literally not an answer.

The second question was: "If so, why?"
"What do you think"? is literally not an answer.

Try again, please.

>>127634233
Toleration implies not approving of something but choosing not to do anything about it.

>>127637659
What did he mean by this?

I'm white.

>>127637721
>splitting hairs with my answer while refusing to give one of his own

>>127637691
>What's their endgame?
Sharia law and everyone to convert to Islam.

File: tmp_10321-la-et-hc-simon-helberg-and-jocelyn-towne-23rd-annual-screen-actors-guild-awards-201701291893115242.jpg (479KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

479KB, 2048x1365px

There is an excellent southpark episode that might be easy enough for you kids to understand

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_Camp_of_Tolerance

Also tolerance is tolerating something you can't stand but may be necessary. If you're just playing virtuous games like the lefties and accepting any retarded shit for fear of not being virtuous, you're a coward.

The answer is acceptance and that comes from actually understanding the problem.. not just accepting the veiled lies these people make up to make themselves feel good.

>>127637877
>blatantly avoiding the question and lying about it
Do you consider it a virtue or not? All you have to do is to say "yes" or "no", and then explain why you chose that answer (instead of avoiding it by asking me questions).

>>127637947
What do they actually get out of that, though? Why is that a motive?

>>127638107
Because they think they'll get 72 virgins in heaven and are following their stupid religion.

>>127638089
Kek why do you feel like you get to make the rules for how a 4chan conversation goes?

>>127634233

good men don't tolerate wickedness

>>127634862

this

>>127634233
Tolerance of evil, and acceptance of evil is not a virtue.

File: tmp_10321-14958542332681382996351.jpg (654KB, 2337x1199px) Image search: [Google]

654KB, 2337x1199px

>>127638042
An example of this would be..

If some cunt thinks he's a racing car and he's not a racing car it's tolerance to understand the mental disorder or circumstances.. and acceptance to allow it because it has no real harm.

Blindly tolerating and advocating for acceptance of lies aka the gender disphoria spectrum would not be.. virtuous

>>127637721
>>127637415
>>127637185
>>127636850
>shifty evasive little Jew

>>127635451

treating other people well means holding them to account, for their own good and for the good of others

letting people sin puts them on the path to destruction, as well as those around them

File: Bernie_Sanders.jpg (276KB, 682x864px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 682x864px

Side question: Would you guys have liked Bernie if his policies applied to whites only and he was anti-Islam? Honestly curious.

File: received_10209144863486547.jpg (50KB, 627x500px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 627x500px

>>127634233
Tolerance is not a virtue

>>127634233
Should Jesus have tolerated the money-changers in the temple?

>>127634233

I think tolerance is a virtue but it can get you betrayed.

Some anons seem to go eww gross at all kinds of things that's probably none of their business or obsess over win lose situations and accuse whole categories and think it's an argument

and that's very sad.

>>127638219
> why do you feel like you get to make the rules
I'm not making any rules. I'm just pointing out the irrefutable fact that you did not answer the question. It's a yes/no question, and it doesn't ask about whether or not you should be an asshole "when you don't need to" (as if that even means anything, and isn't in itself a copout from specifying what the exceptions are). The reason you're so afraid of giving a straight answer is that the moment you do, you lose the argument. Thanks for playing.

>>127638410
No. All commies and pinkos should be sent to the gulag desu.

>>127638410

Fuck & No. A handout is a handout, and those receiving handouts are niggers, regardless of race.

>>127638527
I could say you lose because you won't answer me. You're just being stubborn.

>>127638527
remember what hitler said about arguing with Jews?

>>127637691

if you "tolerate" sharia, then you set yourself up for destruction too

do you tolerate intolerance? if not, then you're a hypocrite

you only "tolerate" bad things, in fact. the worst of the worst

modern leftism is a dead end

degeneracy attends destruction throughout time

leftists on the wrong side of history

traditions (traditionalism) exist as such because they are continuously selected, because they work

>>127638329
>Tolerance of evil, and acceptance of evil is not a virtue.

neither is blaspheming against the holy spirit and prejudice can make people do that.

>>127634233
It's a gateway to downward spirals. For example, when you tolerate faggots then it opens up possibilities to tolerate other sexual degeneracy, like how there's a push to normalize pedophilia. They'll always want more, so it's best to give them nothing.
>And destroy them instead

>>127634233
Because look at our society and see what tolerance has gottten us.

>>127638684
>I could say you lose because you won't answer me.
You can say whatever you want, but very clear that you're desperately trying to avoid my question, because it demonstrates the absurdity of your position.

>>127638514
This isn't tolerance. This is emotionally, blindly, following an opposing viewpoint. Don't come down around here with wide swinging bullshit. State exactly what's very sad or fuck right off.

File: Feel the BERN.jpg (216KB, 2048x1489px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 2048x1489px

>>127638410
Fuck NO, this Kike Shill and his humpback would get laughed out of saudi arabia. The free world would laugh at him , cucks love this guy

>>127638879
The answer to your question is really simple but you're not answering anything of mine so I see no reason to just allow you to steer the conversation any way you see fit.

Tolerance is a code word for white genocide.

Stop white genocide. SAY NO TO RACE MIXING! 1488

>>127638527

Israeli anon is correct. and we all already know the answer to the question. It's revealed in the OP

leftists are intolerant of people who have moral standards

you're not tolerant. you're just degenerate

>>127639076
>white genocide
What does this meme actually mean? Just because other races are reproducing faster than white people doesn't mean there's a genocide going on. It's very sloppy and careless use of the word tbqh.

>>127634233>>127639074

see>>127639121

>>127638825
>if you "tolerate" sharia, then you set yourself up for destruction too

What if Muslims think western law is more sharia than wahabism and daesh etc. a bit like tolerant religious people think people with other religions can be righteous?

>>127639074
>The answer to your question is really simple
And yet you're avoiding it for the 7th time or so.

>you're not answering anything of mine
I don't consider treating bad people well to be a virtue, because I don't see a reason to. Now answer the question and explain your answer.

>>127639121
Can you please tell me what degeneracy means in this context?

>>127639203

White genocide is when the European gene pool is contaminated by non white DNA. For example, have you seen mulattos? Light skinned black folk with ape like features and frizzy hair. Yeah, pretty cruel to give birth to a child with identity problems.

>>127639269
>What if Muslims think western law is more sharia than wahabism and daesh

western law is degenerate as fuck

legalized pornography
legalized gambling
legalized no-fault divorce
legalized abortion
legalized adultery
legalized gay adoption
etc.

>tolerant religious people think people with other religions can be righteous?

mostly religions share a common moral foundation. religions are a vehicle, not the source, for morality

>>127639380
Cool, thanks. That wasn't so hard was it? :^) The answer to your question is yes. Kindness is an end in and of itself. I mean obviously if you have someone who's literally and tangibly harming others like a thief or rapist or some shit, they need to be stopped.

>>127639434
That is literally and figuratively not genocide. In fact since you're talking about reproduction, I could argue that it's basically the polar opposite of genocide.

>>127639616
* > legalized interracial marriage and race mixing (white genocide)

>>127639382

degeneracy means you excuses behaviors considered "immoral" by standards of the vast majority of people throughout history and even around the world to this day

they are behaviors that are personally destructive and self-destructive, motivated by selfishness and hedonism (appetite) rather than behavior guided by morality and self-discipline

see >>127639616

again, it is obvious that leftists are not actually tolerant of others' opinions. if you disagree with a leftist they will attack you, censor you, slander you with "racist, bigot, sexist, etc. etc. etc." bullshit. leftists only tolerate the short-sighted degenerate selfish bullshit they want to do

>>127639618
>The answer to your question is yes.
>Kindness is an end in and of itself.
>if you have someone who's literally and tangibly harming others ... they need to be stopped
So is treating someone well who's literally and tangibly harming others still a virtue? You just keep trying all sorts of different tactics to avoid addressing the question, but it's not working.

>>127639807

"white genocide" is protesting too much. I generally oppose interracial marriage, but it's destructive of both identities, init, not just the white identity involved.

The Jew wants the white race destroyed.

Also, they only teach love and tolerance to "peaceful non whites and niggers" but if a group of niggers rape a white girl it is not considered a hate crime. The Jew excuse for this is "historical oppresin and slavery white devils be oppressin peeple an shiiet"

>>127639915
I literally and directly just answered. If you have a follow-up question, no problem, but your accusing me of not answering is autism. If someone is out raping kids or some shit though, he should be put in prison, despite the fact that prison is not kind treatment. It's for the good of the kids, clearly. I don't believe he should be tortured to death or any of the edgy shit people sometimes say should happen to criminals, though, because that's not necessary and helps no one.

File: 14440810_110075929458954_7479791491945510151_n.jpg (132KB, 644x729px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 644x729px

This meme should be put in the newspaper.

>>127639882
Immoral on what grounds? Can you be a little more specific?

File: this-problem-requires.jpg (29KB, 367x384px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 367x384px

>>127640246
So here's what you're literally saying:
Treating bad people well is a virtue, but if someone is being bad (e.g. by raping children), he should be put in prison "despite the fact that prison is not kind treatment"?

So it's a virtue, but sometimes you should do exactly the opposite of what this virtue prescribes?

>>127640378

defining morality is not the point. the point is that leftists attack people who hold these so-called moral values; ie. leftists are INTOLERANT of these people, indeed the majority of the world's people, who hold a contrary opinion.

leftists are only tolerant of their own degenerate bullshit. that's not tolerance. leftists only promote themselves as "tolerant" because they are lying, hypocritical fucks to boot

File: 1488521442717.jpg (31KB, 567x561px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 567x561px

>>127640704
Are you unable to grasp that sometimes a situation can have multiple considerations at play, and that those considerations can conflict with one another?

>>127640704

right. OP you already admit we must treat wrongdoing harshly

the difference is OP doesn't recognize that degeneracy is actually harmful. short-sightedness/ignorance motivated by appetite is all

and that's exactly how you fall

degeneracy is on the wrong side of human nature and the wrong side of history

>>127640859
>sometimes a situation can have multiple considerations at play, and that those considerations can conflict with one another
So it's a virtue, but sometimes you should do exactly the opposite of what this virtue prescribes? Yes or no?

>>127640793
Yeah some liberals get carried away here, I agree. The spirit of the liberal attitude is supposed to be "live and let live", basically, and that isn't how all liberals behave.

>>127640793

/thread

>>127640976
So are you unable to grasp this concept? Yes or no?

>>127640704
You're lumping all "bad people" together. What a fucking jew tactic. An average "bad person" can be overcome and changed by some acts of kindness. Someone going around killing people and raping little children should be put away.

It's not the same thing.

>>127641095
>he keeps avoiding the question for 20 posts in a row
You lose. Thanks for playing.

>>127640976
You're even dumber than the libtard, Chaim. Jesus.

>>127641044

you do too. your entire OP is in effect the expression of opposition to what you see as "intolerance", correct?

in other words, you are intolerant of others' moral views and the behavior guided by those views

you're a hypocrite too

>>127641322
Haha you're really not nearly as good at this as you think you are man.

>>127641327

no, Chaim is 100% correct. he's simply exposing OP's inconsistency (hypocrisy)

>>127641153
>You're lumping all "bad people" together.
No I'm not, you mongoloid. I'm just giving a specific example of someone being bad and asking if they should receive kind treatment as OP's rule implies.

>>127641401
The entire OP was a short question. Discussion is not intolerance. Besides, it's not as if you actually live up to all of your own ideals of human behavior.

>>127640976
Again, stop lumping every scenario with the same prescription. You wouldn't treat a scrape to the knee in the same way you'd treat a deeply cut wound. Treating a rude person with kindness is not the same as accepting a serial killer's actions.

>>127641415
Is that why you repeatedly avoid a simple yes/no question? If I'm so bad at this, why are you so evidently afraid of giving a straight answer?

>>127634233
I tolerate people's bullshit until it directly comes in contact with my life. since you stupid faggots want to steal money out of my pocket to pay for shit I didn't agree to because you want to save the world from itself. I think you're all spineless shitheads and would be happier if your head was cut off but I tolerate you because it's your right to fuck off your own life.

You believe in nothing but pretending to care. You have no real morals or virtues, you cannot recognize what virtues really are because you're without a soul.

You're an NPC gaining the ability to realize you're an NPC and it hurts you so bad you lash out at all life.

>>127641520
Oh my b.

>>127638856

When homosexuality is legal, homosexuals are free to openly condemn pedos and homorapists.

When homosexuality is illegal they're forced into the underground with them.

>>127641684
You don't even understand the argument you're participating in. You have no grasp of nuance. It's highly autistic.

OP why should we tolerate evil?

>>127641644
>stop lumping every scenario with the same prescription
That's not my prescription. It's his prescription, and evidently this prescription doesn't always apply. You can keep labeling it a "virtue" if you want, but in that case, labeling "tolerance" a virtue does not, in and of itself, prove that you should be tolerant in a specific situation, so the entire thread is inherently moot. You people are as dumb as a pile of rocks.

>>127641044
>>127641401

>The spirit of the liberal attitude is supposed to be "live and let live"

let live? liberals are responsible for the deaths of millions of living human beings in utero

>that isn't how all liberals behave.

all? how about any. maybe a few braindead libertarians, but that pure logic taken to its logical end allows for rape, murder, sharia law, etc., ie. in effect the contradiction of that philosophy

holding moral standards and constraining selfish, degenerate behavior is liberating, because it protects society from the damages of that kind of destructive behavior

related;

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/04/opinion/the-downside-of-liberty.html

>>127641865
>You don't even understand the argument you're participating in
Your """argument""" is provably moot, you low-IQ piece of trash. Read this for a detailed explanation: >>127641973

>>127642044
Checked. Always remember to archive blogs with a reputation for shilling and clickbait. Thank you.

https://archive.is/zXiId <- nytimes.com article

tolerance doesn't teach people to communicate and work out our differences. It just means to keep your mouth shut and not to offend people.

>>127634233
Tolerance IS not telling your neighbour each time you meet him on your way to your apartment that you think he's a cunt and should shove his fucking DIY hobbie at 06:00 AM up his ass.

Tolerance IS NOT wanting to suck his cock, let him enter to your home and rape your wife just because he's poor and in need of some love.

>>127642044
>let live? liberals are responsible for the deaths of millions of living human beings in utero
This is a religious belief that makes about as much sense as 72 virgins, famalam. There is no humanity attached to an embryo. Not in any meaningful way.

>>127641540

now you're equivocating

it wasn't just a question. you have demonstrated ITT your opposition to intolerance. don't lie. you refuse to admit it now because you realize that attitude in itself is contradictory, but here we are.

time to reconsider your position OP

we all have to grow up some day

>Besides, it's not as if you actually live up to all of your own ideals of human behavior.

Yes I actually do, but not the point of this thread either. quit trying to change the subject.

you fags can't even argue "straight"

>>127642298

>religious belief

wrong

>When life begins is a scientific, not a philosophic or theological, question: Life begins when the chromosomes of the sperm fuse with those of the ovum, forming a distinctive DNA complex that controls the new organism’s growth. This growth process continues unless a natural accident interrupts it or it is ended by the sort of deliberate violence Planned Parenthood sells.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-barbarity-of-a-nation/2015/07/31/344f5140-36eb-11e5-9739-170df8af8eb9_story.html

>>127642345
Do you actually believe that it's okay to be hostile toward demographics of people because it would be intolerant of people to be intolerant of your intolerance? I mean I get the logic you're using but it doesn't seem very good.

>>127638906
>Don't come down around here with wide swinging bullshit.

Oh, hello, welcome to /pol/ we have a lot of wide swinging bullshit here . . . sadly.

>>127642298

you also failed to address the rest of my post

>>127642484
Yeah it's alive, sure, but is it meaningfully human yet? There's no consciousness so who cares?

>>127642575

first, are you admitting you're intolerant of intolerance?

let's get that equivocation out of the way first

>>127642575

>Do you actually believe that it's okay to be hostile toward demographics of people because it would be intolerant of people to be intolerant of your intolerance?

I'm not the one here advocating blind tolerance as a virtue, even if you are hypocritical about it. you are

I'm advocating intolerance of what I (and the majority of the world) consider to be bad behavior. my position is consistent.

File: trannystomp.jpg (71KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 800x450px

>>127634233
I'm extremely tolerant. I'm not very accepting, however.

>>127642691
I believe that it's a lazy way to wash your hands of an inhumane stance toward a group of people. Like saying it's hypocritical to hate hate, or something.

>>127642681

>meaningfully human
>meaningfully

dissembling

it's human. what else could it meaningfully be? an elephant?

>Yeah it's alive, sure

then that's the end of that conversation. you said "live and let live". you didn't say live and let consciousness

File: societies-are-far-gone-in-depravity-when-toleration-is-considered-10873685.png (232KB, 500x647px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 500x647px

>>127634233

>>127643012
This nitpicking you guys do is not nearly as clever as you think it is.

File: quote-tolerance-is-the-virtue-of-the-man-without-convictions-gilbert-k-chesterton-36118.jpg (58KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 850x400px

>>127634233

well,

>>127642575
Since we've established that calling tolerance a "virtue" doesn't prove that you should be tolerant in any specific situation, what makes you think that people should be tolerant towards Muslims/trannies/faggots/leftist/whoever you're here to defend? Adhering to "virtues" (at least as you define them) doesn't necessarily makes you virtuous.

>>127642952

see >>127642821

I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy, but the basis of my beliefs isn't your hypocrisy. you're conflating

and even without admitting it openly (again, your inability/refusal to do so is telling in itself) you have acknowledged you are indeed intolerant of what you view as intolerance

in effect we just have different moral systems then; just yours is essentially hypocritical

>>127634233
Should Pol reclaim the rainbow?

>>127643111

not an argument. I'll take your inability to produce a substantive counter-argument as a concession

>>127643451
You're picking at words instead of the actual message of the argument, which I know you fully understand. It's a tactic of distraction and obfuscation and is not good discussion.

>>127643442
Go for it familia.

>>127643346
>>127642821

by refuting "tolerance" as a virtue in itself, then we can actually begin to consider what actual behaviors you're promoting, things like >>127639616

indeed, leftists censor, slander, etc., because they can't actually defend their wickedness; it doesn't hold up under honest scrutiny

>>127643766

no, I believe innocent human life is intrinsically valuable, and I don't make some arbitrary exception for a human life just because it is in utero.

the value of innocent human life is the foundation of all social morality, and when you undermine it you undermine all lives, including your own

>>127643766
>You're picking at words instead of the actual message of the argument
Your IQ is clearly way too low to understand that your constant use of weasel words, squirming and refusal to answer questions concretely is evidence of sloppy thinking. You're so used to your shitlib buddies just "getting what you mean" that you can't form a concrete argument, so it's like swordfighting a fart. "Hurr durr but it's not meaningfully human" is a subjectivist non-argument.

>>127634233
Tolerance, in your usage, means you hate God and support/accept a dun that God openly says he hates and has taken action to destroy. I am not "tolerant" considering homosexuality. I am aggressive and inky laws if a perverted government keeps me from taking action.

Plus Homo sex is unhygienic

It's perverted. It poisonous to anyone's soul, especially children. Your perversion of our court will not lady forever. All who "tolerate" this cursing of God will share the same fate as faggots.

Justly so, bitch. I would not even blink an eyelid. I would spit on the ground. Finished.

>>127634233
/pol/ despises gays as long as nobody is trying to throw them off the roof. then they turn into a bullterrier in 100% protection mode

>>127643899
What's wrong with >>127639616 behaviors?

>legalized pornography
Just harmless faps m8.
>legalized gambling
Something to do with one's own money, no moral issue here.
>legalized no-fault divorce
How is it immoral to get divorced? I got divorced. My ex and I are still friends. She's a nice gal, we just didn't work out.
>legalized abortion
Having children is usually crueler than aborting them, but more basically, there's no consciousness there.
>legalized adultery
Cheating on someone is shitty and I don't endorse it, but it isn't a criminal issue and if consenting adults want to be polyamorous or "cucks" or whatever you like, no problem.
>legalized gay adoption
The world is full of children who need homes so what's the problem?

>>127643303

I don't think we should be tolerant to Alex Jones fans, they're statistically more likely to be terrorists than Muslims.

As for Muslims, there's more than a billion of them, if you treat them like shit then a small % will snap and go spree killing, just like any one else would.

Intolerance should be specific to radicalisation and brainwashing etc. not which book people think is the best bible.

File: 1488055969654.png (261KB, 1039x559px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 1039x559px

>>127644167
K :^)

>>127644506

>What's wrong with >>127639616 (You) behaviors?

lurk moar

>>127644180
*tips fedora*

>>127644180
>Plus Homo sex is unhygienic

it's boring as well.

I don't see how anyone gets so obsessed with it.

>>127645610

Homophobic anons should try it a few times just to see how boring it is, then they'll probably calm down and stop being jealous and assuming God wants to smite queers.

>>127644613
I growing to be very intolerant of irrational people such as you.

File: 18767662_10155081491616187_8450263394745183214_n.jpg (68KB, 960x752px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 960x752px

>>127634233

>>127646098

>being jealous

you're a moron.

sodomy is hostile, anti-social behavior that spreads like a virus;

>The failures and dropouts congregated in large groups in the middle of the enclosure, their listless withdrawal occasionally interrupted by spasms and waves of pointless violence. The victims of these random attacks became attackers.

http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/42/wiles.php

>The mortality rate among females was extremely high. A large proportion of the population became bisexual, then increasingly homosexual, and finally asexual. There was a breakdown in maternal behavior. Mothers stopped caring for their young, stopped building a nest for them and even began to attack them, resulting in a 96 percent mortality rate in the two crowded pens. Calhoun coined a term—“behavioral sink”—to describe the decay.

https://nihrecord.nih.gov/newsletters/2008/07_25_2008/story1.htm

>>127646408
>sodomy is hostile, anti-social behavior that spreads like a virus;
Only a closet queer feels this strongly about gay sex.

>>127646270

>White knight syndrome over Alex Jones fans

So you like em paranoid and trembling, huh?
and maybe a bit on the stupid bimbo side?

>>127646704

>DURR

>Everybody who opposes homosexuality is actually gay

fags can't even argue straight

>>127646969
>fags can't even argue straight
You're apparently right, you can't.

>>127647152

>You're apparently right

>>127647401
Yeah and you're gay. Hope you're happy.

>>127646408

So I copy pasted one of your links and it was about an experiment on mice.

I will never get that thirty seconds of my life back and I feel silly now.

well played anon, your response is so silly it's genius.

>>127647553

cool story

>>127644183
We are to allow God his time to convert them.

They need to stay in the closet until God says, "they are finished". Then we handle the dripping flesh.

File: 394760-paris-attack-afp.png (832KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

832KB, 600x600px

>>127636291


Wise kraut is wise.

We've become TOO tolerant of shit.

There has to be a line somewhere.

>>127634233
By and large, we do. We just believe in absolute freedom of association where we don't have to tolerate as much, and that abnormality shouldn't be promoted/celebrated as normal.

>>127634233
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_berr4I1cic

>>127634654
this.
moderation in all things.

>>127634233
pol's not virtuous

>>127649225

wrong

>>127650803
Not an argument.

>>127651091

wasn't necessary. I wasn't responding to one

also, /pol/ is not one person