well?

>>127590646
No says the man in moscow, it belongs to everyone

>>127593625


what cucks, those "men" in moscow

>>127593625
No says the man in Vatican, it belongs to God!

No says the man in Washington, it belongs to the poor!

A man is not entitled to anything, he deserves nothing, except that which he is willing to take by force.

It was like that 20000 years ago, it will be like that forever.

No, says the libertarian and industrialist, it belongs to the creditors!

>>127590646
can a slave say "I quit"

>>127590646
A man is not a man but a beast, and all beasts have burdens.

>>127590646

No, says the woman in Berlin, it belongs to the refugees.

>>127590646
No says the SJW, it belongs to minorities

>>127594350
Don't take out loans then you monkey nigger.

>>127595345
Say that to your government.
I agree actually, except past a certain point it's impossible. If you are born in a world where all land is owned, you cannot escape them.

>>127595814
>If you are born into a world where all land is owned it is inevitable

Not only is this nonsequitor how in the ever loved fuck do you get a world where all land is owned. And that's even ignoring the fact that you're talking about municipal debts which wouldn't be a problem with most libertarian systems of government since they would be limited. But let's say for the sake of argument that literally every peice of land is owned. Why does that necessitate you taking out credit? If you want to buy land perhaps it would make that easier but you don't have an urgent need for credit because someone else owns land. Try to control your fucking impulses and act like a human being.

>gets protection from government
>gets to use the government's roads
>gets clean drinking water from the government
>spends time in the government's public spaces
STOP TAXING ME YOU STATIST DICTATOR!!!

File: IMG_7436.jpg (47KB, 395x390px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 395x390px

>>127595230
Woah-tier post

File: 1456176602669.jpg (225KB, 964x1280px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 964x1280px

>>127596347
Thanks my freedom friend

>>127596266
Not it's not a non sequitur retard, claims of logical fallacies aren't get out of jail free cards you get as a "prize" for learning "fancy" words, fucking 60% monkey.
You have to live somewhere, and once few enough people own enough land they have no reason to sell it to you, for any price. By extension they own every commodity too. The paper making your good goy Ayn Rand books, the ore used to make the steel structure you live in, the food you eat, they can control the price at will simply by changing the rent rates on the farm, or the the ore deposit, or the lumber mill, if not coercing them directly. They can simply outright kick them ff the land if they don't do exactly what they want.
Even if enough money could convince them, there would be no way for you to get your hands on it, because again, they own everything you consume, so even if until then you lived in your parents basement as you do now, they can just raise your costs of living, or force your employer to reduce your wage by simply increassing the cost of his rent or the cost of the commodities he need to keep his company going and done right he wont go bankrupt either, especially considering they will own those debts too and can do whatever the fuck they want with them and by extension the debtors.

>>127599276
>HOW COULD THIS EVEN BE POSSIBLE!!?
It already is mostly the case, the vast majority of the land on Earth is owned by someone, and most of them, at lease in western countries, have a mortgage of some sort which they are less and less likely to be able to pay off as the decades roll by.
Sure you might still be able to find some sort of cheap land with plenty of fertile soil to live off but you wont be able to prevent the eventual inevitable.
Your laughable system and communism are close to being two sides of the same coin, both reducing your common men to equal cattle, equal because once everyone is living with the bare minimum their net production for whoever owns them will be at it's peak, much more than a society with several classes where it's implied that the poorest of the class are getting at lease just enough to live so the classes above are getting more than they need, securing less stuff for the absolute top. Only difference really is they take over a lolbertarian society through cultural subversion and decay instead of just killing off whoever is in power which is what commies usually do.
And just like the red shirts it's about ideals, much fairness, muh NAP, muh equality, it's not about inevitable, consistent actual outcome.